Trying to use the snippet at Kotlin site under HTML Builder tap, so I wrote the below:
val tbl = createHTML().table {
for ((num, string) in data) {
tr {
td { +"$num" }
td { +string }
}
}
}
document.getElementById("container")!!.appendChild(tbl)
but the IDE is underlying the tbl with error as below:
What mistake I;m doing here?
createHtml() produces a String, which cannot be passed to appendChild(). You should instead use
val tbl = document.create.table {
...
}
which produces an HTMLElement (which is a Node) or simply skip the variable.
document.getElementById("container")!!.append.table {
...
}
createHTML().xxx is best used with server Ktor.io where you create something like:
val html = createHTML().html {
body {
form(action = "/login", encType = FormEncType.applicationXWwwFormUrlEncoded, method = FormMethod.post) {
p {
+"user:"
textInput(name = "user") {
value = principal?.name ?: ""
}
}
p {
+"password:"
passwordInput(name = "pass")
}
p {
submitInput() { value = "Login" }
}
}
}
}
Then send it to the browser using:
call.respondText(html, ContentType.Text.Html)
Related
I've written a trigger under the LeadConvert update event as follows:
trigger WebhookSenderTriggerLeadConvert on Lead (after update) {
if (Trigger.new.size() == 1) {
if (Trigger.old[0].isConverted == false && Trigger.new[0].isConverted == true) {
if (Trigger.new[0].ConvertedAccountId != null) {
String url = 'https://mydomain.io';
String content = WebhookSender.jsonContent(Trigger.new, Trigger.old);
WebhookSender.callout(url, content);
}
}
}
}
This works for me on a dev Salesforce, and in the payload I correctly receive:
{
"new":[
{
"attributes":{
"type":"Lead",
"url":"/services/data/v56.0/sobjects/Lead/B00000000000000000"
},
"Id":"B00000000000000000",
...(+30 more fields)
}
],
"old":[
{
"attributes":{
"type":"Lead",
"url":"/services/data/v56.0/sobjects/Lead/B00000000000000000"
},
"Id":"B00000000000000000",
...(+30 more fields)
}
],
"userId":"A00000000000000000"
}
However in another third party Salesforce account I get the following:
{
"new":[
{
"attributes":{
"type":"Lead",
"url":"/services/data/v56.0/sobjects/Lead/C00000000000000000"
},
...(9 more fields)
}
],
"old":[
{
"attributes":{
},
...(9 more fields)
}
],
"userId":"D00000000000000000"
}
I've obfuscated a lot of the fields here as a lot of it is sensitive, but what i'm unable to determine is what exactly causing a large portion of fields in the third-party Salesforce to not be there, including the Id field, where in the dev Salesforce everything is present.
Is there anything that may be doing this?
EDIT:
Posting WebhookSender, as it's been brought up in comments
public class WebhookSender {
public static String jsonContent(List<Object> triggerNew, List<Object> triggerOld) {
String newObjects = '[]';
if (triggerNew != null) {
newObjects = JSON.serialize(triggerNew);
}
String oldObjects = '[]';
if (triggerOld != null) {
oldObjects = JSON.serialize(triggerOld);
}
String userId = JSON.serialize(UserInfo.getUserId());
String content = '{"new": ' + newObjects + ', "old": ' + oldObjects + ', "userId": ' + userId + '}';
return content;
}
#future(callout=true)
public static void callout(String url, String content) {
Http h = new Http();
HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
req.setEndpoint(url);
req.setMethod('POST');
req.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
req.setHeader('Authorization', 'someKey');
req.setBody(content);
if (!Test.isRunningTest()) {h.send(req);}
}
public static Map<String, Object> ParseRequest(RestRequest req) {
String body = req.requestBody.toString();
Map<String, Object> data = (Map<String, Object>) JSON.deserializeUntyped(body);
return data;
}
}
Well, is the WebhookSender class identical in both? Does it dump all fields it received to JSON or does it contain some security-related code such as "stripInaccessible"? Maybe the fields are there but your Profile doesn't see them so strip... cuts them out?
Can it be that your dev org simply has 20+ custom fields in Lead table more than the other org?
Are the fields you're missing coming from managed package? They'd have namespace__FieldName__c format, with 4 underscores total. Maybe the package isn't installed. If you know the fields are there but your user doesn't have license for that managed package - it's possible they'll be hidden.
I'm trying to make a use from Steam API data as I like to learn on live examples, and looking at the way various statistics are returned I began to think that OOP approach would suit me best in this case.
What I'm trying to achieve is to loop through all the results, and programatically populate an array with objects of type that corresponds to the actual type of the statistic. I've tried to build myself a basic class, called Statistic, and after instantiating an object determine wheter or not it's class should change (i.e. whether or not to cast an object of type that Statistic is parent to and if so, of what type). How to do that in PHP? My solution gives me no luck, all of the objects are of type Statistic with it's 'type' property being the object I want to store alone in the array. Code:
$data = file_get_contents($url);
$data = json_decode($data);
$data = $data->playerstats;
$data = $data->stats;
$array;
for($i=0;$i<165;$i++)
{
$array[$i] = new Statistic($data[$i]);
echo "<br/>";
}
var_dump($array[10]);
And the classes' code:
<?php
class Statistic
{
public function getProperties()
{
$array["name"] = $this->name;
$array["value"] = $this->value;
$array["type"] = $this->type;
$array["className"] = __CLASS__;
return json_encode($array);
}
public function setType($x)
{
$y = explode("_",$x->name);
if($y[0]=="total")
{
if(!isset($y[2]))
{
$this->type = "General";
}
else
{
if($y[1]=="wins")
{
$this->type = new Map($x);
$this->__deconstruct();
}
if($y[1]=="kills")
{
$this->type = new Weapon($x);
$this->__deconstruct();
}
else $this->type="Other";
}
}
else $this->type = "Other";
}
function __construct($obj)
{
$this->name = $obj->name;
$this->value = $obj->value;
$this->setType($obj);
}
function __deconstruct()
{
echo "deconstructing <br/>";
return $this->type;
}
}
class Weapon extends Statistic
{
public function setType($x)
{
$y = explode("_",$x);
if($y[1]=="kills")
{
$this->type = "kills";
}
else if($y[1]=="shots")
{
$this->type = "shots";
}
else if($y[1]=="hits")
{
$this->type = "hits";
}
}
function __construct($x)
{
$name = explode("_",$x->name);
$this->name = $name[2];
$this->value = $x->value;
$this->setType($x->name);
}
function __deconstruct()
{
}
}
class Map extends Statistic
{
public function setType($x)
{
if($x[1]=="wins")
{
$this->type = "wins";
}
if($x[1]=="rounds")
{
$this->type = "rounds";
}
}
public function setName($name)
{
if(isset($name[3]))
{
if(isset($name[4]))
{
return $name[3] + " " + $name[4];
}
else return $name[3];
}
else return $name[2];
}
function __construct($x)
{
$name = explode("_",$x->name);
$this->name = $this->setName($name);
$this->value = $x->value;
$this->setType($name);
}
function __deconstruct()
{
}
}
Gives the result:
object(Statistic)#223 (3) {
["name"]=> string(18) "total_kills_deagle"
["value"]=> int(33)
["type"]=> object(Weapon)#222 (3) {
["name"]=> string(6) "deagle"
["value"]=> int(33)
["type"]=> string(5) "kills" }
}
Should that determination be driven from the loop itself, the whole advantage of having a set of functions that does everything for me and returns a ready-to-serve data is gone, since I would really have to cast different objects that aren't connected to each other, which is not the case here. How can I achieve returning objects of different type than the object itself is?
For answer your question How can I achieve returning objects of different type than the object itself is?
"Casting to change the object's type is not possible in PHP (without using a nasty extension)"
For more info: Cast the current object ($this) to a descendent class
So you can't change the class type of an instance with type of a derived class. In other world can't change instance of Static with instance of Weapon.
Suppose I would like to write a Module, which can catch both data from <input> tag and as raw:
<div>Value1</div>
<div><input type="text" value="Value2"></div>
...
and I write
class MaybeInput extends Module {
static content = {
hasInput {
if( $("input").length )
return true;
}
else {
return false;
}
}
nav {
if( hasInput ) {
$("input")
}
{
// return entire content! how?
}
}
}
}
so that I can catch with
static content = {
elem {
i -> $("div", i).module(MaybeInput)
}
}
How to return entire content in MaybeInput?
I implemented a custom serializer by inheriting ODataEntityTypeSerializer. The serializer sets the value of "MessageStateName" by getting the name of BayStateEnum from the value of "MessageState".
It works well only except when the URL contains "$select". I debugged the code and found it was executed and entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance had the correct value, but entityInstanceContext.EdmModel, which was of type System.Web.OData.Query.Expressions.SelectExpandBinder.SelectSome, still had an empty "MessageStateName".
public class CustomEntitySerializer : ODataEntityTypeSerializer
{
public CustomEntitySerializer(ODataSerializerProvider serializerProvider)
: base(serializerProvider)
{
}
public override ODataEntry CreateEntry(SelectExpandNode selectExpandNode, EntityInstanceContext entityInstanceContext)
{
if (entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance is SmartLinkInfoModel)
{
var smartLinkInfo = entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance as SmartLinkInfoModel;
if (smartLinkInfo.ModemIMEI != null)
{
smartLinkInfo.ModemIMEIString = "0x" + string.Join(string.Empty, smartLinkInfo.ModemIMEI.Select(b => (b - 48).ToString()));
}
if (smartLinkInfo.SmartLinkHardwareId != null)
{
smartLinkInfo.SmartLinkHardwareIdString = "0x" + string.Join(string.Empty, smartLinkInfo.SmartLinkHardwareId.Select(b => b.ToString()));
}
if (smartLinkInfo.XbeeSourceId != null)
{
smartLinkInfo.XbeeSourceIdString = "0x" + string.Join(string.Empty, smartLinkInfo.XbeeSourceId.Select(b => b.ToString()));
}
}
else if (entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance is BayMessageModel)
{
var bayMessage = entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance as BayMessageModel;
bayMessage.MessageStateName = Enum.GetName(typeof(BayStateEnum), bayMessage.MessageState);
}
return base.CreateEntry(selectExpandNode, entityInstanceContext);
}
}
Your code to change the entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance is right, but it won't change the result of select, you can see
object propertyValue = entityInstanceContext.GetPropertyValue(structuralProperty.Name);
in ODataEntityTypeSerializer 's CreateStructuralProperty method, you should override this method, if the structuralProperty.Name is MessageStateName, then use (entityInstanceContext.EntityInstance as BayMessageModel).MessageStateName
I've got a problem populating nested List<>
The object graph looks like this:
Route ⇒ Section ⇒ Co-ordinates
Whenever I try to populate Сoordinates list it just overwrites previous record and at the end gives me only the last Coordinate record. But I want all the Co-ordinates.
Here is my controller code:
List<RequestRouteDataClass> result = new List<RequestRouteDataClass> {
new RequestRouteDataClass() {
RouteRequestId = objRouteManagement.RouteRequestId,
RouteName = objRouteManagement.RouteName,
RouteDescription = objRouteManagement.RouteDescription,
RouteSections = new List<RouteSections> {
new RouteSections() {
Route_Sections_Id = objSections.Route_Sections_Id,
Section_Speed = objSections.Section_Speed,
Section_Description = objSections.Section_Description,
RouteCordinatesSections = new List<SectionCoordinatesRelationData> {
new SectionCoordinatesRelationData() {
SectionCoordinate_Relat_Id = objSectionsCordinates.SectionCoordinate_Relat_Id,
CoordinateLat = objSectionsCordinates.CoordinateLat,
CoordinateLag = objSectionsCordinates.CoordinateLag
}
}
}
}
}
If you want to use Nested List.
Your Model Contains =>
public class MainModelToUse
{
public MainModelToUse()
{
FirstListObject = new List<FirstListClass>();
}
public List<FirstListClass> FirstListObject { get; set; }
}
public class FirstListClass
{
public FirstListClass()
{
SecondListObject = new List<SecondListClass>();
}
public List<SecondListClass> SecondListObject { get; set; }
}
public class SecondListClass
{
public SecondListClass()
{
ThirdListObject = new List<ThirdListClass>();
}
public List<ThirdListClass> ThirdListObject { get; set; }
}
public class ThirdListClass
{
}
Your Code to Nested List =>
FirstListClass vmFirstClassMenu = new FirstListClass();
vmFirstClassMenu.SecondListClass = new List<SecondListClass>();
FirstListClass vmFirstClassCategory = new FirstListClass();
var dataObject1 = //Get Data By Query In Object;
foreach (Model objModel in dataObject1)
{
vmFirstClassCategory = new FirstListClass
{
//Your Items
};
var DataObject2 = //Get Data By Query In Object;
vmFirstClassCategory.SecondListClass = new List<SecondListClass>();
foreach (SecondListClass menuItem in DataObject2)
{
SecondListClass vmFirstClassMenuItem = new SecondListClass
{
//Your Items
};
var DataObject3 = //Get Data By Query In Object;
vmFirstClassMenuItem.ThirdListClass = new List<ThirdListClass>();
foreach (ThirdListClass price in DataObject3)
{
ThirdListClass vmThirdClassobj = new ThirdListClass
{
//Your Items
};
vmFirstClassMenuItem.ThirdListClass.Add(vmThirdClassobj);
}
vmFirstClassCategory.SecondListClass.Add(vmFirstClassMenuItem);
}
}
Hope this is what you are looking for.
First off: spacing helps with readability (edit: but I see you fixed that in your question already):
List<RequestRouteDataClass> result = new List<RequestRouteDataClass>
{
new RequestRouteDataClass()
{
RouteRequestId = objRouteManagement.RouteRequestId,
RouteName = objRouteManagement.RouteName,
RouteDescription = objRouteManagement.RouteDescription,
RouteSections = new List<RouteSections>
{
new RouteSections()
{
Route_Sections_Id = objSections.Route_Sections_Id,
Section_Speed = objSections.Section_Speed,
Section_Description = objSections.Section_Description,
RouteCordinatesSections = new List<SectionCoordinatesRelationData>
{
new SectionCoordinatesRelationData()
{
SectionCoordinate_Relat_Id = objSectionsCordinates.SectionCoordinate_Relat_Id,
CoordinateLat = objSectionsCordinates.CoordinateLat,
CoordinateLag =objSectionsCordinates.CoordinateLag
}
}
}
}
}
};
Next: what you are doing with the above is initiating your lists with a single element in each list. If you want more elements, you have to add them. I recommend using a foreach and the Add() functionality to fill your lists.
From your example it is not clear how your source data is stored, but if you have multiples of something I would expect those too to be in a list or an array of some kind.