A table for storing items, in a particular order, associated with a container. Separate ak_* constraints involving item_id and seq ensure a container contains distinct items and the sequence of those items is distinct.
CREATE TABLE [container_items] (
[container_item_id] INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[container_id] INT NOT NULL,
[item_id] INT NOT NULL,
[seq] INT NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [pk_container_item] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([container_item_id] ASC),
CONSTRAINT [ak_container_item_seq] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([container_id] ASC, [seq] ASC),
CONSTRAINT [ak_container_item_item] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([container_id] ASC, [item_id] ASC),
CONSTRAINT [fk_container_item_item] FOREIGN KEY ([item_id]) REFERENCES [items] ([item_id]),
CONSTRAINT [fk_container_item_container] FOREIGN KEY ([container_id]) REFERENCES [containers] ([container_id])
);
Suppose for container_id=1 the original data is
container_item_id, container_id, item_id, seq
1,1,1,1
2,1,3,2
3,1,10,3
4,1,8,4
and some client app for reordering says the new sequence for the item_ids is
8,1
10,2
3,3
1,4
The ak_* constraints make it impossible to update the data base table directly. For instance, trying update in this manner:
update container
container_items
set item_id=8, seq=1
where container_item_id = 1
fails
Violation of UNIQUE KEY constraint ak_container_item_item. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'container_items'. The duplicate key value is (1, 8).
The statement has been terminated.
Q: Is it worth the effort to find an algorithm that would reuse existing container_item_id records when the seq order is changed ?
A non-reusing approach would be to delete the existing records for survery_id=1 and then append the new sequenced item_ids as new records.
You can encapsulate the whole operation in a simple atomic transaction. Also, you need a at least one 'aux' value, I a couple of aux values with simple * -1 operation in this sample:
begin transaction tx1;
set transaction isolation level serializable;
update container
survey_items
set seq=-1*seq #<-- set aux values
where container_id = 1;
update container
survey_items
set seq=1
where container_id = 1 and item_id = 8;
update container
survey_items
set seq=2
where container_id = 1 and item_id = 10;
#and so on
commit;
Notice than you can work at repeatable read with the same guaranties because no phantoms are made.
Related
I need to ensure that the values in a column from a table are unique as part of a larger process.
I'm aware of the UNIQUE constraint, but I'm wondering if there is a better way to do the check.
I'm running the queries using psycopg2 so adding that tag on the off chance there's something in there that can help with this.
If the column is unique I can add a constraint. If the column is not unique adding the constraint will return an error.
If there is already a constraint of the same name a useful error is returned. in this case would prefer to just check for the existing constraint.
If the column is the primary key, the unique constraint can be added without error but in this case it would be preferable to just recognize that the column must be unique based on the primary key.
Code examples of this below.
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS unique_test;
CREATE TABLE unique_test (
pkey INT PRIMARY KEY,
unique_yes CHAR(1),
unique_no CHAR(1)
);
INSERT INTO unique_test (pkey, unique_yes, unique_no)
VALUES(1, 'a', 'a'),
(2, 'b', 'a');
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CONCURRENTLY u_test_1 ON unique_test (unique_yes);
ALTER TABLE unique_test
ADD CONSTRAINT unique_target_1
UNIQUE USING INDEX u_test_1;
-- the above runs no problem
-- check what happens when column is not unique
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CONCURRENTLY u_test_2 ON unique_test (unique_no);
ALTER TABLE unique_test
ADD CONSTRAINT unique_target_2
UNIQUE USING INDEX u_test_2;
-- returns:
-- SQL Error [23505]: ERROR: could not create unique index "u_test_2"
-- Detail: Key (unique_no)=(a) is duplicated.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CONCURRENTLY u_test_1 ON unique_test (unique_yes);
ALTER TABLE unique_test
ADD CONSTRAINT unique_target_1
UNIQUE USING INDEX u_test_1;
-- returns
-- SQL Error [42P07]: ERROR: relation "unique_target_1" already exists
-- test what happens if adding constrint to primary key column
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CONCURRENTLY u_test_pkey ON unique_test (pkey);
ALTER TABLE unique_test
ADD CONSTRAINT unique_target_pkey
UNIQUE USING INDEX u_test_pkey;
-- this runs no problem but is inefficient.
If all you want to do is verify that values are unique, then use a query:
select unique_no, count(*)
from unique_test
group by unique_no
having count(*) > 1;
If it needs to be boolean output:
select not exists (
select unique_no, count(*)
from unique_test
group by unique_no
having count(*) > 1
);
If you just want a flag, you can use:
select count(*) <> count(distinct uniq_no) as duplicate_flag
from unique_test;
DELETE FROM
zoo x
USING zoo y
WHERE
x.animal_id < y.animal_id
AND x.animal = y.animal;
I think this is simpler, https://kb.objectrocket.com/postgresql/delete-duplicate-rows-in-postgresql-762 for reference
I need help in database design.
I have following tables.
Pseudo code:
Table order_status {
id int[pk, increment]
name varchar
}
Table order_status_update {
id int[pk, increment]
order_id int[ref: > order.id]
order_status_id int[ref: > order_status.id]
updated_at datetime
}
Table order_category {
id int[pk, increment]
name varchar
}
Table file {
id int[pk, increment]
order_id int[ref: > order.id]
key varchar
name varchar
path varchar
}
Table order {
id int [pk] // primary key
order_status_id int [ref: > order_status.id]
order_category_id int [ref: > order_category.id]
notes varchar
attributes json // no of attributes is not fixed, hence needed a json column
}
Everything was okay, but now I need an auto-increment id for each type of order_category_id column.
For example, if I have 2 categories electronics and toys , then I would need electronics-1, toy-1, toy-2, electronics-2, electronics-3, toy-3, toy-4, toy-5 values associated with rows of order table. But it's not possible as auto-increment increments based on each new row, not column type.
In other words, for table order instead of
id order_category_id
---------------------
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 2
5 1
6 2
7 1
I need following,
id order_category_id pretty_ids
----------------------------
1 1 toy-1
2 1 toy-2
3 1 toy-3
4 2 electronics-1
5 1 toy-4
6 2 electronics-2
7 1 toy-5
What I tried:
I created separate table for each order category (not an ideal solution but currently I have 6 order categories, so it works for now )
Now, I have table for electronics_order and toys_order. Columns are repetitive, but it works. But now I have another problem, my every relationship with other tables got ruined. Since, both electronics_order and toys_orders can have same id, I cannot use id column to reference order_status_update, order_status, file tables.
I can create another column order_category in each of these tables, but will it be the right way? I am not experienced in database design, so I would like to know how others do it.
I also have a side question.
Do I need tables for order_category and order_status just to store names? Because these values will not change much and I can store them in code and save in columns of order table.
I know separate tables are good for flexibility, but I had to query database 2 times to fetch order_status and order_category by name before inserting new row to order table. And later it will be multiple join for querying order table.
--
If it helps, I am using flask-sqlalchemy in backend and postgresql as database server.
In order to track the increment id which is based on the order_category, we can keep track of this value on another table. Let us call this table: order_category_sequence. To show my solution, I just created simplified version of order table with order_category.
CREATE TABLE order_category (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name VARCHAR(100) NULL
);
CREATE TABLE order_category_sequence (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
order_category_id int NOT NULL,
current_key int not null
);
Alter Table order_category_sequence Add Constraint "fk_order_category_id" FOREIGN KEY (order_category_id) REFERENCES order_category (id);
Alter Table order_category_sequence Add Constraint "uc_order_category_id" UNIQUE (order_category_id);
CREATE TABLE "order" (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
order_category_id int NOT NULL,
pretty_id VARCHAR(100) null
);
Alter Table "order" Add Constraint "fk_order_category_id" FOREIGN KEY (order_category_id) REFERENCES order_category (id);
The order_category_id column in order_category_sequence table refers the order_category. The current_key column holds the last value in order.
When a new order row is added, we can use a trigger to read the last value from order_category_sequence and update pretty_id. The following trigger definition can be used to achieve this.
--function called everytime a new order is added
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION on_order_created()
RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
current_pretty_id varchar(100);
BEGIN
-- increment last value of the corresponding order_category_id in the sequence table
Update order_category_sequence
set current_key = (current_key + 1)
where order_category_id = NEW.order_category_id;
--prepare the pretty_id
Select
oc.name || '-' || s.current_key AS current_pretty_id
FROM order_category_sequence AS s
JOIN order_category AS oc on s.order_category_id = oc.id
WHERE s.order_category_id = NEW.order_category_id
INTO current_pretty_id;
--update order table
Update "order"
set pretty_id = current_pretty_id
where id = NEW.id;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$BODY$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER order_created
AFTER INSERT
ON "order"
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE on_order_created();
If we want to synchronize the two table, order_category and order_category_sequence, we can use another trigger to have a row in the latter table every time a new order category is added.
//function called everytime a new order_category is added
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION on_order_category_created()
RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
--insert a new row for the newly inserted order_category
Insert into order_category_sequence(order_category_id, current_key)
values (NEW.id, 0);
RETURN NEW;
END;
$BODY$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER order_category_created
AFTER INSERT
ON order_category
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE on_order_category_created();
Testing query and result:
Insert into order_category(name)
values ('electronics'),('toys');
Insert into "order"(order_category_id)
values (1),(2),(2);
select * from "order";
Regarding your side question, I prefer to store the lookup values like order_status and order_category in separate tables. Doing this allows to have the above flexibility and it is easy when we have changes.
To answer your side question: yes, you should keep tables with names in them, for a number of reasons. First of all, such tables are small and generally kept in memory by the database, so there is negligible performance benefit to not using the tables. Second, you want to be able to use external tools to query the database and generate reports, and you want these kind of labels available to those tools. Third, you want to minimize the coupling of your software to the actual data so that they can evolve independently. Adding a new category should not require modifying your software.
Now, to the main question, there is no built-in facility for the kind of auto-increment you want. You have to build it yourself.
I suggest you keep the sequence number for each category as a column in the category table. Then you can update it and use the updated sequence number in the order table, like this (which is specific to PostgreSQL):
-- set up the tables
create table orders (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
order_category_id int,
pretty_id VARCHAR
);
create unique index order_category_pretty_id_idx
on orders (pretty_id);
create table order_category (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name varchar NOT NULL,
seq int NOT NULL default 0
);
-- create the categories
insert into order_category
(name) VALUES
('toy'), ('electronics');
-- create orders, specifying the category ID and generating the pretty ID
WITH
new_category_id (id) AS (VALUES (1)), -- 1 here is the category ID for the new order
pretty AS (
UPDATE order_category
SET seq = seq + 1
WHERE id = (SELECT id FROM new_category_id)
RETURNING *
)
INSERT into orders (order_category_id, pretty_id)
SELECT new_category_id.id, concat(pretty.name, '-', pretty.seq)
FROM new_category_id, pretty;
You just plug in your category ID where I have 1 in the example and it will create the new pretty_id for that category. The first category will be toy-1, the next toy-2, etc.
| id | order_category_id | pretty_id |
| --- | ----------------- | ------------- |
| 1 | 1 | toy-1 |
| 2 | 1 | toy-2 |
| 3 | 2 | electronics-1 |
| 4 | 1 | toy-3 |
| 5 | 2 | electronics-2 |
In order to do toys-1 toys-2 toys-3 you should repeat the logic of order_status update, There is no difference between track some status by time or by count.
Just in the order_status update it is simpler you just put now() into updated_at for lets say order_category_track you would take last value + 1 or have different sequences respectively category (would not recommend to do like this because it binds database objects with data in the DB).
I would change a schema to:
In this schema might be in inconsistent state. But in my opinion in your application there are three different entities "order","order_status","order category track" which live their own lives.
And still it is almost impossible to achieve consistent state for this task with out locks for example. This task is complicated by condition that next rows depends on previous what contradicts with SQL.
I would suggest to split category into 2-level hierarchy: category (toy, electronic) and subcategory (toy-1, toy-2, electronic-1, etc.):
So you can use column order_subcategory.full_name contain compiled "toy-1" value, or you can create view to make this field on the fly:
select oc.name || "-" || os.number
from order_category as oc
join order_subcategory as os on oc.id = os.category_id
https://dbdiagram.io/d/5dd6a132edf08a25543e34f8
Regarding your questions "Do I need tables for order_category and order_status just to store names?":
It is best practice to store this kind of data as a separate dictionary table. It gives you consistency and reliability. Querying those tables is very fast and easy for RDBMS, so feel free to use it.
I'll focus on only 3 tables you showed: order, order_status and order_category.
Creating a new table for a new record is not the right way. As your explanation, I think you trying to use order and order_category tables as many to many relationship. If it's so, the thing you need is a pivot table like this:
I currently add order_status column in order table,
you can add this column one of these tables as your need.
side question:
for order_status, if order status is fixed,( like only ACTIVE,INACTIVE and it won't be more values in the future) it would be better to use a column with ENUM type.
The easy answer would be to answer directly to your question. But I do not think it is a good thing in this case. So I will do otherwise.
I think that maybe the whole conception is wrong.
First things first : clarification of your business needs and assertions.
One order can have multiple categories
One category can concern multiple orders
One order can only have one status at a time but multiple through time
One status can be used by multiple orders
One order correspond to a file (probably a billing proof)
One file concerns only one order
Second : Advices
There is a little amount of reserved key words that you must not use in production environment. (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-keywords-appendix.html). So for example I replace the word 'order' by 'command'.
Remaining questions that mandatory needs an answer before production : why the attributes attribute in your 'order' table? There is a risk of non respect of normal forms here. (https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/normal-forms-in-dbms/)
Third : conception solution
This normally is enough to give you a good start. But I wanna have fun a little more :) So...
Fourth : interrogation on needed performance
estimation of load per day/month in order (ten million rows per month?)
Fifth : physical solution proposition
Archiving in another tablespace (trigger when cancel or terminated => archived)
Indexes in another tablespace (your dba will thank you for that)
Possible partitionning of order table (https://pgxn.org/dist/pg_partman/doc/pg_partman.html, https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html)
Hardware and option choosings (high availibility? disaster management? if it is: the elaboration needs further study but few)
Data transposition (is it really needed? if it is: the elaboration needs further study but few)
The finaaaaaal code-down ! (with the good music)
-- as a postgres user
CREATE DATABASE command_system;
CREATE SCHEMA in_prgoress_command;
CREATE SCHEMA archived_command;
--DROP SCHEMA public;
-- create tablespaces on other location than below
CREATE TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs location 'c:/Data/indexes';
CREATE TABLESPACE archived_command_tbs location 'c:/Data/archive';
CREATE TABLESPACE in_progress_command_tbs location 'c:/Data/command';
CREATE TABLE in_prgoress_command.command
(
id bigint /*or bigserial if you use a INSERT RETURNING clause*/ primary key
, notes varchar(500)
, fileULink varchar (500)
)
TABLESPACE in_progress_command_tbs;
CREATE TABLE archived_command.command
(
id bigint /*or bigserial if you use a INSERT RETURNING clause*/ primary key
, notes varchar(500)
, fileULink varchar (500)
)
TABLESPACE archived_command_tbs;
CREATE TABLE in_prgoress_command.category
(
id int primary key
, designation varchar(45) NOT NULL
)
TABLESPACE in_progress_command_tbs;
INSERT INTO in_prgoress_command.category
VALUES (1,'Toy'), (2,'Electronic'), (3,'Leather'); --non-exaustive list
CREATE TABLE in_prgoress_command.status
(
id int primary key
, designation varchar (45) NOT NULL
)
TABLESPACE in_progress_command_tbs;
INSERT INTO in_prgoress_command.status
VALUES (1,'Shipping'), (2,'Cancel'), (3,'Terminated'), (4,'Payed'), (5,'Initialised'); --non-exaustive list
CREATE TABLE in_prgoress_command.command_category
(
id bigserial primary key
, idCategory int
, idCommand bigint
)
TABLESPACE in_progress_command_tbs;
ALTER TABLE in_prgoress_command.command_category
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_category_category FOREIGN KEY (idCategory) REFERENCES in_prgoress_command.category(id);
ALTER TABLE in_prgoress_command.command_category
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_category_command FOREIGN KEY (idCommand) REFERENCES in_prgoress_command.command(id);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_category_category ON in_prgoress_command.command_category USING BTREE (idCategory) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE INDEX idx_command_category_command ON in_prgoress_command.command_category USING BTREE (idCommand) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE TABLE archived_command.command_category
(
id bigserial primary key
, idCategory int
, idCommand bigint
)
TABLESPACE archived_command_tbs;
ALTER TABLE archived_command.command_category
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_category_category FOREIGN KEY (idCategory) REFERENCES in_prgoress_command.category(id);
ALTER TABLE archived_command.command_category
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_category_command FOREIGN KEY (idCommand) REFERENCES archived_command.command(id);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_category_category ON archived_command.command_category USING BTREE (idCategory) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE INDEX idx_command_category_command ON archived_command.command_category USING BTREE (idCommand) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE TABLE in_prgoress_command.command_status
(
id bigserial primary key
, idStatus int
, idCommand bigint
, change_timestamp timestamp --anticipate if you can the time-zone problematic
)
TABLESPACE in_progress_command_tbs;
ALTER TABLE in_prgoress_command.command_status
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_status_status FOREIGN KEY (idStatus) REFERENCES in_prgoress_command.status(id);
ALTER TABLE in_prgoress_command.command_status
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_status_command FOREIGN KEY (idCommand) REFERENCES in_prgoress_command.command(id);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_status_status ON in_prgoress_command.command_status USING BTREE (idStatus) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE INDEX idx_command_status_command ON in_prgoress_command.command_status USING BTREE (idCommand) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idxu_command_state ON in_prgoress_command.command_status USING BTREE (change_timestamp, idStatus, idCommand) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sp_trg_archiving_command ()
RETURNS TRIGGER
language plpgsql
as $function$
DECLARE
BEGIN
-- Copy the data
INSERT INTO archived_command.command
SELECT *
FROM in_prgoress_command.command
WHERE new.idCommand = idCommand;
INSERT INTO archived_command.command_status (idStatus, idCommand, change_timestamp)
SELECT idStatus, idCommand, change_timestamp
FROM in_prgoress_command.command_status
WHERE idCommand = new.idCommand;
INSERT INTO archived_command.command_category (idCategory, idCommand)
SELECT idCategory, idCommand
FROM in_prgoress_command.command_category
WHERE idCommand = new.idCommand;
-- Delete the data
DELETE FROM in_prgoress_command.command_status
WHERE idCommand = new.idCommand;
DELETE FROM in_prgoress_command.command_category
WHERE idCommand = new.idCommand;
DELETE FROM in_prgoress_command.command
WHERE idCommand = new.idCommand;
END;
$function$;
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS t_trg_archiving_command ON in_prgoress_command.command_status;
CREATE TRIGGER t_trg_archiving_command
AFTER INSERT
ON in_prgoress_command.command_status
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (new.idstatus = 2 or new.idStatus = 3)
EXECUTE PROCEDURE sp_trg_archiving_command();
CREATE TABLE archived_command.command_status
(
id bigserial primary key
, idStatus int
, idCommand bigint
, change_timestamp timestamp --anticipate if you can the time-zone problematic
)
TABLESPACE archived_command_tbs;
ALTER TABLE archived_command.command_status
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_command_status FOREIGN KEY (idStatus) REFERENCES in_prgoress_command.category(id);
ALTER TABLE archived_command.command_status
ADD CONSTRAINT fk_command_command_status FOREIGN KEY (idCommand) REFERENCES archived_command.command(id);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_status_status ON archived_command.command_status USING BTREE (idStatus) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE INDEX idx_command_status_command ON archived_command.command_status USING BTREE (idCommand) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idxu_command_state ON archived_command.command_status USING BTREE (change_timestamp, idStatus, idCommand) TABLESPACE command_indexes_tbs;
Conclusion:
In many cases, when you are worried by the disposition of your keys it is because they are not in the good place. Same goes for cars ones! :D
Do not take any solution as prophetic solution : benchmark it.
I am trying to optimize the query I use for fetching paginated data from database with large data sets.
My schema looks like this:
CREATE TABLE users (
user_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT,
custom_fields TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE events (
event_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
organizer_id TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES users(user_id) ON DELETE SET NULL ON UPDATE CASCADE,
name TEXT NOT NULL,
type TEXT NOT NULL,
start_time INTEGER,
duration INTEGER
-- more columns here, omitted for the sake of simplicity
);
CREATE INDEX events_organizer_id_start_time_idx ON events(organizer_id, start_time);
CREATE INDEX events_organizer_id_type_idx ON events(organizer_id, type);
CREATE INDEX events_organizer_id_type_start_time_idx ON events(organizer_id, type, start_time);
CREATE INDEX events_type_start_time_idx ON events(type, start_time);
CREATE INDEX events_start_time_desc_idx ON events(start_time DESC);
CREATE INDEX events_start_time_asc_idx ON events(IFNULL(start_time, 253402300800) ASC);
CREATE TABLE event_participants (
participant_id TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES users(user_id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
event_id TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES events(event_id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
role INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
UNIQUE (participant_id, event_id) ON CONFLICT REPLACE
);
CREATE INDEX event_participants_participant_id_event_id_idx ON event_participants(participant_id, event_id);
CREATE INDEX event_participants_event_id_idx ON event_participants(event_id);
CREATE TABLE event_tag_maps (
event_id TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES events(event_id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
tag_id TEXT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (event_id, tag_id) ON CONFLICT IGNORE
);
CREATE INDEX event_tag_maps_event_id_tag_id_idx ON event_tag_maps(event_id, tag_id);
Where in events table I have around 1,500,000 entries, and around 2,000,000 in event_participants.
Now, a typical query would look something like:
SELECT
EVTS.event_id,
EVTS.type,
EVTS.name,
EVTS.time,
EVTS.duration
FROM events AS EVTS
WHERE
EVTS.organizer_id IN(
'f39c3bb1-3ee3-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'4555e70f-3f1d-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'6e7e33ae-3f1c-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'4850a6a0-3ee4-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'e06f784c-3eea-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'bc6a0f73-3f1d-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'68959fb5-3ef3-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'c4c96cf2-3f1a-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'727e49d1-3f1b-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008',
'930bcfb6-3f09-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008')
AND EVTS.type IN('Meeting', 'Conversation')
AND(
EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM event_tag_maps AS ETM WHERE ETM.event_id = EVTS.event_id AND
ETM.tag_id IN ('00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000', '6ae6870f-1aac-11e6-aeb9-005056c00008', '6ae6870c-1aac-11e6-aeb9-005056c00008', '1f6d3ccb-eaed-4068-a46b-ec2547fec1ff'))
OR NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM event_tag_maps AS ETM WHERE ETM.event_id = EVTS.event_id)
)
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM event_participants AS EPRTS
WHERE
EVTS.event_id = EPRTS.event_id
AND participant_id NOT IN('79869516-3ef2-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008', '79869515-3ef2-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008', '79869516-4e18-11e6-a0dc-005056c00008')
)
ORDER BY IFNULL(EVTS.start_time, 253402300800) ASC
LIMIT 100 OFFSET #Offset;
Also, for fetching the overall count of the query-matching items, I would use the above query with count(1) instead of the columns and without the ORDER BY and LIMIT/OFFSET clauses.
I experience two main problems here:
1) The performance drastically decreases as I increase the #Offset value. The difference is very significant - from being almost immediate to a number of seconds.
2) The count query takes a long time (number of seconds) and produces the following execution plan:
0|0|0|SCAN TABLE events AS EVTS
0|0|0|EXECUTE LIST SUBQUERY 1
0|0|0|EXECUTE LIST SUBQUERY 1
0|0|0|EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 1
1|0|0|SEARCH TABLE event_tag_maps AS ETM USING COVERING INDEX event_tag_maps_event_id_tag_id_idx (event_id=? AND tag_id=?)
1|0|0|EXECUTE LIST SUBQUERY 2
0|0|0|EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 2
2|0|0|SEARCH TABLE event_tag_maps AS ETM USING COVERING INDEX event_tag_maps_event_id_tag_id_idx (event_id=?)
0|0|0|EXECUTE CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY 3
3|0|0|SEARCH TABLE event_participants AS EPRTS USING INDEX event_participants_event_id_idx (event_id=?)
Here I don't understand why the full scan is performed instead of an index scan.
Additional info and SQLite settings used:
I use System.Data.SQLite provider (have to, because of custom functions support)
Page size = cluster size (4096 in my case)
Cache size = 100000
Journal mode = WAL
Temp store = 2 (memory)
No transaction is open for the query
Is there anything I could do to change the query/schema or settings in order to get as much performance improvement as possible?
create table Linq_TB
{
url_id int NOTNULL,
Pg_Name nvarchar(50) NOTNULL,
URL nvarchar(50) NUTNULL,
CONSTRAINT Linq_id PRIMARY KEY (url_id,DBCC Checkident(Linq_TB,RESEED,0) case url_id not in(select URL_Id from URL_TB ))
}
I want to make a table which it's primary key is Linq_id and gets it's value from both the url_id and identity with start from 1 and increments 1 by 1. url_id is a foreign key. For example if url_id is 1, linq_id's will be 11, 12, 13,... and I also want to reset linq_id identity when the url_id changes.
What should the query be? The query above doesn't work, why?
Thanks in advance
Well, a constraint contains conditions and not code to be executed. You should consider using a stored procedure for your task and also a homegrown method of assigning IDs.
However, it is not a common practice to have your primary keys 'pretty' or formatted, as there is no real benefit (except maybe for debugging purposes maybe).
I do not recommend executing DBCC whenever your url_ID changes. This has a great negative impact on performance.
Why don't you leave the IDs like they are?
You can do this with the following table and trigger definitions:
CREATE TABLE Linq_TB
(
url_id INT NOT NULL,
Linq_id INT NOT NULL,
Pg_Name NVARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
URL NVARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT PK_Link_TB PRIMARY KEY (url_id, Linq_id),
CONSTRAINT FK_URL_TB_URL_ID FOREIGN KEY (url_id) REFERENCES URL_TB (url_id)
)
GO
CREATE TRIGGER tr_Linq_TB_InsertUpdate
ON Linq_TB
INSTEAD OF INSERT
AS
INSERT INTO Linq_TB
SELECT i.url_id,
ISNULL(tb.Linq_id, 0)
+ row_number() over (partition by i.url_id order by (select 1)),
i.Pg_Name, i.URL
FROM inserted i
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT url_id, MAX(Linq_ID) Linq_id
FROM Linq_TB
GROUP BY url_id
) tb ON i.url_id = tb.url_id
GO
The CREATE TABLE defines your columns and constraints. And, the trigger creates the logic to generate a sequence value in your Linq_id column for each url_id.
Note that the logic in the trigger is not complete. A couple of issues are not addressed: 1) If the url_id changes for a row, the trigger doesn't update the Link_id, and 2) deleting rows will lead to gaps in the Linq_TB column sequence.
How could I set a constraint on a table so that only one of the records has its isDefault bit field set to 1?
The constraint is not table scope, but one default per set of rows, specified by a FormID.
Use a unique filtered index
On SQL Server 2008 or higher you can simply use a unique filtered index
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX IX_TableName_FormID_isDefault
ON TableName(FormID)
WHERE isDefault = 1
Where the table is
CREATE TABLE TableName(
FormID INT NOT NULL,
isDefault BIT NOT NULL
)
For example if you try to insert many rows with the same FormID and isDefault set to 1 you will have this error:
Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.TableName' with unique
index 'IX_TableName_FormID_isDefault'. The duplicate key value is (1).
Source: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc280372.aspx
Here's a modification of Damien_The_Unbeliever's solution that allows one default per FormID.
CREATE VIEW form_defaults
AS
SELECT FormID
FROM whatever
WHERE isDefault = 1
GO
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX ix_form_defaults on form_defaults (FormID)
GO
But the serious relational folks will tell you this information should just be in another table.
CREATE TABLE form
FormID int NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
DefaultWhateverID int FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Whatever(ID)
From a normalization perspective, this would be an inefficient way of storing a single fact.
I would opt to hold this information at a higher level, by storing (in a different table) a foreign key to the identifier of the row which is considered to be the default.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Foo](
[Id] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Foo] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Id] ASC
) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[DefaultSettings](
[DefaultFoo] [int] NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[DefaultSettings] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_DefaultSettings_Foo] FOREIGN KEY([DefaultFoo])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Foo] ([Id])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[DefaultSettings] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_DefaultSettings_Foo]
GO
You could use an insert/update trigger.
Within the trigger after an insert or update, if the count of rows with isDefault = 1 is more than 1, then rollback the transaction.
CREATE VIEW vOnlyOneDefault
AS
SELECT 1 as Lock
FROM <underlying table>
WHERE Default = 1
GO
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX IX_vOnlyOneDefault on vOnlyOneDefault (Lock)
GO
You'll need to have the right ANSI settings turned on for this.
I don't know about SQLServer.But if it supports Function-Based Indexes like in Oracle, I hope this can be translated, if not, sorry.
You can do an index like this on suposed that default value is 1234, the column is DEFAULT_COLUMN and ID_COLUMN is the primary key:
CREATE
UNIQUE
INDEX only_one_default
ON my_table
( DECODE(DEFAULT_COLUMN, 1234, -1, ID_COLUMN) )
This DDL creates an unique index indexing -1 if the value of DEFAULT_COLUMN is 1234 and ID_COLUMN in any other case. Then, if two columns have DEFAULT_COLUMN value, it raises an exception.
The question implies to me that you have a primary table that has some child records and one of those child records will be the default record. Using address and a separate default table here is an example of how to make that happen using third normal form. Of course I don't know if it's valuable to answer something that is so old but it struck my fancy.
--drop table dev.defaultAddress;
--drop table dev.addresses;
--drop table dev.people;
CREATE TABLE [dev].[people](
[Id] [int] identity primary key,
name char(20)
)
GO
CREATE TABLE [dev].[Addresses](
id int identity primary key,
peopleId int foreign key references dev.people(id),
address varchar(100)
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dev].[defaultAddress](
id int identity primary key,
peopleId int foreign key references dev.people(id),
addressesId int foreign key references dev.addresses(id))
go
create unique index defaultAddress on dev.defaultAddress (peopleId)
go
create unique index idx_addr_id_person on dev.addresses(peopleid,id);
go
ALTER TABLE dev.defaultAddress
ADD CONSTRAINT FK_Def_People_Address
FOREIGN KEY(peopleID, addressesID)
REFERENCES dev.Addresses(peopleId, id)
go
insert into dev.people (name)
select 'Bill' union
select 'John' union
select 'Harry'
insert into dev.Addresses (peopleid, address)
select 1, '123 someplace' union
select 1,'work place' union
select 2,'home address' union
select 3,'some address'
insert into dev.defaultaddress (peopleId, addressesid)
select 1,1 union
select 2,3
-- so two home addresses are default now
-- try adding another default address to Bill and you get an error
select * from dev.people
join dev.addresses on people.id = addresses.peopleid
left join dev.defaultAddress on defaultAddress.peopleid = people.id and defaultaddress.addressesid = addresses.id
insert into dev.defaultaddress (peopleId, addressesId)
select 1,2
GO
You could do it through an instead of trigger, or if you want it as a constraint create a constraint that references a function that checks for a row that has the default set to 1
EDIT oops, needs to be <=
Create table mytable(id1 int, defaultX bit not null default(0))
go
create Function dbo.fx_DefaultExists()
returns int as
Begin
Declare #Ret int
Set #ret = 0
Select #ret = count(1) from mytable
Where defaultX = 1
Return #ret
End
GO
Alter table mytable add
CONSTRAINT [CHK_DEFAULT_SET] CHECK
(([dbo].fx_DefaultExists()<=(1)))
GO
Insert into mytable (id1, defaultX) values (1,1)
Insert into mytable (id1, defaultX) values (2,1)
This is a fairly complex process that cannot be handled through a simple constraint.
We do this through a trigger. However before you write the trigger you need to be able to answer several things:
do we want to fail the insert if a default exists, change it to 0 instead of 1 or change the existing default to 0 and leave this one as 1?
what do we want to do if the default record is deleted and other non default records are still there? Do we make one the default, if so how do we determine which one?
You will also need to be very, very careful to make the trigger handle multiple row processing. For instance a client might decide that all of the records of a particular type should be the default. You wouldn't change a million records one at a time, so this trigger needs to be able to handle that. It also needs to handle that without looping or the use of a cursor (you really don't want the type of transaction discussed above to take hours locking up the table the whole time).
You also need a very extensive tesing scenario for this trigger before it goes live. You need to test:
adding a record with no default and it is the first record for that customer
adding a record with a default and it is the first record for that customer
adding a record with no default and it is the not the first record for that customer
adding a record with a default and it is the not the first record for that customer
Updating a record to have the default when no other record has it (assuming you don't require one record to always be set as the deafault)
Updating a record to remove the default
Deleting the record with the deafult
Deleting a record without the default
Performing a mass insert with multiple situations in the data including two records which both have isdefault set to 1 and all of the situations tested when running individual record inserts
Performing a mass update with multiple situations in the data including two records which both have isdefault set to 1 and all of the situations tested when running individual record updates
Performing a mass delete with multiple situations in the data including two records which both have isdefault set to 1 and all of the situations tested when running individual record deletes
#Andy Jones gave an answer above closest to mine, but bearing in mind the Rule of Three, I placed the logic directly in the stored proc that updates this table. This was my simple solution. If I need to update the table from elsewhere, I will move the logic to a trigger. The one default rule applies to each set of records specified by a FormID and a ConfigID:
ALTER proc [dbo].[cpForm_UpdateLinkedReport]
#reportLinkId int,
#defaultYN bit,
#linkName nvarchar(150)
as
if #defaultYN = 1
begin
declare #formId int, #configId int
select #formId = FormID, #configId = ConfigID from csReportLink where ReportLinkID = #reportLinkId
update csReportLink set DefaultYN = 0 where isnull(ConfigID, #configId) = #configId and FormID = #formId
end
update
csReportLink
set
DefaultYN = #defaultYN,
LinkName = #linkName
where
ReportLinkID = #reportLinkId