I've been adding records to a dynamic module via the API and in the process during my experimentation I added a bunch of records that weren't associated correctly with any valid parent record.
I've checked and so far I can see that Sitefinity stores data about these records in a number of tables:
mydynamiccontenttype_table
sf_dynamic_content
sf_dynmc_cntnt_sf_lnguage_data
sf_dynmc_cntent_sf_permissions
I would like to clean up the database by deleting these records but I want to make sure I don't create more problems in the process.
Anyone know if there are more references to these dynamic content type records or a process to safely delete them?
There are probably other tables, so your safest option would be to delete the items using the Sitefinity API.
Just get the masterId of the item and use a code like this:
public static void DeleteDataItemOfType(this DynamicModuleManager manager, string type, Guid Id)
{
Type resolvedType = TypeResolutionService.ResolveType(type);
using (var region = new ElevatedModeRegion(manager))
{
manager.DeleteDataItem(resolvedType, Id);
manager.SaveChanges();
}
}
Related
I want to create or update a UserAccount entity with an EmailAddress property, whilst ensuring the EmailAddress is unique. UserAccount has it's own Id property of type long, this is just so I can track each UserAccount entity, as using the email address as the document id would present issues if the user wishes to change their email address.
I've heard I could create a new collection called UniqueEmailAddresses that could be collection of empty (or near empty?) documents and the email address would be the actual document id.
Is this correct? If I update both collections in one transaction, is this the best way to ensure that 2 documents with the same email addresses don't end up in UserAccount collection? Does adding this extra collection with the user's email address as the id, cause any performance issues when dealing with millions of users? Is it possible to create an empty document? Am I going down the right path?
EDIT
These are the available bundles, which bundle do I need to add to get the unique constraint features?
EDIT 2
I've added the Raven.Bundles.UniqueConstraints DLL to the folder ~/App_Data/RavenDB/Plugins (I'm using the embedded server) and changed my Document Store Provider to:
protected override IDocumentStore CreateInstance(IContext context)
{
EmbeddableDocumentStore documentStore = new EmbeddableDocumentStore()
{
DataDirectory = #"~\App_Data\RavenDB",
UseEmbeddedHttpServer = true,
Configuration = { Port = 8181, PluginsDirectory = #"~\App_Data\RavenDB\Plugins" }
};
documentStore.RegisterListener(new UniqueConstraintsStoreListener());
documentStore.Initialize();
return documentStore;
}
But it still doesn't show in the available bundles list and my call to checkResult.ConstraintsAreFree() wrongly returns true when I'm testing by breaking the constraint.
RavenDB has the notion of the unique constraints bundles that does all of it for you.
See the docs:
http://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/3.0/csharp/client-api/bundles/how-to-work-with-unique-constraints-bundle
I'm using the MVC 4 template with VS 2012. I have enabled a comments section which stores the logged in user's UserId to a table. When I display the comments I want to display the user's user name and email from the UserProfiles table.
I've tried the following code:
public static string GetUserName(int userId)
{
using (var db = new UsersContext())
{
return db.UserProfiles.Single(x => x.UserId == userId).UserName;
}
}
But I get an exception:
The model backing the 'UsersContext' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=238269).
Any suggestions?
The exception is pretty descriptive. Your model does not reflect what your database look like. I recommend you to read this about code first migrations, basically what migrations mean is that you update your database to match your models, its done with one line of command in VS.
Hope this helps
Also I would recommend you to use .Find() or .First() instead of .Single()
A small briefing on what I am trying to do.
I have three tables Content(contentId, body, timeofcreation), ContentAttachmentMap(contentId, attachmentId) and Attachment(attachmentId, resourceLocation).
The reason I adopted to create the mapping table because in future application the attachment can also be shared with different content.
Now I am using HQL to get data. My objectives is as follows:
Get All contents with/without Attachments
I have seen some examples in the internet like you can create an objective specific class (not POJO) and put the attribute name from the select statement within its constructor and the List of that Class object is returned.
For e.g. the HQL will be SELECT new com.mydomain.myclass(cont.id, cont.body) ..... and so on.
In my case I am looking for the following SELECT new com.mydomain.contentClass(cont.id, cont.body, List<Attachment>) FROM ...`. Yes, I want to have the resultList contain contentid, contentbody and List of its Attachments as a single result List item. If there are no attachments then it will return (cont.id, contentbody, null).
Is this possible? Also tell me how to write the SQL statements.
Thanks in advance.
I feel you are using Hibernate in a fundamentally wrong way. You should use Hibernate to view your domain entity, not to use it as exposing the underlying table.
You don't need to have that contentClass special value object for all these. Simply selecting the Content entity serves what you need.
I think it will be easier to have actual example.
In your application, you are not seeing it as "3 tables", you should see it as 2 entities, which is something look like:
#Entity
public class Content {
#Id
Long id;
#Column(...)
String content;
#ManyToMany
#JoinTable(name="ContentAttachmentMap")
List<Attachment> attachments;
}
#Entity
public class Attachment {
#Id
Long id;
#Column(...)
String resourceLocation
}
And, the result you are looking for is simply the result of HQL of something like
from Content where attachments IS EMPTY
I believe you can join fetch too in order to save DB access:
from Content c left join fetch c.attachments where c.attachments IS EMPTY
I want to add property to existing document (using clues form http://ravendb.net/docs/client-api/partial-document-updates). But before adding want to check if that property already exists in my database.
Is any "special,proper ravendB way" to achieve that?
Or just load document and check if this property is null or not?
You can do this using a set based database update. You carry it out using JavaScript, which fortunately is similar enough to C# to make it a pretty painless process for anybody. Here's an example of an update I just ran.
Note: You have to be very careful doing this because errors in your script may have undesired results. For example, in my code CustomId contains something like '1234-1'. In my first iteration of writing the script, I had:
product.Order = parseInt(product.CustomId.split('-'));
Notice I forgot the indexer after split. The result? An error, right? Nope. Order had the value of 12341! It is supposed to be 1. So be careful and be sure to test it thoroughly.
Example:
Job has a Products property (a collection) and I'm adding the new Order property to existing Products.
ravenSession.Advanced.DocumentStore.DatabaseCommands.UpdateByIndex(
"Raven/DocumentsByEntityName",
new IndexQuery { Query = "Tag:Jobs" },
new ScriptedPatchRequest { Script =
#"
this.Products.Map(function(product) {
if(product.Order == undefined)
{
product.Order = parseInt(product.CustomId.split('-')[1]);
}
return product;
});"
}
);
I referenced these pages to build it:
set based ops
partial document updates (in particular the Map section)
With my only ORM knowledge being L2S/EF, I was surprised when the following code inserted a row into the database before I called repo.Save:
var repo = new UserRepository();
var user = new User { Name = "test" }
repo.Add(user);
//repo.Save();
Repo looks like this:
public void Add(T entity)
{
session.Save(entity);
}
public void Save()
{
session.Flush();
}
After some digging, it seems NHibernate needs to make the insert happen right away in order to get the ID of the new entity (since it's using an auto increment ID). But L2S/EF doesn't work like this; I can add many entities and save them all at the end.
Question is: is there a way to achieve the same thing with NHibernate, while still using auto increment IDs, and out of interest does anyone know why it works like this?
Fabio Maulo already blogged about the usage of identity generator a few times. The answer is: use hilo, guid.comb or something like this.
NHibernate needs the identity because every entity in the session (they are called "persistent entities") needs to be identified. The identity is also normally used to determine if the record already exists in the database (unsaved value).
session.Save actually only makes a transient entity persistent. When the database is generating the id, it needs to be stored to get the id. If NH can create the id itself (eg using hilo), it could be stored next time when the session gets flushed.