Problems with using a dll in a access database - dll

What is the reason for this error in using dll??
enter image description here

Firstly->Check parameters!
The error says "No value given for one or more required parameters".
Then read this question (with answer), it may be helpful.
No value given for one or more required parameters When all parameters are given

Related

Different parameter count in FORM and PERFORM

I am trying to add a formal parameter in the FORM and PERFORM in an existing code, as I will be need it the extra parameter in a new function that I have to call. The idea is that when executing the new code it keeps showing the error: Different parameter count in FORM and PERFORM (routine: CM_SHOW_CRC, number of formal parameters: 2, number of actual parameters: 3).
The code that I have for the form part is as follows:
FORM cm_show_crc
USING
civ_matnr TYPE matnr
civ_charg TYPE charg_d
civ_werks TYPE werks_d. "The parameter that I added
And the perform code is:
PERFORM cm_show_crc
USING
pis_sdow_alv-matnr
pis_sdow_alv-charg
pis_sdow_alv-werks. "The parameter that I added
The table pis_sdow_alv is type of a structure that also includes the variable WERK(Component type WERKS_D)
Before adding the new parameter WERK the code was working fine.
May anyone know what the problem in this part of the code may be?
There was also another similar question in: Different number of parameters in FORM and PERFORM, however I am not using the syntax CHANGING in my code, as it was also not used prior.
Please do tell me if you need additional information.
Thank you all in advance!
This problem can occur when FORM and PERFORM are in different includes and you only activate one but not the other.
When you activate an include, then it is checked against the active version of all other repository objects it depends on. Not the saved version. This can lead to an annoying catch-22 situation. You can not activate A because it does not match the previous version of B, and you can not activate B because it does not match the previous version of A.
The solution to this conundrum is to activate both objects together. When you activate something in SE80 and you have multiple inactive objects, you get a window where you can select multiple objects to activate together:
In Eclipse, you get a similar list by clicking on the "activate multiple" button:

Number of formal parameters is larger than the number of actual parameters

So when I try to compile (activate), the compiler throws this error message:
Different number of parameters in FORM and PERFORM (routine:
CALL_CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM, number of formal parameters: 7, number of
actual parameters: 6)
It refers to the line 169 in the include LJ_1B_NFE_INF3B, where there is this statement:
PERFORM call_calculate_tax_item
USING
ls_rbkpv
ls_drseg
ls_j_lbaa
ls_lfa1
ls_xmlpo
abap_true
CHANGING
et_bapiret2[].
Here is the form code:
FORM call_calculate_tax_item
USING ls_rbkpv TYPE mrm_rbkpv
ls_drseg TYPE mmcr_drseg
ls_j_1baa TYPE j_1baa
ls_lfa1 TYPE lfa1
ls_xmlpo TYPE ty_xmlpo_ext "1843823
lv_get_conditions TYPE flag "2142110
CHANGING et_bapiret2 TYPE bapirettab.
So, it's obvious that there are 7 parameters both in PERFORM and FORM, why does the compiler say that there are only 6 actual parameters?
Thanks and sorry for broken English.
Usually such problems result from a not fully implemented SAP Note or not activating all the changes made by the note at the very same time.
In your case I see that either SAP Note 2142110 is not fully implemented or some of the changes resulting from the implementation of it have not been activated.

Ignoring only one parameter in a Visual Basic .net unit test's stub?

Trying to debug the problem that spawned this question gave me the following thought:
Q: is there a way to tell the stub to ignore only some parameters but not the others? (in opposition to ignoring all parameters with IgnoreArguments)
The syntax for ignoring a parameter in VB.net is Arg(Of T).Is.Anything.
For example if I had:
myObj.Stub(Function(x) x.MyMethod(string1, string2)).Return(myReturn)
And I wish to ignore only string1, I could just write:
myObj.Stub(Function(x) x.MyMethod(Arg(Of String).Is.Anything, Arg(Of String).Is.Equal(string2))).Return(myReturn)
Note that in order to ignore one or more parameters this way ALL of them must be written in that notation, even the ones that you want to have a specific value (with the .Is.Equal(...) notation).
Answer found thanks to this comment

Adobe Livecycle: how to get the value of process data

I have a process data defined in Adobe livecycle, addField as a string. I am passing the value of this variable as an input when i invoke a process. Further i want to compare the value of this process data if it is true or false. I am trying to use the following expression:
string(/process_data/#addField)=string("true")
but i am not getting the value out of the expression. Is the above expression true? If not what is used to get the value of the process data?
I believe your XPath expression is wrong. I just did a quick mock-up in workbench and I got the correct response. Here are the details of what I did:
Created an input string variable i workbench called addField.
Created a two step process. The first step has two routes going out to two different set values.
On one of the routes, I added the following condition:
/process_data/#addField = "true"
Turned on recording, and invoked the process.
In the input parameters screen in workbench, I added the following text: true
In the recording, I can see the expression evaluating correctly and going to the correct set value.
Do let me know if you have any other questions.
Thanks,
Armaghan.

What's the correct format to extract an attribute from an element of some id using selenium.getAttribute()?

I've tried tracking down the appropriate syntax to extract an attribute using selenium.getAttribute(someXPath), and while I've come across many examples, nothing seems to work. From what I can tell, standard xpath syntax, such as:
//*[#id='someID']
doesn't work. What's the correct format to extract an attribute from an element of some id?
So it seems as if that format is almost correct. The correct string would be
//*[#id="someId"]#someAttribute
Another solution is to use
"someId#someAttribute"
which actually is "better" as the former can generate errors for IE.
Also, it seems that when an element contains no attributes at all, the error message is "attributeValue is null" instead of the normal "Element / attribute not found".