Find last updated date from a table in SQL database - sql

Is there a way to find last time updated date from a table without using sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats?? I have been searching for this for an hour now but all answers I found were using this property which seems to be reset on SQL database restart.
Thanks.

You can use this property (which is greatly advised).
Or you can code your own ON UPDATE TRIGGER that will populate this table
(or another homemade) on its own.
Also if you just wish to collect some data about current usage,
you can setup a SQL Profiler that will do the job
(then parse the results somehow, Excel or whatever)
Last option, restore successively the backups you have taken (on a copy).
Hoping you have enough backup retention to find the data you're searching for.

Related

Azure Data Factory - Rerun Failed Pipeline Against Azure SQL Table With Differential Date Filter

I am using ADF to keep an Azure SQL DB in sync with an on-prem DB. The on-prem DB is read only and the direction is one-way, from the Azure SQL DB to the on-prem DB.
My source table in the Azure SQL Cloud DB is quite large (10's of millions of rows) so I have the pipeline set to use an UPSERT (merge, trying to create a differential merge). I am using a filter on the Source table and the and the Filter Query has a WHERE condition that looks like this:
[HistoryDate] >= '#{formatDateTime(pipeline().parameters.windowStart, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm' )}'
AND [HistoryDate] < '#{formatDateTime(pipeline().parameters.windowEnd, 'yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm' )}'
The HistoryDate column is auto-maintained in the source table with a getUTCDate() type approach. New records will always get a higher value and be included in the WHERE condition.
This works well, but here is my question: I am testing on my local machine before deploying to the client. When I am not working, my laptop hibernates and the pipeline rightfully fails because my local SQL Instance is "offline" during that run. When I move this to production this should not be an issue (computer hibernating), but what happens if the clients connection is temporarily lost (i.e, the client loses internet for a time)? Because my pipeline has a WHERE condition on the source to reduce the table size upsert to a practical number, any failure would result in a loss of any data created during that 5 minute window.
A failed pipeline can be rerun, but the run time would be different at that moment in time and I would effectively miss the block of records that would have been picked up if the pipeline had been run on time. pipeline().parameters.windowStart and pipeline().parameters.windowEnd will now be different.
As an FYI, I have this running every 5 minutes to keep the local copy in sync as close to real-time as possible.
Am I approaching this correctly? I'm sure others have this scenario and it's likely I am missing something obvious. :-)
Thanks...
Sorry to answer my own question, but to potentially help others in the future, it seems there was a better way to deal with this.
ADF offers a "Metadata-driven Copy Task" utility/wizard on the home screen that creates a pipeline. When I used it, it offers a "Delta Load" option for tables which takes a "Watermark". The watermark is a column for an incrementing IDENTITY column, increasing date or timestamp, etc. At the end of the wizard, it allows you to download a script that builds a table and corresponding stored procedure that maintains the values of each parameters after each run. For example, if I wanted my delta load to be based on an IDENTITY column, it stores the value of the max value of a particular pipeline run. The next time a run happens (trigger), it uses this as the MIN value (minus 1) and the current MAX value of the IDENTITY column to get the added records since the last run.
I was going to approach things this way, but it seems like ADF already does this heavy lifting for us. :-)

Will BigQuery finish long running jobs with a destination table if my browser crashes / computer turns off?

I frequently run BigQuery jobs in the web gui that take 30 minutes or more, saving the results into another table to view later.
Since I'm not waiting for the result to come soon, and not storing them in my computer's memory, it would be great if I could start a query and then turn off my computer, to come back the next day and look at the results in the destination table.
Will this work?
The same applies if my computer crashes, or browser runs out of memory, or anything else that causes me to lose my connection to Bigquery while the job is running.
The simple answer is yes, the processing takes place in the cloud, not on your browser. As long as you set a destination table, the results will be saved there or if not, you can check the query history to see if there were any issues which caused it not to be produced.
If you don't set a destination table it will save to a temporary table which may not be available if you don't return in time.
I'm sure someone can give you a much more detailed answer.
Even if you have not defined destination table - you still can access result of the query by checking Query History. You should locate your query in the list of presented queries and then expand respective item and locate value of Destination Table.
Note: this is not regular table - rather so called anonymous table that is being available for about 24 hours after query was executed
So, knowing that table you can just use it in whatever way you want - for example just simply query it as in below
SELECT *
FROM `yourproject._1e65a8880ba6772f612fbe6ff0eee22c939f1a47.anon9139110fa21b95d8c8729cf0bb6e4bb6452946d4`
Note: anonymous table is being "saved" in a "system" dataset that is started with underscore so you will not be able to see it in UI. Also table name startes with 'anon' which I believe states for 'anonymous'

Backing up portion of data in SQL

I have a huge schema containing billions of records, I want to purge data older than 13 months from it and maintain it as a backup in such a way that it can be recovered again whenever required.
Which is the best way to do it in SQL - can we create a separate copy of this schema and add a delete trigger on all tables so that when trigger fires, purged data gets inserted to this new schema?
Will there be only one record per delete statement if we use triggers? Or all records will be inserted?
Can we somehow use bulk copy?
I would suggest this is a perfect use case for the Stretch Database feature in SQL Server 2016.
More info: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/dn935011.aspx
The cold data can be moved to the cloud with your given date criteria without any applications or users being aware of it when querying the database. No backups required and very easy to setup.
There is no need for triggers, you can use job running every day, that will put outdated data into archive tables.
The best way I guess is to create a copy of current schema. In main part - delete all that is older then 13 months, in archive part - delete all for last 13 month.
Than create SP (or any SPs) that will collect data - put it into archive and delete it from main table. Put this is into daily running job.
The cleanest and fastest way to do this (with billions of rows) is to create a partitioned table probably based on a date column by month. Moving data in a given partition is a meta operation and is extremely fast (if the partition setup and its function is set up properly.) I have managed 300GB tables using partitioning and it has been very effective. Be careful with the partition function so dates at each edge are handled correctly.
Some of the other proposed solutions involve deleting millions of rows which could take a long, long time to execute. Model the different solutions using profiler and/or extended events to see which is the most efficient.
I agree with the above to not create a trigger. Triggers fire with every insert/update/delete making them very slow.
You may be best served with a data archive stored procedure.
Consider using multiple databases. The current database that has your current data. Then an archive or multiple archive databases where you move your records out from your current database to with some sort of say nightly or monthly stored procedure process that moves the data over.
You can use the exact same schema as your production system.
If the data is already in the database no need for a Bulk Copy. From there you can backup your archive database so it is off the sql server. Restore the database if needed to make the data available again. This is much faster and more manageable than bulk copy.
According to Microsoft's documentation on Stretch DB (found here - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-server-stretch-database/), you can't update or delete rows that have been migrated to cold storage or rows that are eligible for migration.
So while Stretch DB does look like a capable technology for archive, the implementation in SQL 2016 does not appear to support archive and purge.

SQL: Tracking changes to the table that gets truncated everyday (and repulled form different srvr)

I have a table that is a replicate of a table from a different server.
Unfortunately I don't have access to the transaction information, and all I have is the table that shows "as is" information & I have a SSIS to replicate the table on my server every day (the table gets truncated, and new information is pulled every night).
Everything has been fine and good, but I want to start tracking what has changed. i.e. I want to know if a new row has been inserted or a value of a column has changed.
Is this something that could be done easily?
I would appreciate any help..
The SQL version is SQL Server 2012 SP1 | Enterprise
If you want to do this for a perticular table then you can go for a scd(slowly changing dimension) transform in SSIS control flow which will keep the hystory records in different table
or
you can create CDC(changing data capture) method on that table.CDC will help you on monitering of every DML operation in that table.It will inserted in the modified row in the system table.

Find out when a database backup was made

Folks,
Assume you receive a disconnected backup of a SQL Server database (2005 or 2008) and you restore that to your SQL Server instance.
Is there a way, is there a system catalog or something, to find out when the last write operation occured on that particular database? I'd like to be able to find out what day a particular database backup was from - unfortunately, that's not really being recorded explicitly anywhere, and checking all dozens of data table for the highest date/time stamp isn't really an option either....
Any ideas? Sure - I can look at the date/time stamp of the *.bak file - but can I find out more precisely from within SQL Server (Management Studio) ??
Thanks!
Marc
If you have access to the SQL Server instance where the backup was originally run, you should be able to query msdb:
SELECT backup_set_id, backup_start_date, backup_finish_date
FROM msdb.dbo.backupset
WHERE database_name = 'MyDBname' AND type = 'D'
There are several table relating to backup sets:
backupfile -- contains one row for each data file or log file backed up
backupmediafamily -- contains one row for each media family
backupmediaset -- contains one row for each backup media set
backupset -- contains one row for each backup set
By querying these tables you can determine when the last backups occurred, what type of backups occurred and where the files were written to.
You can try RESTORE HEADERONLY on your backup file, as described here
that should give you the information you're looking for.
A bit late, but should be what you want.
Each write to the database is an entry in the log file. Which has an LSN.
This must be stored in the backup for log restores at least.
So, how to match LSN to a datetime?
SELECT TOP 5 [End Time] AS BringFirst, *
FROM ::fn_dblog (NULL, NULL)
WHERE [End Time] IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY BringFirst DESC
I've never used this before (just had a play for this answer). Some writes are very likely part of the backup itself, but you should be able to distinguish them with some poking around.
as far as I know in the master database there exists a Log-table where every write is stored with detailed information. BUT I'm unsure if you need to enable the Log-mechanism - so that the default is not to log and you have to enable it.
In Oracle for example it is the way around there exists a system-database table Log that you can query.
If that is not the case - you could still write yourself a trigger and apply that on every table/column needed and do the logging yourself.