So far, I experimented with:
new DroneDeploy({version: 1}).then(function(dronedeploy){
dronedeploy.Plans.getCurrentlyViewed().then(function(plan){
plan.shared_users.push({username: "my.username#mail.kom"});
return plan;
).then(function(plan){
dronedeploy.Plans.update( plan.id,{shared_users: plan.shared_users});
});
);
It gives error:
shared_users is not a whitelisted field to update on the plan.
But still makes the sharing. I guess it is not the best and reliable way, what what be the proper one?
Unfortunately, the ability to edit shared_users is actually a bug that will be fixed soon. There is no official way to share through the DroneDeploy API.
If you'd like to request that as a feature, you can do so by opening an issue here: https://github.com/dronedeploy/DroneDeploy-App-Market/issues
Disclosure: I am a developer on the DroneDeploy team
Related
I got problem with my company internal extension. They don't want to publish it, as it does gather data on external server. So I need to host it myself... but would like not to lose ability of autoupdate.
As far as I read I need to use update_url in manifest, but nothing more is said in Opera documentation...
"update_url": "http://path/to/updateInfo.xml", - as it is said in documentation page
Ok... and what should I put in that xml? Will it autoupdate or just notify users about new updates? Where do I put rest of updated files?
I tried to concat Opera itself about this question, but they don't give any contact information except something like if you have problem, ask on stackoverflow... so here I am.
If it does not work, I was thinking about really BAD method, using unsafe-eval and keeping newest version in local storage... but would rather like to avoid that.
In general the behavior is the same as for Chrome. You can base on this document: https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/autoupdate
on my blog I’m using from a long time the IntenseDebate pluging as commenting system in place of the default one.
I would replace it with Google+ comment system but I don’t want to lose all comments already left by the users via IntenseDebate, so I would figure out if there’s any way to load on the old posts the IntenseDebate pluging in place of the default Google+.
As possible solution, I’m thinking something like a tag in the html post code that (if defined) load the IntenseDebate pluging.
What do you think?
its not posible to migrate IntenseDebate comment on google plus. Their is one solution that you can use multiple comment system in your blogger blog. just few month ago i had written trick for the same. I hope that this will be useful to you.
http://www.tipsviablogging.com/multiple-comment-system-blogspot/
Is it possible to do a search for apps by title via the API? For example, the equivalent of "Return a list of apps (if any) with the word 'dog' in the title".
I've seen two access points that come close, but don't seem to offer this:
The RSS feed; it lists apps, but apparently only groupings like, "top 100..."
The query interface; but it doesn't seem to query over the app media type. (?)
I found the answer. Although not explicitly documented, it's possible to search by app name.
http://www.apple.com/itunes/affiliates/resources/documentation/itunes-store-web-service-search-api.html
You're right, it wasn't very clear on that iTunes page at all. The parameter entity=software is the key. For example, here's a search for my app, TypeLink:
http://itunes.apple.com/search?entity=software&term=typelink&callback=myCallbackFunction
If you're wondering what the callback is for, here's some more info on the JSONP format it uses:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSONP
For any future person who wants to link to the App Store keyword search result page directly from a web link - this format works as of April 2013:
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSearch.woa/wa/search?media=software&submit=media&term=KEYWORD%20GOES%20HERE
Was a PITA to figure out but finally got the syntax right... Needed this because a client has apps made by multiple developers so I couldn't just use the suggested Appstore.com/DeveloperName link to return all their apps.
Thanks all for sharing wisdom. Hope this helps someone.
Is it possible to make a Facebook app which edits user's post on his wall automatically (edits EVERY POST that user makes, app has user's permission and everything)
I don't think that's possible, but maybe I'm wrong?
Based on the Graph API docs, I actually think it could work.
Get the extended permission called
"offline_access". See
http://developers.facebook.com/docs/authentication/permissions
Periodically pull from
https://graph.facebook.com/PROFILE_ID/feed
to see if the user has posted new
posts.
If so, for each new post that has appeared:
Pull and store the text of the post.
Manipulate the text as desired.
Delete the original post using
"DELETE". See
http://developers.facebook.com/docs/api#deleting
Publish your modified version of the
post using "POST". See
http://developers.facebook.com/docs/api#publishing
#Jon: You cannot delete a post that your application has not published.
See here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/post/
No, it's not possible for security reasons. Even though you probably have the best of intentions, there are lots of people who unfortunately don't. The few ruin it for all.
I would like to be able to generate custom bit.lys (http://bit.ly/thecakeisalie type things) through their API. This does not appear to be possible, but I thought I'd check; does anyone happen to know otherwise?
This unfortunately had to be removed for our free users due to on-going abuse. All of the custom bitlinks on bit.ly are created in the same key space, so allowing for automated creation there quickly leads to there being no sane options availble for anybody else.
That being said, we have recently added the ability for our paid customers to create custom bitlinks if they are using a custom domain. In this case, our customers get their own key space so creating custom bitlinks en-mass isn't a problem.
It was removed from the API. I like many others were trying to do this and bit.ly's support email replied saying it has been removed. Similar experiences on their ApiDocumentation wiki here.