In the past, I've always generated reports by querying a database, dropping it on a worksheet, sorting, reading into an array, and then looping through to create the documents. What I'm trying to do now is generate the reports directly from the recordset.
The problem I have though is when using arrays I had an absolute record number, so I could check if a field in the previous record was the same as in the current record.
What is the best way of going about doing this with a recordset? Store the field value in a variable? Use nested While loops? Get a total record count and use absolute positions to move back and forth (which doesn't seem like a good idea)?
UPDATE
The recordset contains multiple records from 20 different companies. I sort the query by the company name and then start loop through it. I then need to check each record to see if it's from the same company as the previous and if not create a new worksheet for that company.
I usually do the sort in the query using an "Order By" clause. Then just loop through the sorted records using a variable to track the current sort order name and detect the name change by comparing the current record name field to the variable value.
Related
Its my intention to implement a History function in my database where users can see what records they've previously worked on. To achieve this initially, I created an extra field in the table they we're looking at and added their name from the login screen and timestamp to the record. This works, but the problem is if another user loads up the record, it overrides the last person since its just one field and its inconsistent.
So instead I created a new table and added their names and timestamps in there as a new line. The issue here is that eventually there's going to be 1000's of records in a table eating away at my hard drive space over time and eventually since the max for a table is 2GB, its just going to break one day.
After researching, Queries have a max limit, but you've still got to link that to a table that holds the data. I would like a table that contains, lets say 100 records, and at the 101st record, the oldest line is overridden and so on.
There's no code to share since my problem isn't with VBA, but rather finding a work around for this, I would of assumed this would be implemented into Access by default. I just have a table called 'History' and in VBA, an 'open recordset' function and '.addnew' 'User' and 'Date'.
You could use an After Insert data macro to remove the oldest row when a new one is added:
I have an Azure SQL database, and my records inside table Spiderfood_RITMData in that database includes 13 different fields. Lots of stuff. I have confirmed in SQL-SMS that the records have data in each field.
There are way more items in the database than PowerApps can see using LOOKUP (1600-9000 records or more). However, I know FOR A FACT that there is only ONE record that has any given value in the NUMBER column. It's not a primary key, but it is unique in the table.
In PowerApps, I am trying to pull that field so that I can eventually parse out the individual items.
So, the commands I'm trying are:
ClearCollect(MLE_test1, Filter('Spiderfood_RITMData', "RITM2170467" in Number));
ClearCollect(MLE_test2, Search('Spiderfood_RITMData',"RITM2170467", "Number"));
However, the Collection results for MLE_test1 and MLE_test2 both are empty EXCEPT for the value of NUMBER. Say what?!
I'm trying to use the examples posted on https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/maker/canvas-apps/functions/function-filter-lookup but I am honestly getting baffled by this.
How should I be formatting this call such that I can pull the whole record?
Big picture explanation: I need to do a lot of data LOOKUPS into my table Spiderfood_RITMData table, but it has way more than 2000 rows, and PowerApps will not perform the Lookup correctly. So my presumably smart idea is to create a MUCH SMALLER "version" of Spiderfood_RITMData as a local collection, using a more delegateable function (such as FILTER or IN). If I filter by all records containing the values of NUMBER, then I go from, say a 10,000-record SQL table to a 10-record Collection. And I can do LOOKUPS against that collection for the rest of the function (uh, I think -- I'm still trying to experiment accordingly). Please let me know if this is crazy or not.
LookUp is just used to get one record, instead try this:
ClearCollect(MLE_test1, Filter('Spiderfood_RITMData', "RITM2170467" = Number));
This gets a collection with all the items where Number is = to "RITM2170467"
Collections are limited to only 2000 records in each collections.
I had same issue. Go to App settings. Under Upcoming Features make sure Explicit column selection is turned off. Hope this does it for you.
I want to delete all the rows from a table that haven't been red or haven't been created within the last year.
There is no column that indicates the last access date of a row.
Is there a way to accomplish this anyway the using some internal logs or anything like this in MS Access?
There is no way to do this. Access doesn't keep this sort of log (or any DBMS I know of).
You would need a "date_created" or "date_accessed" column to achieve this.
BTW, in a continuous form or datasheet view, all rows are read (or the filtered ones).
I have a table with a bunch of different fields. One is named period.
The period is not part of the raw data but I run a query when I import new data to the database that gives each record a period.
Now I need a delete query that will delete all the records that have the same period as what is selected in a combobox.
The values in the combobox come from a calendar table that contain all the possible values that could be in that period column at any time.
This is the basic query i thought would solve this issue but it tells me it is going to delete 0 rows every time I run it:
DELETE *
FROM PlanTemp
WHERE PlanTemp.period = Forms![Plan Form]!Combo163;
If you don't need the key field, just remove it.
Look at the "PROPERTIES" section and look at the column names.
Ether remove it there, or from your QUERY source.
You can also look at the Data section of the properties, and change your BOUND column, to Column 2... or whatever holds the data you want to use.
I have problems with my records within my database, so I have a template with about 260,000 records and for each record they have 3 identification columns to determine what time period the record is from and location: one for year, one for month, and one for region. Then the information for identifying the specific item is TagName, and Description. The Problem I am having is when someone entered data into this database they entered different description for the same device, I know this because the tag name is the same. Can I write code that will go through the data base find the items with the same tag name and use one of the descriptions to replace the ones that are different to have a more uniform database. Also some devices do not have tag names so we would want to avoid the "" Case.
Also moving forward into the future I have added more columns to the database to allow for more information to be retrieved, is there a way that I can back fill the data to older records once I know that they have the same tag name and Description once the database is cleaned up? Thanks in advance for the information it is much appreciated.
I assume that this will have to be done with VBA of some sort to modify records by looking for the first record with that description and using a variable to assign that description to all the other items with the same tag name? I just am not sure of the correct VBA syntax to go about this. I assume a similar method would be used for the backfilling process?
Your question is rather broad and multifaceted, so I'll answer key parts in steps:
The Problem I am having is when someone entered data into this
database they entered different description for the same device, I
know this because the tag name is the same.
While you could fix up those inconsistencies easily enough with a bit of SQL code, it would be better to avoid those inconsistencies being possible in the first place:
Create a new table, let's call it 'Tags', with TagName and TagDescription fields, and with TagName set as the primary key. Ensure both fields have their Required setting to True and Allow Zero Length to False.
Populate this new table with all possible tags - you can do this with a one-off 'append query' in Access jargon (INSERT INTO statement in SQL).
Delete the tag description column from the main table.
Go into the Relationships view and add a one-to-many relation between the two tables, linking the TagName field in the main table to the TagName field in the Tags table.
As required, create a query that aggregates data from the two tables.
Also some devices do not have tag names so we would want to avoid the
"" Case.
In Access, the concept of an empty string ("") is different from the concept of a true blank or 'null'. As such, it would be a good idea to replace all empty strings (if there are any) with nulls -
UPDATE MyTable SET TagName = Null WHERE TagName = '';
You can then set the TagName field's Allow Zero Length property to False in the table designer.
Also moving forward into the future I have added more columns to the
database to allow for more information to be retrieved
Think less in terms of more columns than more tables.
I assume that this will have to be done with VBA of some sort to modify records
Either VBA, SQL, or the Access query designers (which create SQL code behind the scenes). In terms of being able to crunch through data the quickest, SQL is best, though pure VBA (and in particular, using the DAO object library) can be easier to understand and follow.