I have created a database of "trips" with the following
TripParent
Id
DrivingCompany
Client
TripDetails
Id
Destination
PlannedArrivalDate
StatusLog
Id
CatStatusId (Comes from another table just with the names)
DateTimeModified
Let me explain the tables, first of all I hid another fields to keep it simple, the "Parent" table has MANY TripDetails, so it is just a summary for the many "Details" it has. The TripDetails table its 1 row for 1 destination, let's say the Trip is going from A to C, then we have a Row for each "stop" (A, B, C).
And then we got the StatusLog table that has MANY Rows for each "TripDetails".
The problem is, I need a stored procedure that returns the DrivingCompany, Client, PlannedArrivalDate, RealArrivalDate and RealDepartureDate.
The "Real Dates" come from the StatusLog table. Status 1 means that the truck has arrived Destination (A/B/C) and the status 2 means that it has left said location.
So far I got the following
SELECT
TP.DrivingCompany, TP.Client, TD.PlannedArrivalDate,
'Real Arrival Date' = CASE SL.CatStatusId
WHEN 1 THEN SL.DateTimeModified
ELSE NULL
END,
'Real Departure Date' = CASE SL.CatStatusId
WHEN 2 THEN SL.DateTimeModified
ELSE NULL
END
FROM
TripParent TP
JOIN
TripDetails TD ON TD.TripParentId = TE.Id
JOIN
StatusLog SL ON SL.TripDetailsId = TD.Id
GROUP BY
TP.Id
ORDER BY
TD.Id
Is using the CASE the correct way to show the same column twice in the SELECT statement? I think I'm on the right track but I can't group by TP.Id and I also need to show ALL the rows, going by this query, It doesn't show the "TripDetails" that don't have a "StatusLog" row because they haven't arrived.
Any help is appreciated
Try this:
SELECT TP.Id,
TP.DrivingCompany,
TP.Client,
TD.PlannedArrivalDate,
'Real Arrival Date' = CASE SL.CatStatusId
WHEN 1 THEN SL.DateTimeModified
ELSE NULL
END,
'Real Departure Date' = CASE SL.CatStatusId
WHEN 2 THEN SL.DateTimeModified
ELSE NULL
END
FROM TripParent TP
JOIN TripDetails TD ON TD.TripParentId = TE.Id
LEFT JOIN StatusLog SL ON SL.TripDetailsId = TD.Id
GROUP BY TP.Id,
TP.DrivingCompany,
TP.Client,
TD.PlannedArrivalDate
ORDER BY TD.Id
They way you use CASE if perfectly fine, yes. Columns you want to group by must be contained in the SELECT. Using a LEFT JOIN for the log entries ensures that you get also rows without corresponding log.
When grouping, each column you display must be either contained in the GROUP BY clause or in an aggregate function in the SELECT. So you have to think about why you are grouping, do you want to create a sum, count, ... ? >> Change the two CASE columns accordingly.
Related
I need to filter down to only service orders that have a "service" work group value in at least one of their tasks. However, I don't want to get rid of the rows that aren't work group = "Service" if at least one of the task rows has that value. The end result would leave out all data from service orders that didn't have at least one BI_WRKFLW_TASK_KEY that was equal to "SERVICE". I know how to do normal filters but getting it to this specificity is beyond my current experience.
I've experimented with normal filters but they leave out rows that are a part of the same Service Order but just don't have that work group.
SELECT W.BI_WRKFLW_KEY,
T.BI_WORK_EVENT_CD,
T.BI_TASK_CD,
T.BI_WORKGRP,
**M.BI_SO_NBR**,
M.BI_SO_TYPE_CD,
M.BI_CLOSE_DT,
M.BI_OPEN_DT,
M.BI_SO_STAT_CD,
R.BI_WRKFLW_TMPLT_NM,
T.BI_WRKFLW_TASK_SEQ_NBR,
T.BI_WORKGRP,
A.BI_WORK_EVENT_CD,
A.BI_EVENT_DT_TM,
A.SY_JOB_QUEUE_ID,
**A.BI_WORKGRP**,
A.SY_USER_ID,
**A.BI_WRKFLW_TASK_KEY**
FROM BI_WRKFLW W
LEFT JOIN BI_WRKFLW_TASKS T ON W.BI_WRKFLW_KEY = T.BI_WRKFLW_KEY
LEFT JOIN BI_SO_DET D ON W.BI_WRKFLW_KEY = D.BI_WRKFLW_KEY
LEFT JOIN BI_SO_MASTER M ON D.BI_SO_NBR = M.BI_SO_NBR
LEFT JOIN BI_WRKFLW_TMPLT_REF R ON W.BI_WRKFLW_TMPLT_ID = R.BI_WRKFLW_TMPLT_ID
LEFT JOIN BI_TASK_ACT A ON T.BI_WRKFLW_TASKS_KEY = A.BI_WRKFLW_TASKS_KEY
WHERE M.BI_OPEN_DT >= ADD_MONTHS(CURRENT_DATE, -'12')
--AND M.BI_SO_TYPE_CD IN ('IVC-NEW1')
--AND M.BI_SO_STAT_CD LIKE 'O'
ORDER BY M.BI_SO_NBR, T.BI_EVENT_DT_TM
Any Service order row where the Service order has at least one BI_WRKFLOW_TASK_CD = "Service" would be kept and all other service orders filtered out.
I tried to map this out, i may not have got it quite right,
I think you are asking for BI_SO_MASTER records that have >=1 BI_WRKFLW_TASKS that belong to a certain group.
Try using a CTE to get the detail rows with a correct task, then you can find the SO population... then you can ???not sure what the ultimate result set goal is?
;with matchingTasks as ( D.BI_SO_NBR, D.<id> , W.BI_WRKFLW_KEY , T.<key> , A.Key
from BI_WRKFLW W
LEFT JOIN BI_WRKFLW_TASKS T ON W.BI_WRKFLW_KEY = T.BI_WRKFLW_KEY
LEFT JOIN BI_SO_DET D ON W.BI_WRKFLW_KEY = D.BI_WRKFLW_KEY
LEFT JOIN BI_TASK_ACT A ON T.BI_WRKFLW_TASKS_KEY = A.BI_WRKFLW_TASKS_KEYW
Where
<good dates>
and <A.field is what I am looking for>
)
/*Here you have the SO population
as well as the ids that helped this SO qualify.
*/
, My_SO_Population as (select Distinct BI_SO_NBR from matchingTasks )
/*now you can go get what you need.
the challenge of finding SOs w/ >=1 matching task has been solved...
*/
select <necessary fields> from
My_SO_Population
join <whatever you need....this is where i am cloudy>
if i am missing the goal, let me know where...
You can just add this to your WHERE clause:
AND T.BI_WRKFLW_KEY IN (
SELECT BI_WRKFLW_KEY
FROM BI_WRKFLW_TASKS
WHERE BI_WRKFLOW_TASK_CD = 'Service')
I'm presently making a report on ssrs from a Great Plains Dynamics DB.
It's a pretty simple report with a few columns. Everything works fine but in GP, when creating an Invoice or a Return bill, sometimes GP is gonna give the same Bill ID. It doesn't really shows as a duplicated because for GP, an Invoice and a Return can/could have the same ID because they are not the same type. Don't ask me why..
So for my report, when I start a research from a multiples values parameters with my SopNumber (Bill ID) it gives me the right information. But now I would like to have a flag on those information that equals the bill ID and has Invoice and Return at the same time.
Since it is normal for GP to have 2 different type of document for the same ID, I cannot ask my report to remove the return or the invoice cause in different case, an Invoice could be the important document and in an other case, the return.
In my tablix, I do not show the Bill ID, because I don't need the information except when there is this "duplication".
I would also like after the flag (line highlited), that on the top of my report, a sentence shows something like : "Those documents are in conflict : 000123123". So with this information showing my ID, I can now go in my multiple values parameter and remove this number.
I wanna achieve those 2 flags because I'm making a calcul from my documents amount and if those 2 would be there, it would make my calcul wrong.
I hope you guys can help me. If so, thank you very much in advance!
I worked on a couple of different expressions but never got the result I wanted. Use previous statement and equals but couldn't find how to make it look like is equals to Invoice and Return and SopNumber equals the same.
select CASE SOP10200.SOPTYPE
WHEN 1 THEN 'QUOTE'
WHEN 2 THEN 'ORDER'
WHEN 3 THEN 'INVOICE'
WHEN 4 THEN 'RETURN'
WHEN 5 THEN 'BACK ORDER'
WHEN 6 THEN 'FULLFILLMENT ORDER'
END AS SOPTYPE,
sop10200.SLPRSNID,
sop10200.XTNDPRCE as ExtendedPrice,
sop10200.SOPNUMBE,
iv00101.ITMCLSCD as FAMILYCLASS,
sop10100.DOCDATE
from sop10200
left join iv00101 on sop10200.ITEMNMBR = iv00101.ITEMNMBR
left join sop10100 on sop10200.SOPNUMBE = sop10100.SOPNUMBE
WHERE SOP10100.DOCDATE BETWEEN '2018-01-01 00:00:00.000' AND '2035-01-01 00:00:00.000'
union all
select CASE SOP30300.SOPTYPE
WHEN 1 THEN 'QUOTE'
WHEN 2 THEN 'ORDER'
WHEN 3 THEN 'INVOICE'
WHEN 4 THEN 'RETURN'
WHEN 5 THEN 'BACK ORDER'
WHEN 5 THEN 'FULLFILLMENT ORDER'
END AS SOPTYPE,
sop30300.SLPRSNID,
sop30300.XTNDPRCE as ExtendedPrice,
sop30300.SOPNUMBE,
iv00101.ITMCLSCD as FAMILYCLASS,
sop30200.DOCDATE
from sop30300
left join iv00101 on sop30300.ITEMNMBR = iv00101.ITEMNMBR
left join sop30200 on sop30300.SOPNUMBE = sop30200.SOPNUMBE
WHERE SOP30200.DOCDATE BETWEEN '2018-01-01 00:00:00.000' AND '2035-01-01 00:00:00.000'
ORDER BY SOPNUMBE desc
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you want a way to see if there is a duplicate record for the report and use that in a calculation?
You could do a subquery to retrieve a count, and if that is more than 1 than you have a duplicate record
EDIT:
SELECT *, (IF
(SELECT Count(S1.SOPTYPE) FROM sop10200 S1 WHERE T1.BillID = S1.BillID ) > 1 THEN "Duplicate " ELSE "" END) AS DuplicateCheck
FROM sop10200 T1
The above solution will give you a value you can use on each page to report whether or not that it has a duplicate BillID.
Hi I have a redshift table of articles that has a field on it that can contain many accounts. So there is a one to many relationship between articles to accounts.
However I want to create a new view where it lists the partner id's in one column and in another column a count of how many times the partner id appears in the articles table.
I've attempted to do this using regex and created a new redshift view, but am getting weird results where it doesn't always build properly. So one day it will say a partner appears 15 times, then the next 17, then the next 15, when the partner id count hasn't actually changed.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
SELECT partner_id,
COUNT(DISTINCT id)
FROM (SELECT id,
partner_ids,
SPLIT_PART(partner_ids,',',i) partner_id
FROM positron_articles a
LEFT JOIN util.seq_0_to_500 s
ON s.i < regexp_count (partner_ids,',') + 2
OR s.i = 1
WHERE i > 0
AND regexp_count (partner_ids,',') = 0
ORDER BY id)
GROUP BY 1;
Let's start with some of the more obvious things and see if we can start to glean other information.
Next GROUP BY 1 on your outer query needs to be GROUP BY partner_id.
Next you don't need an order by in your INNER query and the database engine will probably do a better job optimizing performance without it so remove ORDER BY id.
If you want your final results to be ordered then add an ORDER BY partner_id or similar clause after your group by of your OUTER query.
It looks like there are also problems with how you are splitting a partnerid from partnerids but I am not positive about that because I need to understand your view and the data it provides to know how that affects your record count for partnerid.
Next your LEFT JOIN statement on the util.seq_0_to_500 I am pretty sure you can drop off the s.i = 1 as the first condition will satisfy that as well because 2 is greater than 1. However your left join really acts more like an inner join because you then exclude any non matches from positron_articles that don't have a s.i > 0.
Oddly then your entire join and inner query gets kind of discarded because you only want articles that have no commas in their partnerids: regexp_count (partner_ids,',') = 0
I would suggest posting the code for your util.seq_0_to_500 and if you have a partner table let use know about that as well because you can probably get your answer a lot easier with that additional table depending on how regexp_count works. I suspect regex_count(partnerids,partnerid) exampleregex_count('12345,678',1234) will return greater than 0 at which point you have no choice but to split the delimited strings into another table before counting or building a new matching function.
If regex_count only matches exact between commas and you have a partner table your query could be as easy as this:
SELECT
p.partner_id
,COUNT(a.id) AS ArticlesAppearedIn
FROM
positron_articles a
LEFT JOIN PARTNERTABLE p
ON regexp_count(a.partnerids,p.partnerid) > 0
GROUP BY
p.partner_id
I will actually correct myself as I just thought of a way to join a partner table without regexp_count. So if you have a partner table this might work for you. If not you will need to split strings. It basically tests to see if the partnerid is the entire partnerids, at the beginning, in the middle, or at the end of partnerids. If one of those is met then the records is returned.
SELECT
p.partner_id
,COUNT(a.id) AS ArticlesAppearedIn
FROM
PARTNERTABLE p
INNER JOIN positron_articles a
ON
(
CASE
WHEN a.partnerids = CAST(p.partnerid AS VARCHAR(100)) THEN 1
WHEN a.partnerids LIKE p.partnerid + ',%' THEN 1
WHEN a.partnerids LIKE '%,' + p.partnerid + ',%' THEN 1
WHEN a.partnerids LIKE '%,' + p.partnerid THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
) = 1
GROUP BY
p.partner_id
My query below is doubling the amount on the last record it returns. I have 3 tables - activities, bookings and tempbookings. The query needs to list the activities and attached information and pull the total number (using the SUM) of places booked (as BookingTotal) from the booking table by each activity and then it needs to calculate the same for tempbookings (as tempPlacesReserved) providing the reservedate field inside that table is in the future.
However the first issue is that if there are no records for an activity in the tempbookings table it does not return any records for that activity at all, to get around this i created dummy records in the past so that it still returns the record, but if I can make it so I don't have to do this I would prefer it!
The main issue I have is that on the final record of the returned results it doubles the booking total and the places reserved which of course makes the whole query useless.
I know that I am doing something wrong I just haven't been able to sort it, I have searched similar issues online but am unable to apply them to my situation correctly.
Any help would be appreciated.
P.S. I'm aware that normally you wouldn't need to fully label all the paths to the databases, tables and fields as I have but for the program I am planning to use it in I have to do it this way.
Code:
SELECT [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityID],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityName],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityDate],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityPlaces],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityPrice],
SUM([LeisureActivities].[dbo].[bookings].[bookingPlaces]) AS 'bookingTotal',
SUM (CASE WHEN[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[tempbookings].[tempReserveDate] > GetDate() THEN [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[tempbookings].[tempPlaces] ELSE 0 end) AS 'tempPlacesReserved'
FROM [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[bookings],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[tempbookings]
WHERE ([LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityID]=[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[bookings].[activityID]
AND [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityID]=[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[tempbookings].[tempActivityID])
AND [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityDate] > GetDate ()
GROUP BY [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityID],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityName],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityDate],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityPlaces],
[LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities].[activityPrice];
Your current query is using an INNER JOIN between each of the tables so if the tempBookings table has no records, you will not return anything.
I would advise that you start to use JOIN syntax. You might also need to use subqueries to get the totals.
SELECT a.[activityID],
a.[activityName],
a.[activityDate],
a.[activityPlaces],
a.[activityPrice],
coalesce(b.bookingTotal, 0) bookingTotal,
coalesce(t.tempPlacesReserved, 0) tempPlacesReserved
FROM [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[activities] a
LEFT JOIN
(
select activityID,
SUM([bookingPlaces]) AS bookingTotal
from [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[bookings]
group by activityID
) b
ON a.[activityID]=b.[activityID]
LEFT JOIN
(
select tempActivityID,
SUM(CASE WHEN [tempReserveDate] > GetDate() THEN [tempPlaces] ELSE 0 end) AS tempPlacesReserved
from [LeisureActivities].[dbo].[tempbookings]
group by tempActivityID
) t
ON a.[activityID]=t.[tempActivityID]
WHERE a.[activityDate] > GetDate();
Note: I am using aliases because it is easier to read
Use new SQL-92 Join syntax, and make join to tempBookings an outer join. Also clean up your sql with table aliases. Makes it easier to read. As to why last row has doubled values, I don't know, but on off chance that it is caused by extra dummy records you entered. get rid of them. That problem is fixed by using outer join to tempBookings. The other possibility is that the join conditions you had to the tempBookings table(t.tempActivityID = a.activityID) is insufficient to guarantee that it will match to only one record in activities table... If, for example, it matches to two records in activities, then the rows from Tempbookings would be repeated twice in the output, (causing the sum to be doubled)
SELECT a.activityID, a.activityName, a.activityDate,
a.activityPlaces, a.activityPrice,
SUM(b.bookingPlaces) bookingTotal,
SUM (CASE WHEN t.tempReserveDate > GetDate()
THEN t.tempPlaces ELSE 0 end) tempPlacesReserved
FROM LeisureActivities.dbo.activities a
Join LeisureActivities.dbo.bookings b
On b.activityID = a.activityID
Left Join LeisureActivities.dbo.tempbookings t
On t.tempActivityID = a.activityID
WHERE a.activityDate > GetDate ()
GROUP BY a.activityID, a.activityName,
a.activityDate, a.activityPlaces,
a.activityPrice;
Need help on a query using sql server 2005
I am having two tables
code
chargecode
chargeid
orgid
entry
chargeid
itemNo
rate
I need to list all the chargeids in entry table if it contains multiple entries having different chargeids
which got listed in code table having the same charge code.
data :
code
100,1,100
100,2,100
100,3,100
101,11,100
101,12,100
entry
1,x1,1
1,x2,2
2,x3,2
11,x4,1
11,x5,1
using the above data , it query should list chargeids 1 and 2 and not 11.
I got the way to know how many rows in entry satisfies the criteria, but m failing to get the chargeids
select count (distinct chargeId)
from entry where chargeid in (select chargeid from code where chargecode = (SELECT A.chargecode
from code as A join code as B
ON A.chargecode = B.chargeCode and A.chargetype = B.chargetype and A.orgId = B.orgId AND A.CHARGEID = b.CHARGEid
group by A.chargecode,A.orgid
having count(A.chargecode) > 1)
)
First off: I apologise for my completely inaccurate original answer.
The solution to your problem is a self-join. Self-joins are used when you want to select more than one row from the same table. In our case we want to select two charge IDs that have the same charge code:
SELECT DISTINCT c1.chargeid, c2.chargeid FROM code c1
JOIN code c2 ON c1.chargeid != c2.chargeid AND c1.chargecode = c2.chargecode
JOIN entry e1 ON e1.chargeid = c1.chargeid
JOIN entry e2 ON e2.chargeid = c2.chargeid
WHERE c1.chargeid < c2.chargeid
Explanation of this:
First we pick any two charge IDs from 'code'. The DISTINCT avoids duplicates. We make sure they're two different IDs and that they map to the same chargecode.
Then we join on 'entry' (twice) to make sure they both appear in the entry table.
This approach gives (for your example) the pairs (1,2) and (2,1). So we also insist on an ordering; this cuts to result set down to just (1,2), as you described.