I have an Express API server running on localhost on my own machine. How do I make it accessible from the Internet and not just my own machine?
Preferably, it would be deployed on AWS.
In AWS there are multiple ways of hosting your express application based on flexibility vs convenience.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk:
This will provide you more convenience by creating an autoscaling and loadbalancing environment with version management and roll back support from one place in AWS web console. Also provide you IDE support for deployments and CLI commands for CI/CD support.
AWS ECS:
If you plans to dockerize your application(Which I highly recommend) you can use AWS ECS to manage your docker cluster with container level Autoscaling and loadbalancing support for more convenience. This also provides CLI for CI/CD.
AWS EC2:
If you need more flexibility, you can get a virtual server in AWS and also manually configure autoscaling and loadbalancing which I prefer as the least option simply for a web app since you have to do most of the things manually.
All this services will provide you with publicly accessible URL if you configure them properly to grant access from outside. You need to configure networking and security groups properly either exposing the loadbalancer or instance IP/DNS URL to the outside.
Related
I'm writing an aspnet core app which can be deployed to either azure or aws. The Microsoft libraries for accessing azure logging / configuration sources are well-behaved and fail silently if they're not in an appropriate environment. However the AWS SDK blows up with and exception Unable to get IAM security credentials from EC2 Instance Metadata Service. if the providers are configured outside of AWS. Are there some environment variables I can look at to determine if my application is running in AWS so I can skip those?
All EC2 instances (and therefore all AWS hosting methods) have access to an instance meta-data http service running on a local-link address at http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/. The best process I can come up with is to make a call to this service. If the call fails -- the process is not hosted on an EC2 instance.
I'm trying to deploy a node.js application into aws using Elastic BeansTalk. However, while creating a web server environment, it fails because my account does not havve the permission to use auto scaling due to cost. Is there a way to disable autoscaling completely with elastic beanstalk?
Yes, just create a single instance environment.
As per the AWS docs, single instance environments do not have load balancers or auto-scaling. You can read more about Elastic Beanstalk environment types here:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/latest/dg/using-features-managing-env-types.html?ref_=pe_395030_31184250_9
My client is currently evulating AKS which seems to be really promising. Our current platform is based on Azure VM's we provision ourselves. We would like to create private communication between both our existing platform and the managed AKS cluster but so far that does not seem to be supported yet.
Some example use cases for us are:
- Proxying incoming HTTP traffic via our main entrypoint, a Varnish server, to the new AKS environment so we don't have to change url's
- Accessing non publically exposed API's from the AKS environment
Right now the AKS cluster is it's a different subscription and resource group than other parts of our platform. The main reason we we can't connect though seems to be that it's not possible to specify which private IP range should be used when creating an AKS cluster.
Is there support planned for this or is there a reliable workaround?
Thanks for the inquiry, there's a workaround for the stated case, it's through the use of ACS Engine, "ACS Engine, for Azure Container Service Engine, is a CLI tool that helps to generate Azure Resource Manager templates to deploy Docker enabled clusters on Microsoft Azure. It works with all the orchestrators supported by ACS: Docker Swarm, Mesosphere DC/OS and Kubernetes"
So using this solution will allow you to integrate Azure Container Service Cluster into an existing Virtual Network.More details and step by step guide can be found here: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jcorioland/2017/01/10/how-to-integrate-a-new-azure-container-service-cluster-into-an-existing-virtual-network-using-acs-engine/
I'm having question about spinnaker-Halyard installation, Can spinnaker manage AWS cloud provider without being installed on EC2 instance?. meaning that can I install spinnaker locally and add aws account and manage pipelines
Can spinnaker manage AWS cloud provider without being installed on EC2 instance?
Spinnaker can be installed on any Ubuntu server - for example, you could run a Spinnaker instance from Google's Click to Deploy image and have it manage your EC2 account.
Spinnaker is comprised of a bunch of microservices, so running it on a local workstation may be cumbersome. I suggest dedicating a specific machine to it. Alternatively, if you're set on running it locally, you could install Halyard locally and point it to a Minikube installation on your machine.
You can setup the these many providers under your spinnaker setup
https://www.spinnaker.io/setup/install/providers/
App Engine
Amazon Web Services
Azure
Cloud Foundry
DC/OS Google
Compute Engine
Kubernetes (legacy)
Kubernetes V2 (manifest based)
Openstack Oracle
You just need to integrate your service accounts into spinnaker to authorize resource creation.
Yes It will work just you need to create service account and Need to pass kubeconfig file to spinnaker, then spinnaker handle Deployment part automatically, you need to configure spinnaker for that.
Some useful link
https://www.spinnaker.io/setup/security/authorization/service-accounts/
https://www.spinnaker.io/setup/
Currently I have an app (myapp) that deploys as a Java web app running on top of a "raw" (Ubuntu) VM. In production there are essentially 5 - 10 VMs running at any given time, all load balanced behind an nginx load balancer. Each VM is managed by Chef, which injects the correct env vars and provides the app with runtime arguments that make sense for production. So again: load balancing via nginx and configuration via Chef.
I am now interested in containerizing my future workloads, and porting this app over to Docker/Kubernetes. I'm trying to see what features Kubernetes offers that could replace my app's dependency on nginx and Chef.
So my concerns:
Does Kube-Proxy (or any other Kubernetes tools) provide subdomains or otherwise-loadbalanced URLs that could load balance to any number of pod replicas. In other words, if I "push" my newly-containerized app/image to Kubernetes API, is there a way for Kubernetes to make image available as, say, 10 pod replicas all load balanced behind myapp.example.com? If not what integration between Kubernetes and networking software (DNS/DHCP) is available?
Does Kubernetes (say, perhas via etc?) offer any sort of key-value basec configuration? It would be nice to send a command to Kubernetes API and give it labels like myapp:nonprod or myapp:prod and have Kubernetes "inject" the correct KV pairs into the running containers. For instance perhaps in the "nonprod" environment, the app connects to a MySQL database named mydb-nonprod.example.com, but in prod it connects to an RDS cluster. Or something.
Does Kubernetes offer service registry like features that could replace Consul/ZooKeeper?
Answers:
1) DNS subdomains in Kubernetes:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/cluster/addons/dns
Additionally, each Service loadbalancer gets a static IP address, so you can also program other DNS names if you want to target that IP address.
2) Key/Value pairs
At creation time you can inject arbitrary key/value environment variables and then use those in your scripts/config. e.g. you could connect to ${DB_HOST}
Though for your concrete example, we suggest using Namespaces (http://kubernetes.io/v1.0/docs/admin/namespaces/README.html) you can have a "prod" namespace and a "dev" namespace, and the DNS names of services resolve within those namespaces (e.g. mysql.prod.cluster.internal and mysql.dev.cluster.internal)
3) Yes, this is what the DNS and Service object provide (http://kubernetes.io/v1.0/docs/user-guide/walkthrough/k8s201.html#services)