Not the most pressing problem facing humanity at the moment, but a frequent if minor annoyance:
When using Google BigQuery, you can only seem to use the default Google Account that your browser is logged into. Currently when I need to use BQ from a browser, I have to start an incognito window and log in using my secondary Google Account. This is unlike any other Google service (cloud or not); generally I can switch accounts in the top right.
Is there a way around this?
This is not implemented yet in Web UI!
See respective issue tracker - Multilogin Support
Quotes from link:
We don't yet have a version of the BQ UI in Pantheon that is far enough along to be a solution to this problem. We hope to have a version ready to try out this summer, but it may not be feature-complete even then.
In the meantime I'd recommend using Chrome profiles (or equivalent in your browser of choice) to switch users rather than using multilogin. Or, if you still want to use multilogin and you have only one account that you use BQ with, make it your primary multilogin account (i.e., sign out of everything else and sign in to that account first).
Pretty late, but the problem still persists.
Firefox(quantum) users(afaik from v57) can open color coded container tabs. This way you can have multiple (default) google sessions per tabs/tab groups. That solves not only BQ, but also google product problems
colored container tab groups
Related
I recently asked this question and user's #DalmTo and #Sergio NH they gave me an exhaustive answer for which I thank them very much.
Moving forward to question, we started publishing the application, and its verification was not required, since no scope was added (here it is a little unclear why the requests worked in an application with a test mode in which these scope were not added (google drive, google sheet and google ads)).
However, this time the application in the "In Production" mode began to give us an "Unverified app screen" (see Unverified app screen). We decided that we still need to add scope to the list, and, of course, that the scope list (their list is described above) requires verification by Google.
We started filling in the necessary fields, while studying the Google documentation at the same time, and came across the following information (see block Verification process -> What are the requirements for verification?):
Apps not applicable for verification
Apps for internal use only
(single domain use) Apps for personal use only Apps that are Gmail
SMTP plugins for WordPress Apps that are in development or
staging/testing
Apps for personal use only
And this is just our case: we have already received permission from Google Ads and are just generating simple reports that we want to integrate with Google Sheet. I.e., this is an elementary script that works within this account (however, we still need to request the first concert screen, even for this developer account) and cannot be distributed to any other accounts.
But when adding our scope, Google requires us to pass verification, forcing us to fill in the required fields, in the form of domains and their verification via the Search Console (we have already done this and this stage does not cause difficulties) and links to Youtube videos - where we must show how scope is used.
And just this stage is not clear. We do not allow other people's accounts to connect to this application, and the software does not have any interface, it is just a script that receives data from Google Ads and saves it to Google Sheet (creating a file via Google Drive). We have described all this in the scope usage description field. But the link to the Youtube video is require field, and we sincerely do not understand why (considering our case) we should record something, and most importantly, what exactly we should record in this case. If the documentation itself says that in our case we do not even need a verification.
Maybe we did not understand something and now we are doing it wrong? We will be glad to receive any tips from experts working with Google Cloud Console and apologize in advance for broken English.
We also apologize in advance to the StackOverflow community that we have to publish such elementary (which we are absolutely sure of from our side) questions here. We come here from Google Cloud Console - > Support - > Community support, and we must first try to publish posts in the Google Groups specified there, but they simply do not answer us, apparently considering our questions too elementary and not worthy of attention (however, these same questions in Google Groups are moderated) (for example, the previous question). And we are no longer able to contact any other support. Once again, we apologize for having to ask about this here.
It is true that if your app is a single use app then you do not need to be verified.
However if you don't get your app verified then there will be some restrictions.
you will see the unverified app screen
your refresh tokens will probably only be good for two weeks.
In the case of the YouTube api uploaded videos will be suck private.
If you can live with those points then you don't need to verify your app and you can continue as is.
If on the other hand you don't want to see the unverified app screen and you want a refresh token that will last longer then two weeks. You will need to verify your app. Yes, Even if your app is a console application running as a job some where you still show the consent screen. This is the YouTube video you will need to show Google. Show the consent screen popping up show the URL bar and then show your script running. You also need to set up the homepage and privacy policy screens. Yes i 100% agree with you that this is silly.
When you go though the process. Explain to google that this is a single use script running as a job some where.
Unfortunately when Google changed it so that Refresh tokens expire for unverified apps they pretty much tied the hands of all developers who are running such single user scripts. We now have to get our apps verified if we don't want to have to request a new refresh token every two weeks.
If your program needs to access the requested scopes of the Google account privacy, even though the user is yourself, you also need to provide a youtube video to demonstrate how you use this program. The auditor cannot guarantee whether you will make this program public.
I am currently running a website where I promote different coffees from pubs in my city. On my website I have links to the different coffees.
I have recently seen some of this links being shared on Facebook and other social networks.
So I was wondering if it is somehow possible to track how often one of this links are being clicked?
I have tried using redirects to my site but Facebook uses my pictures in the previews, whereas I don't want this because it is misleading.
I have seen that this works with Bitly so it must somehow be possible?
And there are of course different services providing this, but it would be nice if it would run without any foreign services.
So basically I am looking for a solution which will let me know how often a link, origination from my site was clicked in Facebook, Google+ or any other forum.
There definitely is. Try looking into Google Analytics, it will show you show much data from your personal websites and links that it can blow your mind! Here is the link
Google Analytics helps you analyze visitor traffic and paint a
complete picture of your audience and their needs. Track the routes
people take to reach you and the devices they use to get there with
reporting tools like Traffic Sources. Learn what people are looking
for and what they like with In-Page Analytics. Then tailor your
marketing and site content for maximum impact.
You can even get a free package to use!
Hope this helps!
Yes you have plenty of analytical options.
Something as straight forward as Google Analytics for example.
If you are using cpanel on your hosts server, you even have options such as AWSTATS, which will also provide information.
If all else fails you can even use post data stored in your apache / nginx logs.
Since you have amended your question you might want to check out this tool. It is not google. :)
It is called Click Meter and performs Link Tracking and provides click reports, etc
I had a really frustrating issue recently with Tweetdeck, a tool to manage multiple twitter accounts. Since we get feedback and support questions on Twitter accounts with our projects, it is MUCH easier to see all the information in one place. That said, I had a recent issue and couldn't find ANY help online. I was able to find and test a workaround though, and have decided since it helped me I should post it here.
First, let me explain the exact issue, so you can see if my solution might work for you (YES, I already have the answer and posted it below)
I know my Tweetdeck was working previously (as I had multiple accounts). Since some of the projects were going away, and new ones were starting, I removed the existing ones and started trying to add the new ones.
The twitter page would come up asking to authenticate, then after typing in the information, I would get a generic "You have been logged into Tweetdeck, please return to the application" in the new window, but when closing it, I would not be logged in on Tweetdeck with the other account (only the original one)
I tried NUMEROUS steps to fix this including some of the following (NONE of these steps worked):
Tried different computers (with different Operating Systems). These included Windows 7 and Linux (Ubuntu 10.04) and more than one browser (Google Chrome, Firefox, etc). I also tried clearing cache, cookies, history, etc.
NOTE: I also tried to contact both Tweetdeck and Twitter support, neither of which have ever responded to any question I have ever had in years.
So the initial question was... "How do I get Tweetdeck to authenticate with other accounts successfully" with the error "You have been logged into Tweetdeck, please return to the application", but the new accounts do not actually authenticate and I cannot use them in Tweetdeck.
After extensive attempts to find a way to make my Tweetdeck work once again, I found a workaround that has worked great for me. I am not sure exactly why this works, but I have a feeling it has to do with the difference between the authentication method of just Tweetdeck online vs. the Google Chrome App.
On a whim, I decided to install the actual Google Chrome App plugin (as I was running out of options). Then, when using the app, it succeeded with no problems.
While I have posted an answer that works for me here, I would appreciate any comments that might give more real information (not guesses) on why this happened. If there is something else I can try so that I am not limited to the Google Chrome App if I want to add new accounts, I would also be happy to try those possible solutions. Please make sure to read my question which covers what I have already done.
NOTE: Since I have a working workaround, if your solution will take substantial effort, I will probably not try it .
Like most people, we're pretty impressed with BigQuery. We're willing to put up with it being based on proprietary "Dremel" in exchange for not having to configure a ton of servers in our LAN, on EC2, or anywhere else.
The REST API is excellent, and we're incorporating that into our apps, but we still find ourselves using the BQ Browser interface as well. We'd like to incorporate something like a 'generic SQL window' into our app, without divulging that the backend is BQ or that data is stored in Google at all, for that matter. Does Google provide a way to use their BQ browser tool in a white-label manner?
Note also, that even extending access to the existing browser tool is problematic. It relies on user-accounts existing in one's own domain - something that can't be done, in our case, with a customer's email address. The REST interface solves this with service-level accounts, but that doesn't get you to the SQL window/browser tool.
If the folks at Google are listening (and I know that you are), consider the benefits of white-labeling the browser tool: I think you'd find a lot of software companies integrating it into their suites of products and, then, running circles around any Hadoop/CDH/EMR/Impala/Hive combination.
So, to summarize: How does a software developer import or emulate the BQ browser tool (with all it's autocompletes, query histories, etc..) in their own web-based app?
The initial version of the BigQuery web interface was considered just an 'example' UI that anyone could create themselves. It uses only the public BigQuery API to talk to BigQuery.
There are a couple of Google-internal things we've added since then, such as the current design of 'saved queries', and an auth shortcut so that users don't have to explicitly grant permission to the UI to access BigQuery data. But it is still mostly plain-ol-javascript talking to BigQuery via the REST API the same way anybody else does.
The javascript is obfuscated, however, but my understanding is that this is just for compression purposes so that it downloads more quickly.
The SQL highlighting is done by CodeMirror with special configuration for the BigQuery SQL variant.
I'll talk to the other members of the BigQuery team about open-sourcing the javascript code in the Web UI. It may be difficult to do at this point, but it doesn't hurt to have a conversation about it. I'll bring this up with the team and update this thread. The most likely answer will be "We'll think about it", but hopefully we can also think about it and start working on it too :-)
Let me know if that sounds like it would meet your needs. It might not solve the auth problems you mention, since your users likely won't have BigQuery accounts, but you may be able to solve that by proxying oauth2 access tokens.
Is it possible to use Google Analytics API's to track Mac OSX applications?
If not could any one suggest me an alternative for Google Analytics.
Google Analytics is designed to work with web applications not for desktop apps. Although it might be possible to collect info about your application and send it to your Google Analytic account but the amount of work required to retrofit might be better spent, building your own Analytic solution.
A good starting point would be to create a simple web service, which collects information regarding clicks. Then rewrite your application to call that web service on every click within your application.
You would ideally want to store this information locally and submit it to the web service in batches. You would also want to design the application, so that if you ever shut down the web service, the application would still be able to operate.
UPDATE: As pointed out in the comments by Václav Slavík, they have added apps analytics for iOS/Android.
I made a simple set of classes for doing this:
https://github.com/stephenlind/SimpleCocoaGoogleAnalytics
Google Analytics is not only for web applications, but also for mobile. It's available on the platform like android, iOS, etc. If you want to track your MAC OS X application, you can choose DeskAppTrack or DeskMetrics. DeskAppTrack is only available on MAC. It provide a professional data statistical analysis and it's free. While DeskMetrics is available on MAC and Windows. Either one is ok.
This really depends on how detailed you want to get. If you are are truly looking for analytics with detail and control flow data, you are better suited to created your own web service, as mentioned.
However, if you simply want to know a small number of operations, that occur at a small volume, i.e. when the app is launched (a quick and dirty solution): then in theory you could create a landing page on your site that contains a minimal head section, and a blank body, and then load the URL with an NSURL when you want to trigger the action.
Of course, you would have to include the google analytics tracking codes in the header, and you may need to load an off-screen webview to get the javascript to run. Like I said, quick and dirty.
In either case, you want to make sure the application will continue to perform properly, even if the web service / page is not present.