VBA: Testing for perfect cubes - vba

I'm trying to write a simple function in VBA that will test a real value and output a string result if it's a perfect cube. Here's my code:
Function PerfectCubeTest(x as Double)
If (x) ^ (1 / 3) = Int(x) Then
PerfectCubeTest = "Perfect"
Else
PerfectCubeTest = "Flawed"
End If
End Function
As you can see, I'm using a simple if statement to test if the cube root of a value is equal to its integer portion (i.e. no remainder). I tried testing the function with some perfect cubes (1, 8, 27, 64, 125), but it only works for the number 1. Any other value spits out the "Flawed" case. Any idea what's wrong here?

You are testing whether the cube is equal to the double supplied.
So for 8 you would be testing whether 2 = 8.
EDIT: Also found a floating point issue. To resolve we will round the decimals a little to try and overcome the issue.
Change to the following:
Function PerfectCubeTest(x As Double)
If Round((x) ^ (1 / 3), 10) = Round((x) ^ (1 / 3), 0) Then
PerfectCubeTest = "Perfect"
Else
PerfectCubeTest = "Flawed"
End If
End Function
Or (Thanks to Ron)
Function PerfectCubeTest(x As Double)
If CDec(x ^ (1 / 3)) = Int(CDec(x ^ (1 / 3))) Then
PerfectCubeTest = "Perfect"
Else
PerfectCubeTest = "Flawed"
End If
End Function

#ScottCraner correctly explains why you were getting incorrect results, but there are a couple other things to point out here. First, I'm assuming that you are taking a Double as input because the range of acceptable numbers is higher. However, by your implied definition of a perfect cube only numbers with an integer cube root (i.e. it would exclude 3.375) need to be evaluated. I'd just test for this up front to allow an early exit.
The next issue you run into is that 1 / 3 can't be represented exactly by a Double. Since you're raising to the inverse power to get your cube root you're also compounding the floating point error. There's a really easy way to avoid this - take the cube root, cube it, and see if it matches the input. You get around the rest of the floating point errors by going back to your definition of a perfect cube as an integer value - just round the cube root to both the next higher and next lower integer before you re-cube it:
Public Function IsPerfectCube(test As Double) As Boolean
'By your definition, no non-integer can be a perfect cube.
Dim rounded As Double
rounded = Fix(test)
If rounded <> test Then Exit Function
Dim cubeRoot As Double
cubeRoot = rounded ^ (1 / 3)
'Round both ways, then test the cube for equity.
If Fix(cubeRoot) ^ 3 = rounded Then
IsPerfectCube = True
ElseIf (Fix(cubeRoot) + 1) ^ 3 = rounded Then
IsPerfectCube = True
End If
End Function
This returned the correct result up to 1E+27 (1 billion cubed) when I tested it. I stopped going higher at that point because the test was taking so long to run and by that point you're probably outside of the range that you would reasonably need it to be accurate.

For fun, here is an implementation of a number-theory based method described here . It defines a Boolean-valued (rather than string-valued) function called PerfectCube() that tests if an integer input (represented as a Long) is a perfect cube. It first runs a quick test which throws away many numbers. If the quick test fails to classify it, it invokes a factoring-based method. Factor the number and check if the multiplicity of each prime factor is a multiple of 3. I could probably optimize this stage by not bothering to find the complete factorization when a bad factor is found, but I had a VBA factoring algorithm already lying around:
Function DigitalRoot(n As Long) As Long
'assumes that n >= 0
Dim sum As Long, digits As String, i As Long
If n < 10 Then
DigitalRoot = n
Exit Function
Else
digits = Trim(Str(n))
For i = 1 To Len(digits)
sum = sum + Mid(digits, i, 1)
Next i
DigitalRoot = DigitalRoot(sum)
End If
End Function
Sub HelperFactor(ByVal n As Long, ByVal p As Long, factors As Collection)
'Takes a passed collection and adds to it an array of the form
'(q,k) where q >= p is the smallest prime divisor of n
'p is assumed to be odd
'The function is called in such a way that
'the first divisor found is automatically prime
Dim q As Long, k As Long
q = p
Do While q <= Sqr(n)
If n Mod q = 0 Then
k = 1
Do While n Mod q ^ k = 0
k = k + 1
Loop
k = k - 1 'went 1 step too far
factors.Add Array(q, k)
n = n / q ^ k
If n > 1 Then HelperFactor n, q + 2, factors
Exit Sub
End If
q = q + 2
Loop
'if we get here then n is prime - add it as a factor
factors.Add Array(n, 1)
End Sub
Function factor(ByVal n As Long) As Collection
Dim factors As New Collection
Dim k As Long
Do While n Mod 2 ^ k = 0
k = k + 1
Loop
k = k - 1
If k > 0 Then
n = n / 2 ^ k
factors.Add Array(2, k)
End If
If n > 1 Then HelperFactor n, 3, factors
Set factor = factors
End Function
Function PerfectCubeByFactors(n As Long) As Boolean
Dim factors As Collection
Dim f As Variant
Set factors = factor(n)
For Each f In factors
If f(1) Mod 3 > 0 Then
PerfectCubeByFactors = False
Exit Function
End If
Next f
'if we get here:
PerfectCubeByFactors = True
End Function
Function PerfectCube(n As Long) As Boolean
Dim d As Long
d = DigitalRoot(n)
If d = 0 Or d = 1 Or d = 8 Or d = 9 Then
PerfectCube = PerfectCubeByFactors(n)
Else
PerfectCube = False
End If
End Function

Fixed the integer division error thanks to #Comintern. Seems to be correct up to 208064 ^ 3 - 2
Function isPerfectCube(n As Double) As Boolean
n = Abs(n)
isPerfectCube = n = Int(n ^ (1 / 3) - (n > 27)) ^ 3
End Function

Related

Generate "n" random numbers between a and b to reach desired average in m rows

Suppose in column Z with 200 rows, are my optimal averages.
Now I want a macro that generates n random integers between a and b inclusive (n <= 20) so that difference between the average of numbers generated with optimal average is in (-0.15,+0.15).
Example:
Z1:optimal average1=5.5
Z2:optimal average2=5.3
Z200:optimal average200=6.3
n=8
a=1; b=10
numbers of generated:
A1:H1)5-9-4-3-7-4-9-3
A2:H2)10-7-3-2-5-4-3-9
.
.
.
A200:H200)4-8-9-6-6-6-10-2
Here is a hit-or-miss approach (which is often the only viable way to get random numbers which satisfy additional constraints in an unbiased way):
Function RandIntVect(n As Long, a As Long, b As Long, mean As Double, tol As Double, Optional maxTries As Long = 1000) As Variant
'Uses a hit-or-miss approach to generate a vector of n random ints in a,b inclusive whose mean is
'within the tolerance tol of the given target mean
'The function raises an error if maxTries misses occur without a hit
Dim sum As Long, i As Long, j As Long
Dim lowTarget As Double, highTarget As Double 'targets for *sums*
Dim vect As Variant
lowTarget = n * (mean - tol)
highTarget = n * (mean + tol)
For i = 1 To maxTries
ReDim vect(1 To n)
sum = 0
j = 0
Do While j < n And sum + a * (n - j) <= highTarget And sum + b * (n - j) >= lowTarget
j = j + 1
vect(j) = Application.WorksheetFunction.RandBetween(a, b)
sum = sum + vect(j)
Loop
If j = n And lowTarget <= sum And sum <= highTarget Then
'Debug.Print i 'uncomment this line to see how many tries required
RandIntVect = vect
Exit Function
End If
Next i
'error if we get to here
RandIntVect = CVErr(xlErrValue)
End Function
This could be used as a worksheet array formula. The target means were in column I and in A2:H2 I entered =RandIntVect(8,1,10,I2,0.15) (with ctrl+shift+enter as an array formula) and then copied down:
Note that array formulas are volatile, so these numbers would be recalculated every time the worksheet is. You could use the function in VBA to place the numbers directly in the ranges rather than using the function as a worksheet formula. Something like:
Sub test()
Dim i As Long
For i = 1 To 3
Range(Cells(i + 1, 1), Cells(i + 1, 8)).Value = RandIntVect(8, 1, 10, Cells(i + 1, 9).Value, 0.15)
Next i
End Sub
enter image description here
The difference between two means is not within range (0.15+, 0.15-)

MS Excel. VBA function returns #value

It would be nice if someone could explain what causes function above return #value error.
Public Function papild(x)
Dim Sum As Double, A As Double, pi As Double,
Sum = 0.5 - (x - pi / 4)
A = -(x - pi / 4)
pi = Application.WorksheetFunction.pi()
Dim k As Integer, i As Integer
k = 2
i = 0
Do While Abs(A) > 0.0001
A = -A * 4 * A * A / (k + i) * (k + i + 1)
Sum = Sum + A
k = k + 1
i = i + 1
Loop
paplid = Sum
End Function
Function takes x value from MS Excel cell and it's equal = -1.5708 (=-PI()/2 #Formula Bar)
In lines 3 and 4 you work with variable pi before setting it in line 5...
Could there be some brackets missing in your formula. It basically says:
A = -4A^3 * (k+i+1)/(k+1)
This obviously drifts to +/- infinite so your loop cannot end.
Also there is a comma too much in the second line and a spelling error in the last line (paplid instead of papild).
Have you tried debugging the code?
When I run the code I get an overflow error # the 6th iteration of the while loop starting with x = -1.5708. Number gets to large to fit inside variable
.Other than that there are some minor things:
missing As Double
Public Function papild(x) As Double
and unnecessary comma at the end
Dim Sum As Double, A As Double, pi As Double,

Overflow error VBA

I have this code below, and I'm getting an overflow error at the line:
s = s + (x Mod 10) [first line in the Do Loop]
Why? I declared x and s to be of type Double. Adding two doubles, why is this not working?
Thanks for your help.
Public Sub bidon1()
Dim i As Double, x As Double, s As Double, k As Byte, h As Byte
Dim y(1 To 6) As Double
For i = 1 To 1000000
x = i ^ 3
Do
s = s + (x Mod 10)
x = x \ 10
Loop Until x = 0
If s = x Then
k = k + 1
y(k) = x
If y(6) > 0 Then
For h = 1 To 6
Debug.Print y(h)
Next
Exit Sub
End If
End If
Next
End Sub
The problem is that the VBA mod operator coerces its arguments to be integers (if they are not already so). It is this implicit coercion which is causing the overflow. See this question: Mod with Doubles
On Edit:
Based on your comments, you want to be able to add together the digits in a largish integer. The following function might help:
Function DigitSum(num As Variant) As Long
'Takes a variant which represents an integer type
'such as Integer, Long or Decimal
'and returns the sum of its digits
Dim sum As Long, i As Long, s As String
s = CStr(num)
For i = 1 To Len(s)
sum = sum + Val(Mid(s, i, 1))
Next i
DigitSum = sum
End Function
The following test sub shows how it can be used to correctly get the sum of the digits in 999999^3:
Sub test()
Dim x As Variant, y As Variant
Debug.Print "Naive approach: " & DigitSum(999999 ^ 3)
y = CDec(999999)
x = y * y * y
Debug.Print "CDec approach: " & DigitSum(x)
End Sub
Output:
Naive approach: 63
CDec approach: 108
Since 999999^3 = 999997000002999999, only the second result is accurate. The first result is only the sum of the digits in the string representation of the double 999999^3 = 9.99997000003E+17

Visual Basic - False Position Root Finding

I'm trying to create a code that uses the false position method to find the roots of an equation. The equation is as follows:
y = x^(1.5sinā”(x)) * e^(-x/7) + e^(x/10) - 4
I used a calculator to find the roots, and they are 6.9025, 8.8719, and 12.8079.
My VBA code is as follows:
Option Explicit
Function Func(x)
Func = (x ^ (1.5 * Sin(x))) * Exp(-x / 7) + Exp(x / 10) - 4
End Function
Function FalsePos(Guess1, Guess2)
Dim a, b, c As Single
Dim i As Integer
a = Guess1
b = Guess2
For i = 0 To 1000
c = a - Func(a) * (b - a) / (Func(b) - Func(a))
If (Func(c) < 0.00001) Then
i = 1001
Else
If Func(a) * Func(c) < 0 Then
b = c
Else
a = c
End If
End If
Next
FalsePos = c
End Function
My problem is that when I call the function and use for example 4 and 8 as my two guesses, the number it returns is 5.29 instead of the root between 4 and 8 which is 6.9025.
Is there something wrong with my code or am I just not understanding the false position method correctly?
You should use Double for precision with Maths problems. Three other notes about coding that you may not be aware of:
dim a, b, c as Single
will dim a and b as Variants, and c as a Single, and you can use Exit For to escape from a for loop, rather than setting the control variable out of the bounds. Finally, you should define the outputs of a Function by specifying As ... after the closing parenthesis.
You should use breakpoints (press F9 with the carrot in a line of code to breakpoint that line), then step through the code by pressing F8 to advance line-by-line to see what is happening, and keep your eye on the Locals window (Go to View > Locals)
This is the code with the above changes:
Function Func(x As Double) As Double
Func = (x ^ (1.5 * Sin(x))) * Exp(-x / 7) + Exp(x / 10) - 4
End Function
Function FalsePos(Guess1 As Double, Guess2 As Double) As Double
Dim a As Double, b As Double, c As Double
Dim i As Integer
a = Guess1
b = Guess2
For i = 0 To 1000
c = a - Func(a) * (b - a) / (Func(b) - Func(a))
If (Func(c) < 0.00001) Then
Exit For
Else
If Func(a) * Func(c) < 0 Then
b = c
Else
a = c
End If
End If
Next
FalsePos = c
End Function

I'm having overflow issues in this two-variable optimization program

First off, here is what I have so far:
Option Explicit
Dim y As Variant
Dim yforx As Variant
Dim yfork As Variant
Dim ynew As Variant
Dim ymin As Variant
Dim x As Variant
Dim xmin As Variant
Dim k As Variant
Dim kmin As Variant
Dim s As Variant
Dim Z As Variant
Dim Track As Variant
Sub PracticeProgram()
'Selects the right sheet
Sheets("PracticeProgram").Select
'y = k ^ 2 * (x ^ 2 + 2 * x * k - 6) / (x + k) ^ 2
'these are the bounds we are stepping through
Track = 0
x = 1
xmin = 1
k = 1
kmin = 1
y = 100000000
yforx = 100000
yfork = 1000000000
Do
y = 100000000
For x = 0 To 1000 Step 0.1
ynew = kmin ^ 2 * (x ^ 2 + 2 * x * kmin - 6) / (x + kmin) ^ 2
'This checks the new y-value against an absurdly high y-value we know is wrong. if it is less than this y-value, we keep the x-value that corresponds with it.
If ynew < y Then
xmin = x
y = ynew
yforx = y
xmin = Application.Evaluate("=Round(" & xmin & ", 3)")
Else
End If
Next
MsgBox (yforx)
For k = 0 To 1000 Step 0.1
y = k ^ 2 * (xmin ^ 2 + 2 * xmin * k - 6) / (xmin + k) ^ 2
If ynew < y Then
kmin = k
y = ynew
yfork = y
kmin = Application.Evaluate("=Round(" & kmin & ",3)")
Else
End If
Next
MsgBox (yfork)
Loop Until (Abs(yforx - yfork) < 10)
End Sub
This program is supposed to find the values of x and k in order to minimize the value of y. This is a practice for a much more complicated program that will use this same concept. In my actual program y, k, and x will all be greater than zero no matter what, but since it was hard to think of a simple equation whose results would be in the shape of a parabola opening up, I decided to allow negative answers for this practice program.
Basically, it should bounce back and forth between the equations finding the ideal values for x and k until finally it has a minimal answer for y using ideal answers for both x and k. I'm not sure what the actual answer is, so I'm letting it stop within a range of 10. If it works, I'll make it smaller, but I don't want the program going for forever, just in case.
MY PROBLEM: I keep getting overflow errors! I'm trying to round the values for xmin and kmin to three figures after the decimal, but it doesn't seem to be helping. Am I using them wrong? Can someone help me get this program working?
You're doing a division by zero. xmin = 0, k = 0, (xmin + k) ^ 2 = 0. (I'm not sure why it isn't reporting division by zero.)
A suggestion: use the Locals pane to see the value of local variables. You can also use the Watch pane to see the value of expressions you want to monitor.