Is it possible to dynamically define the type of an element inside a custom components template at runtime?
I'd like to avoid duplication of the inner contents of the button and a element in the following example:
<template>
<button if.bind="!isLinkBtn">
<span class="btn-icon">${icon}</span>
<span class="btn-text">${contentText}</span>
</button>
<a if.bind="isLinkBtn">
<!--
The content is a 1:1 duplicate of the button above which should be prevented
somehow in order to keep the view DRY
-->
<span class="btn-icon">${icon}</span>
<span class="btn-text">${contentText}</span>
</a>
</template>
Is it possible to write something like this:
<template>
<!--
The type of element should be defined at runtime and can be a standard HTML "button"
or an anchor "a"
-->
<element type.bind="${isLinkBtn ? 'a' : 'button'}">
<span class="btn-icon">${icon}</span>
<span class="btn-text">${contentText}</span>
</element>
</template>
I'm aware of dynamic composition with <compose view="${widget.type}-view.html"></compose> but as far as I know, this won't allow me to create default HTML elements but only custom components, correct?
I've asked this question on the Aurelia Gitter where Erik Lieben suggested to use a #processContent(function) decorator, replace the content within the given function and return true to let Aurelia process it.
Unfortunately I don't know how to actually apply those instructions and am hoping for some alternative approaches here or some details about how to actually accomplish this.
Edit
I've created a corresponding feature request. Even though possible solutions have been provided, I'd love to see some simpler way to solve this ;)
When you want to reuse HTML snippets, use compose. Doing so does not create a new custom element. It simply includes the HTML at the location of each compose element. As such, the view-model for the included HTML is the same as for the element into which it is composed.
Take a look at this GistRun: https://gist.run/?id=36cf2435d39910ff709de05e5e1bedaf
custom-link.html
<template>
<button if.bind="!isLinkBtn">
<compose view="./custom-link-icon-and-text.html"></compose>
</button>
<a if.bind="isLinkBtn" href="#">
<compose view="./custom-link-icon-and-text.html"></compose>
</a>
</template>
custom-link.js
import {bindable} from 'aurelia-framework';
export class CustomLink {
#bindable() contentText;
#bindable() icon;
#bindable() isLinkBtn;
}
custom-link-icon-and-text.html
<template>
<span class="btn-icon">${icon}</span>
<span class="btn-text">${contentText}</span>
</template>
consumer.html
<template>
<require from="./custom-link"></require>
<custom-link content-text="Here is a button"></custom-link>
<custom-link is-link-btn.bind="true" content-text="Here is a link"></custom-link>
</template>
You may want to split these into separate elements, like <custom-button> and <custom-link> instead of controlling their presentation using an is-link-btn attribute. You can use the same technique to reuse common HTML parts and composition with decorators to reuse the common code.
See this GistRun: https://gist.run/?id=e9572ad27cb61f16c529fb9425107a10
Response to your "less verbose" comment
You can get it down to one file and avoid compose using the techniques in the above GistRun and the inlineView decorator:
See this GistRun: https://gist.run/?id=4e325771c63d752ef1712c6d949313ce
All you would need is this one file:
custom-links.js
import {bindable, inlineView} from 'aurelia-framework';
function customLinkElement() {
return function(target) {
bindable('contentText')(target);
bindable('icon')(target);
}
}
const tagTypes = {button: 'button', link: 'a'};
#inlineView(viewHtml(tagTypes.button))
#customLinkElement()
export class CustomButton {
}
#inlineView(viewHtml(tagTypes.link))
#customLinkElement()
export class CustomLink {
}
function viewHtml(tagType) {
let result = `
<template>
<${tagType}${tagType === tagTypes.link ? ' href="#"' : ''}>
<span class="btn-icon">\${icon}</span>
<span class="btn-text">\${contentText}</span>
</${tagType}>
</template>
`;
return result;
}
Sorry, I was doing 2 things at once while looking at gitter, which I am not good at apparently :-)
For the thing you wanted to accomplish in the end, could this also work?
I am not an a11y expert or have a lot of knowledge on that area, but from what I understand, this will accomplish what you want. The browser will look at the role attribute and handle it as a link or button and ignores the actual element type itself / won't care if it is button or anchor it will act as if it is of the type defined in role.
Then you can style it like a button or link tag with css.
<a role.bind="type"><span>x</span><span>y</span></a>
where type is either link or button, see this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/ARIA_Techniques/Using_the_link_role
Related
I'm using a UIKit library for a tab component that listens to a uk-tab property that targets an id. The problem with this, is that it creates the same ID for every tabbed component. I like the UI, but whoever thought of this, didn't think too far into it. I could fix it by making the id dynamic but I am having trouble calling it in the uk-tab property because it is rendering a string. Coming from a react background, I would do a string literal and some JSX, something like #item-${_id}to show #item-12, #item-13....and so on. But That's not working. How can I do this in Vue?
Here is an example of how it works
<div class="mytrigger">
<ul uk-tab="connect: #component-tab-left; animation: uk-animation-fade">
</div>
<div class="mytargetedtab">
<ul id="component-tab-left" class="uk-switcher">
</div>
Here is an example of how what I need
<div class="mytrigger">
<ul uk-tab="connect: #_uid+'switcher'; animation: uk-animation-fade">
</div>
<div class="mytargetedtab">
<ul :id="_uid+'switcher'" class="uk-switcher">
</div>
Check out the dev tools. It should be 810switcher, but instead is taking it as a string
Any ideas? Thanks
I believe what you need is:
<ul :uk-tab="`connect: #${_uid}switcher; animation: uk-animation-fade`">
Or if you prefer not to use backticks:
<ul :uk-tab="'connect: #' + _uid + 'switcher; animation: uk-animation-fade'">
The output will be:
<ul uk-tab="connect: #22switcher; animation: uk-animation-fade">
A few notes:
Using a : is short for v-bind: but don't let the name confuse you. v-bind doesn't necessarily bind anything, it just makes the attribute value a JavaScript expression.
I'd avoid using numbers at the start of element ids, I've seen that cause problems in the past. It'd be better to put the numbers at the end.
The underscore at the start of _uid indicates that it's private to Vue. There are no guarantees about what form it will take or whether it will even exist going forward.
Use data-uk-tab instead of uk-tab like below.
<div class="mytrigger">
<ul data-uk-tab="{connect: `#${_uid}switcher`, animation: 'uk-animation-fade'}">
</div>
<div class="mytargetedtab">
<ul :id="_uid+'switcher'" class="uk-switcher">
</div>
For more information => Switcher with tabs
You can use any javascript expression in a data binding in vue. So, if you bind a string template to the attribute, it'll populate what you expect.
<ul :uk-tab="`connect: #${uid}switcher`'; animation: uk-animation-fade">
I have an app that is using ngx-bootstrap to show a tooltip on mouseover. I want to test that the content, which is dynamically added, shows properly. In order to do this I have a test that looks like this:
it(shows the right tooltip', fakeAsync(() => {
fixture.debugElement.query(By.directive(TooltipDirective))
.triggerEventHandler('mouseover', null);
tick();
fixture.detectChanges();
expect(fixture.debugElement.query(By.css('.tooltip-inner')).nativeElement)
.toBe('the tooltip text');
}
This results in an error that indicates that fixture.debugElement.query(By.css('.tooltip-inner')): "Cannot read property 'nativeElement' of null"
If I print out the content of fixture.debugElement.nativeElement I get this:
<div id="root1" ng-version="5.2.9">
<my-component>
<div ng-reflect-tooltip="the tooltip text">
<img src="images/test.png">
</div>
<bs-tooltip-container role="tooltip" class="tooltip in tooltip-right">
<div class="tooltip-arrow arrow"></div>
<div class="tooltip-inner">the tooltip text</div>
</bs-tooltip-container>
<my-component>
</div>
The important take away is that the html exists - it is just not accessible by the DebugElement.query.
My current solution to get the spec passing is to change the expect to:
expect(fixture.debugElement.nativeElement.textContent.trim())
.toBe('the tooltip text');
This works, but it is a hack that will fall to pieces if I run into a similar situation with multiple tooltips (for example). Has anyone been able to handle this in a better way? Am I not setting this spec up correctly?
Using nv-file-upload (https://github.com/nervgh/angular-file-upload) how can I make the drop zone act also as a clickable element to select files? Adding {{nv-file-select}} does not seem to work.
The answer is that YOU CANT, there is no way to do this inside that plugin but i use a simple solution for this kind of problems. Add a ng-click inside your dragNdrop tag and call your function:
<div nv-file-drop="" uploader="upload" ng-click="launchFilePicker()">
<div class="drop-box" ng-show="upload.isHTML5" uploader="upload" nv-file-over="" over-class="dragover" filter="image/*,application/pdf">
Drag a file here.
</div>
</div>
<div ng-hide="upload.isHTML5"> <input id="fileDialog" type="file" nv-file-select uploader="upload"/><br/></div>
And inside your controller you do this:
$scope.launchFilePicker = function () {
//$('#fileDialog').click(); //not angular way
angular.element('#fileDialog').trigger('click'); //angular way
};
I hope this help.
I can easily show a loading message while the activate method is doing its thing like so:
<div data-bind="compose:ActiveVm">
<div class="text-center" style="margin : 75px">
<i class="fa fa-spinner fa-spin"></i>
</div>
</div>
However if I then update my ActiveVm property with a different viewmodel, the splash content does not show. I understand that the splash content is only designed to show on 'initial' load, but what options do I have for displaying such a message when transitioning from one viewmodel to another?
Note that this composition does not participate in routing...
Update: Related durandal issue here which might be of value to future visitors: https://github.com/BlueSpire/Durandal/issues/414
This begs for a comment of 'what have you tried?' but given that I could see the benefit of this for future users I wanted to throw in my $0.02 -
The splash displays on your screen until Durandal loads up the application and replaces the div with id="applicationHost" 's content with the shell view and the subsequent views that are loaded. If you wanted to make this a re-usable component one thing that you could do is to take that Html.Partial view that is being loaded and create your own view inside of your app folder in your Durandal project.
For example you would create a new HTML view inside of your app folder -
splashpage.html
<div class="splash">
<div class="message">
My app
</div>
<i class="icon-spinner icon-2x icon-spin active"></i>
</div>
And then compose it from your shell -
<div data-bind="if: showSplash">
<!-- ko compose: 'splashpage.html' -->
<!-- /ko -->
</div>
And in your view model you would toggle the observable showSplash whenever you want to show / hide it -
var showSplash = ko.observable(false);
var shell = {
showSplash: showSplash
};
return shell;
And you could call that from your activate methods inside your other view models like this -
define(['shell'], function (shell) {
function activate() {
shell.showSplash(true);
// do something
shell.showSplash(false);
}
});
This sounds to me like a scenario where a custom transition may be useful. When the composition mechanism switches nodes in and out of the DOM, it can use a transition.
This page, under Additional Settings>Transition (about halfway down) describes a custom transition: http://durandaljs.com/documentation/Using-Composition/
I am trying to extend dijit.form.Button with an extra attribute but this is not working.Code is given below
In file1.js
dojo.require('dijit.form.Button');
dojo.extend(dijit.form.Button,{xyz: ''});
In file2.jsp
<script type="text/javascript" src="file1.js"></script>
<div dojoType="dijit.form.Button" xyz="abc"></div>
However when I look at the HTML of the created button (In chrome seen by right click and then selecting 'inspect element' option), it doesn't show xyz attribute.
You need to keep in mind that there's a distinction between the widget object and its HTML representation. When you extend dijit.form.Button, the xyz attribute is added to the widget class, but not automatically to the HTML that the widget will render. So in your case, if you do
console.debug(dijit.byId("yourWidgetId").get("xyz"));
.. you'll see that the button object does have the xyz member, but the HTML (like you point out) does not.
If you also want it do be visible in the HTML, you have to manually add it to the HTML rendering of the button. One way to do that is to subclass dijit.form.Button and override the buildRendering method.
dojo.declare("my.Button", dijit.form.Button, {
xyz: '',
buildRendering: function() {
this.inherited(arguments);
this.domNode.setAttribute("xyz", this.xyz);
}
});
If you add an instance of your new Button class in the HTML, like so:
<div dojoType="my.Button" xyz="foobar" id="mybtn"></div>
.. then the HTML representation (after Dojo has parsed it and made it into a nice looking widget) will contain the xyz attribute. Probably something like this:
<span class="..." xyz="foobar" dir="ltr" widgetid="mybtn">
<span class="..." dojoattachevent="ondijitclick:_onButtonClick">
<input class="dijitOffScreen" type="button" dojoattachpoint="valueNode" ...>
</span>