recursive template function does not compile with Clang? - g++

I have a template function which recurses over a parameter pack. In essence it is meant to map something.Get<A,B,C>() into something.Get<A>().Get<B>().Get<C>().
This can be achieved by doing (full stand-alone source below the fold)
template <typename... Pack> class Struct {
std::tuple<Pack...> mTuple;
template <typename Type> auto &GetRef_internal() {
return std::get<first_true<std::is_same<Type, Pack>::value...>::value>(
mTuple);
}
public:
template <typename Current> Current &GetRef() {
return GetRef_internal<Current>();
}
template <typename Current, typename... Next,
typename std::enable_if<sizeof...(Next) != 0>::type * = nullptr>
auto &GetRef() {
auto current = GetRef_internal<Current>();
return current.GetRef<Next...>();
}
};
where first_true returns the index of the first element which is true.
This compiles with g++, and seemingly on MSVC too using an online compiler. When compiling with clang++ I get the following error though:
test.cxx:40:31: error: expected '(' for function-style cast or type construction
return current.GetRef<Next...>();
~~~~^
test.cxx:38:9: error: cannot deduce return type 'auto &' for function with no return statements
auto &GetRef() {
^
test.cxx:48:12: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'Struct<Struct<int, Struct<float, float> >, Struct<char>, int>::GetRef<Struct<int, Struct<float, float> >, Struct<float, float> , nullptr>' requested here
.GetRef<Struct<int, Struct<float, float>>, Struct<float, float>>();
^
2 errors generated.
What could cause this?
p.s. The actual 'production code' is more useful than the example makes it seem, but that would be too much to post here.
=========================================================================
#include <tuple>
#include <type_traits>
// Template to check if condition holds true for all members of a parameter
// pack.
template <bool... b> struct BoolArray {};
template <bool... b>
using all_true = std::is_same<BoolArray<b...>, BoolArray<(b, true)...>>;
//helper type trait
template <bool... b> struct first_true {
template <
unsigned index = 0,
typename std::enable_if<index<sizeof...(b)-1>::type * =
nullptr> static constexpr unsigned check() {
return std::get<index>(std::make_tuple(b...)) ? index : check<index + 1>();
}
template <unsigned index = 0,
typename std::enable_if<index >= sizeof...(b)-1>::type * = nullptr>
static constexpr unsigned check() {
return std::get<index>(std::make_tuple(b...)) ? index : 0;
}
static constexpr unsigned value = first_true<b...>::check();
};
//The actual problem struct
template <typename... Pack> class Struct {
std::tuple<Pack...> mTuple;
template <typename Type> auto &GetRef_internal() {
return std::get<first_true<std::is_same<Type, Pack>::value...>::value>(
mTuple);
}
public:
template <typename Current> Current &GetRef() {
return GetRef_internal<Current>();
}
template <typename Current, typename... Next,
typename std::enable_if<sizeof...(Next) != 0>::type * = nullptr>
auto &GetRef() {
auto current = GetRef_internal<Current>();
return current.GetRef<Next...>();
}
};
int main() {
// Define a random nested struct
Struct<Struct<int, Struct<float, float>>, Struct<char>, int> myStruct;
// Then retrieve one of the substructures to instantiate the template
auto substruct =
myStruct
.GetRef<Struct<int, Struct<float, float>>, Struct<float, float>>();
return 0;
}

current.GetRef<Next...> is a dependent name, so you need to specify that GetRef names a template using the template keyword:
return current.template GetRef<Next...>();
See Where and why do I have to put the "template" and "typename" keywords? for more information about dependent names.

Related

Initialize C++/CLI array of structures

I wish to partially initialize an array of structures like in a C++ POD type. The String^ would normally be a char* but managed C++ doesn't allow that.
#include "stdafx.h"
using namespace System;
ref struct Field
{
String^ name;
int fences;
int length;
};
int main(array<System::String ^> ^args)
{
array<Field^>^ farm =
{
{ "eenie", 10 },
{ "meenie", 20 },
{ "miny", 4 }
};
for each (Field^ field in farm)
{
field->length = field->fences * 22;
}
return 0;
}
This results in
1>arrayinit.cpp(18): error C2440: 'initializing' : cannot convert from 'const char [6]' to 'Field ^'
1> Reason: cannot convert from 'const char *' to 'Field ^'
1> No user-defined-conversion operator available, or
1> Cannot convert an unmanaged type to a managed type
So I tried
#include "stdafx.h"
using namespace System;
ref struct Field
{
String^ name;
int fences;
int length;
};
int main(array<System::String ^> ^args)
{
array<Field^>^ farm =
{
{ String("eenie"), 10 },
{ String("meenie"), 20 },
{ String("miny"), 4 }
};
for each (Field^ field in farm)
{
field->length = field->fences * 22;
}
return 0;
}
Now I get
1>arrayinit.cpp(18): error C2440: 'initializing' : cannot convert from 'System::String' to 'Field ^'
1> No user-defined-conversion operator available, or
1> No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform this conversion, or the operator cannot be called
1>arrayinit.cpp(18): error C2078: too many initializers
Almost every example I've looked at only tells how to initialize an array of strings or integers. I haven't found out a way of initializing an array of structures containing strings.
Is there a simple way of doing this or do I have to create a special constructor and gcnew every element?
I found that I can gcnew every element with a special constructor. Is there a simpler way of doing this similar to a POD initialization?
#include "stdafx.h"
using namespace System;
ref struct Field
{
String^ name;
int fences;
int length;
Field(String^ x, int in_fences)
{
name = x;
fences = in_fences;
}
};
int main(array<System::String ^> ^args)
{
array<Field^>^ farm =
{
gcnew Field("eenie", 10 ),
gcnew Field("meenie", 20 ),
gcnew Field("miny", 4 )
};
for each (Field^ field in farm)
{
field->length = field->fences * 22;
}
return 0;
}
Alternatively, if Field is changed to a value instead of a reference,
#include "stdafx.h"
using namespace System;
value struct Field
{
String^ name;
int fences;
int length;
Field(String^ x, int in_fences)
{
name = x;
fences = in_fences;
}
void Init()
{
length = fences * 22;
}
};
int main(array<System::String ^> ^args)
{
array<Field>^ farm =
{
Field("eenie", 10 ),
Field("meenie", 20 ),
Field("miny", 4 )
};
for each (Field% field in farm)
{
field.Init();
}
return 0;
}
This is slightly better than gcnewing every field.

passing a class variable to API function

I want to track a global variable that I am passing into an API function. I found that one could do it using a class:
template <class T>
class MonitoredVariable
{
public:
MonitoredVariable() {}
MonitoredVariable(const T& value) : m_value(value) {}
//T operator T() const { return m_value; }
const MonitoredVariable& operator = (const T& value)
{
PlugIn::gResultOut << "value changed " << std::endl;
m_value = value;
return *this;
}
private:
T m_value;
};
The API function takes variables as
bool APIFunction(double time, bool *is_done, double *fraction_done);
The following gives me an error:
ImagePtr Im;
bool is_done;
MonitoredVariable<double*> fraction_done;
bool frameready = Im->APIFunction(2.1, is_done, fraction_done);
ERROR:
error C2664: cannot convert argument 3 from 'MonitoredVariable<double *>' to 'double *'
what would I have to change here?
thx!
I'm not really sure if this is what you want:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
template <class T>
class MonitoredVariable
{
public:
MonitoredVariable() {}
MonitoredVariable(const T& value) : m_value(value) {}
//T operator T() const { return m_value; }
const MonitoredVariable& operator = (const T& value)
{
//PlugIn::gResultOut << "value changed " << std::endl;
m_value = value.m_value;
return *this;
}
void printValue() {
std::cout << m_value;
}
T& getValue() {
return m_value;
}
private:
T m_value;
};
bool func(double firstDouble, bool *is_done, double* fraction_done) {
// do stuff
*fraction_done = firstDouble + (40.23 * 5);
*is_done = true;
return true;
}
int main()
{
bool is_done = true;
MonitoredVariable<double> fraction_done;
func(2.10, &is_done, &fraction_done.getValue());
fraction_done.printValue();
return 0;
}
So basically we have a Class called MonitoredVariable which has a variable called m_value. I'm not really sure why you wanted it to be a pointer, because we can also take the address of a normal double variable.
In the following it makes perhaps more sense what I want to achieve. I want to input a class variable into an API function and monitor the variable in real time. This value goes from zero to 1 every 3 ms or so. Yet I try to avoid using while loop and track it within the class with overloaded = operator.
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <future>
using namespace std;
template <class T>
class MonitoredVariable
{
public:
MonitoredVariable() {}
MonitoredVariable(const T& value) : m_value(value) {}
void printValue() {
std::cout << m_value;
}
const MonitoredVariable& operator = (const T& value)
{
m_value = value.m_value;
if(m_value> 0.8) std::cout << m_value; // *THIS NEVER GETS PRINTED!!!*
return *this;
}
T& getValue() {
return m_value;
}
private:
T m_value;
};
bool func(bool *is_done, double* fraction_done) {
unsigned long c = 1;
while (*is_done)
{
*fraction_done = (double) 0.01*c;
this_thread::sleep_for(chrono::milliseconds(10));
c++;
if (*fraction_done >= 1) *is_done = false;
}
return true;
}
int main()
{
bool is_done = true;
MonitoredVariable<double> *MonitoredVariablePtr = new MonitoredVariable<double>();
std::future<bool> fu = std::async(std::launch::async,func, &is_done, &MonitoredVariablePtr->getValue());
// IF I UNCOMMENT THIS, IT PRINTS...
/*
while(is_done)
{
if(MonitoredVariablePtr->getValue() > 0.8) MonitoredVariablePtr->printValue();
}
*/
return 0;
}
Why does not the (if(m_value> 0.8) std::cout << m_value) line within the class never gets printed when the value is updated?
THX!

boost multi index - loop through key value of specific entry

I have a multi index with 2 indexes(in real code, they are of different type).
class CrUsersKeys{
int IMSI;
int TIMESTAMP;
}
After i find an entry in the multi index, I have the iterator of the entry.
auto it = multi.GetIteratorBy<IMSI_tag>(searchKey);
Now i want to loop through all the indexed members in this specific (*it) and check them. Note that i don't want to iterate through the iterator, but through the the indexed element of CrUsersKeys. How can i do it?
for(key in it)
{
if(isGoodKey(key))
std::cout<<"key "<<key <<" is good key"<<std::endl;
}
So it should check isGoodKey((*it).IMSI) and isGoodKey((*it).TIMESTAMP).
CrUsersKeys is template parameter, so i can't really know the members of CrUsersKeys.
Code example at http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/d97195a6e4bb7ad4
My multi index class is in shared memory.
Your question has little to do with Boost.MultiIndex and basically asks for a way to compile-time iterate over the members of a class. If you're OK with CrUsersKeys being defined as a std::tuple (or a tuple-like class), then you can do something like this (C++17):
Edit: Showed how to adapt a non-tuple class to the framework.
Live On Coliru
#include <tuple>
template<typename Tuple,typename F>
bool all_of_tuple(const Tuple& t,F f)
{
const auto fold=[&](const auto&... x){return (...&&f(x));};
return std::apply(fold,t);
}
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
bool isGoodKey(int x){return x>0;}
bool isGoodKey(const char* x){return x&&x[0]!='\0';}
template<typename Tuple>
bool areAllGoodKeys(const Tuple& t)
{
return all_of_tuple(t,[](const auto& x){return isGoodKey(x);});
}
struct CrUsersKeys
{
int IMSI;
const char* TIMESTAMP;
};
bool areAllGoodKeys(const CrUsersKeys& x)
{
return areAllGoodKeys(std::forward_as_tuple(x.IMSI,x.TIMESTAMP));
}
int main()
{
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(std::make_tuple(1,1))<<"\n"; // 1
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(std::make_tuple(1,"hello"))<<"\n"; // 1
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(std::make_tuple(1,0))<<"\n"; // 0
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(std::make_tuple("",1))<<"\n"; // 0
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(CrUsersKeys{1,"hello"})<<"\n"; // 1
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(CrUsersKeys{0,"hello"})<<"\n"; // 0
std::cout<<areAllGoodKeys(CrUsersKeys{1,""})<<"\n"; // 0
}

Cannot return a cli array of a generic type

I got this function
array<ItemType>^ GetNextItems(int n) {
auto ret = gcnew Collections::Generic::List < ItemType > ;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
auto item = GetNextItem();
if (item == ItemType()) break;
ret->Add(item);
}
return ret->ToArray();
}
But the compile gives me an error: cannot convert from 'cli::array< ItemType,1 > ^' to 'cli::array< ItemType,1 > ^'
ItemType is a template parameter ie.
generic <typename ItemType>
I've been staring at this for a while, I can't detect the fault. Why won't it compile?
If ItemType is a .NET/CLR type, then you'll need the ^-hat inside the return type declaration. The ^ is still not included in the actual type declaration.
So it would be something like this:
generic <typename ItemType>
ref class Test
{
array<ItemType ^>^
GetNextItems(int n)
{
List<ItemType ^> ^ ret = gcnew List<ItemType ^>(n);
...
return ret->ToArray();
}
};
Notice the added caret inside the <ItemType ^> return type declaration, but not in the class' generic definition.

Workaround for not having lambdas that can capture managed variables

In C++/CLI, you cannot create managed lambdas (like you can in C#), and thus you can't capture managed variables. You can create regular methods (rather than lambdas), but you are still left without being able to capture managed variables.
Is there a standard workaround to employ in C++/CLI code? In other words I'm looking for a standard pattern I could use in C++/CLI to do the following from C#:
class A { }
class B
{
void Foo()
{
A a = new A();
Func<A> aFunc = () => a; // Captures a
}
}
I could
Create a member variable for each variable I want to capture, and then in the delegate use that member variable. This wouldn't work in the general case as you might have two invocations of the method that want to work on different captured a's, but it would work for the common case.
Create a nested class that does the capturing in its ctor, and then use a method of this nested class as the delegate. This should work in the general case, but it means I need a nested class every time I want to capture different variables.
Question: Is there a better option than the ones above, or which option above would be your go-to approach?
Related Questions:
Lambda expressions as CLR (.NET) delegates / event handlers in Visual C++ 2010
Lambdas in C++/CLI
I wrote Lamda2Delegate struct for this purpose.
Actually it converts c++11 lambda to any .net delegate.
The example of usage:
Thread^ TestLambaWrapper()
{
gcroot<String ^> str = "Testext";
int i = 12345;
Thread^ newThread = gcnew Thread(
Lambda2Delegate<ParameterizedThreadStart>() = [&, str](Object ^ str2)
{
Sleep(2000);
Console::WriteLine("Thread output = {0} {1} {2}", str, i, str2);
}
);
newThread->Start("Nahnah");
return newThread;
}
For your case:
gcroot<A^> a = gcnew A();
Func<A^> ^ aFunc = Lambda2Delegate<>() = [a](){ return (A^)a; };
auto a2 = aFunc();
To capture managed classes you need to wrap them with gcroot, and capture explicitly by value.
And the Lambda2Delegate.h itself
#pragma once
#ifdef _MANAGED
struct AutoDetectDelegateType {};
template<typename TDelegate, typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename ...TParams>
ref class LambdaHolder;
template<typename TDelegate, typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename ...TParams>
ref class LambdaHolder
{
public:
inline LambdaHolder(const TLambda % func) { m_func = new TLambda(func); }
!LambdaHolder() { delete m_func; }
~LambdaHolder() { !LambdaHolder(); }
public:
TRet Callback(TParams... params) { return (*m_func)(params...); }
operator TDelegate ^ () { return gcnew TDelegate(this, &LambdaHolder::Callback); }
private:
TLambda * m_func;
};
template<typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename ...TParams>
ref class LambdaHolder<AutoDetectDelegateType, TLambda, TRet, TParams...>
{
public:
inline LambdaHolder(const TLambda % func) { m_func = new TLambda(func); }
!LambdaHolder() { delete m_func; }
~LambdaHolder() { !LambdaHolder(); }
public:
TRet Callback(TParams... params) { return (*m_func)(params...); }
template<typename TDelegate>
operator TDelegate ^ () { return gcnew TDelegate(this, &LambdaHolder::Callback); }
private:
TLambda * m_func;
};
template <typename TDelegate, typename TLambda>
struct get_labmda_holder : public get_labmda_holder < TDelegate, decltype(&TLambda::operator()) > {};
template <typename TDelegate, typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename... TParams>
struct get_labmda_holder < TDelegate, TRet(__clrcall TLambda::*)(TParams...) const >
{
typedef LambdaHolder<TDelegate, TLambda, TRet, TParams...> TLambdaHolder;
};
template <typename TDelegate, typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename... TParams>
struct get_labmda_holder < TDelegate, TRet(__clrcall TLambda::*)(TParams...) >
{
typedef LambdaHolder<TDelegate, TLambda, TRet, TParams...> TLambdaHolder;
};
template <typename TDelegate, typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename... TParams>
struct get_labmda_holder < TDelegate, TRet(__thiscall TLambda::*)(TParams...) const >
{
typedef LambdaHolder<TDelegate, TLambda, TRet, TParams...> TLambdaHolder;
};
template <typename TDelegate, typename TLambda, typename TRet, typename... TParams>
struct get_labmda_holder < TDelegate, TRet(__thiscall TLambda::*)(TParams...)>
{
typedef LambdaHolder<TDelegate, TLambda, TRet, TParams...> TLambdaHolder;
};
template<typename TDelegate = AutoDetectDelegateType>
struct Lambda2Delegate
{
template<typename TLambda>
typename get_labmda_holder<TDelegate, TLambda>::TLambdaHolder ^ operator = (const TLambda % func)
{
return gcnew get_labmda_holder<TDelegate, TLambda>::TLambdaHolder(func);
}
};
#endif
UPDATE: It is not possible to declare c++ lambda function inside managed member function, but there is workaround - use static member function:
ref class S
{
public:
int F(System::String ^ str)
{
return F(this, str);
}
private:
//static function declaring c++ lambda
static int F(S ^ pThis, System::String ^ str)
{
gcroot<System::String ^> localStr = "local string";
System::Func<System::String ^, int> ^ func = Lambda2Delegate<>() = [=](System::String ^ str)
{
System::Console::WriteLine(str);
System::Console::WriteLine(localStr);
return str->Length;
};
return func(str);
}
};
If you look at a decompilation of a C# lambda, you'll see that the C# compiler does the same thing as your option #2. It's annoying to create a bunch of single-use classes, but that's what I'd recommend.
With a C# lambda, when it creates the nested class instance, it uses that everywhere instead of the local variable. Keep that in mind as you write the method that uses the nested class.
This is my solution for handling lambdas in C++/CLI, with a pretty straightforward syntax. I thought someone else might find it useful:
struct DefaultDelegate;
template<typename... Args>
value struct DelegateType;
template<typename Ret, typename... Args>
value struct DelegateType<DefaultDelegate, Ret, Args...>
{
delegate Ret MyDelegate(Args...);
typedef MyDelegate delegate_type;
};
template<typename Target, typename Ret, typename... Args>
value struct DelegateType<Target, Ret, Args...>
{
typedef Target delegate_type;
};
template<typename Lambda>
ref class LambdaWrapper
{
public:
LambdaWrapper(Lambda &&lambda) : func(new Lambda(std::forward<Lambda>(lambda))) {}
!LambdaWrapper() { delete func; }
~LambdaWrapper() { delete func; }
template<typename Ret, typename... Args>
Ret CallLambda(Args... args) { return (*func)(args...); }
private:
Lambda *func;
};
template<typename Target, typename Lambda, typename Ret, typename... Args>
auto _toDelegate(Lambda &&lambda, Ret(Lambda::*func)(Args...))
{
LambdaWrapper<Lambda> ^lw = gcnew LambdaWrapper<Lambda>(std::forward<Lambda>(lambda));
return gcnew typename DelegateType<Target, Ret, Args...>::delegate_type(lw, &LambdaWrapper<Lambda>::CallLambda<Ret, Args...>);
}
template<typename Target, typename Lambda, typename Ret, typename... Args>
auto _toDelegate(Lambda &&lambda, Ret(Lambda::*func)(Args...) const)
{
LambdaWrapper<Lambda> ^lw = gcnew LambdaWrapper<Lambda>(std::forward<Lambda>(lambda));
return gcnew typename DelegateType<Target, Ret, Args...>::delegate_type(lw, &LambdaWrapper<Lambda>::CallLambda<Ret, Args...>);
}
template<typename Target, typename Lambda>
auto toDelegate(Lambda &&lambda)
{
return _toDelegate<Target>(std::forward<Lambda>(lambda), &Lambda::operator());
}
Usage:
int k = 2;
//If you need a generic delegate
Delegate ^d = toDelegate<DefaultDelegate>([k](int i, int j) ->int {return k * (i + j); });
//If you need a delegate of a specific type
MyDelegate ^d = toDelegate<MyDelegate>([k](int i, int j) ->int {return k * (i + j); });