I have following table structure. On the basis what type of request comes, I should be able to pick the right column for matching the value.
| resource_id | result | request |
| | 15127 | /campaign/add |
| 15127 | | /campaign/modify |
For eg:
if the request is like /campaign/add then result should be compared with the number the is sent by the user else resource_id should be picked.
Programmatically I can say
if(request.equals())
fetch values from database where resource_id = 15127
else
fetch values from database where resource_id = 15127
Now I need to do same thing using database.
You can use a CASE expression to do that:
select *
from the_table
where case
when request = '/campaign/add' then result
when request = '/campaign/modify' then resource_id
end = number_sent_by_the_user
Is this what you want?
where (request like '/campaign/add%' and result = $user_Input) or
(request like '/campaign/modify%' and resource_id = $user_Input)
Related
I am working within Microsoft Sentinel Analytics Rules with the Kusto Query Language. (KQL)
I need to work in a Table called CrowdstrikeReplicatorLogs_CL which contains rows that contain a) data rows for which I need to alert on and b) metadata. that contains information about the subject in the alert.
This means I need to self-join the KQL table with itself to get the final result.
The column in question to join the table itself is the aid_g column.
ThreatIntelligenceIndicator
| where foo == bar
| join kind=innerunique (
CrowdstrikeReplicatorLogs_CL
| where TimeGenerated >= ago(dt_lookBack)
| where event_simpleName_s has_any ("NetworkConnectIP4", "NetworkConnectIP6")
| extend json=parse_json(custom_fields_message_s)
| extend ip4 = json["RemoteAddressIP4"], ip6=json["RemoteAddressIP6"]
| extend CS_ipEntity = tostring(iff(isnotempty(ip4), ip4, ip6))
| extend CommonSecurityLog_TimeGenerated = TimeGenerated
) on $left.TI_ipEntity == $right.CS_ipEntity
| join kind=innerunique (
CrowdstrikeReplicatorLogs_CL
| where custom_fields_message_s has "ComputerName"
| extend customFields=parse_json(custom_fields_message_s)
| project Hostname=customFields['ComputerName'], Platform=event_platform_s, aid_g
) on $left.aid_g == $right.aid_g
;
However, this raises a Query contains incompatible 'set' commands. error in Sentinel.
Is there a proper way to self-join tables?
I am crafting a sql query that dynamically builds a where clause. I was able to transform the separate pieces of the where clause as return rows like so:
-------------------------------------------
| ID | Query Part |
-------------------------------------------
| TOKEN 1 | (A = 1 OR B = 2) |
-------------------------------------------
| TOKEN 2 | ([TOKEN 1] or C = 3 |
-------------------------------------------
| TOKEN 3 | ([TOKEN 2] and D = 4) |
-------------------------------------------
My goal is to wrap the current return results above in a stuff and or replace (or something entirely different I hadn't considered) to output the following result:
(((A=1 OR B=2) OR C=3) AND D=4)
Ideally there would be no temp table necessary but I am open to recommendations.
Thank you for any guidance, this has had me pretty stumped at work.
Its unusual. It looks like the query part you want is only Token 3. Then the process should replace any [token] tags in this query part with the corresponding query parts. With the subsequent resulting query part, again the process should replace any [token] tags with the corresponding query parts. This continues until there are no more [token] tags to replace.
I think there should there be a way of indicating the master query (ie token 3) , then use a recursive common table expression to build the expression up until there are no more [token]s.
I'm working on a filter where the user can choose different conditions for the end output. Right now I'm doing the construction of the SQL query, but whenever more conditions are selected, it doesn't work.
Example of the advalues table.
+----+-----------+---------------+------------+
| id | listingId | value | identifier |
+----+-----------+---------------+------------+
| 1 | 1a | Alaskan Husky | race |
+----+-----------+---------------+------------+
| 2 | 1a | Højt | activity |
+----+-----------+---------------+------------+
| 3 | 1c | Akita | race |
+----+-----------+---------------+------------+
| 4 | 1c | Mellem | activity |
+----+-----------+---------------+------------+
As you can see, there's a different row for each advalue.
The outcome I expect
Let's say the user has checked/ticked the checkbox for the race where it says "Alaskan Husky", then it should return the listingId for the match (once). If the user has selected both "Alaskan Husky" and activity level to "Low" then it should return nothing, if the activity level is either "Mellem" or "Højt" (medium, high), then it should return the listingId for where the race is "Alaskan Husky" only, not "Akita". I hope you understand what I'm trying to accomplish.
I tried something like this, which returns nothing.
SELECT * FROM advalues WHERE (identifier="activity" AND value IN("Mellem","Højt")) AND (identifier="race" AND value IN("Alaskan Husky"))
By the way, I want to select distinct listingId as well, so it only returns unique listingId's.
I will continue to search around for solutions, which I've been doing for the past few hours, but wanted to post here too, since I haven't been able to find anything that helped me yet. Thanks!
You can split the restictions on identifier in two tables for each type. Then you join on listingid to obtain the listingId wich have the two type of identifier.
SELECT ad.listingId
FROM advalues ad
JOIN advalues ad2
ON ad.listingId = ad2.listingId
WHERE ( ad.identifier = 'activity' AND ad.value IN( 'Mellem', 'Højt' ) )
AND ( ad2.identifier = 'race' AND ad2.value IN( 'Alaskan Husky' ) )
The question isn't exactly clear, but I think you want this:
WHERE (identifier="activity" AND value IN("Mellem","Højt")) OR (identifier="race" AND value IN("Alaskan Husky"))
If I got you right you are trying to fetch data with different "filters".
Your Query
SELECT listingId FROM advalues
WHERE identifier="activity"
AND value IN("Mellem","Højt")
AND identifier="race"
AND value IN("Alaskan Husky")
Will always return 0 results as you are asking for identifier = "activity" AND identifier = "race"
I think you wanted to do something like this instead:
SELECT listingId FROM advalues
WHERE
(identifier="activity" AND value IN("Mellem","Højt"))
OR
(identifier="race" AND value IN("Alaskan Husky"))
I need to build a query which will compare off one of two value pairs in my table, my table structure looks something like this:
product_id | psi_a | gpm_a | psi_b | gpm_b |
-------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCT_123 | 1000 | 400 | 8000 | 300 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCT_456 | 2804 | 3006 | 5800 | 579 |
When my psi_a and gpm_a are a value pair as are psi_b and gpm_b, I currently have to run two SQL querys to get the values I require to render my site page correctly, however this results in two sets of results being appended to the page.
Markup
$flowQ = $function->flow_query( $pType, $pVal, $gVal, $class_style, $cVal, $pageCat );
$highQ = $function->high_query( $pType, $pVal, $gVal, $class_style, $cVal, $pageCat );
if(empty($flowQ)===false){
$function->generate_view( $flowQ, $pType, $pVal, $gVal, $class_style, $cVal, $pageCat );
}
The current SQL built by these functions are as follow:
flow_query();
$query = $this->db->prepare( "SELECT * FROM `pumps` WHERE `pump_type` = ? AND `psi_a` >= ? AND gpm_a >= ? AND `pump_category` = ? ORDER BY pump_type DESC" );
$query->bindValue(1, $pType);
$query->bindValue(2, $pVal);
$query->bindValue(3, $gVal);
$query->bindValue(4, $cVal);
The second query is pretty much identical, but it uses psi_a and gpm_a as value parameters. Is there any way to combine these querys to return a single result set that will reference psi_a and gpm_a, and if that returns no results then it references psi_b and gpm_b?
I am relatively novice to SQL so if this is not possible then I shall seek an alternative solution.
May as well call it an answer. You can use and / or clauses in you where statement.
where (psi_a = ? and gpm_a = ? ) or (psi_b = ? and gpm_b = ? )
You can also put a case clause in the select statement that will show you which where clause found the match if it's needed.
I have a query I need to perform to show search results for a project. What needs to happen, I need to sort the results by the "horsesActiveDate" and this applies to all of them except for any ad with the adtypesID=7. Those results are sorted by date but they must always result after all other ads.
So I will have all my ads in the result set be ordered by the Active Date AND adtypesID != 7. After that, I need all adtypesID=7 to be sorted by Active Date and appended at the bottom of all the results.
I'm hoping to put this in one query instead of two and appending them together in PHP. The way the code is written, I have to find a way to get it all in one query.
So here is my original query which has worked great until I had to ad the adtypesID=7 which has different sorting requirements.
This is the query that exists now that doesn't take into account the adtypesID for sorting.
SELECT
horses.horsesID,
horsesDescription,
horsesActiveDate,
adtypesID,
states.statesName,
horses_images.himagesPath
FROM horses
LEFT JOIN states ON horses.statesID = states.statesID
LEFT JOIN horses_images ON horses_images.himagesDefault = 1 AND horses_images.horsesID = horses.horsesID AND horses_images.himagesPath != ''
WHERE
horses.horsesStud = 0
AND horses.horsesSold = 0
AND horses.horsesID IN
(
SELECT DISTINCT horses.horsesID
FROM horses
LEFT JOIN horses_featured ON horses_featured.horsesID = horses.horsesID
WHERE horses.horsesActive = 1
)
ORDER BY adtypesID, horses.horsesActiveDate DESC
My first thought was to do two queries where one looked for all the ads that did not contain adtypesID=7 and sort those as the query does, then run a second query to find only those ads with adtypesID=7 and sort those by date. Then take those two results and append them to each other. Since I need to get this all into one query, I can't use a php function to do that.
Is there a way to merge the two query results one after the other in mysql? Is there a better way to run this query that will accomplish this sorting?
The Ideal Results would be as below (I modified the column names so they would be shorter):
ID | Description | ActiveDate | adtypesID | statesName | himagesPath
___________________________________________________________________________
3 | Ad Text | 06-01-2010 | 3 | OK | image.jpg
2 | Ad Text | 05-31-2010 | 2 | LA | image1.jpg
9 | Ad Text | 03-01-2010 | 4 | OK | image3.jpg
6 | Ad Text | 06-01-2010 | 7 | OK | image5.jpg
6 | Ad Text | 05-01-2010 | 7 | OK | image5.jpg
6 | Ad Text | 04-01-2010 | 7 | OK | image5.jpg
Any help that can be provided will be greatly appreciated!
I am not sure about the exact syntax in MySQL, but something like
ORDER BY case when adtypesID = 7 then 2 else 1 end ASC, horses.horsesActiveDate DESC
would work in many other SQL dielects.
Note that most SQL dialects allow the order by to not only be a column, but an expression.
This should work:
ORDER BY (adtypesID = 7) ASC, horses.horsesActiveDate DESC
Use a Union to append two queries together, like this:
SELECT whatever FROM wherever ORDER BY something AND adtypesID!=7
UNION
SELECT another FROM somewhere ORDER BY whocares AND adtypesID=7
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/union.html
I re-wrote your query as:
SELECT h.horsesID,
h.horsesDescription,
h.horsesActiveDate,
adtypesID,
s.statesName,
hi.himagesPath
FROM HORSES h
LEFT JOIN STATES s ON s.stateid = h.statesID
LEFT JOIN HORSES_IMAGES hi ON hi.horsesID = h.horsesID
AND hi.himagesDefault = 1
AND hi.himagesPath != ''
LEFT JOIN HORSES_FEATURED hf ON hf.horsesID = h.horsesID
WHERE h.horsesStud = 0
AND h.horsesSold = 0
AND h.horsesActive = 1
ORDER BY (adtypesID = 7) ASC, h.horsesActiveDate DESC
The IN subquery, using a LEFT JOIN and such, will mean that any horse record whose horsesActive value is 1 will be returned - regardless if they have an associated HORSES_FEATURED record. I leave it to you for checking your data to decide if it should really be an INNER JOIN. Likewise for the STATES table relationship...