Neo4jrb 8.x- Cypher query issues - cypher

I am using a rails app with neo4j database, recently I had updated Neo4j server from v 2.x to 3.x and the gem neo4j from 7.x to 8.x .
Having these models in my app:
class Country
include Neo4j::ActiveNode
property :summary, type: String
property :code, type: String
has_many :out, :provinces, type: :placed, model_class: :Province
end
class Province
include Neo4j::ActiveNode
property :summary, type: String
property :code, type: String
has_one :in, :country, type: :placed, model_class: :Country
end
when I try to do a query in this way:
Neo4j::Core::Query.new.match(p: Province, c: Country).match("(c)-[PLACED]->(p)").order_by('p.summary').return(:p).pluck(:p)
I retrieve this error:
Neo4j::Core::Query.new.match(p: Province, c: Country).match("(c)-[PLACED]->(p)").order_by('p.summary').return(:p).pluck(:p)
NoMethodError: undefined method `_query' for nil:NilClass
and in the same way for the other similar queries performed by Neo4j::Core::Query class.
What i am doing wrong?

The neo4j-core API has changed in the latest versions of the gems. You should check out the upgrade guide:
http://neo4jrb.readthedocs.io/en/8.0.x/UpgradeGuide.html

Related

Rails 5.1.3 API using Devise Auth Token custom rendering

I'm developing an API using Rails 5.1.3 and I'm using the gem devise_token_auth for authenticate. Everything was working fine until I needed to customize the JSON renderized after an error occurred, like the client sending an request with an invalid email.
So, to do this, I redefined my routes from
mount_devise_token_auth_for 'User', at: 'auth'
to
mount_devise_token_auth_for 'User', at: 'auth', controllers: {
registrations: 'devise/registrations'
}
and created a file app/controllers/devise/registrations_controller.rb as below:
class RegistrationController < DeviseAuthToken::RegistrationController
def render_create_error
render 'devise/registrations/create_error.json'
end
def render_create_success
super
end
end
Now all requests that depends of RegistrationController are getting this error:
ActionView::Template::Error:
undefined method `protect_against_forgery?' for #<#<Class:0x007f84cfab70d8>:0x007f84cec53e10>
What I should do to fix this error?
Thanks in advance!
This is what I did on my rails server (rails 6). I have created folders called overrides where I place all my custom controllers / views
routes.rb
mount_devise_token_auth_for 'User', at: 'auth', controllers: {
registrations: 'overrides/registrations'
}
app/controllers/overrides/registrations_controller.rb
module Overrides
class RegistrationsController < DeviseTokenAuth::RegistrationsController
def render_create_success
render partial: 'overrides/registrations/render_create_success.json.jbuilder'
end
end
end
app/views/overrides/registrations/_render_create_success.json.jbuilder
json.status 'success'
json.data do
json.extract! #resource, :field1, :field2, etc.
end

RSpec gives error 'trait not registered: name'

I tried to test my Rails 3 application on Windows with RSpec. I've wrote tests and factories, but can't solve the issues which raise when I run RSpec on command line.
Here is one of the test files:
require 'spec_helper'
describe "SignIns" do
it "can sign in" do
user = FactoryGirl.create(:user)
visit new_user_session_path
fill_in "login", with: user.username
fill_in "password", with: user.password
click_on "sign in"
current_user.username.should == user.username
end
end
And here's the factories.rb:
factory :layout do
name "layout1"
end
factory :club do
sequence(:name) { |i| "Club #{i}" }
contact_name "John Doe"
phone "+358401231234"
email "#{name}#example.com"
association :layout
end
factory :user do
sequence(:username) { |i| "user#{i}" }
password 'password'
email "test#example.com"
club
end
When I try to run RSpec it gives the following error:
trait not registered: name
#C: in 'object'
#.spec/features/sign_in_spec.rb:11:in 'block (2 levels) in (top(required))
What am I doing wrong?
I know this is an old question, but in case anyone else ends up here when searching "Trait not registered":
When using a dependent attribute like how email depends on name in the :club factory from the question, you need to wrap the attribute in curly braces so it gets lazy evaluated:
email {"#{name}#example.com"}
It's a FactoryGirl error, and it seems you're using (at spec/features/sign_in_spec.rb:11) something like :
FactoryGirl.create :user, :name
This will only work if you registered a trait called name for the Factory user, more on traits here
Note that if you just want to override the name of the created user, the syntax is
FactoryGirl.create :user, name: 'THE NAME'
For future readers' reference:
What didn't work -
ArgumentError:
Trait not registered: user_id
FactoryBot.define do
factory :startup do
user_id
name { FFaker::Lorem.word }
website { FFaker::Internet.uri(host: 'example.com') }
founded_at { "01.01.2000" }
end
end
How I solved this issue using either of these, when everything seemed to look right:
put empty curly braces after user_id
FactoryBot.define do
factory :startup do
user_id {}
name { FFaker::Lorem.word }
website { FFaker::Internet.uri(host: 'example.com') }
founded_at { "01.01.2000" }
end
end
Move user_id below other block-using helpers:
FactoryBot.define do
factory :startup do
name { FFaker::Lorem.word }
website { FFaker::Internet.uri(host: 'example.com') }
founded_at { "01.01.2000" }
user_id
end
end
Another late answer. I banged my head awhile because I forgot my model is very new and I didn't migrate the test database. So the attribute in fact did not exist.
i.e. had to run beforehand
rails db:migrate RAILS_ENV=test
In my case, none of the above(below?) answers helped to solve trait not registered error.
This time it was caused by improper order of loading factories. I've moved a file with declared global traits and FactoryBot started to load it in an improper order.
How did I fix it?
Rename it as, "spec/factories/01_factory_traits" and the issue is solved.
Perhaps there is a better way but it works.

Rails 3 functional tests: Can't mass-assign protected attributes: controller, action

When running functional tests on my controller code in a Rails 3 project, I have a fatal error; the params variable contains controller and action, and ActiveModel is not happy about it:
ActiveModel::MassAssignmentSecurity::Error: Can't mass-assign protected attributes: controller, action
/Users/phooze/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/activemodel-3.2.1/lib/active_model/mass_assignment_security/sanitizer.rb:48:in `process_removed_attributes'
/Users/phooze/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/activemodel-3.2.1/lib/active_model/mass_assignment_security/sanitizer.rb:20:in `debug_protected_attribute_removal'
/Users/phooze/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/activemodel-3.2.1/lib/active_model/mass_assignment_security/sanitizer.rb:12:in `sanitize'
/Users/phooze/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/activemodel-3.2.1/lib/active_model/mass_assignment_security.rb:228:in `sanitize_for_mass_assignment'
/Users/phooze/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/activerecord-3.2.1/lib/active_record/attribute_assignment.rb:75:in `assign_attributes'
/Users/phooze/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p0/gems/activerecord-3.2.1/lib/active_record/base.rb:495:in `initialize'
/Users/phooze/Documents/rails-app/app/controllers/credentials_controller.rb:40:in `new'
The application call is to the "new" method (where the error is occurring), the code is:
# Credential#create (POST)
def create
#credential = Credential.new(params)
# ... controller continues
end
Finally, my test case:
test "should create credential" do
assert_difference('Credential.count', 1) do
post :create, { :fid => "foobarbaz", :credentials_hash => "f00ba7f00ba7", :uid => "10023", :cid => "342" }
end
assert_response :created
end
Changing my controller code to a "separate" parameter hash containing ONLY the fid, credentials_hash, uid, and cid makes it work. I'm pretty sure Rails is trying to be "nice" and provide me with addtional values for testing, but it seems to be causing problems.
Any recommendations on how to solve this?
Looks like you have set config.active_record.mass_assignment_sanitizer = :strict
in your test environment only, but not in development or production, because params always contains controller and action, in any environment.
I think the best-practice recommendation here is to always use form_for, so that you'd have your credentials in params[:credential], or, indeed, do params.slice(:fid, :uid, etc).

Error when saving a Backbone.js model with Rails

I have Backbone.js collection and model for a project object:
window.Project = Backbone.Model.extend();
window.Projects = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: Project,
url: '/projects'
});
I have setup a rails controller to respond to the Backbone.js collection:
class ProjectsController < ApplicationController
def index
render :json => Project.all
end
def create
project = Project.create! params
render :json => project
end
end
Index works fine and I get a list of projects in my web app. The problem is if I try and create a model on the Projects collection I get a 500 error from the server.
The error message on the server is as follows:
Started POST "/projects" for 127.0.0.1 at 2011-08-21 08:27:56 +0100
Processing by ProjectsController#create as JSON
Parameters: {"title"=>"another test"}
Completed 500 Internal Server Error in 16ms
ActiveRecord::UnknownAttributeError (unknown attribute: action):
app/controllers/projects_controller.rb:8:in `create'
I am not sure what the unknown attribute: action is referring to.
For info I have set up the projects_controller as resources :projects. I have also set rails to ActiveRecord::Base.include_root_in_json = false.
Yes, Rails always adds the action and controller to params. The parameters come from ActionDispatch::Http::Parameters:
def parameters
#env["action_dispatch.request.parameters"] ||= begin
params = request_parameters.merge(query_parameters)
params.merge!(path_parameters)
encode_params(params).with_indifferent_access
end
end
And path_parameters:
Returns a hash with the parameters used to form the path of the request. Returned hash keys are strings:
{'action' => 'my_action', 'controller' => 'my_controller'}
So you shouldn't be doing project = Project.create! params. You could go the update_attributes route:
project = Project.new
project.update_attributes params[:model_name]
But this assumes that you have what you need in a sub-hash of params and it won't call your validators. Backbone won't namespace your attributes by default but you could override Backbone.sync and do it yourself. Still, you probably want your validations so update_attributes should generally be avoided.
Your best bet is to pull exactly the attributes out of params that you're expecting to be there. This is even the Backbone recommended practise:
*(In real code, never use update_attributes blindly, and always whitelist the attributes you allow to be changed.)*
You can enable parameter wrapping. Add a file in the initializer directory with:
ActiveSupport.on_load(:action_controller) do
wrap_parameters format: [:json]
end
and, for json request, you post params will now be wrapped with the model name.

How do I write a Rails 3.1 engine controller test in rspec?

I have written a Rails 3.1 engine with the namespace Posts. Hence, my controllers are found in app/controllers/posts/, my models in app/models/posts, etc. I can test the models just fine. The spec for one model looks like...
module Posts
describe Post do
describe 'Associations' do
it ...
end
... and everything works fine.
However, the specs for the controllers do not work. The Rails engine is mounted at /posts, yet the controller is Posts::PostController. Thus, the tests look for the controller route to be posts/posts.
describe "GET index" do
it "assigns all posts as #posts" do
Posts::Post.stub(:all) { [mock_post] }
get :index
assigns(:posts).should eq([mock_post])
end
end
which yields...
1) Posts::PostsController GET index assigns all posts as #posts
Failure/Error: get :index
ActionController::RoutingError:
No route matches {:controller=>"posts/posts"}
# ./spec/controllers/posts/posts_controller_spec.rb:16
I've tried all sorts of tricks in the test app's routes file... :namespace, etc, to no avail.
How do I make this work? It seems like it won't, since the engine puts the controller at /posts, yet the namespacing puts the controller at /posts/posts for the purpose of testing.
I'm assuming you're testing your engine with a dummy rails app, like the one that would be generated by enginex.
Your engine should be mounted in the dummy app:
In spec/dummy/config/routes.rb:
Dummy::Application.routes.draw do
mount Posts::Engine => '/posts-prefix'
end
My second assumption is that your engine is isolated:
In lib/posts.rb:
module Posts
class Engine < Rails::Engine
isolate_namespace Posts
end
end
I don't know if these two assumptions are really required, but that is how my own engine is structured.
The workaround is quite simple, instead of this
get :show, :id => 1
use this
get :show, {:id => 1, :use_route => :posts}
The :posts symbol should be the name of your engine and NOT the path where it is mounted.
This works because the get method parameters are passed straight to ActionDispatch::Routing::RouteSet::Generator#initialize (defined here), which in turn uses #named_route to get the correct route from Rack::Mount::RouteSet#generate (see here and here).
Plunging into the rails internals is fun, but quite time consuming, I would not do this every day ;-) .
HTH
I worked around this issue by overriding the get, post, put, and delete methods that are provided, making it so they always pass use_route as a parameter.
I used Benoit's answer as a basis for this. Thanks buddy!
module ControllerHacks
def get(action, parameters = nil, session = nil, flash = nil)
process_action(action, parameters, session, flash, "GET")
end
# Executes a request simulating POST HTTP method and set/volley the response
def post(action, parameters = nil, session = nil, flash = nil)
process_action(action, parameters, session, flash, "POST")
end
# Executes a request simulating PUT HTTP method and set/volley the response
def put(action, parameters = nil, session = nil, flash = nil)
process_action(action, parameters, session, flash, "PUT")
end
# Executes a request simulating DELETE HTTP method and set/volley the response
def delete(action, parameters = nil, session = nil, flash = nil)
process_action(action, parameters, session, flash, "DELETE")
end
private
def process_action(action, parameters = nil, session = nil, flash = nil, method = "GET")
parameters ||= {}
process(action, parameters.merge!(:use_route => :my_engine), session, flash, method)
end
end
RSpec.configure do |c|
c.include ControllerHacks, :type => :controller
end
Use the rspec-rails routes directive:
describe MyEngine::WidgetsController do
routes { MyEngine::Engine.routes }
# Specs can use the engine's routes & named URL helpers
# without any other special code.
end
– RSpec Rails 2.14 official docs.
Based on this answer I chose the following solution:
#spec/spec_helper.rb
RSpec.configure do |config|
# other code
config.before(:each) { #routes = UserManager::Engine.routes }
end
The additional benefit is, that you don't need to have the before(:each) block in every controller-spec.
Solution for a problem when you don't have or cannot use isolate_namespace:
module Posts
class Engine < Rails::Engine
end
end
In controller specs, to fix routes:
get :show, {:id => 1, :use_route => :posts_engine}
Rails adds _engine to your app routes if you don't use isolate_namespace.
I'm developing a gem for my company that provides an API for the applications we're running. We're using Rails 3.0.9 still, with latest Rspec-Rails (2.10.1). I was having a similar issue where I had defined routes like so in my Rails engine gem.
match '/companyname/api_name' => 'CompanyName/ApiName/ControllerName#apimethod'
I was getting an error like
ActionController::RoutingError:
No route matches {:controller=>"company_name/api_name/controller_name", :action=>"apimethod"}
It turns out I just needed to redefine my route in underscore case so that RSpec could match it.
match '/companyname/api_name' => 'company_name/api_name/controller_name#apimethod'
I guess Rspec controller tests use a reverse lookup based on underscore case, whereas Rails will setup and interpret the route if you define it in camelcase or underscore case.
It was already mentioned about adding routes { MyEngine::Engine.routes }, although it's possible to specify this for all controller tests:
# spec/support/test_helpers/controller_routes.rb
module TestHelpers
module ControllerRoutes
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
routes { MyEngine::Engine.routes }
end
end
end
and use in rails_helper.rb:
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include TestHelpers::ControllerRoutes, type: :controller
end