I'm having some difficulties trying to access the ontologias of AgroPortal, it says my api key is not valid but I created an account and it was given to me an api key.
I'm trying to do like I did with BioPortal since the API is the same but with the BioPortal it works, my code is like this:
function getAgroPortalOntologies() {
var searchString = "http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies?apikey=72574b5d-b741-42a4-b449-4c1b64dda19a&display_links=false&display_context=false";
// we cache results and try to retrieve them on every new execution.
var cache = CacheService.getPrivateCache();
var text;
if (cache.get("ontologies_fragments") == null) {
text = UrlFetchApp.fetch(searchString).getContentText();
splitResultAndCache(cache, "ontologies", text);
} else {
text = getCacheResultAndMerge(cache, "ontologies");
}
var doc = JSON.parse(text);
var ontologies = doc;
var ontologyDictionary = {};
for (ontologyIndex in doc) {
var ontology = doc[ontologyIndex];
ontologyDictionary[ontology.acronym] = {"name":ontology.name, "uri":ontology["#id"]};
}
return sortOnKeys(ontologyDictionary);
}
var result2 = UrlFetchApp.fetch("http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/annotator", options).getContentText();
And what I did with BioPortal is very similar, I did this:
function getBioPortalOntologies() {
var searchString = "http://data.bioontology.org/ontologies?apikey=df3b13de-1ff4-4396-a183-80cc845046cb&display_links=false&display_context=false";
// we cache results and try to retrieve them on every new execution.
var cache = CacheService.getPrivateCache();
var text;
if (cache.get("ontologies_fragments") == null) {
text = UrlFetchApp.fetch(searchString).getContentText();
splitResultAndCache(cache, "ontologies", text);
} else {
text = getCacheResultAndMerge(cache, "ontologies");
}
var doc = JSON.parse(text);
var ontologies = doc;
var ontologyDictionary = {};
for (ontologyIndex in doc) {
var ontology = doc[ontologyIndex];
ontologyDictionary[ontology.acronym] = {"name":ontology.name, "uri":ontology["#id"]};
}
return sortOnKeys(ontologyDictionary);
}
var result = UrlFetchApp.fetch("http://data.bioontology.org/annotator", options).getContentText();
Can someone help me?
Thanks, my regards.
Related
This seems like a trivial issue but I'm not sure Photoshop supports this type of functionality:
Is it possible to implement use last script functionality?
That is without having to add a function on each and every script that writes it's filename to a text file.
Well... It's a bit klunky, but I suppose you could read in the scriptlistener in reverse order and find the first mention of a script file:
// Switch off any dialog boxes
displayDialogs = DialogModes.NO; // OFF
var scripts_folder = "D:\\PS_scripts";
var js = "C:\\Users\\GhoulFool\\Desktop\\ScriptingListenerJS.log";
var jsLog = read_file(js);
var lastScript = process_file(jsLog);
// use function to call scripts
callScript(lastScript)
// Set Display Dialogs back to normal
displayDialogs = DialogModes.ALL; // NORMAL
function callScript (ascript)
{
eval('//#include "' + ascript + '";\r');
}
function process_file(afile)
{
var needle = ".jsx";
var msg = "";
// Let's do this backwards
for (var i = afile.length-1; i>=0; i--)
{
var str = afile[i];
if(str.indexOf(needle) > 0)
{
var regEx = str.replace(/(.+new\sFile\(\s")(.+\.jsx)(.+)/gim, "$2");
if (regEx != null)
{
return regEx;
}
}
}
}
function read_file(inFile)
{
var theFile = new File(inFile);
//read in file
var lines = new Array();
var l = 0;
var txtFile = new File(theFile);
txtFile.open('r');
var str = "";
while(!txtFile.eof)
{
var line = txtFile.readln();
if (line != null && line.length >0)
{
lines[l++] = line;
}
}
txtFile.close();
return lines;
}
I have the code below, but i've been struggling to get it to work properly, either it creates duplicate folders every time i run it, or it doesn't upload the attachments and just creates the folders... I am also getting an error now that the newMail Uploads object does not have a .hasnext() function.
What i want to do, is have this script running and it puts attachments in a folder relating to their label -- So in the code below, all mail with the newMail label would go to a single folder, but i want to be able to extend the code further to run for multiple labels ect, so i want to check if the relevant folders exist and if not create them, if they exist they should be used.
-Edit, Now it is only taking the attachment from the first email from a certain address.
function startProcess()
{
var gmailLabels = "newLabel";
var driveFolder = "newFolder";
var archiveLabel = "Processed";
var moveToLabel = GmailApp.getUserLabelByName(archiveLabel);
if ( ! moveToLabel )
{
moveToLabel = GmailApp.createLabel(archiveLabel);
}
findFolder(gmailLabels, driveFolder, archiveLabel, moveToLabel);
}
function findFolder(gmailLabels, driveFolder, archiveLabel, moveToLabel)
{
var filter = "has:attachment label:" + gmailLabels;
var folder = DriveApp.getFoldersByName(driveFolder);
if (folder.hasNext()) {
folder = folder.next();
} else {
folder = DriveApp.createFolder(driveFolder);
}
callThreads(gmailLabels, driveFolder, archiveLabel, moveToLabel, filter, folder)
}
function callThreads(gmailLabels, driveFolder, archiveLabel, moveToLabel, filter, folder)
{
var threads = GmailApp.search(filter);
for (var x=0; x<threads.length; x++) {
var label = GmailApp.getUserLabelByName(gmailLabels);
var message = threads[x].getMessages()[x];
var desc = message.getSubject() + " #" + message.getId();
var att = message.getAttachments();
for (var z=0; z<att.length; z++) {
try {
file = folder.createFile(att[z]);
file.setDescription(desc);
}
catch (e) {
Logger.log(e.toString());
}
}
//threads[x].addLabel(moveToLabel);
label.removeFromThreads(threads);
//threads[x].moveToTrash();
}
}
This is just a suggestion. I haven't tested this code, it probably doesn't work. But that's not the point. I'm trying to show how you might create some order to your code so that it's easier to understand and debug:
function sendToGoogleDrive() {
makeNewFolders();
putEmailsIntoFolders();
};
function makeNewFolders() {
var gmailLabels = "newMail";
var driveFolder = "newMail";
var archiveLabel = "Processed";
var rootUploadFolders ="newMail Uploads";
var rootDriveFolder = DriveApp.getFolders();
var rootExist = false;
var childExist = false;
while (rootDriveFolder.hasNext()) {
var folder = rootDriveFolder.next();
if(folder.getName()==rootUploadFolders) {
var folderId = folder.getId();
if(folder.getName()!==driveFolder) {
var child = DriveApp.getFolderById(folderId).createFolder(driveFolder);
};
};
};
};
function putEmailsIntoFolders() {
};
I am trying to write a script that copies a layer from one document into another.
var srcDocName = 0;
var destDocName = 1;
var layerNameOriginal = "Original";
var layerNameCopyTo = "Destination";
var destDoc = app.documents.item(destDocName);
var layerSrc = app.documents.item(srcDocName).layers.item(layerNameOriginal);
try {
layerSrc.duplicate(destDoc, ElementPlacement.INSIDE);
}
catch(e) {
alert(e)
}
Apparently this works in Photoshop but not in InDesign. I have been trying for ages to find some decent documentation for InDesign scripting. But all I can find is the CS scripting guide, which isn't of much use.
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/indesign/pdfs/InDesignCS5_ScriptingGuide_JS.pdf
If someone can point me to a good reference to the object model I would be grateful.
After some more googling I finally found the answer:
var sourceLayer = app.documents[0].layers.itemByName("Layer1");
var destLayer = app.documents[1].layers[0];
sourceLayer.pageItems.everyItem().duplicate(destLayer);
I also came across jongware which seems to be a complete Object reference extracted directly out of Adobe CS.
You can use this script: https://redokun.com/blog/indesign-copy-entire-layer-one-file-another
The underlying implementation is basically the same, but we've added a UI so it's not necessary to edit the script every time the layer name changes.
Edit: We've been told that the solution above doesn't work with threaded text frames, so I re-wrote the script. The new implementation is way more complex but it now supports threaded TFs.
To expand on the solution offered by Loopo and offer you the ability to copy all layers from 1 document to another...
main();
function main()
{
var source = GetSourceDocument();
if(source == -1)
{
return;
}
var target = GetTargetDocument ();
if(target == -1)
{
return;
}
if(target == source)
{
return;
}
copyLayersOver(source, target);
}
function GetSourceDocument()
{
var returnVal = -1;
var oldPrefs = app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel;
app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel=UserInteractionLevels.INTERACT_WITH_ALL;
var dialog = app.dialogs.add({name:"Document to Copy From", canCanel: true, label:"DocumentToCopyFrom"});
var col1 = dialog.dialogColumns.add();
var StringList= [];
for(var i = 0; i<app.documents.length; i++)
{
StringList.push("[" + app.documents[i].index + "] " + app.documents[i].name);
}
var ddl = col1.dropdowns.add({id:"SourceDocDDL", stringList: StringList});
if(dialog.show() == true)
{
returnVal = ddl.stringList[ddl.selectedIndex].split("]")[0].substr(1);
}
else
{
returnVal -1;
}
dialog.destroy();
app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel = oldPrefs;
return returnVal;
}
function GetTargetDocument()
{
var returnVal = -1;
var oldPrefs = app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel;
app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel=UserInteractionLevels.INTERACT_WITH_ALL;
var dialog = app.dialogs.add({name:"Document to Copy To", canCanel: true, label:"DocumentToCopyTo"});
var col1 = dialog.dialogColumns.add();
var StringList= [];
for(var i = 0; i<app.documents.length; i++)
{
StringList.push("[" + app.documents[i].index + "] " + app.documents[i].name);
}
var ddl = col1.dropdowns.add({id:"SourceDocDDL", stringList: StringList});
if(dialog.show() == true)
{
returnVal = ddl.stringList[ddl.selectedIndex].split("]")[0].substr(1);
}
else
{
returnVal -1;
}
dialog.destroy();
app.scriptPreferences.userInteractionLevel = oldPrefs;
return returnVal;
}
function copyLayersOver(source, target)
{
var sourceDocument = app.documents[source];
var targetDocument = app.documents[target];
var sourceLayers = sourceDocument.layers;
//Match the number of pages
while(targetDocument.pages.length < sourceDocument.pages.length)
{
targetDocument.pages.add();
}
//copy the layers over
for(var i= 0; i < sourceLayers.length; i++)
{
var names = targetDocument.layers.everyItem().name;
var merge = false;
for(var y = 0; y < names.length; y++)
{
if(names[y] == sourceLayers[i].name)
{
merge = true;
break;
}
}
if(merge)
{
var targetLayer = targetDocument.layers.add();
targetLayer.name = "temp";
sourceLayers[i].pageItems.everyItem().duplicate(targetLayer);
targetDocument.layers.itemByName(sourceLayers[i].name).merge(targetLayer);
}
else
{
var targetLayer = targetDocument.layers.add();
targetLayer.name = sourceLayers[i].name;
targetLayer.layerColor = sourceLayers[i].layerColor;
sourceLayers[i].pageItems.everyItem().duplicate(targetLayer);
}
}
}
I try to get selected user IDs from people picker control as below:
function GetUserIdsFromPP() {
var xml = _picker.find('div#divEntityData');
var visiblefor = new Array();
xml.each(function (i, row) {
var data = $(this).children().first('div').attr('data');
var xmlDoc;
if (window.DOMParser) {
parser = new DOMParser();
xmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(data, "text/xml");
}
else // Internet Explorer
{
xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM");
xmlDoc.async = false;
xmlDoc.loadXML(data);
}
var uid = xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName('Value')[0].firstChild.nodeValue;
visiblefor.push(uid);
});
return visiblefor;
}
The problem is that sometimes XML doesn't contain <Key>SPUserID</Key><Value>1</Value> and I get FQUN (user login with domain name).
What is the better way to resolve selected SPUserIds from PeoplePicker control?
This is how resolve emails from people picker control on client side
function GetEmailsFromPicker() {
var xml = _picker.find('div#divEntityData');
var result = new Array();
xml.each(function (i, row) {
var data = $(this).children().first('div').attr('data');
var xmlDoc;
if (window.DOMParser) {
parser = new DOMParser();
xmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(data, "text/xml");
}
else // Internet Explorer
{
xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM");
xmlDoc.async = false;
xmlDoc.loadXML(data);
}
var emailIndex = -1;
for (var i = 0; i < xmlDoc.childNodes[0].childNodes.length; i++) {
var element = xmlDoc.childNodes[0].childNodes[i];
var key = element.childNodes[0].childNodes[0].nodeValue;
if (key == 'Email') {
var uid = xmlDoc.childNodes[0].childNodes[i].childNodes[1].childNodes[0].nodeValue;
result.push({ EMail: uid });
break;
}
}
});
return result;
}
Use the above answer, but...
Replace this with an appropriate Jquery or Javascript element name.
var xml = _picker.find('div#divEntityData');
I'm trying to archive my search results for a term by
Using the Bing API in an async controller
Inserting them into database using Entity Framework
using the Bing API and insert them into a database using entity framework. For whatever reason it is returning 50 results, but then it enters 100 results into the database.
My Controller Code:
public class DHWebServicesController : AsyncController
{
//
// GET: /WebService/
private DHContext context = new DHContext();
[HttpPost]
public void RunReportSetAsync(int id)
{
int iTotalCount = 1;
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment(iTotalCount);
if (!context.DHSearchResults.Any(xx => xx.CityMarketComboRunID == id))
{
string strBingSearchUri = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingSearchURI"];
string strBingAccountKey = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingAccountKey"];
string strBingUserAccountKey = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingUserAccountKey"];
CityMarketComboRun cityMarketComboRun = context.CityMarketComboRuns.Include(xx => xx.CityMarketCombo).Include(xx => xx.CityMarketCombo.City).First(xx => xx.CityMarketComboRunID == id);
var bingContainer = new Bing.BingSearchContainer(new Uri(strBingSearchUri));
bingContainer.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(strBingUserAccountKey, strBingAccountKey);
// now we can build the query
Keyword keyword = context.Keywords.First();
var bingWebQuery = bingContainer.Web(keyword.Name, "en-US", "Moderate", cityMarketComboRun.CityMarketCombo.City.Latitude, cityMarketComboRun.CityMarketCombo.City.Longitude, null, null, null);
var bingWebResults = bingWebQuery.Execute();
context.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false;
int i = 1;
DHSearchResult dhSearchResult = new DHSearchResult();
List<DHSearchResult> lst = new List<DHSearchResult>();
var webResults = bingWebResults.ToList();
foreach (var result in webResults)
{
dhSearchResult = new DHSearchResult();
dhSearchResult.BingID = result.ID;
dhSearchResult.CityMarketComboRunID = id;
dhSearchResult.Description = result.Description;
dhSearchResult.DisplayUrl = result.DisplayUrl;
dhSearchResult.KeywordID = keyword.KeywordID;
dhSearchResult.Created = DateTime.Now;
dhSearchResult.Modified = DateTime.Now;
dhSearchResult.Title = result.Title;
dhSearchResult.Url = result.Url;
dhSearchResult.Ordinal = i;
lst.Add(dhSearchResult);
i++;
}
foreach (DHSearchResult c in lst)
{
context.DHSearchResults.Add(c);
context.SaveChanges();
}
AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "The total number of results was "+lst.Count+". And there are " + context.DHSearchResults.Count().ToString();
}
else
{
AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "You have already run this report";
}
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement(iTotalCount);
}
public string RunReportSetCompleted(string message)
{
string str = message;
return str;
}
}
Here is how I am calling it from my asp.net mvc 4 page.
#Ajax.ActionLink("Run Report", "GatherKeywordsFromBing", "DHWebServices",
new { id=item.CityMarketComboRunID},
new AjaxOptions { OnSuccess = "ShowNotifier();", UpdateTargetId = "TopNotifierMessage", HttpMethod = "POST", InsertionMode = InsertionMode.Replace, LoadingElementId = strCityMarketComboProgressID, LoadingElementDuration = 1000 },
new { #class = "ViewLink" })
<span class="ProgressIndicator" id="#strCityMarketComboProgressID"><img src="#Url.Content("~/Content/img/SmallBall.gif")" alt="loading" /></span>
For whatever reason all of
Try saving only once:
foreach (DHSearchResult c in lst)
{
context.DHSearchResults.Add(c);
}
context.SaveChanges();
Also there's nothing asynchronous in your code, so there's no point of using asynchronous controller. Not only that it won't improve anything but it might make things worse.