I have a file (; seperated) with data like this
111111121;000-000.1;000-000.2
111111211;000-000.1;000-000.2
111112111;000-000.1;000-000.2
111121111;000-000.1;000-000.2
111211111;000-000.1;000-000.2
112111111;000-000.1;000-000.2
121111112;000-000.2;020-000.8
121111121;000-000.2;020-000.8
121111211;000-000.2;020-000.8
121113111;000-000.3;000-200.2
211111121;000-000.1;000-000.2
I would like to remove any $3 that has less than 3 occurences, so the outcome would be like
111111121;000-000.1;000-000.2
111111211;000-000.1;000-000.2
111112111;000-000.1;000-000.2
111121111;000-000.1;000-000.2
111211111;000-000.1;000-000.2
112111111;000-000.1;000-000.2
121111112;000-000.2;020-000.8
121111121;000-000.2;020-000.8
121111211;000-000.2;020-000.8
121113111;000-000.3
211111121;000-000.1;000-000.2
That is, only $3 got deleted, as it had only a single occurence
Sadly I am not really sure if (thus how) this could be done relatively easily (as doing the =COUNT.IF matching, and manuel delete in Excel feels quite embarrassing)
$ awk -F';' 'NR==FNR{cnt[$3]++;next} cnt[$3]<3{sub(/;[^;]+$/,"")} 1' file file
111111121;000-000.1;000-000.2
111111211;000-000.1;000-000.2
111112111;000-000.1;000-000.2
111121111;000-000.1;000-000.2
111211111;000-000.1;000-000.2
112111111;000-000.1;000-000.2
121111112;000-000.2;020-000.8
121111121;000-000.2;020-000.8
121111211;000-000.2;020-000.8
121113111;000-000.3
211111121;000-000.1;000-000.2
or if you prefer:
$ awk -F';' 'NR==FNR{cnt[$3]++;next} {print (cnt[$3]<3 ? $1 FS $2 : $0)}' file file
this awk one-liner can help, it processes the file twice:
awk -F';' 'NR==FNR{a[$3]++;next}a[$3]<3{NF--}7' file file
Though that awk solutions are the best in terms of performance, your goal could be also achieved with something like this:
while IFS=" " read a b;do
if [[ "$a" -lt "3" ]];then
sed -i "s/$b//" b.txt
fi
done <<<"$(cut -d";" -f3 b.txt |sort |uniq -c)"
Operation is based on the output of cut which counts occurrences.
$cut -d";" -f3 b.txt |sort |uniq -c
7 000-000.2
1 000-200.2
3 020-000.8
Above works for editing source file in place, so keep a back up for testing.
You can feed the file twice to awk. On the first run you gather a statistic that you use in the second run:
script.awk
FNR == NR { stats[ $3 ]++
next
}
{ if( stats[$3] < 3) print $1 $2
else print
}
Run it like this: awk -F\; -f script.awk yourfile yourfile .
The condition FNR == NR is true during processing of the first filename given to awk. The next statement skips the second block.
Thus the second block is only used for processing the second filename given to awk (which is here the same as the first filename).
Related
I have a file set up like
Words on
many line
%
More Words
on many lines
%
Even More Words
on many lines
%
and I would like to output the second to last record of this file where the record is delimited by % after each block of text.
I have used:
awk -v RS=\% ' END{ print NR }' $f
to find the number of records (1136). Then I did
awk -v RS=\% ' { print $(NR-1) }' $f
and
awk -v RS=\% ' { print $(NR=1135) }' $f
.
Neither of these worked, and, instead, displayed a record towards the beginning of the file and a many blank lines.
OUTPUT:
"You know, of course, that the Tasmanians, who never committed adultery, are
now extinct."
-- M. Somerset Maugham
"The
is
what
that
This output had many, many more blank lines and contains a record near the middle of the file.
awk -v RS=\% 'END{ print $(NR-1) }' $f
returns a blank line. The same command with different $(NR-x) values also returns a blank line.
Can someone help me to print the second to last record in this case?
Thanks
You can do:
awk '{this=last;last=$0} END{print this}' file
Or, if you don't mind having the entire file in memory:
awk '{a[NR]=$0} END{print a[NR-1]}' file
Or, if it is just line count (or record count) based, you can keep a rolling deletion going so you are not too piggish on memory:
$ seq 999999 | tail -2
999998
999999
$ seq 999999 | awk '{a[NR]=$0; delete a[NR-3]} END{print a[NR-1]}'
999998
If they are blocks of text the same method works if you can separate the blocks into delimited records.
Given:
$ echo "$txt"
Words on
many line
%
More Words
on many lines
%
Even More Words
on many lines
%
You can do:
$ echo "$txt" | awk -v RS=\% '{a[NR]=$0} END{print a[NR-1]}'
Even More Words
on many lines
$ echo "$txt" | awk -v RS=\% '{a[NR]=$0} END{print a[NR-2]}'
More Words
on many lines
If you want to not print the leading and trailing \n you can do:
$ echo "$txt" | awk 'BEGIN{RS="%\n"} {a[NR]=$0} END{printf a[NR-2]}'
Words on
many line
Finally, if you know the specific record you want to print, do it this way in awk:
$ seq 999999 | awk -v mrk=1135 'NR==mrk{print; exit}'
1135
If you want a random record, you can do:
$ awk -v min=1 -v max=1135 'BEGIN{srand()
RS="%\n"
tgt=int(min+rand()*(max-min+1))
}
NR==tgt{print; exit}' file
Does the solution have to be with awk? Just using head and tail would be simpler.
tail -2 file.txt | head 1 > justthatline.txt
The best way for this would be to use the BEGIN construct.
awk 'BEGIN{RS="%\n"; ORS="%\n"}(NR>=2){print}' file
RS and ORS set the input file and output record separators respectively.
I'm attempting to write a small script in bash. The script's purpose is to pull out a search pattern from file1.txt and to print the line number of the matching search from file2.txt. I know the exact place of the pattern that I want in file1.txt, and I can pull that out quite easily with sed and awk e.g.
sed -n 3p file1.txt | awk '{print $4}'
The part that I'm having trouble with is passing that information again to awk to use as a search pattern in file2.txt. Something along the lines of:
awk '/search_pattern/{print NR}' file2.txt
I was able to get this code working in two lines of code by storing the output of the first line as a variable, and passing that variable to awk in the second line,
myVariable=`sed -n 3p file1.txt | awk '{print $4}'`
awk '/'"$myVariable"'/{print NR}' file2.txt
but this seems "inelegant". I was hoping there was a way to do this in one line of code using file redirects (or something similar?). Any help is greatly appreciated!
You can avoid sed | awk with
awk 'NR==3{print $4; exit 0}' file1.txt
You can do your search with:
search=$(awk 'NR==3{print $4; exit 0}' file1.txt)
awk -v search="$search" '$0 ~ search { print NR }' file2.txt
You could even write that all on one line, but I don't recommend that; clarity is more important than brevity.
In principle, you could use:
awk 'NR==3{search = $4; next} FNR!=NR && $0 ~ search {print NR}' file1.txt file2.txt
This scans file1.txt and finds the search pattern; then it scans file2.txt and finds the lines that match. One line — even moderately clear. There'll be lots of matches if there isn't a column 4 on line 3 of file1.txt.
I am trying to get the difference of two text files. However, the first line can always change. For this reason I was executing this from a python:
tail -n +2 file1
tail -n +2 file2
Then to compare I match the results from the outputs.
However, I would like to use awk or sed if possible.
What I have found so far is:
awk 'NR == FNR { A[$0]=3; next } !A[$0]' file2 file1
but this compares from the first line.
How can I diff from the second line?
You can use diff together with process substitution:
diff <(tail -n +2 file1) <(tail -n +2 file2)
You can write something like
awk 'NR == FNR { A[$0]=3; next } !A[$0]&&FNR>1' file2 file1
FNR>1 The FNR value is reset to 1 for each file read. So FNR>1 selects all lines from the second line onwards.
All of the current AWK answers won't show differences between files, they will simply show if one file doesn't contains lines from the other, with no respect to order or number of occurences.
An awk way that compares line by line.
awk 'NR==FNR{A[FNR]=$0}FNR>1&&!(A[FNR]==$0)' file1 file2
If you want both lines to be output(similar to diff(ish))
awk 'NR==FNR{A[FNR]=$0}
FNR>1&&!(A[FNR]==$0){
print "Line:",FNR"\n"ARGV[1]":"A[FNR]"\n->\n"ARGV[2]":"$0"\n"
}' file file2
Explanation
Sets an array with File record number(FNR) as key to the line for first file.
Checks if line in second file is the same for the same FNR as the first file.
If it isn't print
Second one is mostly just formatting for the output.
It outputs FNR,first arg to awk(filename1),line from array,arrow,second arg to awk(filename2),line from file2
In addition to nu11p01n73R solution, you can always use <(...) for input files:
awk 'NR == FNR { A[$0]=3; next } !A[$0]' <(tail -n+2 f2) <(tail -n+2 f1)
I have a bunch of dns entries in a file
a1.us.company.com ------ DO NOT PRINT
a2.us.us.company.com ------PRINT------ ("us" is repeated)
a3.eu.a3.compamy.com ------PRINT------ ("a3" is repeated)
a4.tx.a4.tx.company.com -----PRINT------- ("a4" and "tx" is repeated)
awk 'BEGIN {FS="."; OFS="."} {if ($2==$3) print $1"."$2"."$NF}' device_list
awk 'BEGIN {FS="."; OFS="."} {if ($1==$3) print $1"."$2"."$NF}' device_list
I am using 2 commands above.
Can someone please give me a awk command that lists duplicate columns per row.
Some of the names are crazy with as many as 7 to 8 . separated fields.
$ cat file
a1.us.company.com
a2.us.us.company.com
a3.eu.a3.compamy.com
a4.tx.a4.tx.company.com
$ awk -F'.' '{delete seen; for (i=1;i<=NF;i++) if (seen[$i]++) {print; next} }' file
a2.us.us.company.com
a3.eu.a3.compamy.com
a4.tx.a4.tx.company.com
Note that using delete seen is GNU-awk specific, with other awks you can delete the whole array by doing split("",seen).
$ awk -F. '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++)if(x[$i]++){print;delete x;next}}' file
a2.us.us.company.com
a3.eu.a3.compamy.com
a4.tx.a4.tx.company.com
If you want to try this on a Solaris/SunOS system, change awk to /usr/xpg4/bin/awk , /usr/xpg6/bin/awk , or nawk
I have a small problem and I would appreciate helping me in it.
In summary, I have a file:
1,5,6,7,8,9
2,3,8,5,35,3
2,46,76,98,9
I need to read specific lines from it and print them into another text document. I know I can use (awk '{print "$2" "$3"}') to print the second and third columns beside each other. However, I need to use two statement as (awk '{print "$2"}' >> file.text) then (awk '{print "$3"}' >> file.text), but the two columns would appear under each other and not beside each other.
How can I make them appear beside each other?
If you must extract the columns in separate processes, use paste to stitch them together. I assume your shell is bash/zsh/ksh, and I assume the blank lines in your sample input should not be there.
paste -d, <(awk -F, '{print $2}' file) <(awk -F, '{print $3}' file)
produces
5,6
3,8
46,76
Without the process substitutions:
awk -F, '{print $2}' file > tmp1
awk -F, '{print $3}' file > tmp2
paste -d, tmp1 tmp2 > output
Update based on your answer:
On first appearance, that's a confusing setup. Does this work?
for (( x=1; x<=$number_of_features; x++ )); do
feature_number=$(sed -n "$x {p;q}" feature.txt)
if [[ -f out.txt ]]; then
cut -d, -f$feature_number file.txt > out.txt
else
paste -d, out.txt <(cut -d, -f$feature_number file.txt) > tmp &&
mv tmp out.txt
fi
done
That has to read the file.txt file a number of times. It would clearly be more efficient to only have to read it once:
awk -F, -f numfeat=$number_of_features '
# read the feature file into an array
NR==FNR {
colno[++i] = $0
next
}
# now, process the file.txt and emit the desired columns
{
sep = ""
for (i=1; i<=numfeat; i++) {
printf "%s%s", sep, $(colno[i])
sep = FS
}
print ""
}
' feature.txt file.txt > out.txt
Thanks all for contributing in the answers. I believe that i should be more clearer in my question, sorry for that.
My code is as follow:
for (( x = 1; x <= $number_of_features ; x++ )) # the number extracted from a text file
do
feature_number=$(awk 'FNR == "'$x'" {print}' feature.txt)
awk -F, '{print $"'$feature_number'"}' file.txt >> out.txt
done
Basically, I extract the feature number (which is the same as column number) from a text document and then print that column. the text document may contains many features number.
The thing is, each time I have different features number (which reflect the column number). so, applying the above solutions are not sufficient for this problem.
I hope it is clearer now.
Waiting for your comments please.
Thanks
Ahmad
instead of using awks file redirection, use shell redirection eg
awk '{print $2,$3}' >> file
the comma is replaced with the value of the output field seperator( space by default ).