How to update all the strokes on the canvas in JSFL? - jsfl

I am looking for a way to update the widths of all the strokes on the canvas.
document.selectAll();
document.selection.forEach(function(el) {
if (el instanceof Shape) {
el.beginEdit();
el.edges.forEach(function(edge) {
edge.stroke.thickness = edge.stroke.thickness * 2;
});
el.endEdit();
}
});
This throws exceptions. In addition, there is no edge.setCustomStroke (that only exists for Shape objects, but I don't want to set the same stroke with for the entire selection of the canvas).

Related

Resize an already drawn rectangle paperjs

I am creating a rectangle in a canvas using paper JS. The following is code for drawing the rectangle in vue.js.
created () {
const toolDrag = event => {
let trackingRect = new paper.Path.Rectangle(event.downPoint, event.point)
trackingRect.strokeColor = new paper.Color('#2661D8')
trackingRect.strokeColor.alpha = 0.7
trackingRect.strokeWidth = this.strokeWidth
trackingRect.removeOn({
drag: true,
up: true
})
}
// Finalise rectangle properties and draw.
let $this = this;
const toolUp = event => {
let newRect = new paper.Path.Rectangle(event.downPoint, event.point)
newRect.strokeColor = new paper.Color(this.getColor().stroke)
newRect.fillColor = new paper.Color(this.getColor().fill)
newRect.strokeWidth = this.strokeWidth
newRect.selected = true;
// Custom data attribute:
newRect.data.type = 'rectangle'
newRect.data.class = ''
// Flag the annotation has been edited and the changes are not saved
this.flagAnnotationEdits()
}
this.toolRect = new paper.Tool();
this.toolRect.onMouseDrag = toolDrag;
this.toolRect.onMouseUp = toolUp;
},
Now I want to allow user to resize this drawn rectangle by dragging any corner of the rectangle, but I am kind of stuck and unable to understand how to do this.
I have seen solutions for resizing a rectangle by changing bounds, but could not find solution for my use case. Any help is appreciated.
There are many ways to achieve what you want.
One of the simplest that I found is to recreate the rectangle, each time you drag one of its corners.
This way, you only have to know the dragged corner position and the opposite corner position and you can easily create the proper rectangle.
Here is a sketch demonstrating a possible implementation.
I think that you should easily be able to transpose it to your specific case.
// This settings controls the handles size.
const HANDLES_RADIUS = 5;
// This flag allow us to know when we are dragging an handle.
let dragging = false;
// This will store the offset from the handle position to the
// mouse down point. This allow a better drag UX.
let offset;
// This will store the point representing the opposite rectangle corner from
// the one being dragged.
let oppositePoint;
// We start by creating a rectangle in the middle of the canvas.
// This rectangle will be replaced each time a corner is dragged.
let rectangle = createRectangle(view.center - 50, view.center + 50);
// Then, we create an handle for each of the corners.
// These will be used to modify the rectangle shape.
const handles = rectangle.segments.map((segment, index) => new Path.Rectangle({
from: segment.point - HANDLES_RADIUS,
to: segment.point + HANDLES_RADIUS,
fillColor: 'orange',
// We store the segment index bound to this specific handle in the custom
// data object. This will allow us to know, when an handle is clicked,
// which segment is concerned by the event.
data: { segmentIndex: index },
// On mouse down on an handle...
onMouseDown: function(event) {
// ...get and store the opposite segment point.
// We will use it later to redraw the rectangle.
const oppositeSegmentIndex = (this.data.segmentIndex + 2) % 4;
oppositePoint = rectangle.segments[oppositeSegmentIndex].point;
// Store the offset.
offset = event.point - rectangle.segments[this.data.segmentIndex].point;
// Activate dragging state.
dragging = true;
}
}));
// On mouse move...
function onMouseMove(event) {
// ...don't do nothing if we are not dragging an handle.
if (!dragging) {
return;
}
// Get the new corner position by applying the offset to the event point.
const activePoint = event.point + offset;
// Recreate the rectangle with the new corner.
rectangle.remove();
rectangle = createRectangle(oppositePoint, activePoint);
// For each corner...
rectangle.segments.forEach((segment, index) => {
// ...place an handle...
handles[index].position = segment.point;
// ...store the potentially new segment <=> corner bound.
handles[index].data.segmentIndex = index;
});
}
// On mouse up...
function onMouseUp() {
// Disable dragging state
dragging = false;
}
//
// HELPERS
//
// This method is used to avoid duplicating the rectangle instantiation code.
function createRectangle(from, to) {
return new Path.Rectangle({
from,
to,
strokeColor: 'orange'
});
}

A slider to separate 2 content divs

I want to create an "image comparison slider" for contents. Example:
Codepen Link
// Call & init
$(document).ready(function(){
$('.ba-slider').each(function(){
var cur = $(this);
// Adjust the slider
var width = cur.width()+'px';
cur.find('.resize img').css('width', width);
// Bind dragging events
drags(cur.find('.handle'), cur.find('.resize'), cur);
});
});
// Update sliders on resize.
// Because we all do this: i.imgur.com/YkbaV.gif
$(window).resize(function(){
$('.ba-slider').each(function(){
var cur = $(this);
var width = cur.width()+'px';
cur.find('.resize img').css('width', width);
});
});
function drags(dragElement, resizeElement, container) {
// Initialize the dragging event on mousedown.
dragElement.on('mousedown touchstart', function(e) {
dragElement.addClass('draggable');
resizeElement.addClass('resizable');
// Check if it's a mouse or touch event and pass along the correct value
var startX = (e.pageX) ? e.pageX : e.originalEvent.touches[0].pageX;
// Get the initial position
var dragWidth = dragElement.outerWidth(),
posX = dragElement.offset().left + dragWidth - startX,
containerOffset = container.offset().left,
containerWidth = container.outerWidth();
// Set limits
minLeft = containerOffset + 10;
maxLeft = containerOffset + containerWidth - dragWidth - 10;
// Calculate the dragging distance on mousemove.
dragElement.parents().on("mousemove touchmove", function(e) {
// Check if it's a mouse or touch event and pass along the correct value
var moveX = (e.pageX) ? e.pageX : e.originalEvent.touches[0].pageX;
leftValue = moveX + posX - dragWidth;
// Prevent going off limits
if ( leftValue < minLeft) {
leftValue = minLeft;
} else if (leftValue > maxLeft) {
leftValue = maxLeft;
}
// Translate the handle's left value to masked divs width.
widthValue = (leftValue + dragWidth/2 - containerOffset)*100/containerWidth+'%';
// Set the new values for the slider and the handle.
// Bind mouseup events to stop dragging.
$('.draggable').css('left', widthValue).on('mouseup touchend touchcancel', function () {
$(this).removeClass('draggable');
resizeElement.removeClass('resizable');
});
$('.resizable').css('width', widthValue);
}).on('mouseup touchend touchcancel', function(){
dragElement.removeClass('draggable');
resizeElement.removeClass('resizable');
});
e.preventDefault();
}).on('mouseup touchend touchcancel', function(e){
dragElement.removeClass('draggable');
resizeElement.removeClass('resizable');
});
}
Same as above, but instead of images, I want to create content divs with text, images, html. Like 2 pages with a slider to compare both.
Your comparison script utilizes a resizing a div, so there's no way (that I know of) to achieve this without some considerable trickery (or how to achieve the same effect without resizing).
The only way to prevent the text from automatically wrapping is by using ...
white-space: nowrap;
... but that would just result in one continuous line of text.
Breaks <br> could be inserted from there, but that would just look awful and negate any resizing.
Personally, my approach would be to render the text within a canvas element first (https://www.w3schools.com/graphics/canvas_text.asp).
Since a canvas is treated nearly identical to that of an image, it wouldn't require any changes to the existing comparison script.

Updating texture and geometry in three.js

I'm trying to figure out if there is a way of getting a callback once a texture has been updated? I'm swapping the geometry in the scene but sharing the same changing underlying texture based on a canvas and I'm noticing random corruption that eventually disappears as the program runs. I think this is as a result of thrashing that is causing the geometry changes to become unsynchronized with the texture updates.
So I realize the established mechanism is to set is needsUpdate = true on the texture and material, but can I know when that update has been applied so that I can add the new geometry to the scene? I think I am adding the geometry before that update actually gets to the gpu and using the old texture for random frames. Is this possible, or does the texture update definitely get processed before the scene is drawn?
If you can point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated.
Additionally I've added an update event listener to the material, which gets called frequently, but I still end up with the same issues relating to the texture update happening after the geometry has been updated.
Here is an example of what I mean, some code removed. The general idea is to share the same texture / material among many generated objects. Update the canvas, and then add the new object into the scene. This for the most part works under chrome, but occasionally glitches where a frame has the previous texture applied.
var material, texture, texture_canvas, context;
var frames = [];
var total_frames = 24;
var last_frame = undefined;
var current_frame = 0;
var scene;
function init() {
// initialize scene, etc
scene = new THREE.Scene();
// Set up render etc, omitted
texture_canvas = document.createElement('canvas');
texture_canvas.height = 1024;
texgture_canvas.width = 1024;
context = texture_canvas.getContext( '2d' );
context.fillStyle = '#000000';
context.fillRect( 0, 0,
texture_canvas.width,
texture_canvas.height );
texture = new THREE.Texture( this.texture_canvas );
texture.minFilter = THREE.LinearFilter;
texture.magFilter = THREE.LinearFilter;
texture.generateMipmaps = false;
material = new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({ map: texture } );
for (var i=0; i<total_frames; i++) {
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh( generate_geometry(), material );
frames.push(mesh);
}
}
function animate() {
if (last_frame) {
scene.remove(frames[last_frame]);
}
// Update / generate new canvas
context.drawImage( generate_image(), 0, 0 );
texture.needsUpdate = true;
material.needsUpdate = true;
frames[current_frame].uvsNeedUpdate = true;
scene.add(frames[current_frame % total_frames]);
last_frame = current_frame;
current_frame++;
requestAnimationFrame( animate );
}

EaselJs shape hitTest unable to set alpha or visiblity

From the sample I created
I am unable to set the circle's alpha / visiblity when mousedown draw line. But I am able to console log it when its detect hitTest.. Is there advise in this?
Below is the block of codes:
var canvas, stage;
var drawingCanvas;
var oldPt;
var oldMidPt;
var title;
var color;
var stroke;
var colors;
var index;
var rect, circle1;
var currMidPt;
$(document).ready(function() {
init();
});
function init() {
canvas = document.getElementById("canvas");
index = 0;
colors = ["#828b20", "#b0ac31", "#cbc53d", "#fad779", "#f9e4ad", "#faf2db", "#563512", "#9b4a0b", "#d36600", "#fe8a00", "#f9a71f"];
//check to see if we are running in a browser with touch support
stage = new createjs.Stage(canvas);
stage.autoClear = false;
stage.enableDOMEvents(true);
createjs.Touch.enable(stage);
createjs.Ticker.setFPS(24);
createjs.Ticker.on("tick", tick);
drawingCanvas = new createjs.Shape();
stage.addEventListener("stagemousedown", handleMouseDown);
stage.addEventListener("stagemouseup", handleMouseUp);
title = new createjs.Text("Click and Drag to draw", "36px Arial", "#777777");
title.x = 300;
title.y = 200;
rect = new createjs.Shape();
rect.graphics.beginFill("#000").drawRect(0, 0, stage.canvas.width, stage.canvas.height);
var container = new createjs.Container();
container.x = 0;
container.y = 0;
stage.addChild(container, title);
stage.addChild(drawingCanvas);
circle1 = new createjs.Shape();
circle1.graphics.beginFill("#990000").drawCircle(120,120,40);
container.addChild(circle1);
stage.update();
}
function handleMouseDown(event) {
if (!event.primary) { return; }
if (stage.contains(title)) {
stage.clear();
stage.removeChild(title);
}
color = colors[(index++) % colors.length];
stroke = Math.random() * 30 + 10 | 0;
oldPt = new createjs.Point(stage.mouseX, stage.mouseY);
oldMidPt = oldPt.clone();
stage.addEventListener("stagemousemove", handleMouseMove);
}
function handleMouseMove(event) {
if (!event.primary) { return; }
var midPt = new createjs.Point(oldPt.x + stage.mouseX >> 1, oldPt.y + stage.mouseY >> 1);
drawingCanvas.graphics.clear().setStrokeStyle(stroke, 'round', 'round').beginStroke(color).moveTo(midPt.x, midPt.y).curveTo(oldPt.x, oldPt.y, oldMidPt.x, oldMidPt.y);
oldPt.x = stage.mouseX;
oldPt.y = stage.mouseY;
oldMidPt.x = midPt.x;
oldMidPt.y = midPt.y;
currMidPt = midPt;
if(circle1.hitTest(currMidPt.x, currMidPt.y)) {
console.log('test');
circle1.alpha = 0.6;
circle1.visible = false;
}
stage.update();
}
function tick(event) {
// console.log(ndgmr.checkPixelCollision(drawingCanvas,circle1,0,false));
stage.update(event);
}
function handleMouseUp(event) {
if (!event.primary) { return; }
stage.removeEventListener("stagemousemove", handleMouseMove);
}
The main reason this doesn't work is because you are using a stage that never clears itself. This gives you the benefit of a "paint brush", since it just adds new curves as you draw, but the circle can never be removed, since it is painted on to the canvas. If you change the alpha, it just draws on top of the current circle. This is also why your circle gets all aliased, as it constantly draws on top of itself, multiplying the alpha.
Here is a quick edit that shows the circle moving its x position instead of adjusting the alpha. Any time you roll over the original position it will move 10 pixels to the right.
http://codepen.io/lannymcnie/pen/redrgo?editors=0010
The hitTest code you have used is not correct though, since it always checks the x/y position of the pen against the local coordinates of the circle -- this means the position of the circle doesn't matter. To fix this, you need to find the local coordinates instead:
currMidPt = circle1.globalToLocal(midPt.x, midPt.y);
Here is an updated fiddle showing that behaviour: http://codepen.io/lannymcnie/pen/grejVg?editors=0010
However, to get the effect you are probably looking for, you have to take a different approach. Instead of using the stage auto-clear, use a cached Shape, and update the cache when you draw. This will provide the paint effect, but let the rest of the stage get updated as usual.
// Remove this!
stage.autoClear = false;
// Cache the drawingCanvas once after creating it
drawingCanvas = new createjs.Shape();
drawingCanvas.cache(0,0,canvas.width,canvas.height);
// After drawing, update the cache. This is at the end of the mousemove function.
// Use "source-over" to apply the new contents on top, instead of clearing the cache.
drawingCanvas.updateCache("source-over");
stage.update();
I also made a few other changes:
Removed the Ticker listener that updates the stage. Your mousemove already updates the stage when the contents change. If you want to reintroduce the ticker update for other content, then remove the stage.update() calls everywhere else, as they are redundant.
Moved the drawingCanvas below the circle/container. This just makes sure the circle is always visible for the demo
Here is a final demo with these changes:
http://codepen.io/lannymcnie/pen/NNYLPX?editors=0010
Hope that helps!

How to avoid camera jumps during/after Tween/animation?

I'm having some trouble while creating a camera Tween in THREE.js, specifically at the end and beginning of the animation, there always seems to be a camera 'jump', meaning that the camera flickers once the animation starts and once the animation ends. For reference, what I'm doing is :
Camera is overlooking a scenario from above.
When user clicks on an element of the scenario, the camera zooms on it (by a TWEEN) and when it's close enough, the OrbitControls target change to the centroid of the selected element, and autorotate starts, so the user sees the element rotating in the center of the screen.
When user clicks again, the camera zooms out to its initial position (by a TWEEN) and goes back to the original controls.
I'm experiencing 'jumps/flickers' at the beginning and end of each TWEEN.
This is my tween function :
var origpos = new THREE.Vector3().copy(camera.position); // original position
var origrot = new THREE.Euler().copy(camera.rotation); // original rotation
camera.position.set(x, y+500, z+variation);
camera.lookAt(new THREE.Vector3(x,y,z));
var dstrot = new THREE.Euler().copy(camera.rotation)
// reset original position and rotation
camera.position.set(origpos.x, origpos.y, origpos.z);
camera.rotation.set(origrot.x, origrot.y, origrot.z);
options = {duration: 3000};
//
// Tweening
//
// position
new TWEEN.Tween(camera.position).to({
x: x,
y: y+500,
z: z
}, options.duration).easing(TWEEN.Easing.Cubic.Out).onUpdate(function () {
camera.lookAt(new THREE.Vector3(x,y,z));
}).onComplete(function () {
controls.autoRotate = true;
controls.autoRotateSpeed = 5.0;
controls.target = new THREE.Vector3(x, y, z);
}).start();
// rotation (using slerp)
(function () {
var qa = camera.quaternion; // src quaternion
var qb = new THREE.Quaternion().setFromEuler(dstrot); // dst quaternion
var qm = new THREE.Quaternion();
var o = {t: 0};
new TWEEN.Tween(o).to({t: 1}, options.duration).onUpdate(function () {
THREE.Quaternion.slerp(qa, qb, qm, o.t);
camera.quaternion.set(qm.x, qm.y, qm.z, qm.w);
}).start();
}).call(this);
OK, it seems that the issue was in itself with the method I was using to rotate the camera, using quaternions and SLERP.
I found that the best way (easier and without flicker/jump) would be to interpolate the parameters of camera.rotation instead of interpolating the quaternions.
So, a Tween of camera.rotation.the_axis_where_you_want_to_rotate works perfectly, and done concurrently with a Tween on the position, achieves the effect I was looking for.