I would be more than appreciative for some help here, as I have been having some serious problems with this.
Background:
I have a list of unique records. For each record I have a monotonically increasing pattern (either A, B or C), and a development position (1 to 5) assigned to it.
So each of the 3 patterns is set out in five fields representing the development period.
Problem:
I need to retrieve the percentages relating to the relevant development periods, from different fields for each row. It should be in a single column called "Output".
Example:
Apologies, not sure how to attach a table here, but the fields are below, the table is a transpose of these fields.
ID - (1,2,3,4,5)
Pattern - (A, B, C, A, C)
Dev - (1,5,3,4,2)
1 - (20%, 15%, 25%, 20%, 25%)
2 - (40%, 35%, 40%, 40%, 40%)
3 - (60%, 65%, 60%, 60%, 60%)
4 - (80%, 85%, 65%, 80%, 65%)
5 - (100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%)
Output - (20%, 100%, 60%, 80%, 40%)
In MS Excel, I could simply use a HLOOKUP or OFFSET function to do this. But how do I do this in Access? The best I have come up with so far is Output: Eval([Category]) but this doesn't seem to achieve what I want which is to select the "Dev" field, and treat this as a field when building an expression.
In practice, I have more than 100 development periods to play with, and over 800 different patterns, so "switch" methods can't work here I think.
Thanks in advance,
alch84
Assuming that
[ID] is a unique column (primary key), and
the source column for [Output] only depends on the value of [Dev]
then this seems to work:
UPDATE tblAlvo SET Output = DLOOKUP("[" & Dev & "]", "tblAlvo", "ID=" & ID)
Before:
ID Pattern Dev 1 2 3 4 5 Output
-- ------- --- -- -- -- -- --- ------
1 A 1 20 40 60 80 100
2 B 5 15 35 65 85 100
3 C 3 25 40 60 65 100
4 A 4 20 40 60 80 100
5 C 2 25 40 60 65 100
After:
ID Pattern Dev 1 2 3 4 5 Output
-- ------- --- -- -- -- -- --- ------
1 A 1 20 40 60 80 100 20
2 B 5 15 35 65 85 100 100
3 C 3 25 40 60 65 100 60
4 A 4 20 40 60 80 100 80
5 C 2 25 40 60 65 100 40
Related
Consider the following table, describing a patients medication plan. For example, the first row describes that the patient with patient_id = 1 is treated from timestamp 0 to 4. At time = 0, the patient has not yet become any medication (kum_amount_start = 0). At time = 4, the patient has received a kumulated amount of 100 units of a certain drug. It can be assumed, that the drug is given in with a constant rate. Regarding the first row, this means that the drug is given with a rate of 25 units/h.
patient_id
starttime [h]
endtime [h]
kum_amount_start
kum_amount_end
1
0
4
0
100
1
4
5
100
300
1
5
15
300
550
1
15
18
550
700
2
0
3
0
150
2
3
6
150
350
2
6
10
350
700
2
10
15
700
1100
2
15
19
1100
1500
I want to add the two columns "kum_amount_start_last_6hr" and "kum_amount_end_last_6hr" that describe the amount that has been given within the last 6 hours of the treatment (for the respective timestamps start, end).
I'm stuck with this problem for a while now.
I tried to tackle it with something like this
SUM(kum_amount) OVER (PARTITION BY patient_id ROWS BETWEEN "dynmaic window size" AND CURRENT ROW)
but I'm not sure whether this is the right approach.
I would be very happy if you could help me out here, thanks!
I Have a data table in postgresql which has these columns and some rows like this:
st
epochnum
satnum
l1
l2
c1
p1
p2
1
1
1
10
11
12
13
14
1
1
2
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
1
20
21
22
23
24
1
2
2
25
26
27
28
29
20
1
1
30
41
52
63
74
20
1
2
75
76
87
88
null
20
2
1
...
I want to get some pairs of rows that have the same value for epochnum and satnum but have different value in "st". By the way, I have a list that specifies which "st" pairs should be subtracted. Its just another table that looks like this:
st1
st2
1
20
The rows in the first table have to be subtracted in l1,l2,c1,p1 and p2 with same epochnum and satnum according to this table and then inserted into a new table like this:
epochnum
st1
st2
satnum
dl1
dl2
dc1
dp1
dp2
1
1
20
1
20
30
40
50
60
1
1
20
2
65
65
75
75
null
...
The actual data has more than 400000 rows that has same epochnums and satnums like this. I have tried java programming in net-beans and used loops to simply get queries for each row and make the new table.
But I think maybe it is not efficient and unnecessarily takes long time due to the lots of queries that has to be done in java.
I wonder if there is a way that this can be done using just a few queries, or creating extra tables and .... I haven't come up with the best solution yet.
Are you looking for joins like this?
select t1.st, t1.epochnum, t1.satnum,
(t2.l1 - t1.l1),
(t2.l2 - t1.l2),
(t2.p1 - t1.p1),
(t2.p2 - t1.p2)
from t t1 join
t t2
on t1.epochnum = t2.epochnum and
t1.satnum = t2.satnum join
pairs p
on t1.st = p.st1 and t2.st = p.st2
I have a table in PowerPivot which contains the logged data of a traffic control camera mounted on a road. This table is filled the velocity and the number of vehicles that pass this camera during a specific time(e.g. 14:10 - 15:25). Now I want to know that how can I get the average velocity of cars for an specific hour and list them in a separate table with 24 rows(hour 0 - 23) where the second column of each row is the weighted average velocity of that hour? A sample of my stat_table data is given below:
count vel hour
----- --- ----
133 96.00237 15
117 91.45705 21
81 81.90521 6
2 84.29946 21
4 77.7841 18
1 140.8766 17
2 56.14951 14
6 71.72839 13
4 64.14309 9
1 60.949 17
1 77.00728 21
133 100.3956 6
109 100.8567 15
54 86.6369 9
1 83.96901 17
10 114.6556 21
6 85.39127 18
1 76.77993 15
3 113.3561 2
3 94.48055 2
In a separate PowerPivot table I have 24 rows and 2 columns but when I enter my formula, the whole rows get updated with the same number. My formula is:
=sumX(FILTER(stat_table, stat_table[hour]=[hour]), stat_table[count] * stat_table[vel])/sumX(FILTER(stat_table, stat_table[hour]=[hour]), stat_table[count])
Create a new calculated column named "WeightedVelocity" as follows
WeightedVelocity = [count]*[vel]
Create a measure "WeightedAverage" as follows
WeightedAverage = sum(stat_table[WeightedVelocity]) / sum(stat_table[count])
Use measure "WeightedAverage" in VALUES area of pivot Table and use "hour" column in ROWS to get desired result.
Let's assume we have the following:
A
1 10
2 20
3 30
4 20
5 10
6 30
7 20
8
9
10 =(AVERAGE(A1:A7)
11 4
12 6
I would like to be able to find a way to calculate the Average of A1-A7 into cell A10 while excluding row range defined in A11 and A12. That is, according to the above setup the result should be 20:
((10 + 20 + 30 + 20) / 4) = 20
because if rows 4,5 and 6 are excluded what's left is rows 1,2,3,7 to be averaged.
Two other options:
=AVERAGE(FILTER(A1:A7,ISNA(MATCH(ROW(A1:A7),A11:A12,0))))
=ArrayFormula(AVERAGEIF(MATCH(ROW(A1:A7),A11:A12,0),NA(),A1:A7))
Seems to meet your requirement, though not flexible:
=(sum(A1:A7)-indirect("A"&A11)-indirect("A"&A12))/(count(A1:A7)-2)
Adjust re misunderstanding of requirements:
=(SUM(A1:A7)-SUM(INDIRECT("A"&A11&":A"&A12)))/(COUNT(A1:A7)-A12+A11-1)
Below is some data:
Test Day1 Day2 Score
A 1 2 100
B 1 3 62
C 3 4 90
D 2 4 20
E 4 5 80
I am trying to take the values from column 'day' and 'day2' and use them to select the row number for the column score. For example for Test A I would like to find the sum of 100 and 62 because that is the values of the first and second rows of score. Test B I would like to find the sum of 100, 62 and 90.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to go about doing this? I am looking to use something similar to the indirect function in Excel? Thank You
The trick is to convert variable "Score" as a row. Could not think of an easy way how to avoid SAVE/GET - room for improvements.
file handle tmp
/name = "C:\DATA\Temp".
***.
data list free /Test (a1) Day1 (f8) Day2 (f8) Score (f8).
begin data
A 1 2 100
B 1 3 62
C 3 4 90
D 2 4 20
E 4 5 80
end data.
comp f = 1.
var wid all (12).
save out "tmp\data.sav".
***.
get "tmp\data.sav"
/keep score.
flip.
comp f = 1.
match files
/file "tmp\data.sav"
/table *
/by f
/drop case_lbl.
comp stat = 0.
do rep var = var001 to var005
/k = 1 to 5.
if range(k, Day1, Day2) stat = sum(stat, var).
end rep.
list Test Day1 Day2 Score stat.
The result:
Test Day1 Day2 Score stat
A 1 2 100 162
B 1 3 62 252
C 3 4 90 110
D 2 4 20 172
E 4 5 80 100
Number of cases read: 5 Number of cases listed: 5