Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am interested in how a higher-level (Java-like) language could be build from a stack-based (Forth-like) language. Can anyone recommend some literature, preferably a book?
In case it helps: The application is construction of a higher-level language from Bitcoin's Script.
The script language used by Bitcoin has no loops and is not Turing-complete. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script
It's not possible to write an interpreter or compiler for a Turing-complete language in this language.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a service/library (free or paid) that takes a piece of text and return the language of it?
I need to go over a million blog posts and determine their languages.
I think this is the best out there!
https://code.google.com/p/language-detection/
I've heard good things about langid.py.
Features from the README:
Fast
Pre-trained over a large number of languages (currently 97)
Not sensitive to domain-specific features (e.g. HTML/XML markup)
Single .py file with minimal dependencies
Deployable as a web service
https://github.com/saffsd/langid.py
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a language translator API for my project. I don't want to use the Google Translate API.
Can anyone suggest another? An open source translator would be better.
you can use Bing (Microsoft) machine translation engine.But it is almost the same as translate.google.com Or, you can make your own english-nepali machine tanslation system (engines), e.g.use this:
http://www.statmt.org/moses/
But, it will costs yo a lot of effort and time (question is whether it is worth of it).
Here is some discussion what options do you have if looking for some language translator for not-so-common language:
http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=4370115&type=member&item=201871372&qid=3588ce96-f0c1-4789-a72d-b00a124127ee&trk=group_most_popular-0-b-ttl&goback=.gmp_4370115
(hopefully you will be able to display it)
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I often hack out some Thor, Rake, Bash or even PHP commandline tools. And I want to document the command-line-arguments and variations in a consistent way.
Is there an official, or recommended standard on this documentation?
Like when an option is optional[--foo=bar], or when an option can be one n-values ("yes|no"), etceteras.
I'd rather not come up with my own standard, when there is an official (POSIX?) standard or guide that already lists the do's and don't for documenting tools and applications on CLI's.
I'm not sure what output format you have in mind, but why not use the man-page style? It seems a nice fit for commandline tools.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know of a newer standard for software interface specifications than IEEE J-STD 16 1995? I have been searching the web and the IEEE site and have not found anything, but may not be using the right combination of words in my searches.
I believe the standard that replaced J-STD-016-1995 was IEEE 12207.
The standards that defined the Software Life Cycle Process evolved in the following order:
MIL-STD-2167 (1988) & MIL-STD-7935A (1988)
MIL-STD-498 (1994)
J-STD-016-1995 (1995)
IEEE/EIA 12207 (1998)
Source
From all of the information that I have been able to gather, this is the best standard. There are others out there or I could create my own format, but this one seems to be the most accepted....for anyone who wishes to know an answer to this question.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a document editor that helps formatting documents like API documents or specifications?
I prefer not to use Word but something that is more productive.
LaTeX is particularly well-suited to technical documents, I find.
Depending on the language you use, specially for API documentations, I'd use XML comments and then use a program like SandCastle and SHFB.