I have a flow based conversation modelled in wit.ai. After executing a custom action and sending the results to the user, the user should have the possibility to:
say something like 'show me more' or
say something like 'thank you' in which case the flow is configured to return a direct message 'you are welcome'
I used two separate intents 'more' and 'thank you' to differentiate between the branches. When I send 'show me more' to the bot, wit.ai correctly recognizes the intent 'more'. However, the conversation then takes the wrong branch and the bot sends 'you are welcome' as shown in this wit.ai response body:
{
"confidence" : 1,
"type" : "msg",
"msg" : "You are welcome!",
"entities" : {
"intent" : [ {
"confidence" : 0.9707855789235582,
"type" : "value",
"value" : "more"
} ]
}
}
Why is this happening?
Well even I have faced similar issue sometimes but I was able to get it working by setting the right context or entity field names for "has" & "does not have" options for respective actions and responses in the Actions tab. This seems to have worked although it is a bit frustrating to see that Wit does not recognise the flow based on intent sometimes.
Related
I'm struggling to get my head around this one and I know the way to do this is through a custom index. Essentially, I have several collections that share some common properties, one of which is "system id" which describes a many-to-one relationship, e.g.
// Id() = "component:a"
{
"Name": "Component A"
"SystemId": "system:foo"
}
// Id() = "resource:a"
{
"Name": "Resource A",
"SystemId": "system:foo"
}
So these are two example objects which live in two different collections, Components and Resources, respectively.
I have another collection called "Notifications" and they have a RecipientID which refers to the Id of one of the entities described above. e.g.
// Id() = "Notifications/84-A"
{
"RecipientID": "component:a",
"Message": "hello component"
}
// Id() = "Notifications/85-A"
{
"RecipientID": "resource:a",
"Message": "hello resource"
}
The query that I want to be able to perform is pretty straight forward -- "Give me all notifications that are addressed to entities which have a system of ''" but I also want to make sure I have some other bits from the entities themselves such as their name, so a result object something like this:
{
"System": "system:foo",
"Notifications": [{
"Entity": "component:a",
"EntityName": "Component A",
"Notifications": [{
"Id": "Notifications/84-A",
"Message": "hello component"
}]
}, {
"Entity": "resource:a",
"EntityName": "Resource A",
"Notifications": [{
"Id": "Notifications/85-A",
"Message": "hello resource"
}]
}]
}
Where I am with it right now is that I'm creating a AbstractMultiMapIndexCreationTask which has maps for all of these different entities and then I'm trying to use the reduce function to mimic the relationship.
Where I'm struggling is with how these map reduces work. They require that the shape is identical between maps as well as the reduce output. I've tried some hacky things like including all of the notifications as part of the map and putting dummy values where the properties don't match, but besides it making it really hard to read/understand, I still couldn't figure out the reduce function to make it work properly.
How can I achieve this? I've been digging for examples, but all of the examples I've come across make some assumptions about how references are arranged. For example, I don't think I can use Include because of the different collections (I don't know how Raven would know what to query), and coming from the other direction, the entities don't have enough info to include or load notifications (I haven't found any 'load by query' function). The map portion of the index seems fine, I can say 'give me all the entities that share this system, but the next part of grabbing the notifications and creating that response above has eluded me. I can't really do this in multiple steps either, because I also need to be able to page. I've gone in circles a lot and I could use some help.
How about indexing the related docs ?
Something like this (a javascript index):
map("Notifications", (n) => {
let c = load(n.RecipientID, 'Components');
let r = load(n.RecipientID, 'Resources');
return {
Message: n.Message,
System: c.SystemId || r.SystemId,
Name: c.Name || r.Name,
RelatedDocId: id(c) || id(r)
};
})
Then you can query on this index, filter by the system value, and get all matching notifications docs.
i.e. sample query:
from index 'yourIndexName'
where System == "system:foo"
Info about related documents is here:
RavenDB Demo
https://demo.ravendb.net/demos/csharp/related-documents/index-related-documents
Documentation
https://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/5.4/csharp/indexes/indexing-related-documents
I am trying to verify whether the title of the board is not empty. If my request is sent in the format of {title: ""} I am able to do check("title").not().isEmpty(), and it works just fine.
However, if I am sending the request like this:
board: {
"title": "Something
}
Then the check from the above doesn't work as I am always getting the title to be undefined. How can I test for the title being not empty in this case using express-validator?
Thank you!
Figured it out. It should be check("board.title").not().isEmpty()
So I intend to detect and trigger a firebase custom event when my app crashes, is there a recommended way to check that? I tried AppDelegate method applicationWillTerminate but it didn't work, similarly I tried to observe through an NSSetUncaughtExceptionHandler but again in vain. I want to know how Crashlytics or Sentry or Bugsnag do it. Any help will be more than helpful.
Whenever app is crashed it means it doesnt respond to any of the events triggered or any calls you make in your app. So if it helps you can send event parameters in the Crash log event something like this.
let keysAndValues = [
"string key" : "string value",
"string key 2" : "string value 2",
"boolean key" : true,
"boolean key 2" : false,
"float key" : 1.01,
"float key 2" : 2.02
] as [String : Any]
Crashlytics.crashlytics().setCustomKeysAndValues(keysAndValues)
Refer : https://firebase.google.com/docs/crashlytics/customize-crash-reports for more details
I have created API module in my yii2 advanced application and also added HttpBearerAuth in controller file and it is working.
On Unauthorized I'm getting below response :
{"name":"Unauthorized","message":"Your request was made with invalid credentials.","code":0,"status":401,"type":"yii\\web\\UnauthorizedHttpException"}
I want to change key label of this response like below :
{"error":"Unauthorized","errorMessage":"Your request was made with invalid credentials.","code":0,"status":401}
How do I update these keys?
Attach an event handler to yii\web\Response::EVENT_BEFORE_SEND and examine the $data attribute of the yii\web\Response class. Not sure, but guess you'll find an array where the keys are exactly those that you want to change.
You just need to filter out the responses you want to handle (eg everything except status codes 200 & 201).
Maybe something like this... probably bugs included :-)
Event::on(yii\web\Response::className(), yii\web\Response::EVENT_BEFORE_SEND, function ($event) {
if (Yii::$app->response->getStatusCode() > 201) {
if (isset(Yii::$app->response->data['name']) {
Yii::$app->response->data['error'] = Yii::$app->response->data['name'];
unset(Yii::$app->response->data['name']);
}
}
});
If I POST an issue transition like this:
{
"fields" : {
"resolution" : {
"name" : "Fixed"
}
}
}
...I get this error:
{
"errorMessages" : ["Missing 'transition' identifier"],
"errors" : {}
}
This seems to imply that I need to include a transition ID along with my list of changed fields. https://stackoverflow.com/a/14642966/565869 seems to say the same. Fine.
However, transition IDs appear to be global. It's not enough to look up the highest transition ID for this issue and increment it; such an ID is probably in use elsewhere. At some expense, I could get the highest transaction ID used anywhere in the system; this might be 68,000 at this moment. But if I were then to use transaction ID 68,001 there's a real chance that a GUI user would attempt a transition of their own and use this ID before I could.
I could use transaction IDs in the range of 1,000,001 and up, but if the JIRA web GUI uses the highest previously used transaction ID when generating new IDs I'll just collide in this range instead of the 68,000 range. I could use 69,000 and trust that there won't be a thousand transitions in the length of time it takes to get the highest transaction ID.
These both seem terribly clumsy, however. Is there no way to post a transition and let JIRA generate its own unique ID? I don't need to retrieve the generated IDs, I just want to update issues' statuses and resolutions.
You're getting mixed up a bit. So lets see if I can explain it better for you.
To transition a JIRA Issue, you use the Transition ID to identify what transition to apply to the issue. You aren't specifying an ID for a transaction or a transition ID to identify that the transition occurred, JIRA takes care of this for you.
The easiest way to understand it is to see it.
So first you can look at what transitions are available to an Issue by doing a GET to the API Call:
/rest/api/2/issue/${issueIdOrKey}/transitions
Example:
/rest/api/2/issue/ABC-123/transitions
Which will show something like this:
{
"expand": "transitions",
"transitions": [
{
"id": "161",
"name": "Resolve",
"to": {
"description": "A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.",
"iconUrl": "https://localhost:8080/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png",
"id": "5",
"name": "Resolved",
"self": "https://localhost:8080/rest/api/2/status/5"
}
}
]
}
So you can see only 1 transition is available for issue ABC-123 and it has an ID of 161.
If you were to browse to that JIRA Issue through the GUI, you would see only 1 Transition available and it would match the API Call. In fact if you inspected the element you should see it having an a tag and in the href something like action=161
So should you want to transition this issue, you'll need to do a POST to the following URL:
/rest/api/2/issue/ABC-123/transitions
With JSON like this:
{
"update": {
"comment": [
{
"add": {
"body": "Bug has been fixed."
}
}
]
},
"fields": {
"assignee": {
"name": "bob"
},
"resolution": {
"name": "Fixed"
}
},
"transition": {
"id": "161"
}
}
Which uses the transition ID found from the call that shows all transitions. I also update the resolution and assignee and add comments at the same time.
That make a bit more sense?