I have been using the query below and it was working fine but now it's giving a SQL error.
There were no changes made that could cause this to stop working.
There is no Field 'APPLICATIONID' in the table.
QueueSQL=select distinct (convert(char(5),SkillsetID)+'='+Skillset) from iagentbySkillsetStat where ApplicationID > 10000
QueueMappingSQL=SELECT DISTINCT (convert(char(5),SkillsetID)+'='+Skillset), SkillsetID FROM iagentbySkillsetStat iagentbySkillsetStat WHERE (iagentbySkillsetStat.ApplicationID>10000)
DB- Intersystems Cache
Error details for the log files are below.
14/09/2016 11:20:05 a.m. > ERROR - SQL Error '[Cache ODBC][State : S1000][Native Code 29]
[C:\xlink\xlink Compiled Package\Xlink Application\Isps_Ul.exe]
[SQLCODE: <-29>:<Field not found in the applicable tables>]
[Cache Error: <<SYNTAX>errdone+2^%qaqqt>]
[Details: <Prepare>]
[%msg: < SQL ERROR #29: Field 'APPLICATIONID' not found in the applicable tables^select distinct ( convert ( char ( 5 ) , SkillsetID ) + :%qpar(1) + Skillset ) from iagentbySkillsetStat where ApplicationID >>]'
Question was also asked at InterSystems Developer Community, where I noticed that table names are different. So, the answer is, that table name is suddenly changed somehow.
Related
I have the following problem retrieving messages from the OpenFire Monitoring Service plugin. I discovered that the error is due to an incorrect query in the database but I still cannot detect the error for which the query is not working correctly.
SELECT
fromjid,
fromjidresource,
tojid,
tojidresource,
sentdate,
body,
stanza,
messageid,
barejid
FROM
(
SELECT
DISTINCT ofmessagearchive.fromjid,
ofmessagearchive.fromjidresource,
ofmessagearchive.tojid,
ofmessagearchive.tojidresource,
ofmessagearchive.sentdate,
ofmessagearchive.body,
ofmessagearchive.stanza,
ofmessagearchive.messageid,
ofconparticipant.barejid
FROM
ofmessagearchive
INNER JOIN ofconparticipant ON ofmessagearchive.conversationid =
ofconparticipant.conversationid
WHERE
(
ofmessagearchive.stanza IS NOT NULL
OR ofmessagearchive.body IS NOT NULL
)
AND ofmessagearchive.messageid IS NOT NULL
AND ofmessagearchive.sentdate >= 0
AND ofmessagearchive.sentdate <= 1602748770287
AND ofconparticipant.barejid = 'usuario3#192.168.0.79'
AND (
ofmessagearchive.tojid = 'usuario4#192.168.0.79'
OR ofmessagearchive.fromjid = 'usuario3#192.168.0.79'
)
ORDER BY
ofmessagearchive.sentdate DESC
LIMIT
100
) AS part
ORDER BY
sentdate
I get an error when doing the following query
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
Command line error:32 Column: 9
There is no LIMIT keyword available in Oracle and if you are using Oracle 12c you can use FETCH FIRST 100 ROWS ONLY instead of it.
You cannot use AS to give alias to the sub query and it is not recognised by Oracle. So either you can remove the alias completely as you are not using it anywhere or just remove the AS and keep the alias name part only which should be fine.
Here is a good SO link about the Oracle limiting result set and you can always look into other sites available such as Oracle base or the official document as well. For 11g solution you have to use row_number
I need to pass a parameter into an HQL at execution time. For this we have updated the .param file with the required value. Now I am facing issue in using it.
SELECT * FROM temp_table A
WHERE PRODT_CTGRY_CD = 'CAR' AND
(
(DATE(A.CUST_BRTH_DT) BETWEEN concat(${hiveconf:PRODYEAR} - 13 ,"-02","-28") and concat(${hiveconf:PRODYEAR} - 7 ,"-03","-01")
AND DATE(A.TERM_DT) >= concat(${hiveconf:PRODYEAR} - 1 ,"-03","-31")
)
In the above query if I don't include the condition of term_dt the query is running fine. However when I include that I am getting an error as below:
FAILED: ClassCastException org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.objectinspector.primitive.WritableIntObjectInspector cannot be cast to org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.objectinspector.primitive.BooleanObjectInspector (state=42000,code=40000)
Can someone let me know what needs to be done here?
I have a following table:
EstimatedCurrentRevenue -- Revenue column value of yesterday
EstimatedPreviousRevenue --- Revenue column value of current day
crmId
OwnerId
PercentageChange.
I am querying two snapshots of the similarly structured data in Azure data lake and trying to query the percentage change in Revenue.
Following is my query i am trying to join on OpportunityId to get the difference between the revenue values:
#opportunityRevenueData = SELECT (((opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue - optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue)*100)/opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue) AS PercentageRevenueChange, optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue,
opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue, opty.crmId, opty.OwnerId From #opportunityCurrentData AS opty JOIN #opportunityPreviousData AS optyPrevious on opty.OpportunityId == optyPrevious.OpportunityId;
But i get the following error:
E_CSC_USER_SYNTAXERROR: syntax error. Expected one of: AS EXCEPT FROM
GROUP HAVING INTERSECT OPTION ORDER OUTER UNION UNION WHERE ';' ')'
','
at token 'From', line 40
near the ###:
This expression is having the problem i know but not sure how to fix it.
(((opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue - optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue)*100)/opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue)
Please help, i am completely new to U-sql
U-SQL is case-sensitive (as per here) with all SQL reserved words in UPPER CASE. So you should capitalise the FROM and ON keywords in your statement, like this:
#opportunityRevenueData =
SELECT (((opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue - optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue) * 100) / opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue) AS PercentageRevenueChange,
optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue,
opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue,
opty.crmId,
opty.OwnerId
FROM #opportunityCurrentData AS opty
JOIN
#opportunityPreviousData AS optyPrevious
ON opty.OpportunityId == optyPrevious.OpportunityId;
Also, if you are completely new to U-SQL, you should consider working through some tutorials to establish the basics of the language, including case-sensitivity. Start at http://usql.io/.
This same crazy sounding error message can occur for (almost?) any USQL syntax error. The answer above was clearly correct for the provided code.
However since many folks will probably get to this page from a search for 'AS EXCEPT FROM GROUP HAVING INTERSECT OPTION ORDER OUTER UNION UNION WHERE', I'd say the best advice to handle these is look closely at the snippet of your code that the error message has marked with '###'.
For example I got to this page upon getting a syntax error for a long query and it turned out I didn't have a casing issue, but just a malformed query with parens around the wrong thing. Once I looked more closely at where in the snippet the ### symbol was, the error became clear.
I have wrote a query so I can view people who are overdue an order based on their average order dates. The query is to be ran on a PostgreSQL database, and will be executed from a Java process.
However in the line :
CASE WHEN
(max(date_trunc('day', dateordered))-
min(date_trunc('day', dateordered)) ) /
count(distinct dateordered) + 5 <
date_trunc('day',now()) -
max(date_trunc('day', dateordered)) THEN 'ORDEROVERDUE' ELSE
null
END
I receive the error message :
Operator does not exist : integer < interval
I have read a lot of questions which have a similar issue, but none which seem to fix my particular issue.
If I alter my query to this :
CASE WHEN
(max(dateordered::date) - min(dateordered::date) )/
count(distinct dateordered) + 5 <
now()::date - max(dateordered::date) THEN
'ORDEROVERDUE' ELSE null
END
Then it runs on the database, however I can't get this syntax to work in my process in eclipse.
My understanding of SQL is letting me down. I understand the general reason behind the error, but I am unable to create a solution.
Is there a way of altering this line in a way which removes the error and I can still get the desired result?
I'm working on a IBM iseries v6r1m0 system.
I'm trying to execute a very simple query :
select * from XG.ART where DOS = 998 and (DES like 'ALB%' or DESABR like 'ALB%')
The columns are:
DOS -> numeric (3,0)
DES -> Graphic(80) CCSID 1200
DESABR -> Garphic(25) CCSID 1200
I get :
SQL State : 58004
SQL Code : -901
Message : [SQL0901] SQL System error.
Cause . . . . . : An SQL system error has occurred. The current SQL statement cannot be completed successfully. The error will not prevent other SQL statements from being processed. Previous messages may indicate that there is a problem with the SQL statement and SQL did not correctly diagnose the error. The previous message identifier was CPF4204. Internal error type 3107 has occurred. If precompiling, processing will not continue beyond this statement.
Recovery . . . : See the previous messages to determine if there is a problem with the SQL statement. To view the messages, use the DSPJOBLOG command if running interactively, or the WRKJOB command to view the output of a precompile. An application program receiving this return code may attempt further SQL statements. Correct any errors and try the request again.
If I change DES into REF (graphic(25)), it works...
EDIT :
I run some tests this afternoon, and it is very strange :
Just after the creation of the table/indexes, I have no errors.
If I insert some datas : error
If I clear the table : error
If I remove an index (see below) : it works (with or without datas)
!!
The index is :
create index XG.GTFAT_ART_B on XG.ART(
DOS,
DESABR,
ART_ID
)
Edit 2 :
Here is the job log (sorry, it is in French...)
It sais :
Function error X'1720' in machine instruction. Internal snapshot ID 01010054
Foo file created in library QTEMP.
*** stuff with the printer
DBOP *** FAILED open. Exception from call to SLIC$
Internal error in the query processor file
Sql system error
I finally contacted IBM.
It was an old bug from v5.
I have installed the latest PTF, and now, it works.
You need to use the GRAPHIC scalar function to convert your character literals on the LIKE predicate.
CREATE TABLE QTEMP/TEST (F1 GRAPHIC(80))
INSERT INTO QTEMP/TEST (F1) VALUES (GRAPHIC('TEST'))
SELECT * FROM QTEMP/TEST WHERE F1 LIKE GRAPHIC('TE%')
I know this guy got his problem fixed with an update. But here is something that worked for me that might work for the next guy here who has the problem.
My problem query had a lot of common table expressions. Most of them did not create tables with a whole lot of records. So if I figured that the maximum number of records a CTE would make was 1000, I added a "Fetch first 9999 rows only" to it. I knew that the CTE couldn't possibly have more rows than that. I guess the query optimizer had less to think about with that added.
If you have that problem and you don't have the option to upgrade or talk to IBM, I hope this help you.
For other people getting this errore, I encountered it on an IBM i Series v7r3, when tried an UPDATE, retrieving the value to be set on a field using a inner SELECT where multiple results where reduced to 1, using DISTINCT. I solved the problem removing DISTINCT and adding FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY at the end of the inner SELECT.
E.g.: changed from
UPDATE MYTABLE AS T1
SET T1.FIELD1 = (
SELECT DISTINCT T2.FIELD5
FROM MYTABLE AS T2
WHERE T1.FIELD2 = T2.FIELD2
AND T1.FIELD3 = T2.FIELD3
)
WHERE T1.FIELD4 = 'XYZ'
to
UPDATE MYTABLE AS T1
SET T1.FIELD1 = (
SELECT T2.FIELD5
FROM MYTABLE AS T2
WHERE T1.FIELD2 = T2.FIELD2
AND T1.FIELD3 = T2.FIELD3
FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY
)
WHERE T1.FIELD4 = 'XYZ'