Does DAQmx solely work with NI hardware or can it work with other brands of equipment? If it cannot how would I start to make a block diagram for an optical encoder that stores the position of a stepper motor? Sorry for the newbie question, thank you.
As #AndreTec mentioned, Arduino would be good solution if you have moderate speed motor. You can connect your encoder outputs to two interrupt pins.
However, I encourage you to use pure serial communication between Arduino and LabVIEW to avoid data loss since no LabVIEW addons deals with interrupt up to the best of my knowledge.
Related
Some of these ettus boxes have some serious (& seriously expensive) FPGA's in them. Seems like a waste if all they do is pass data from the ADC to the ethernet bus. When I build something in GRC how much signal processing is done in the FPGA & how much is done by my PC?
GNU Radio itself is host software. So, all the processing you program in GNU Radio is done on your CPUs, unless you use special hardware accelerator blocks, for example:
gr-theano: GPU accelleration
gr-fosphor: OpenCL-accelerated Waterfall spectrogram
gr-ettus: Employing RFNoC to implement specific functionality on the X3x0's FPGA. This requires you to build an FPGA image including the functionality you use as gr-ettus block.
Generally, the FPGA in the X3x0 already does a lot: physically, the ADC and DAC of the X3x0 are running at 200MHz by default, and you can select integer fractions of that as "user sampling rate"; the interpolation/decimation from/to that rate to match these hardware clocks is done in the FPGA with relatively large filters. Also, you can digitally shift your signal in frequency by setting a digital tuning offset, which is also done by a CORDIC in the FPGA.
I have done projects using Arduino IDE.I have seen that many projects can be easily implemented using the IDE.Then, why should one learn register level programing? How important is it?
Can you do EVERYTHING with the Arduino library? If your project would need tight timing (for example to control a huge industrial apparatus), at the level of microsecond fractions, would Arduino still be a good choice? How about medical devices? How about performance - would you be able to design a BLDC controller using Vector Control in Arduino? How about battery life - would you be able to design a device that would run with a single CR2032 cell for a few years using Arduino? How about doing a network router? Does Arduino support threads?
Your question is like one of these:
who needs x-bit microcontrollers when we have y-bit microcontrollers at the same price?
who needs x programming language when we have y programming language?
who needs analog solutions when we have digital solutions?
who needs microcontrollers when we have microprocessors?
...
To be honest, personally (I write firmware for embedded devices),I see Arduino as a toy, nothing more.
Learning register level programming will help you learning how to read a datasheet, and also understanding how stuff works. It will give you more flexibility after you get the hang of it, plus you can optimize your code and write your own libraries.
By knowing how to read a datasheet it will be easier for you to develop device drivers and process algorithms.
What would you do if you cannot find an Arduino library for a certain sensor? If you were using register level programming, you could easily write your driver, by already knowing how to interpret the technical files ;).
Try it out, you will forget Arduino in the first weeks!
Best regards,
Alex Tofan
I have an Arduino Pro Mini and a USB cable with just wires from one side. Is it possible to connect these wires directly with Arduino? I mean, +Data to Rx, -Data to Tx, +5v to one of the numbered pins and ground to GND.
No, in fact you could damage your Arduino doing this.
The RX and TX pins are for Serial (which run at higher voltages than 5volts)
Your best option would be to buy a USB to Serial convetor and then use a MAX232 chip (it is a chip that converts TTL logic (5volts) to RS232 (3 to -25 volts).
Or you could try using the v-usb library. Google v-usb online.
Hope this helps.
Yes, but not as you think, there is a raw voltage and regulated voltage but why run the risk of wiring incorrectly.
The best is use USB device between FTDI.
Here is a simple pin connection to make programming easier in photos. (quality of photos may not be best but you get the idea from them) I don't show how I add the blue to the pins but that is shrink tubing heated.
This makes easier programming of your Arduino this can be attached to a programmer quickly and effectively.
You can get this from Sparkfun for very cheap FTDI
I would like to have Arduino operating in a CAN network. Does the software that provides OSI model network layer exist for Arduino? I would imagine detecting the HI/LOW levels with GPIO/ADC and sending the signal to the network with DAC. It would be nice to have that without any extra hardware attached. I don't mind to have a terminating resistor required by the CAN network though.
By Arduino I mean any of them. My intention is to keep the development environmen.
If such a software does not exist, is there any technical obstacle for that, like limited flash size (again, I don't mean particular board with certain Atmega chip).
You can write a bit banging CAN driver, but it has many limitations.
First it's the timeing, it's hard to achieve the bit timing and also the arbitration.
You will be able to get 10kb or perhaps even 50kb but that consumes a huge amount of your cpu time.
And the code itself is a pain.
You have to calculate the CRC on the fly (easy) but to implement the collision detection and all the timing parameters is not easy.
Once, I done this for a company, but it was a realy bad idea.
Better buy a chip for 1 Euro and be happy.
There are several CAN Bus Shield boards available (e.g: this, and this), and that would be a far better solution. It is not just a matter of the controller chip, the bus interface, line drivers, and power all need to be considered. If you have the resources and skills you can of course create your own board or bread-board for less.
Even if you bit-bang it via GPIO you would need some hardware mods I believe to handle bus contention detection, and it would be very slow and may not interoperate well with "real" CAN controllers on the bus.
If your aim is to communicate between devices of your own design rather than off-the shelf CAN devices, then you don't need CAN for that, and something proprietary will suffice, and a UART will perform faster that a bit-banged CAN implementation.
I don't think, that such software exists. CAN bus is more complex, than for example I2C. Basically you would have to implement functionality of both CAN controller and CAN transceiver. See this thread for more details (in German).
Alternatively you could use one of the CAN shields. Another option were to use BeagleBone with suitable CAN cape.
Also take a look at AVR-CAN.
I'm not interested in a hardware solution, I want to know about software that may "read" modulated signal received trough the power supply - some sort of a low-level driver that would access the power signal in a convenient place and demodulate it.
Is there a way to receive signal from the computer's power supply? I'm interested in an API or library that would allow the computer to be seen as a node in a Power Line Communication network and receive data directly through the power cable, without the need for a converter. Is there any active research in this field?
Edit:
There is software that reads monitors and displays internal component voltages - DC voltage after being converted and filtered by the power supply - now I need is a method of data encoding that would be invariant to conversion and filtering, the original signal embedded in AC being present in some form within the converted DC signal.
This is not possible, as described in the question. Yes, with extra hardware you can do it. No, with the standard hardware in a PC, you could not.
As others have noted, among other problems, the only information you can get from a generic PC is a bit of voltage info for the CPU. It's not going to give a picture of the AC signal, nor any signal modulated on top of it. You'll be watching a few highly regulated DC signals deep inside the computer, probably converted at a relatively low rate too. Almost by definition, if you could see external information on any of those signals, your machine is already suffering a hardware failure and chances are the CPU will be crashing soon...
*blink* No...
Edit: I mean, there's the possibility to use the powerlines as network cables, but only with special adapters. And it is just designed for home networks.
Edit2: You can't read something from the power supply of a computer...it's not designed for that. You would have to create your own component/adapter for this.
Am I mis-reading this? Wouldnt this be a pure hardware solution?
This is highly improbable without adding some hardware.
You see, the power supplies in a regular PC are switching power supplies which effectively decouple the AC input from the supplied DC voltage needed on the PC side. The AC side just basically provides power that fuels the high-speed power switching circuitry.
Also, a DC signal, by definition, doesn't provide a signal per se: it is a "static" power level (and yes the power level does vary a bit in the time domain but not as an easy to leverage function).
Yes there can be an AD (Analog to Digital) monitoring chip that can be used on the PC side to read the voltage of the DC component supplied to the motherboard etc., but that doesn't mean there is still a signal that can be harvested: the original power line "signal" might have been through enough filters that there isn't a "signal" left to be processed.
Lastly, one needs to consider that power supplies design varies from company to company; this fact will undoubtedly affect any possible design of a communication solution.
what you describe is possible but unfortunately, you need an adapter to convert the signal running on the powerlines to sensible network traffic.
the power line acts as a physical medium, thus is at the lowest level f the OSI stack. conversion from electrical signal to sensible network traffic requires a hardware adapter, same for your an ethernet adapter. your computer is unable to understand this traffic since its power supply was not build to transmit those informations. but note that you can easily find an adapter and it will works the same as an ethernet adapter, that is be accessible through the standard BSD socket library.
This is ENTIRELY possible, although you would need to either buy or build some hardware to make it happen. In addition, the software solution would be very, very complex.
The computer's power supply would be out of the picture for the most part. You need to read data straight from the wall with as little extraneous noise as possible. From the electrical engineering perspective, this is a very thoroughly covered topic. In the end, all you're really doing is an analog to digital conversion, and the rest keeps your circuit from being fried.
The software solution would basically be eliminating random noise, and looking for embedded signals. The math behind analog signal analysis is very complex, and you can spend a few semesters in college covering the topic, and the rest of your career trying to master it. If you're good at it, there's a cushy job for you on wallstreet predicting the stock market.
And that only covers reading incoming signals. Transmitting is a whole 'nother sport.
Now, it also sounds like you might be interested in a hack. That is...
You could buy a
commercial-off-the-shelf power-line
Ethernet adapter and tear it apart.
They have two prongs that plug into
a standard wall outlet. You could
remove these and wire them to the
INSIDE of a power supply.
To do that, you'd have to tear apart a power
supply as well, which is incredibly
dangerous and I hereby warn you and
anyone else to NEVER attempt this.
The entire Ethernet adapter could be
tucked into the power supply and you
could basically have an Ethernet
port on the surface of your power
supply (either inside or outside the
computer).
Simply wire that to a
standard Ethernet adapter and voila
(!), you have nothing but a power
cable connecting your computer to
the wall outlet, AND you magically have
Ethernet!
Note that there also has to be another power-line
Ethernet adapter somewhere else for
you to establish a network and make the whole project useful.
How can you read modulated data from the power supply, you are talking about voltage and ohms and apart from a possible electrical shock which would be just shocking :) There are specialized electrical plugs with ethernet jacks in them that you can use.
I just hazard a guess that this is totally transparent as per Adrien Plisson's answer, i.e. you would have all of the OSI layer and is no different. You can write code to read from the sockets.
AFAIK no company that produces this electrical plug would ever open up the API for competition reasons, it is still in early stages as adoption of that is low because obviously it is very expensive (120 euro here in my country for a pair of 'em), as it does not deliver the quoted speed, say 100Mbps power plug, may get maybe 85Mbps due to varying situations and phenomena with power (think surges, brown outs, interference).
My 2cents.
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
Tom.