Doctrine: Related entities are not updated after changing id in EventSubscriber (onFlush) - orm

I use composite primary keys for all Doctrine entities (multi-tenancy).
Example (yaml file):
id:
website:
associationKey: true
id:
type: integer
So I have to auto increment the id manually. All entities have id 1 as default.
Example (EventSubscriber):
class MultitenantEventSubscriber implements EventSubscriber
{
public function getSubscribedEvents()
{
return [
'onFlush'
];
}
public function onFlush(OnFlushEventArgs $event)
{
$em = $event->getEntityManager();
$uow = $em->getUnitOfWork();
foreach ($uow->getScheduledEntityInsertions() as $entity) {
if ($entity instanceof AutoIncrementInterface) {
$maxId = $em
->createQueryBuilder('e')
->select('MAX(e.id)')
->from(get_class($entity), 'e')
->getQuery()
->getSingleScalarResult();
if ($maxId > 1) {
$entity->setId($maxId + 1);
$md = $em->getClassMetadata(get_class($entity));
$uow->recomputeSingleEntityChangeSet($md, $entity);
}
}
}
}
}
Everything is working so far.
Problem:
Foreign key in related entities is not updated when I recompute the change set. Entity A with for example auto incremented id 23 is created correctly, but Entity B with reference to A still returns reference id 1 instead of id 23.
$entityA = new A();
$entityA->setValue('foo');
$entityB = new B();
$entityB->setValue('bar');
$entityB->setA($entityA);
$em->persist($entityA);
$em->persist($entityB);
$em->flush();
echo $entityA->getId(); // Returns 23
echo $entityB->getA()->getId() // Returns 1 instead of 23
Of course I could update the entityB in the EventSubscriber, but I need a generic solution because there are a lot of entities with different relations.
Maybe someone has an idea how to "recompute"/"refresh" related entities?

Related

Phalcon query builder can't get joined table data

I have 2 table 'sanpham' and 'danhmuc'. I use phalcon query builder to get data from 2 tables.
$laytin = $this->modelsManager->createBuilder()
->from("sanpham")
->innerJoin('danhmuc','sanpham.danhmuc=danhmuc.sodanhmuc')
->where('sanpham.sosanpham = '.$id.'')
->getQuery()
->getSingleResult();
$breadcrumbs = array('/' => Tool::getTranslation()->_('trangchu'),"/Loai-san-pham/".$laytin->tendep."/".$laytin->sodanhmuc => $laytin->tendanhmuc,'' => $laytin->tieudesanpham );
The query runs, but $laytin->tendep, $laytin->sodanhmuc, $laytin->tendanhmuc in 'danhmuc' table doesn't display. Every column in 'sanpham' table (such as: $laytin->tieudesanpham) displays properly.
You can add specific columns with:
$this->modelsManager->createBuilder()->columns('danhmuc.tend‌​ep, danhmuc.sodanhmuc')
With this method you will have to add each column you want in your output. QueryBuilder docs.
Another method is to query the Sanpham model.
For example:
class Sanpham extends \Phalcon\Mvc\Model
{
public static function findSomething($something)
{
// this is your actual query, it replaces the queryBuilder
return self::query()
->where('sanpham.sosanpham = :id:', ['id' => $something])
->innerJoin('danhmuc', 'sanpham.danhmuc = danhmuc.sodanhmuc')
->execute()->getFirst();
}
public function initialize()
{
// define the relation to danhmuc
$this->belongsTo('danhmuc', 'danhmuc', 'sodanhmuc');
}
}
class Danhmuc extends \Phalcon\Mvc\Model
{
public function initialize()
{
// there are other options besides "hasMany", like "hasOne".
// this is your relation to sanpham
$this->hasMany('sodanhmuc', 'sanpham', 'danhmuc');
}
}
class YourController extends \Phalcon\Mvc\Controller
{
public function testAction()
{
// get your first record in Sanpham matching "12345"
$sanpham = Sanpham::findSomething(12345);
// from your Sanpham object, get the related danhmuc object.
// this works because we defined the relations (belongsTo and hasMany)
$danhmuc = $sanpham->getRelated('danhmuc');
// now you have access to the values of danhmuc via the $danhmuc variable
$breadcrumbs = [
'/' => Tool::getTranslation()->_('trangchu'),
"/Loai-san-pham/" . $danhmuc->tendep => $danhmuc->tendanhmuc,
'' => $danhmuc->tieudesanpham,
];
}
}
Check the Phalcon model docs for more info on this.

NHibernate Dynamic Component Default Value Issue

All of my entities (that are mapped to a database table) inherit from an entity class with a dynamic component on it called Attributes e.g.:
public abstract class Entity<T> {
public virtual T Id { get; set; }
private IDictionary _attributes;
public virtual IDictionary Attributes {
get { return _attributes ?? (_attributes = new Hashtable()); }
set { _attributes = value; }
}
}
The Attributes collection allows me to add extra fields to each entity without directly changing the entity itself. This allows me to make my application more modular.
For example say I have the following entity:
public class User : Entity<int> {
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
}
Now say I have a Forum module which needs a NumPosts property against the User. I would add the field against the Users table in the database. This field is non nullable and has a default value of 0. I then map the field using the dynamic component against the User entity.
However when I try inserting the user by saying:
session.Save(new User() { Name = "Test" });
It throws an error as it's expecting me to set a value for NumPosts and the generated SQL would be something like:
INSERT INTO Users (Name, NumPosts) VALUES ('Test', NULL)
However NumPosts does not allow nulls and hence the error. Ideally I'd like it to say the following if the Attributes collection does not contain an entry for NumPosts:
INSERT INTO Users (Name) VALUES ('Test')
An alternative is to say the following which would work fine:
session.Save(new User() { Name = "Test", Attributes = new Hashtable() { { "NumPosts", 0 } } });
The problem I have is that I don't want the modules to have a dependency on each other and I can't really say this.
For reference here's a bare bones version of session factory method which maps the NumPosts field:
return Fluently.Configure()
...
.ExposeConfiguration(c => {
// Get the persistent class
var persistentClass = c.GetClassMapping("User");
// Create the attributes component
var component = new Component(persistentClass);
// Create a simple value
var simpleValue = new SimpleValue(persistentClass.Table);
// Set the type name
simpleValue.TypeName = "Int32";
// Create a new db column specification
var column = new Column("NumPosts");
column.Value = simpleValue;
column.Length = 10;
column.IsNullable = false;
column.DefaultValue = "0";
// Add the column to the value
simpleValue.AddColumn(column);
// Ad the value to the component
component.AddProperty(new Property() { Name = column.Name, Value = simpleValue });
// Add the component property
persistentClass.AddProperty(new Property() { Name = "Attributes", Value = component });
})
.BuildConfiguration();
I'd appreciate if someone could let me know if this is possible. Thanks
You know how to make it working as described above:
... An alternative is to say the following which would work fine:
session.Save(new User()
{
Name = "Test", Attributes = new Hashtable() { { "NumPosts", 0 } }
});
... The problem I have is that I don't want the modules to have a dependency on each other and I can't really say this...
In case, that the biggest issue is the explicit Attributes initialization ("...I don't want the modules to have a dependency...") we can use:
12.2. Event system
So, with Listener like this:
[Serializable]
public class MyPersistListener : NHibernate.Event.ISaveOrUpdateEventListener
{
public void OnSaveOrUpdate(SaveOrUpdateEvent #event)
{
var entity = #event.Entity as Entity<int>; // some interface IHaveAttributes
if (entity == null) // would be more appropriate
{
return;
}
var numPosts = entity.Attributes["NumPosts"] as int?;
if (numPosts.HasValue)
{
return;
}
entity.Attributes["NumPosts"] = 0;
}
}
Based on this doc snippet:
Configuration cfg = new Configuration();
ILoadEventListener[] stack = new ILoadEventListener[] { new MyLoadListener(), new DefaultLoadEventListener() };
cfg.EventListeners.LoadEventListeners = stack;
This should be the init in our case:
.ExposeConfiguration(c => {
var stack = new ISaveOrUpdateEventListener [] { new MyPersistListener() };
c.EventListeners.SaveEventListeners= stack;

phalcon - Relationships not defined when converting resultset to array?

I have tested it with 2 methods:
The first:
class ProjectsController extends ControllerBase
{
public function indexAction()
{
$row = array();
$projects = Projects::find();
foreach ($projects as $project) {
foreach($project->employees as $employee){
echo "Employee: " . $employee->name;
}
}
exit;
}
}
Output:
Employee: Admin
The second:
class ProjectsController extends ControllerBase
{
public function indexAction()
{
$row = array();
$projects = Projects::find();
$projects = $projects->toArray();
foreach ($projects as $project) {
foreach($project["employees"] as $employee){
echo $employee->name;
}
}
exit;
}
}
Output:
Notice: Undefined index: employees in app/controllers/ProjectsController.php on line 10
When converting the resultset to array the relationships aren't added to the array, is there a workaround to add it to the array?
The reason I converted the resultset to an array is to edit results for example calculating progress or something like that, without saving it to the database.
Things like this:
foreach($projects as &$project){
//count all the todos.
$todos = Todos::find("project_id = '".$project["id"]."'");
$numberOfTodos = $todos->count();
//count all the todos that are done.
$todos = Todos::find("project_id = '".$project["id"]."' AND status_id = 9");
$numberOfDoneTodos = $todos->count();
$project["percentageDone"] = ($numberOfDoneTodos / $numberOfTodos) * 100;
var_dump($row);exit;
}
$this->view->setVar("projects",$projects);
So I don't have to do calculations on the view side and only have to output it
Yes, when you convert a result set to an array only scalar values are converted.
But for adding a calculated property to your model there's no need to convert it to an array, you can change or create new properties as you wish and it will only be saved to the database when you call for example $project->save() and just properties that match a column name will be stored in the database.
For adding calculated properties I'd recommend you to use the event afterFetch that gets fired for each model retrieved from the database:
class Projects extends \Phalcon\Mvc\Model
{
...
public function afterFetch()
{
//Adds a calculated property when a project is retrieved from the database
$totalTodos = Todos::count("project_id = $this->id");
$completeTodos = Todos::count("project_id = $this->id AND status_id = 9");
$this->percentageDone = round(($completeTodos / $totalTodos) * 100, 2);
}
}

CoolStorage can't set One-To-One relationship

The issue is that I can't understand how to make a OneToOne relation between two objects the way for the first object to have a link to the second and for the second to have a link to the first. Here's the code:
[MapTo("Model")]
public class Model : CSObject<Model, int>
{
[OneToOne(LocalKey = "ModelID", ForeignKey = "ModelID")]
public Product Product { get { return (Product)GetField ("Product"); } set { SetField ("Product", value); } }
}
[MapTo("Product")]
public class Product : CSObject<Product, int>
{
[OneToOne(LocalKey = "ProductID", ForeignKey = "ProductID")]
public Model Model { get { return (Model)GetField ("Model"); } set { SetField ("Model", value); } }
}
The thing is that when I create a product and a model and set the model's property "Product" to the created one and save it, the product's "Model" property doesn't get set and remains NULL. I've already tried making all the local and foreign keys for both Product's and Model's properties the same (e.g. "ModelID") but it didn't solve the problem. What is the right way of doing this?
I guess making one of them [OneToMany] will do the trick but will return a collection while I need a single object to be returned by a property.
Update
Here comes a simple solution one would call a crutch:
[OneToMany]
public CSList<Product> _ProductList { get { return (CSList<Product>)GetField ("_ProductList"); } set { SetField ("_ProductList", value); } }
[NotMapped]
public Product Product {
get {
CSList<Product> list = this._ProductList;
if (list.Count > 0)
return list [0];
return null;
}
set {
if (value != null) {
CSList<Product> list = this._ProductList;
list.RemoveAll ();
list.Add (value);
}
}
}
You can make both relations [ManyToOne]. That will work in your scenario.

Insert in nested field

I'm a new user in LINQ to SQL and I have some problems using it.
I've used LINQ to SQL Designer and I have created my classes, mapped on the DB tables.
In particular, I have one class, named voice:
[global::System.Data.Linq.Mapping.TableAttribute(Name="dbo.voce")]
public partial class voce : INotifyPropertyChanging, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private static PropertyChangingEventArgs emptyChangingEventArgs = new PropertyChangingEventArgs(String.Empty);
private int _id_voce;
... other private fields;
private int _category;
private EntityRef<category> _category1;
public voce()
{
this._riepilogo = new EntitySet<riepilogo>(new Action<riepilogo>(this.attach_riepilogo), new Action<riepilogo>(this.detach_riepilogo));
this._hera = default(EntityRef<hera>);
this._category1 = default(EntityRef<category>);
OnCreated();
}
[global::System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Storage="_id_voce", AutoSync=AutoSync.OnInsert, DbType="Int NOT NULL IDENTITY", IsPrimaryKey=true, IsDbGenerated=true)]
public int id_voce
{
get
{
return this._id_voce;
}
set
{
if ((this._id_voce != value))
{
this.Onid_voceChanging(value);
this.SendPropertyChanging();
this._id_voce = value;
this.SendPropertyChanged("id_voce");
this.Onid_voceChanged();
}
}
}
......
[global::System.Data.Linq.Mapping.ColumnAttribute(Storage="_category", DbType="Int NOT NULL")]
public int category
{
get
{
return this._category;
}
set
{
if ((this._category != value))
{
if (this._category1.HasLoadedOrAssignedValue)
{
throw new System.Data.Linq.ForeignKeyReferenceAlreadyHasValueException();
}
this.OncategoryChanging(value);
this.SendPropertyChanging();
this._category = value;
this.SendPropertyChanged("category");
this.OncategoryChanged();
}
}
}
As you can see, voce class has a field named category that refers to a table named category.
When I add a new voce to my database, I create a new voce istance and, using the DataContext, i simply add it, using:
voce v = new voce(){...field, category1 = //create or retrieve category};
In particular, the category field is retrieved from the DB if already exists or, if not, it is inserted, before I insert the voice.
The problem is that when I add the voice in the database:
datacontext.InsertOnSubmit(v);
datacontext.SubmitChanges();
it inserts the category again, failing with the unique contraint.
How can I add a voice without adding every nested object?
Thank you and sorry for my bad English.
internal category GetCategoryFromDescription (string desc, Utility.VOICE_MODALITY mode)
{
bool type = mode == Utility.VOICE_MODALITY.ENTRATA ? true : false;
var query = from cat in dc.category
where cat.description == desc && cat.type == type
select cat;
if (query.Count() == 0)
{
category newC = new category() { description = desc };
dc.category.InsertOnSubmit(newC);
dc.SubmitChanges();
return newC;
}
else
return query.Single();
}