I'm trying to add image summary operations to visualize how well my network manages to reconstruct inputs from the validation set. However, since there are too many images in the validation set I would only like to plot a small subset of them.
I managed to achieve this with manual training loop, but I struggle to achieve the same with the new Tensorflow Estimator/Experiment/Datasets API. Has anyone done something like this?
The Experiment and Estimator are high level TensorFlow APIs. Although you could probably solve your issue with a hook, if you want more control on what's happening during the training process, it may be easier not to use these APIs.
That said, you can still use the Dataset API which will bring you a lot of useful features.
To solve your problem with the Dataset API, you will need to switch between train and validation datasets in your training loop.
One way to do that is to use a feedable iterator. See here for more details:
https://www.tensorflow.org/programmers_guide/datasets
You can also see a full example switching between training and validation with the Dataset API in this notebook.
In brief, after having created your train_dataset and your val_dataset, your training loop could be something like this:
# create TensorFlow Iterator objects
training_iterator = val_dataset.make_initializable_iterator()
val_iterator = val_dataset.make_initializable_iterator()
with tf.Session() as sess:
# Initialize variables
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess.run(init)
# Create training data and validation data handles
training_handle = sess.run(training_iterator.string_handle())
validation_handle = sess.run(val_iterator.string_handle())
for epoch in range(number_of_epochs):
# Tell iterator to go to beginning of dataset
sess.run(training_iterator.initializer)
print ("Starting epoch: ", epoch)
# iterate over the training dataset and train
while True:
try:
sess.run(train_op, feed_dict={handle: training_handle})
except tf.errors.OutOfRangeError:
# End of epoch
break
# Tell validation iterator to go to beginning of dataset
sess.run(val_iterator.initializer)
# run validation on only 10 examples
for i in range(10):
my_value = sess.run(my_validation_op, feed_dict={handle: validation_handle}))
# Do whatever you want with my_value
...
I figured out a solution that uses Estimator/Experiment API.
First you need to modify your Dataset input to not only provide labels and features, but also some form of an identifier for each sample (in my case it was a filename). Then in the hyperparameters dictionary (params argument) you need to specify which of the validation samples you want to plot. You also will have to pass the model_dir in those parameters. For example:
params = tf.contrib.training.HParams(
model_dir=model_dir,
images_to_plot=["100307_EMOTION.nii.gz", "100307_FACE-SHAPE.nii.gz",
"100307_GAMBLING.nii.gz", "100307_RELATIONAL.nii.gz",
"100307_SOCIAL.nii.gz"]
)
learn_runner.run(
experiment_fn=experiment_fn,
run_config=run_config,
schedule="train_and_evaluate",
hparams=params
)
Having this set up you can create conditional Summary operations in your model_fn and an evaluation hook to include them in your outputs.
if mode == tf.contrib.learn.ModeKeys.EVAL:
summaries = []
for image_to_plot in params.images_to_plot:
is_to_plot = tf.equal(tf.squeeze(filenames), image_to_plot)
summary = tf.cond(is_to_plot,
lambda: tf.summary.image('predicted', predictions),
lambda: tf.summary.histogram("ignore_me", [0]),
name="%s_predicted" % image_to_plot)
summaries.append(summary)
evaluation_hooks = [tf.train.SummarySaverHook(
save_steps=1,
output_dir=os.path.join(params.model_dir, "eval"),
summary_op=tf.summary.merge(summaries))]
else:
evaluation_hooks = None
Note that the summaries have to be conditional - we are either plotting an image (computationally expensive) or saving a constant (computationally cheap). I opted for using histogram versus scalar in for the dummy summaries to avoid cluttering my tensorboard dashboard.
Finally you need to pass the hook in the return object of your `model_fn'
return tf.estimator.EstimatorSpec(
mode=mode,
predictions=predictions,
loss=loss,
train_op=train_op,
evaluation_hooks=evaluation_hooks
)
Please note that this only works when your batch size is 1 when evaluating the model (which should not be a problem).
In my TensorFlow code I want my network to take inputs from one of the two StagingArea objects depending upon whether I want to do training or testing.
A part of the graph construction code I wrote is as follows :
with tf.device("/gpu:0"):
for i in range(numgpus):
with tf.variable_scope(tf.get_variable_scope(), reuse=i>0) as vscope:
with tf.device('/gpu:{}'.format(i)):
with tf.name_scope('GPU-Tower-{}'.format(i)) as scope:
phase = tf.get_variable("phase", [], initializer=tf.zeros_initializer(),dtype=tf.uint8, trainable=False)
phaseassigntest = phase.assign(1)
phaseassigntrain = phase.assign(0)
phasetest = tf.equal(phase, 0)
is_training = tf.cond(phasetest, lambda: tf.constant(True), lambda: tf.constant(False))
trainstagingarea = tf.contrib.staging.StagingArea([tf.float32, tf.int32], shapes=[[trainbatchsize, 3, 221, 221], [trainbatchsize]], capacity=20)
putoptrain = trainstagingarea.put(train_iterator.get_next())
trainputop.append(putoptrain)
getoptrain = trainstagingarea.get()
traingetop.append(getoptrain)
trainclearop = trainstagingarea.clear()
trainstageclear.append(trainclearop)
trainsizeop = trainstagingarea.size()
trainstagesize.append(trainsizeop)
valstagingarea = tf.contrib.staging.StagingArea([tf.float32, tf.int32], shapes=[[valbatchsize, 3, 221, 221], [valbatchsize]], capacity=20)
putopval = valstagingarea.put(val_iterator.get_next())
valputop.append(putopval)
getopval = valstagingarea.get()
valgetop.append(getopval)
valclearop = valstagingarea.clear()
valstageclear.append(valclearop)
valsizeop = valstagingarea.size()
valstagesize.append(valsizeop)
#elem = valgetop[i]
elem = tf.cond(is_training,lambda: traingetop[i],lambda: valgetop[i])
img = elem[0]
label = elem[1]
labelonehot = tf.one_hot(label, depth=numclasses)
net, networksummaries = overfeataccurate(img,numclasses=numclasses, phase=is_training)
I have used tf.cond to make sure that the network is fed by one of the two StagingArea objects. One is meant for training and the other one is meant for validation.
Now, when I try to execute the graph as follows, I do not get any result and infact the code just hangs and I have to kill the process.
with tf.Session(graph=g,config=config) as sess:
sess.run(init_op)
sess.run(tf.local_variables_initializer())
sess.run(val_initialize)
for i in range(20):
sess.run(valputop)
print(sess.run(valstagesize))
writer = tf.summary.FileWriter('.', graph=tf.get_default_graph())
epoch = 0
iter = 0
print("Performing Validation")
sess.run(phaseassigntest)
saver = tf.train.Saver()
while(epoch<10):
time_init = time.time()
while True:
try:
[val_accu, _, summaries] = sess.run([towervalidation, towervalidationupdateop,validation_summary_op])
print(val_accu)
when instead of tf.cond() I directly assign elem = valgetop[i], the code works just fine.
Am I missing something over here ?
What is the right way to feed my network based on whether I want to do training or testing ?
NOTE The error does not go away even if I set numgpus to 1.
Your problem
What you think tf.cond does
Based on the flag, execute what is required to put either traingetop[i] or valgetop[i] into your elem tensor.
What tf.cond actually does
Executes what is required to get both traingetop[i] and valgetop[i], then passes one of them into your elem tensor.
So
The reason it is hanging forever is because it's waiting for an element to be added to your training staging area (so that it can get that element and discard it). You're forgiven for not realising this is what it's doing; it's actually very counter-intuitive. The documentation is awfully unclear on how to deal with this.
Recommended Solution (by Tensorflow documentation)
If you really need the queues to be in the same graph, then you need to make two copies of your ENTIRE graph, one that is fed by your training staging area, and one that is fed by your validation staging area. Then you just use the relevant tensor in your sess.run call. I recommend creating a function that takes a queue output tensor, and returns a model_output tensor. Now you have a train_time_output tensor and a validation_time_output tensor, and you can choose which one you want to execute in your sess.run.
Warning
You need to make sure that you aren't actually creating new variables to go along with these new ops. To do that take a look at the latest documentation on variables. It looks like they've simplified it from v0.12, and it essentially boils down to using tf.get_variable instead of tf.Variable to create your variables.
My preferred work around
Although that is the recommended solution (AFAIK), it is extremely unsatisfying to me; you're creating a whole other set of operations on the graph that just happen to use the same weights. It seems like there's a lot of potential for programmer error by abusing the separation between train time and test/validation time (resulting in the model acting unexpectedly different at these times). Worse; it doesn't solve the problem of tf.cond demanding the values for inputs to both branches, it just forces you to copy your whole graph, which is not always possible.
I prefer to just not have my queues in the graph like that, and treat the model as a function which can be fed an example without caring where it's from. That is, I would instantiate the model with a tf.placeholder as the input, and at execution time I would use feed_dict to actually provide the value. It would function something like this
#inside main training loop
if time_to_train:
example = sess.run(traingettop)
else:
example = sess.run(valgettop)
result = sess.run(model_output, {input_placeholder: example})
It's very useful to note that you can use the feed_dict to feed any value for any tensor anywhere in your model. So, you can change any model definition that, due to tf.cond would always require an input, like:
a = tf.constant(some_value)
b = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
flag = tf.placeholder(tf.bool, [])
one_of_them = tf.cond(flag, a, b)
model_output = build_graph(one_of_them)
Into a definition that doesn't, like:
a = tf.constant(some_value)
model_output = build_graph(a)
Remembering that you can always overwrite what a is at execution time:
# In main training loop,
sess.run(train_op, {a: some_other_value})
This essentially pushes the conditional into native python land. In your code you might end up with something like:
if condition_satisfied:
sess.run(train_op, {a:some_other_value})
else:
sess.run(train_op)
Performance concerns
If you are using tensorflow on a single machine, then there is practically no performance cost to this solution, as the numpy array/s put into the example python variable are actually still stored on the GPU.
If you are using tensorflow in a distributed fashion, then this solution would kill your performance; it would require sending the example from whatever machine it's on to the master so that it can send it back.
I am trying to implemente a Memory-augmented neural network, in which the memory and the read/write/usage weight vectors are updated according to a combination of their previous values. These weigths are different from the classic weight matrices between layers that are automatically updated with the fit() function! My problem is the following: how can I correctly initialize these weights as keras tensors and use them in the model? I explain it better with the following simplified example.
My API model is something like:
input = Input(shape=(5,6))
controller = LSTM(20, activation='tanh',stateful=False, return_sequences=True)(input)
write_key = Dense(4,activation='tanh')(controller)
read_key = Dense(4,activation='tanh')(controller)
w_w = Add()([w_u, w_r]) #<---- UPDATE OF WRITE WEIGHTS
to_write = Dot()([w_w, write_key])
M = Add()([M,to_write])
cos_sim = Dot()([M,read_key])
w_r = Lambda(lambda x: softmax(x,axis=1))(cos_sim) #<---- UPDATE OF READ WEIGHTS
w_u = Add()([w_u,w_r,w_w]) #<---- UPDATE OF USAGE WEIGHTS
retrieved_memory = Dot()([w_r,M])
controller_output = concatenate([controller,retrieved_memory])
final_output = Dense(6,activation='sigmoid')(controller_output)`
You can see that, in order to compute w_w^t, I have to have first defined w_r^{t-1} and w_u^{t-1}. So, at the beginning I have to provide a valid initialization for these vectors. What is the best way to do it? The initializations I would like to have are:
M = K.variable(numpy.zeros((10,4))) # MEMORY
w_r = K.variable(numpy.zeros((1,10))) # READ WEIGHTS
w_u = K.variable(numpy.zeros((1,10))) # USAGE WEIGHTS`
But, analogously to what said in #2486(entron), these commands do not return a keras tensor with all the needed meta-data and so this returns the following error:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'inbound_nodes'
I also thought to use the old M, w_r and w_u as further inputs at each iteration and analogously get in output the same variables to complete the loop. But this means that I have to use the fit() function to train online the model having just the target as final output (Model 1), and employ the predict() function on the model with all the secondary outputs (Model 2) to get the variables to use at the next iteration. I have also to pass the weigth matrices from Model 1 to Model 2 using get_weights() and set_weights(). As you can see, it becomes a little bit messy and too slow.
Do you have any suggestions for this problem?
P.S. Please, do not focus too much on the API model above because it is a simplified (almost meaningless) version of the complete one where I skipped several key steps.
I'm a newbie to TensorFlow. I'm confused about the difference between tf.placeholder and tf.Variable. In my view, tf.placeholder is used for input data, and tf.Variable is used to store the state of data. This is all what I know.
Could someone explain to me more in detail about their differences? In particular, when to use tf.Variable and when to use tf.placeholder?
In short, you use tf.Variable for trainable variables such as weights (W) and biases (B) for your model.
weights = tf.Variable(
tf.truncated_normal([IMAGE_PIXELS, hidden1_units],
stddev=1.0 / math.sqrt(float(IMAGE_PIXELS))), name='weights')
biases = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([hidden1_units]), name='biases')
tf.placeholder is used to feed actual training examples.
images_placeholder = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(batch_size, IMAGE_PIXELS))
labels_placeholder = tf.placeholder(tf.int32, shape=(batch_size))
This is how you feed the training examples during the training:
for step in xrange(FLAGS.max_steps):
feed_dict = {
images_placeholder: images_feed,
labels_placeholder: labels_feed,
}
_, loss_value = sess.run([train_op, loss], feed_dict=feed_dict)
Your tf.variables will be trained (modified) as the result of this training.
See more at https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r0.7/tutorials/mnist/tf/index.html. (Examples are taken from the web page.)
The difference is that with tf.Variable you have to provide an initial value when you declare it. With tf.placeholder you don't have to provide an initial value and you can specify it at run time with the feed_dict argument inside Session.run
Since Tensor computations compose of graphs then it's better to interpret the two in terms of graphs.
Take for example the simple linear regression
WX+B=Y
where W and B stand for the weights and bias and X for the observations' inputs and Y for the observations' outputs.
Obviously X and Y are of the same nature (manifest variables) which differ from that of W and B (latent variables). X and Y are values of the samples (observations) and hence need a place to be filled, while W and B are the weights and bias, Variables (the previous values affect the latter) in the graph which should be trained using different X and Y pairs. We place different samples to the Placeholders to train the Variables.
We only need to save or restore the Variables (at checkpoints) to save or rebuild the graph with the code.
Placeholders are mostly holders for the different datasets (for example training data or test data). However, Variables are trained in the training process for the specific tasks, i.e., to predict the outcome of the input or map the inputs to the desired labels. They remain the same until you retrain or fine-tune the model using different or the same samples to fill into the Placeholders often through the dict. For instance:
session.run(a_graph, dict = {a_placeholder_name : sample_values})
Placeholders are also passed as parameters to set models.
If you change placeholders (add, delete, change the shape etc) of a model in the middle of training, you can still reload the checkpoint without any other modifications. But if the variables of a saved model are changed, you should adjust the checkpoint accordingly to reload it and continue the training (all variables defined in the graph should be available in the checkpoint).
To sum up, if the values are from the samples (observations you already have) you safely make a placeholder to hold them, while if you need a parameter to be trained harness a Variable (simply put, set the Variables for the values you want to get using TF automatically).
In some interesting models, like a style transfer model, the input pixes are going to be optimized and the normally-called model variables are fixed, then we should make the input (usually initialized randomly) as a variable as implemented in that link.
For more information please infer to this simple and illustrating doc.
TL;DR
Variables
For parameters to learn
Values can be derived from training
Initial values are required (often random)
Placeholders
Allocated storage for data (such as for image pixel data during a feed)
Initial values are not required (but can be set, see tf.placeholder_with_default)
The most obvious difference between the tf.Variable and the tf.placeholder is that
you use variables to hold and update parameters. Variables are
in-memory buffers containing tensors. They must be explicitly
initialized and can be saved to disk during and after training. You
can later restore saved values to exercise or analyze the model.
Initialization of the variables is done with sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer()). Also while creating a variable, you need to pass a Tensor as its initial value to the Variable() constructor and when you create a variable you always know its shape.
On the other hand, you can't update the placeholder. They also should not be initialized, but because they are a promise to have a tensor, you need to feed the value into them sess.run(<op>, {a: <some_val>}). And at last, in comparison to a variable, placeholder might not know the shape. You can either provide parts of the dimensions or provide nothing at all.
There other differences:
the values inside the variable can be updated during optimizations
variables can be shared, and can be non-trainable
the values inside the variable can be stored after training
when the variable is created, 3 ops are added to a graph (variable op, initializer op, ops for the initial value)
placeholder is a function, Variable is a class (hence an uppercase)
when you use TF in a distributed environment, variables are stored in a special place (parameter server) and are shared between the workers.
Interesting part is that not only placeholders can be fed. You can feed the value to a Variable and even to a constant.
Adding to other's answers, they also explain it very well in this MNIST tutorial on Tensoflow website:
We describe these interacting operations by manipulating symbolic
variables. Let's create one:
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 784]),
x isn't a specific value. It's a placeholder, a value that we'll input when we ask TensorFlow to
run a computation. We want to be able to input any number of MNIST
images, each flattened into a 784-dimensional vector. We represent
this as a 2-D tensor of floating-point numbers, with a shape [None,
784]. (Here None means that a dimension can be of any length.)
We also need the weights and biases for our model. We could imagine
treating these like additional inputs, but TensorFlow has an even
better way to handle it: Variable. A Variable is a modifiable tensor
that lives in TensorFlow's graph of interacting operations. It can be
used and even modified by the computation. For machine learning
applications, one generally has the model parameters be Variables.
W = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 10]))
b = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([10]))
We create these Variables by giving tf.Variable the initial value of
the Variable: in this case, we initialize both W and b as tensors full
of zeros. Since we are going to learn W and b, it doesn't matter very
much what they initially are.
Tensorflow uses three types of containers to store/execute the process
Constants :Constants holds the typical data.
variables: Data values will be changed, with respective the functions such as cost_function..
placeholders: Training/Testing data will be passed in to the graph.
Example snippet:
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
### Model parameters ###
W = tf.Variable([.3], tf.float32)
b = tf.Variable([-.3], tf.float32)
### Model input and output ###
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
linear_model = W * x + b
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
### loss ###
loss = tf.reduce_sum(tf.square(linear_model - y)) # sum of the squares
### optimizer ###
optimizer = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
train = optimizer.minimize(loss)
### training data ###
x_train = [1,2,3,4]
y_train = [0,-1,-2,-3]
### training loop ###
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(init) # reset values to wrong
for i in range(1000):
sess.run(train, {x:x_train, y:y_train})
As the name say placeholder is a promise to provide a value later i.e.
Variable are simply the training parameters (W(matrix), b(bias) same as the normal variables you use in your day to day programming, which the trainer updates/modify on each run/step.
While placeholder doesn't require any initial value, that when you created x and y TF doesn't allocated any memory, instead later when you feed the placeholders in the sess.run() using feed_dict, TensorFlow will allocate the appropriately sized memory for them (x and y) - this unconstrained-ness allows us to feed any size and shape of data.
In nutshell:
Variable - is a parameter you want trainer (i.e. GradientDescentOptimizer) to update after each step.
Placeholder demo -
a = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
b = tf.placeholder(tf.float32)
adder_node = a + b # + provides a shortcut for tf.add(a, b)
Execution:
print(sess.run(adder_node, {a: 3, b:4.5}))
print(sess.run(adder_node, {a: [1,3], b: [2, 4]}))
resulting in the output
7.5
[ 3. 7.]
In the first case 3 and 4.5 will be passed to a and b respectively, and then to adder_node ouputting 7. In second case there's a feed list, first step 1 and 2 will be added, next 3 and 4 (a and b).
Relevant reads:
tf.placeholder doc.
tf.Variable doc.
Variable VS placeholder.
Variables
A TensorFlow variable is the best way to represent shared, persistent state manipulated by your program. Variables are manipulated via the tf.Variable class. Internally, a tf.Variable stores a persistent tensor. Specific operations allow you to read and modify the values of this tensor. These modifications are visible across multiple tf.Sessions, so multiple workers can see the same values for a tf.Variable. Variables must be initialized before using.
Example:
x = tf.Variable(3, name="x")
y = tf.Variable(4, name="y")
f = x*x*y + y + 2
This creates a computation graph. The variables (x and y) can be initialized and the function (f) evaluated in a tensorflow session as follows:
with tf.Session() as sess:
x.initializer.run()
y.initializer.run()
result = f.eval()
print(result)
42
Placeholders
A placeholder is a node (same as a variable) whose value can be initialized in the future. These nodes basically output the value assigned to them during runtime. A placeholder node can be assigned using the tf.placeholder() class to which you can provide arguments such as type of the variable and/or its shape. Placeholders are extensively used for representing the training dataset in a machine learning model as the training dataset keeps changing.
Example:
A = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None, 3))
B = A + 5
Note: 'None' for a dimension means 'any size'.
with tf.Session as sess:
B_val_1 = B.eval(feed_dict={A: [[1, 2, 3]]})
B_val_2 = B.eval(feed_dict={A: [[4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]]})
print(B_val_1)
[[6. 7. 8.]]
print(B_val_2)
[[9. 10. 11.]
[12. 13. 14.]]
References:
https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/variables
https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/placeholder
O'Reilly: Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn & Tensorflow
Think of Variable in tensorflow as a normal variables which we use in programming languages. We initialize variables, we can modify it later as well. Whereas placeholder doesn’t require initial value. Placeholder simply allocates block of memory for future use. Later, we can use feed_dict to feed the data into placeholder. By default, placeholder has an unconstrained shape, which allows you to feed tensors of different shapes in a session. You can make constrained shape by passing optional argument -shape, as I have done below.
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32,(3,4))
y = x + 2
sess = tf.Session()
print(sess.run(y)) # will cause an error
s = np.random.rand(3,4)
print(sess.run(y, feed_dict={x:s}))
While doing Machine Learning task, most of the time we are unaware of number of rows but (let’s assume) we do know the number of features or columns. In that case, we can use None.
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None,4))
Now, at run time we can feed any matrix with 4 columns and any number of rows.
Also, Placeholders are used for input data ( they are kind of variables which we use to feed our model), where as Variables are parameters such as weights that we train over time.
Placeholder :
A placeholder is simply a variable that we will assign data to at a later date. It allows us to create our operations and build our computation graph, without needing the data. In TensorFlow terminology, we then feed data into the graph through these placeholders.
Initial values are not required but can have default values with tf.placeholder_with_default)
We have to provide value at runtime like :
a = tf.placeholder(tf.int16) // initialize placeholder value
b = tf.placeholder(tf.int16) // initialize placeholder value
use it using session like :
sess.run(add, feed_dict={a: 2, b: 3}) // this value we have to assign at runtime
Variable :
A TensorFlow variable is the best way to represent shared,
persistent state manipulated by your program.
Variables are manipulated via the tf.Variable class. A tf.Variable
represents a tensor whose value can be changed by running ops on it.
Example : tf.Variable("Welcome to tensorflow!!!")
Tensorflow 2.0 Compatible Answer: The concept of Placeholders, tf.placeholder will not be available in Tensorflow 2.x (>= 2.0) by default, as the Default Execution Mode is Eager Execution.
However, we can use them if used in Graph Mode (Disable Eager Execution).
Equivalent command for TF Placeholder in version 2.x is tf.compat.v1.placeholder.
Equivalent Command for TF Variable in version 2.x is tf.Variable and if you want to migrate the code from 1.x to 2.x, the equivalent command is
tf.compat.v2.Variable.
Please refer this Tensorflow Page for more information about Tensorflow Version 2.0.
Please refer the Migration Guide for more information about migration from versions 1.x to 2.x.
Think of a computation graph. In such graph, we need an input node to pass our data to the graph, those nodes should be defined as Placeholder in tensorflow.
Do not think as a general program in Python. You can write a Python program and do all those stuff that guys explained in other answers just by Variables, but for computation graphs in tensorflow, to feed your data to the graph, you need to define those nods as Placeholders.
For TF V1:
Constant is with initial value and it won't change in the computation;
Variable is with initial value and it can change in the computation; (so good for parameters)
Placeholder is without initial value and it won't change in the computation. (so good for inputs like prediction instances)
For TF V2, same but they try to hide Placeholder (graph mode is not preferred).
In TensorFlow, a variable is just another tensor (like tf.constant or tf.placeholder). It just so happens that variables can be modified by the computation. tf.placeholder is used for inputs that will be provided externally to the computation at run-time (e.g. training data). tf.Variable is used for inputs that are part of the computation and are going to be modified by the computation (e.g. weights of a neural network).
I'm working with Seq2Seq example in TensorFlow. I can run the training and see the outputs of perplexity on the development set. It's great!
I just want to add summaries (especially scalar_summary such as perplexity on dev set) to the event file and monitor them in TensorBoard. After reading the documentation, I don't understand how to annotate translate.py with summary ops.
Can anybody can help me with simple pseudo-code?
It looks like translate.py doesn't create a TensorBoard summary log at all. (Part of the reason may be that much of the evaluation happens in Python, rather than in the TensorFlow graph.) Let's see how to add one.
You'll need to create a tf.train.SummaryWriter. Add the following before entering the training loop (here):
summary_writer = tf.train.SummaryWriter("path/to/logs", sess.graph_def)
You'll need to create summary events for the perplexity in each bucket. These values are computed in Python, so you can't use the usual tf.scalar_summary() op. Instead, you'll create a tf.Summary directly by modifying this loop:
perplexity_summary = tf.Summary()
# Run evals on development set and print their perplexity.
for bucket_id in xrange(len(_buckets)):
encoder_inputs, decoder_inputs, target_weights = model.get_batch(
dev_set, bucket_id)
_, eval_loss, _ = model.step(sess, encoder_inputs, decoder_inputs,
target_weights, bucket_id, True)
eval_ppx = math.exp(eval_loss) if eval_loss < 300 else float('inf')
print(" eval: bucket %d perplexity %.2f" % (bucket_id, eval_ppx))
bucket_value = perplexity_summary.value.add()
bucket_value.tag = "peplexity_bucket)%d" % bucket_id
bucket_value.simple_value = eval_ppx
summary_writer.add_summary(perplexity_summary, model.global_step.eval())
You can add other metrics by constructing tf.Summary values yourself and calling summary_writer.add_summary().