I have a Devexpress Gridcontrol bound to a custom class.
The class looks like this:
Public Class AuditList
Public CasualtyList As List(Of CasualtyRecords)
Public MedsList As List(Of CasualtyRecords.Medications)
Public Property FilterString As CriteriaOperator
Public Sub New()
CasualtyList = New List(Of CasualtyRecords)
MedsList = New List(Of CasualtyRecords.Medications)
End Sub
Public Class CasualtyRecords
Private _primary As New PS
Public Property PrimarySurvey As PS
Get
Return _primary
End Get
Set(value As PS)
_primary = value
End Set
End Property
Public Sub New()
Vitals = New List(Of VitalRecords)
End Sub
Public Property Vitals As List(Of VitalRecords)
Public Property Meds As List(Of Medications)
ReadOnly Property MedCount As Integer
Get
Return Meds.Count
End Get
End Property
Property Id As Integer
Property ClinicalImpression As String
Property Disposal As String
Property Age As Integer
Property Gender As String
Class PS
Public Property Airway As Integer
Public Property Breathing As Integer
Public Property Circulation As Integer
Public Property Rate As Integer
End Class
Class Medications
Public Property MedName As String
End Class
End Class
End Class
This is an example of a filter type I am trying to create:
"[Gender] ='Male' AND [Medications].[MedName] = 'Paracetamol' AND [Age] >100"
Is this possible with the class constructed as shown, or perhaps do I need to implement some other interface?
I imagine that it would look something like this with LINQ
Dim b As New CasualtyRecords
b = a.CasualtyList.Where(Function(x) x.Meds.Any(Medications.Med = "Paracetamol") And x.Gender = "Male" And x.Age > 20)
Thanks
I was able to achieve the required results using this LINQ query
Dim newrecords = a.CasualtyList.Where(
Function(x) x.Meds.Any(
Function(b) b.MedName = "Paracetamol") _
And x.Gender = "Male" And x.Age > 20).ToList()
New to using a Dictionary list.
I have an api that is returning a "task object" defined as:
id As Integer
options As Dictionary(string, string)
So I am defining a class called Task to store the returned "task object".
Public Class Task
Private _id As Integer
Public Property Id() As Integer
Get
Return _id
End Get
Set(value As Integer
_id = value
End Set
End Property
Private _optionlist As New List(Of Option)
Public Property OptionList() As List(Of Option)
Get
Return _optionlist
End Get
Set(ByVal value As List(Of Option))
_optionlist = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class Option
Private _key As String
Public Property Key() As String
Get
Return _key
End Get
Set(value As String)
_key = value
End Set
End Property
Private _value As String
Public Property Value() As String
Get
Return _value
End Get
Set(value As String)
_value = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
I will assign the "task object" returned from the api to this Task class.
I defined options as a list. Is that correct?
I will also have to read the option in my class and later repopulate it to send back to the api via function call.
Could use some help...thanks.
You can add the property to the class directly:
Public Class Task
Private _id As Integer
Private options As Dictionary(of string, string)
You can also create Get and Set methods for the "options" parameter.
I have a user control with a property "Rules" that is a generic list.
Every "rule" is associated to a combobox control and i have to create a property to host data for the combobox. I used another generic list to accomplish this.
In design works well, i can add items normally in property grid, but when i run the program the values are not maintained.
Rules property:
Private _regras As New List(Of ParametrosColunasGrid)
<Category("Ecletica")> _
<Browsable(True)> _
<System.ComponentModel.DesignerSerializationVisibility(System.ComponentModel.DesignerSerializationVisibility.Content)>
Public Property Regras() As List(Of ParametrosColunasGrid)
Get
Return _regras
End Get
Set(value As List(Of ParametrosColunasGrid))
_regras = value
End Set
End Property
Public Class ParametrosColunasGrid
'...
Private _itens_Combo As New List(Of ItemComboBox)
<DesignerSerializationVisibility(DesignerSerializationVisibility.Content)>
Public Property ItensCombo As List(Of ItemComboBox)
Get
Return _itens_Combo
End Get
Set(value As List(Of ItemComboBox))
_itens_Combo = value
End Set
End Property
'...
End Class
ItemComboBox Class:
<Serializable()>
Public Class ItemComboBox
Public Property Value As String
Public Property Key As String
Public Overrides Function ToString() As String
Return _Value
End Function
End Class
Lets say I have a class called "Item" and "SubItems"
Public Class SubItem
Private _SubItemName As String
Public Property SubItemName() As String
Get
Return _SubItemName
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_SubItemName = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
<DataServiceKey("Name")> _
Public Class Item
Private _Name As String
Public Property Name() As String
Get
Return _Name
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_Name = value
End Set
End Property
Private _SubItems As List(Of SubItem)
Public Property SubItems() As List(Of SubItem)
Get
Return _SubItems
End Get
Set(ByVal value As List(Of SubItem))
_SubItems = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
How would I create a service that would return a list of Items and upon looking up an individual item I would be able to see the sub items.
You can check out WCF Data Servies reflection provider, e.g.,
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alexj/archive/2010/06/11/tip-56-writing-an-odata-service-using-the-reflection-provider.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd728281.aspx
Hope this helps.
In VB6, there used to be a Collection data type that would allow retrieval of an item in the collection by either its key or its ordinal. However, it wasn't strongly typed.
Now, with VB.Net, I am looking for a suitable replacement that is strongly type and could be used with a generic collection.
This is a simple example of what I want to do. The only problem is that the underlying collection class, BindingList, does not support efficient retrieval of an item by an alpha key, so I have to loop through the elements to get the item I am looking for. For large collections, this is not efficient.
I have looked though the various Collection type classes and have found no suitable replacement.
This is what I want to do, except for the looping that is done with the Item property.
Rather than just saying "Use Hash tables" or something like that, if you could, please include the detailed out as I have done for the short example below.
Public Class Car
Public Sub New(ByVal keyName As String, ByVal property1 As String)
_KeyName = keyName
_Property1 = property1
End Sub
Dim _KeyName As String
Public Property KeyName() As String
Get
Return _KeyName
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_KeyName = value
End Set
End Property
Public _Property1 As String
Public Property Property1() As String
Get
Return _Property1
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_Property1 = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class Cars
Inherits System.ComponentModel.BindingList(Of Car)
Public Overloads ReadOnly Property Item(ByVal key As String) As Car
Get
For Each CurrentCar As Car In Me.Items
If CurrentCar.KeyName = key Then
Return CurrentCar
End If
Next
Return Nothing
End Get
End Property
End Class
I believe you're looking for Dictionary<TKey, TValue>. In fact, if you do want your own collection class that's strongly typed and isn't (itself) generic, if you change your parent class to Dictionary<string, Car>, you should be all set. This all does, of course, assume that you add the cars to the collection with an explicit string key. If you want the lookup to be based on the value of a property in the collection, you'd do better either using or inheriting from List<Car> and using LINQ to query the list. You could then have...
Public Overloads ReadOnly Property Item(ByVal key As String) As Car
Get
Return (from c in Me where c.KeyName = key select c).SingleOrDefault()
End Get
End Property
Do you really need both access by key AND index?
If you do not, then use a Dictionary(Of String, Car), and use
- MyCol.Items("XXX") to retrieve an item by key (or the shorthand MyCol("XXX"))
- MyCol.ContainsKey("XXX") to test if a key exists in the collection
- For Each Entry as KeyValuePair(Of String, Car) in MyCol if you want to enumerate all objects AND their key
- For Each Entry as Car in MyCol.Values if you want to enumerate the entries without consideration for the key
If you need both access by index and key, I'm afraid your best bet is to use a List(of Car) and a Dictionary(of Car) rolled into one custom collection class, because I believe they went away from that kind of collection which is not really all that useful for most problems.
This is what I am thinking is my best solution. I welcome comments for a better way!
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Public Class Car
Implements Xs(Of Car).IKeyName
Private _KeyName As String
Public Sub New(ByVal keyName As String, ByVal property1 As String)
_KeyName = keyName
_Property1 = property1
End Sub
Public Property KeyName() As String Implements Xs(Of Car).IKeyName.KeyName
Get
Return _KeyName
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_KeyName = value
End Set
End Property
Public _Property1 As String
Public Property Property1() As String
Get
Return _Property1
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_Property1 = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class Cars
Inherits System.ComponentModel.BindingList(Of Car)
Public Overloads ReadOnly Property Item(ByVal key As String) As Car
Get
For Each CurrentCar As Car In Me.Items
If CurrentCar.KeyName = key Then
Return CurrentCar
End If
Next
Return Nothing
End Get
End Property
End Class
Public Class X
Private _KeyName As String
Public Property KeyName() As String
Get
Return _Keyname
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_Keyname = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Public Class Xs(Of X)
Inherits Hashtable
Interface IKeyName
Property KeyName() As String
End Interface
Public Shadows Sub Add(ByVal item As IKeyName)
MyBase.Add(item.KeyName, item)
End Sub
Public Shadows ReadOnly Property Item(ByVal key As String) As x
Get
If Me.ContainsKey(key) Then
Return MyBase.Item(key)
Else
'If I mispell a key, I don't want to end up creating a new mispelled version, I want an error
Throw New Exception("Element with key " & key & " is not found")
End If
End Get
End Property
End Class
Public Class Cars2
Inherits Xs(Of Car)
End Class
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim MyCar As New Car("key1", "prop1")
'First approach
Dim MyCars As New Cars
MyCars.Add(MyCar)
Dim RetrievedCar As Car = MyCars.Item("key1") 'Inefficient retrieval by key (uses looping)
'Second approach
Dim Cars2 As New Cars2
Cars2.Add(MyCar)
Dim RetrievedCar2 As Car = Cars2.Item("key1") 'Can now efficiently retreive an item by its key
End Sub
The OrderedDictionary in the System.Collections.Specialized namespace can be accessed by index and by key, if you ever need that. But looking at your solution, it looks like a standard Dictionary, but less efficient because it forces a string type for keys.
Is there any reason you can't use the Dictionary .NET provides you, or another collection type that's already in .NET like OrderedDictionary?