I have ASP 4.5 website with a dependency on the business logic project, which is a class library built using .Net v4.5. Recently to expand the development, I have planned to introduce additional website project which is ASP Core. For the same, I have added the dependency of the business logic project. The business logic currently evaluates the request, cookies and session related stuff through HttpContext.Current instance. Which isn't working when I am accessing the business logic through ASP Core website.
Access HttpContext.Current
I have gone through the above question, and can know that why HttpContext.Current appears as null when I access it through ASP Core. And the answer to it suggests to populate the reference type IHttpContextAccessor through dependency injection. Now, the problem is, this interface belongs to the library Microsoft.AspNet.Http, and I don't see a way to add this to my business logic project.
Someone please help me out to access HttpContext into my business logic project.
I had this exact same need. The way I solved it was to create my own interfaces that live in my class library and I use those to get access to the current HttpContext regardless of whether the library is running under a 4.5 http context or a MVC Core http context.
To explain further, both the ASP 4.5 framework and the ASP Core Framework have an HttpContext object with associated Request and Response objects but they are defined in different namespaces and neither framework knows about the other framework's namespace. So What I decided is that I needed my library code to have access to an IHttpContext that was defined in one of my namespaces. And that IHttpContext would use an IHttpRequest and IHttpResponse that were also defined in my library's namespace. And finally, that IHttpRequest uses ISession, IHeaders and ICookies that are defined in my namespace.
With these interfaces defined, in my ASP 4.5 website I can now at the web layer create an HttpContext class based on my IHttpContext and have that class basically wrap the ASP 4.5 HttpContext object. My HttpContext object could then be passed into my library for use.
And in my MVC Core website I can now at the web layer create an HttpContext class based on my IHttpContext and have that class basically wrap the MVC Core HttpContext object. My HttpContext object could then be passed into my library for use just like it was when I was running under the ASP 4.5 environment.
So in the end, my library doesn't know which HttpContext object (4.5 or Core) it is actually accessing under the hood because it just knows that the object is has access to confirms to the IHttpInterface defined in it's library.
One final note, to help navigate name conflicts, I actually named my interfaces this way:
IAppHttpContext
IAppHttpRequest
IAppHttpResponse
IAppHttpSession
IAppHttpRequestHeaders
IAppHttpRequestCookies
Note that not all the functionality that is available in HttpContext 4.5 is available in MVC Core. The two are very similar but there are a few differences. The biggest difference is that MVC Core Session can only store byte arrays or strings whereas 4.5 session can store objects. So my IAppSession only supports storing byte arrays and strings and I have to make sure all my library's session needs work with that (all the objects that I need to store in session need to be serializable).
As you can imagine, implementing this is a bit of work, but in the end you will have a library that can access HttpContext and not care if it's running under a 4.5 HttpContext or a MVC Core HttpContext. Kinda neat.
Good luck.
i too had this same problem. I solved it by adding following dependency in my project.json file to add the http packages to class library
"Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Abstractions": "1.1.0"
then i used it like below
public class sampleclass
{
private readonly IHttpContextAccessor context;
public ISession GetSession()
{
return context.HttpContext.Session;
}
}
Thank you. Happy Coding :-)
Reference : http://benjii.me/2016/07/using-sessions-and-httpcontext-in-aspnetcore-and-mvc-core/
Related
I have an ASP.NET Core 5.0 MVC application and a .NET 5.0 class library called Application.Data. Due to separation of concerns, I decided that the DbContext and migrations should be contained within the data library. The DDL migrations work perfectly, but I'm having issues seeding AspNetCore.Identity users from within the data library.
Simply put, I want to access a UserManager<MyUser> instance in order to invoke the CreateAsync/AddToRoleAsync methods, but the UserManager constructor takes eight parameters that then also need to be instantiated. My understanding is that I could inject the user manager using the AddIdentity method to the service collection of my MVC project, but since my DbContext is contained within Application.Data, I wouldn't be able to run migration commands from within the MVC project.
What is the best course of action here?
I am using ASP.Net core and I have a requirement to access a specific HTTP Header in a business logic class (not a controller or action).
To provide a full picture of the configuration here, I have a custom ASP.Net Core Middleware which based on some logic will add a value into a custom HTTP Header, it is the value from this header that I need to access in the business logic class.
Currently the way that I achieve this is to inject an HttpContextAccessor, using the following DI registration.
services.AddSingleton<IHttpContextAccessor, HttpContextAccessor>();
In the class which requires access to the HTTP Headers I then request an IHttpContextAccessor using constructor injection and use this to access the relevant HTTP Header.
Doing the above works fine and gives me the results that I require, looking around various articles on the Internet however the general consensus appears to be to avoid using HttpContext.Current in ASP.Net Core.
If the above is the case, is there a better way for my business logic class to access the value that my custom middleware is inserting into a custom HTTP Header?
I should be clear, whilst at present the middleware is storing the required value in a HTTP Header for use by the business logic class, I am open to other methods of the middleware making the required value available to the business logic class if there is a better approach.
Any questions or clarifications, please let me know.
There is no HttpContext.Current in ASP.Net Core, so it's easy to avoid using it. You would have to implement your own extension method if you wanted it, but the general feeling in the .Net Core community is that it's much better to use IHttpContextAccessor.
In earlier versions of .Net Core an implementation of IHttpContextAccessor was auto registered in the DI container. In more current version you have to register it yourself with the line of code you mentioned:
services.AddSingleton<IHttpContextAccessor, HttpContextAccessor>();
Injecting IHttpContext into your method that needs access to the headers is a workable approach. Or if you like you could use a helper method that places a copy of the headers in a simpler structure and then pass that object in to your class since it doesn't really need access to the full HttpContext.
I have created an ActionFilterAttribute
public class LoggingNHibernateSessionAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
The purpose of the filter as name indicates is logging and opens and commits a transaction, before and after target action respectively.
I have a WebApi(myAPI) project (MVC4) and a WebApplication(myContent).
Each Api Controller in myAPI is decorated with this attribute.
using myApp.Web.Common.Filters;
namespace myAPI.Web.Api.Controllers
{
[LoggingNHibernateSession]
public class CategoriesController : ApiController
{
When a Http action (Get/Post) is executed inside the ApiController, the ActionFilter gets executed and it works fine as expected.
The problem:
In the WebApplication(myContent), I have decorated those controllers as well with the ActionFilter.
using myApp.Web.Common.Filters;
namespace myContent.Web.Content.Places.Controllers
{
[LoggingNHibernateSession]
public class PlacesController : Controller
{
But here, when an action is executed inside the controller, the ActionFilter is not getting executed.
The ActionFilter belongs to System.Web.Http.Filters;
I have read some posts, and they said to use System.Web.Mvc filters. So I changed the ActionFilter to be from System.Web.Mvc
And when I switched that, the ActionFilter stopped working in WebApi as well.
What am I doing wrong here?
Although WebApi and MVC are very similar and technically consist of largely the same code, WebApi was created by copying all the code rather than through reuse. This happened, I'm told, because the WCF team didn't want a dependency on the MVC assemblies.
Therefore, code (such as your custom filter) compiled against one assembly will not work in the context of the other.
The solution is to duplicate your own code and compile against both sets of assemblies. You could also set up a build system to cross-compile the same code files using different reference assemblies.
It's truly sad when internal company politics result in something like this. The least they could do was acknowledge the problem and add some proper cross-compile support to their tooling, but alas, I digress.
I'm currently working on an MVC4 project, i make use if Ninject to inject a UnitOfWork into my controllers, and I'm using UnitOfWork + Generic Repository pattern.
I don't like VS2012 MVC4 template because it directly uses database access (db initialization, for example).
My project divides in:
a UI project (the mvc4 application), with Forms Authentication
a Domain project (the db entities, the repositories, the UnitOfWork interface plus two UnifOfWork implementations, one with MOQ and one with EF; they are injected into UI controllers via Ninject).
I looked at this example:
http://kevin-junghans.blogspot.it/2013/03/decoupling-simplemembership-from-your.html
related to this question
SimpleMembership - anyone made it n-tier friendly?
And now I have some question:
How can i inject my UoW here? WebSecurity class is static, there is no contructor, it directly instantiate the UoW to perform activities on db ...
I always have to initialize WebMatrix to directly access DB? This piece of code:
public static void Register()
{
Database.SetInitializer<SecurityContext>(new InitSecurityDb());
SecurityContext context = new SecurityContext();
context.Database.Initialize(true);
if (!WebMatrix.WebData.WebSecurity.Initialized)
WebMatrix.WebData.WebSecurity.InitializeDatabaseConnection("DefaultConnection",
"UserProfile", "UserId", "UserName", autoCreateTables: true);
}
breaks my decoupling with the Domain .. how can i make WebSecurity using my UnitOfWork for example? what is the best practice?
How can i store additional data (for example, EmailAddress and so on) and retrieve it, without performing a Database query everytime i have to access the User profile? Something like the old CustomPrincipal ... Custom principal in ASP.NET MVC
Thank you!
You have a lot of questions here Marco. Let me take a stab at them.
How to inject a UOW
Static classes and dependency injection do not mix well, as pointed out in this QA. When I first went through this exercise of decoupling SimpleMembership the concentration was just on decoupling from the domain, as discussed in the article you referenced. It was just a first step and it can be improved on, including making it easier for dependency injection. I debated whether to make WebSecurity static or not and went with static because that is how the original SimpleMembership is implemented, making it a more seamless transition for user of the SimpleSecurity. SimpleSecurity is an open source project and contributions are welcome. Making it non-static would not be difficult and probably makes sense in the long run. Once it is made non-static we could use a Factory pattern to create the UnitOfWork and inject the appropriate Factory.
Why do I have to Register WebSecurity?
SimpleSecurity is just a wrapper around the WebMatrix WebSecurity classes, which require initialization. The Register method just makes sure that WebMatrix is initialized and initializes our database. I disagree that having this method call in the Globa.asax couples it with the Domain in any way. Having it work with your UnitOfWork should have nothing to do with the Application Domain, or with having to call a Register method at application start-up.
How can I store additional data (ex: email) and retrieve it, without performing a database query every time?
This is actually accomplished quite easy in .NET 4.5 by using ClaimsPrincipal. All principals in .NET 4.5 inherit from ClaimsPrincipal, which allows you to store information in the principal as claims. Claims are basically key value pairs that let you store any type of data on the user. For example in ASP.NET the roles for a user are stored as claims. To add your own claims you need to do something called claims transformation. Then to retrieve the information you can create a custom claims principal. Adding this to SimpleSecurity would be a nice feature.
Using WIF with .NET 4.5 in MVC4 app with Ninject
Here's the situation - I have a custom ClaimsAuthenticationManager subclass called TenantAccessClaimsAuthenticationManager that does some claims transformation. The TenantAccessClaimsAuthenticationManager needs a IRepository object to be injected into it (using ninject).
The .NET 4.5 impl of WIF suggests that I can stick my custom claims authentication manager in the web.config - however, this approach can only instantiate the object via a no-args ctor.
The second approach I had is to not have anything int the web.config, but in App_start, get a handle to the WIF configuration and stick in the TenantAccessClaimsAuthenticationManager in RegisterServices
How do I get a handle to the currently application's WIF configuration context? MSDN docs aren't helping.
Edit: Obviously the problem is that the onServiceConfigurationCreated event is no longer available. What's the best way to do this now
The event is still available!
code://System.IdentityModel.Services:4.0.0.0:b77a5c561934e089/System.IdentityModel.Services.FederatedAuthentication/event:FederationConfigurationCreated:System.EventHandler
More specifically, the event is available at FederatedAuthentication.FederationConfigurationCreated. An example implementation is below:
FederatedAuthentication.FederationConfigurationCreated += (sender, e) => {
e.FederationConfiguration.IdentityConfiguration.ClaimsAuthenticationManager = new MyCustomClaimsAuthenticationManager();
}
There's a blog post at http://dunnry.com/blog/2012/12/20/SettingClaimsAuthenticationManagerProgrammaticallyInNET45.aspx with more information.