Modem config match - modem

I have two similar modems, when I insert the SIM in the first modem it connects automatically to the network. But if I insert the same SIM in the second modem, it doesn't connect to the network.
I launched the command: AT&V to read the profile of each modem. I compared the settings and they are all the same except for the following:
+CGDCONT: (1,"IP","cmnet","0.0.0.0",0,0)
+CGDCONT: (1,"IP","internet","0.0.0.0",0,0)
----------------------
+CIND: 0,3,1,0,0,0,1,0
+CIND: 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
----------------------
+CGATT: 1
+CGATT: 0
----------------------
+COPS: 1,0,""
+COPS: 0,2,""
----------------------
Q1: Could one of these settings cause the problem?
Q2: Is there a way to save/restore a modem config?
NB. The first setting of each pair is of the working modem.

Looks like the APN of the second modem is different from the first one. The APN of second modem is "internet", while the first one is "cmnet". This can cause the problem (first one is attached while the second one did not: +CGATT 1 vs 0), if the network does not support "internet" APN.
You can set same APN for the second modem as the first one to have a try. i.e.
AT+CGDCONT =1,"IP","cmnet"
But, APN difference is only one of the possible reasons. For analyzing the actual reason of attach failure, logs are needed.

Related

What does RHPort mean in tinyusb?

Looking through tinyusb, am a bit confused on the meaning of RHPort - cannot find much on Internet, grepping through source gives me results like:
tinyusb/docs/info/changelog.rst:- Add rhport to hcd_init()
tinyusb/docs/info/changelog.rst: - Support multiple usb ports with rhport=1 is high
...
tinyusb/examples/device/cdc_dual_ports/src/tusb_config.h:// RHPort max operational speed can defined by board.mk
...
tinyusb/examples/device/cdc_dual_ports/src/tusb_config.h:// Device mode with rhport and speed defined by board.mk
...
tinyusb/examples/device/cdc_msc/src/tusb_config.h:// RHPort number used for device can be defined by board.mk, default to port 0
...
... and trying to think of what could "RH" possibly stand for as an acronym, the only thing that pops in my head is "Right Honourable" :)
So, what is the meaning of RHPort in (tiny)USB?
Ok, I think I found at least some sort of an explanation ...
Anyways, https://docs.tinyusb.org/en/latest/reference/getting_started.html says:
Port Selection
If a board has several ports, one port is chosen by default in the
individual board.mk file. Use option PORT=x To choose another port.
For example to select the HS port of a STM32F746Disco board, use:
$ make BOARD=stm32f746disco PORT=1 all
A bit tricky to find where that PORT is used, then - but for the above example, it is most likely in https://github.com/hathach/tinyusb/blob/master/hw/bsp/stm32f7/family.mk :
...
CFLAGS += \
...
-DBOARD_TUD_RHPORT=$(PORT)
...
... which then gets used in e.g. https://github.com/hathach/tinyusb/blob/master/examples/device/dfu_runtime/src/main.c :
...
// init device stack on configured roothub port
tud_init(BOARD_TUD_RHPORT);
...
... which reveals, that "RH" in "RHPort" most likely stands for "Root Hub".
So, my guess is, that for boards that have multiple physical USB port connectors, the RHPort determines which of those ports is tinyusb targeting?

BG95 Can't Activate - AT+QIACT=1 returning error

I'm trying to get a BG95 to activate on hologram.
Here are my commands:
AT+QCFG="band",F,180A,180A OK
AT+QCFG="iotopmode",2 OK
AT+QCFG="nwscanseq",020301 OK
AT+QCFG="nwscanmode",0 OK
AT+QCFG="snrscan",0 OK
AT+QICSGP=1,1,"hologram","","",1 OK
AT+QIACT=1 ERROR
At first I thought it was antenna/signal related so I ran AT+CSQ and got this:
+csq: 11,99
This tells me I have a good signal I believe.
Next I tried AT+QNWINFO and get this:
+QNWINFO: "eMTC","311480","LTE BAND 13",5230
In my mind this is saying it's connected to a network.
After trying that I tried to activate again and got this:
AT+QIACT=1
ERROR
The weird thing is it activated just fine about a week ago with pure AT commands. I did try and use an Arduino library with it (WisLTEBG96TCPIP) which may have changed a setting in it. I've done a factory reset but the it still woln't activate.
Another strange thing is the hologram dashboard. Every once and a while it will show the SIM as connected, even though I can't activate.
I have tried with 2 different SIM cards any get the same activation error.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Verizon has cut off all non ODI products. If your hardware has not been Verizon ODI 'certified' it will no longer be allow to be connected to their network, I have 5 new pet rocks thanks to them. The solution is to purchase new modems from vendors that have been through the Verizon ODI program or switch carriers.
I had the same problem before, after a lot of maling with network operator I find out that there isn't a LTE-CAT-M1 (eMTC) network in my area, I tested in another area successfully
Also before setting AT+QCFG commands try AT+CFUN = 0
and after setting AT+QCFG commands try AT+CFUN = 1 .
before sending AT+QIACT, try 'AT+CEREG?' command several times and tell me what is the return of it

FusionPBX: Ring Group with external phone numbers?

I want to define a Ring Group that, when called, rings one extension and one external number (mobile phone). What is the best way to achieve that?
Right now only the extension is called. So just entering an external number in the Destination field does not work, the logs say
[NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1376 [ring groups][call forward all] user_exists id <mobileno> <domainname>
and later
[DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3865 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 27 [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]
It will check all calls using the dialplan to see if the destination is a local number for an external number it should say user_exists false every time.
This [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] indicates that it may not have found a matching outbound route that matches the number of digits of the external phone number. Or it may mean that your carrier rejected the call maybe didn't like the caller ID that was sent. Easiest thing to try is attempt it with an outbound rout to different carrier.
In case you weren't aware FusionPBX 4.4 was release on 5 April 2018. Instructions to upgrade are post on docs.fusionpbx.com. Search term upgrade (version upgrade).

Addressing ECUs directly using ELM 327 dongle and ISO 9141

I have a VW Golf 4, which is quite old and talks KWP 2000 (ISO 9141) on its CAN bus. I use a dongle powered by ELM 327, connected to the OBD-2 port of the car.
I am trying to send messages individually to each ECU. I tried to change the header of the messages:
AT SH 48 XX F1 (I hoped XX would be the ECU ID; 48 is the flag for "use physical addressing"). Any command I issue (e.g. tried 3E for "tester present") returns NO DATA (I disabled automatic timeouts and set the timeout to maximum value).
Is there a way to send messages directly to the ECU? I am not interested in the set of data provided via OBD-2, neither do I want to re-flash the ECUs. At the moment I just try to find out which ECUs are available on the bus.
Thanks!
VW works on Transport Protocol TP 2.0, hence you need to initialize with 0x200 header.
https://jazdw.net/tp20
See above link for more info.

Message protocol for embedded device

I'm building an embedded device with a couple of sensors. The device will 'stream' digital data from these sensors over Bluetooth or USB.
Most of the communication will be from the embedded device to the host. The host will infrequently be sending control messages, to control the gain etc.
Since the physical and data link layers are taken care of, I'm looking for a simple message protocol that will make it easy to develop user applications to process/display data on the host computer. Does anyone have any suggestions?
A simple text protocol may be the best for this application.
Use the communication channel as a bi-directional serial pipe.
The device can stream sensor values in ASCII (text) format, separated by commas, with each set separated by the newline character. The rate is preferably set by the host.
For example,
21204,32014 (new line character '\n' - 0x0A) at the end of each line
21203,32014
21202,32011
....
This makes it easier to test, to stream the values to a file, import in to a spreadsheet etc.
Similarly commands to the device too, is best done in text.
SET GAIN_1 2 ( sent by host )
OK ( reply by device )
SET GAIN_2 4 (sent by host )
OK ( reply by device )
SET GAIN_9 2 (sent by host )
ERROR ( reply by device if it does not understand)
SET RATE 500 ( set the sensor dump rate to every 500 ms )
OK