I want the server to give me the results of a query in the order I send it.
So if I write:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE column in (9,1,8)
I would like it to give me the results in the order: 9,1,8
One method uses left join:
select t.*
from (select 9 as c, 1 as priority union all select 1, 2 union all select 8, 3
) vals left join
table t
on t.column = vals.c
order by vals.priority;
Note: This is generic syntax. The specific syntax for the subquery may differ depending on the database.
Another method uses case in the order by:
select t.*
from table t
where t.column in (9, 1, 8)
order by (case column when 9 then 1 when 1 then 2 when 8 then 3 end);
Once again, this can be simplified in some databases, say by using special functions.
You could use CASE expression in order you want, something like:
select *
from table_name
where column_name in (9,1,8)
order by case column_name
when 9 then 1
when 1 then 2
when 8 then 3 end
, column_name -- optional, but here could go another column if you want to have custom order
You can do in Oracle SQL if you have
SELECT Column_name
FROM user_tab_columns
where table_name = 'MY_TABLE'
and Column_id in (9,1,8)
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE column IN (9, 1, 8)
ORDER BY CASE WHEN column = 9 THEN 1
WHEN column = 1 THEN 2
WHEN column = 8 THEN 3
END
Related
Suppose I have 10 columns in my table and I want to update each column but one at a time for each row up to 10 rows.
if table is like
1,2,3
4,5,6
7,8,9
I want to update it like
x,2,3
4,y,6
7,8,z
Columns can be of any count so need dynamic approach. Also sometimes need to exclude some columns.
I tried to see if I can update row based on row id but there is no such option available as row id. I don't wanna change design of table to include a counter column.
you can use window function to assign a a row id and based on that :
with cte as (
select * from (
select * , row_number() over (order by id) rn
from tablename
) t ) ;
update t
set col1 = case when rn = 1 then <updatevalue> else col1 end
, col2 = case when rn = 2 then <updatevalue> else col2 end
, col3 = case when rn = 3 then <updatevalue> else col3 end
, ...
from tablename t
join cte on cte.id = t.id
The requirement "Columns can be of any count so need dynamic approach" looks like as a try to implement matrix as a table.
Alternative approach could be usage of ARRAY type and storing entire structure as single "cell" in the table.
CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE t
AS
SELECT ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(1,2,3),
ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(4,5,6),
ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(7,8,9)) c
UNION ALL
SELECT ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(10,20,30),
ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(40,50,60),
ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(70,80,90)) c;
SELECT *
FROM t;
/*
C
[[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]]
[[10,20,30],[40,50,60],[70,80,90]]
*/
Accessing elements:
SELECT c[0][0], c[0][1], c[0][2],
c[1][0], c[1][1], c[1][2],
c[2][0], c[2][1], c[2][2]
FROM t;
/*
C[0][0] C[0][1] C[0][2] C[1][0] C[1][1] C[1][2] C[2][0] C[2][1] C[2][2]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
*/
Update:
UPDATE t
SET c = ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(ARRAY_CONSTRUCT('x' , c[0][1], c[0][2])
,ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(c[1][0], 'y' ,c[1][2])
,ARRAY_CONSTRUCT(c[2][0], c[2][1] , 'z' )
);
SELECT * FROM t;
/*
C
[["x",2,3],[4,"y",6],[7,8,"z"]]
[["x",20,30],[40,"y",60],[70,80,"z"]]
*/
More robust transformations could be performed via user-defined functions.
I have two columns in two different tables.
First column is number like 0493484402 and second column is audit_detail like 'addr_mastersubscription has changed from 32488141893 to 32488141973'.
Audit detail column may have different type of string other than above. I have to check only in above type mentioned strings
I have to check whether first column value is present or not in second column at position of Second number.
If the number is not present I need that number as output
I am using oracel SQL developer
Second column datatype is clob and there is not comman filed in both table's
First column data type is varchar
Use REGEXP_LIKE:
SELECT *
FROM yourTable
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE (col2, ' to ' || col1 || '$');
You need to check the two conditions then you can use REGEXP_SUBSTR and REGEXP_LIKE as follows:
SELECT * FROM YOUR_TABLE
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(SECOND_COLUMN, '^addr_mastersubscription has changed from [0-9]+ to [0-9]+$')
AND TO_NUMBER(FIRST_COLUMN) = TO_NUMBER(REGEXP_SUBSTR(SECOND_COLUMN,'[0-9]+$'))
This is how I understood the question.
Sample data (lines #1 - 9) contain additional ID column (unless you're planning to do cross join between those two tables) which is used to join taba and tabb.
regexp_substr looks for the second number in tabb's col column, which is compared to taba.col. I displayed whether it exists there or not; you can display whatever you want.
Query you might need begins at line #11.
SQL> with
2 taba (id, col) as
3 (select 1, '0493484402' from dual union all
4 select 2, '012345' from dual
5 ),
6 tabb (id, col) as
7 (select 1, 'addr_mastersubscription has changed from 32488141893 to 32488141973' from dual union all
8 select 2, 'nothing changed from 098776 to 012345' from dual
9 )
10 --
11 select a.id,
12 case when a.col = regexp_substr(b.col, '\d+', 1, 2) then a.col || ' exists in tabb'
13 else a.col || ' does not exist in tabb'
14 end result
15 from taba a join tabb b on a.id = b.id;
ID RESULT
---------- ---------------------------------
1 0493484402 does not exist in tabb
2 012345 exists in tabb
SQL>
You can use INSTR(), names itself defines in string where we can check if a particular string is available in the respective column.
Please use below query,
select t1.* from table1 t1
inner join table2 t2
on (instr(t1.first_column, t2.second_column) = 0);
instr(t1.first_column, t2.second_column) = 0 This condition provides you unmatching columns
instr(t1.first_column, t2.second_column) > 0 This condition provides you matching strings
After every group / row i want to insert a hardcoded dummy row with a bunch of 'xxxx' to act a separator.
I would like to use oracle sql to do this query. i can execute it using a loop but i don't want to use plsql.
As the others suggest, it is best to do it on the front end.
However, if you have a burning need to be done as a query, here is how.
Here I did not use the rownum function as you have already done. I assume, your data is returned by a query, and you can replace my table with your query.
I made few more assumptions, as you have data with row numbers in it.
[I am not sure what do you mean by not PL/SQL]
Select Case When MOD(rownm, 2) = 0 then ' '
Else to_char((rownm + 1) / 2) End as rownm,
name, total, column1
From
(
select (rownm * 2 - 1) rownm,name, to_char(total) total ,column1 from t
union
SELECT (rownm * 2) rownm,'XXX' name, 'XXX' total, 'The row act .... ' column1 FROM t
) Q
Order by Q.rownm;
and here is the fiddle
Since you're already grouping the data, it might be easier to use GROUPING SETS instead of a UNION.
Grouping sets let you group by multiple sets of columns, including the same set twice to duplicate rows. Then the GROUP_ID function can be used to determine when the fake values should be used. This code will be a bit smaller than a UNION approach, and should be faster since it doesn't need to reference the table multiple times.
select
case when group_id() = 0 then name else '' end name,
case when group_id() = 0 then sum(some_value) else null end total,
case when group_id() = 1 then 'this rows...' else '' end column1
from
(
select 'jack' name, 22 some_value from dual union all
select 'jack' name, 1 some_value from dual union all
select 'john' name, 44 some_value from dual union all
select 'john' name, 1 some_value from dual union all
select 'harry' name, 1 some_value from dual union all
select 'harry' name, 1 some_value from dual
) raw_data
group by grouping sets (name, name)
order by raw_data.name, group_id();
You can use row generator technique (using CONNECT BY) and then use CASE..WHEN as follows:
SQL> SELECT CASE WHEN L.LVL = 1 THEN T.ROWNM END AS ROWNM,
2 CASE WHEN L.LVL = 1 THEN T.NAME
3 ELSE 'XXX' END AS NAME,
4 CASE WHEN L.LVL = 1 THEN TO_CHAR(T.TOTAL)
5 ELSE 'XXX' END AS TOTAL,
6 CASE WHEN L.LVL = 1 THEN T.COLUMN1
7 ELSE 'This row act as separator..' END AS COLUMN1
8 FROM T CROSS JOIN (
9 SELECT LEVEL AS LVL FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 2
10 ) L ORDER BY T.ROWNM, L.LVL;
ROWNM NAME TOTAL COLUMN1
---------- ---------- ----- ---------------------------
1 Jack 23
XXX XXX This row act as separator..
2 John 45
XXX XXX This row act as separator..
3 harry 2
XXX XXX This row act as separator..
4 roy 45
XXX XXX This row act as separator..
5 Jacob 26
XXX XXX This row act as separator..
10 rows selected.
SQL>
I have data in a table which looks like:
I want to split its data and make it look like the following through a sql query in Oracle (without using pivot):
How can it be done?? is there any other way of doing so without using pivot?
You need to use a pivot query here to get the output you want:
SELECT Name,
MIN(CASE WHEN ID_Type = 'PAN' THEN ID_No ELSE NULL END) AS PAN,
MIN(CASE WHEN ID_Type = 'DL' THEN ID_No ELSE NULL END) AS DL,
MIN(CASE WHEN ID_Type = 'Passport' THEN ID_No ELSE NULL END) AS Passport
FROM yourTable
GROUP BY Name
You could also try using Oracle's built in PIVOT() function if you are running version 11g or later.
Since you mention without using PIVOT function, you can try to
use SQL within group for moving rows onto one line and listagg to display multiple column values in a single column.
In Oracle 11g, we can use the listagg built-in function :
select
deptno,
listagg (ename, ',')
WITHIN GROUP
(ORDER BY ename) enames
FROM
emp
GROUP BY
deptno
Which should give you the below result:
DEPTNO ENAMES
------ --------------------------------------------------
10 CLARK,KING,MILLER
20 ADAMS,FORD,JONES,SCOTT,SMITH
30 ALLEN,BLAKE,JAMES,MARTIN,TURNER,WARD
You can find all the solution(s) to this problem here:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_converting_rows_columns.htm
For Oracle 11g and above, you could use PIVOT.
For pre-11g release, you could use MAX and CASE.
A common misconception, about PIVOT better in terms of performance than the old way of MAX and DECODE. But, under the hood PIVOT is same MAX + CASE. You can check it in 12c where Oracle added EXPAND_SQL_TEXT procedure to DBMS_UTILITY package.
For example,
SQL> variable c clob
SQL> begin
2 dbms_utility.expand_sql_text(Q'[with choice_tbl as (
3 select 'Jones' person,1 choice_nbr,'Yellow' color from dual union all
4 select 'Jones',2,'Green' from dual union all
5 select 'Jones',3,'Blue' from dual union all
6 select 'Smith',1,'Orange' from dual
7 )
8 select *
9 from choice_tbl
10 pivot(
11 max(color)
12 for choice_nbr in (1 choice_nbr1,2 choice_nbr2,3 choice_nbr3)
13 )]',:c);
14 end;
15 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Now let's see what Oracle actually does internally:
SQL> set long 100000
SQL> print c
C
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECT "A1"."PERSON" "PERSON",
"A1"."CHOICE_NBR1" "CHOICE_NBR1",
"A1"."CHOICE_NBR2" "CHOICE_NBR2",
"A1"."CHOICE_NBR3" "CHOICE_NBR3"
FROM (
SELECT "A2"."PERSON" "PERSON",
MAX(CASE WHEN ("A2"."CHOICE_NBR"=1) THEN "A2"."COLOR" END ) "CHOICE_NBR1",
MAX(CASE WHEN ("A2"."CHOICE_NBR"=2) THEN "A2"."COLOR" END ) "CHOICE_NBR2",
MAX(CASE WHEN ("A2"."CHOICE_NBR"=3) THEN "A2"."COLOR" END ) "CHOICE_NBR3"
FROM (
(SELECT 'Jones' "PERSON",1 "CHOICE_NBR",'Yellow' "COLOR" FROM "SYS"."DUAL" "A7") UNION ALL
(SELECT 'Jones' "'JONES'",2 "2",'Green' "'GREEN'" FROM "SYS"."DUAL" "A6") UNION ALL
(SELECT 'Jones' "'JONES'",3 "3",'Blue' "'BLUE'" FROM "SYS"."DUAL" "A5") UNION ALL
(SELECT 'Smith' "'SMITH'",1 "1",'Orange' "'ORANGE'" FROM "SYS"."DUAL" "A4")
) "A2"
GROUP BY "A2"."PERSON"
) "A1"
SQL>
Oracle internally interprets the PIVOT as MAX + CASE.
You're able to create a non-pivot query by understanding what the pivot query will do:
select *
from yourTable
pivot
(
max (id_no)
for (id_type) in ('PAN' as pan, 'DL' as dl, 'Passport' as passport)
)
What the pivot does is GROUP BY all columns not specified inside the PIVOT clause (actually, just the name column), selecting new columns in a subquery fashion based on the aggregations before the FOR clause for each value specified inside the IN clause and discarding those columns specified inside the PIVOT clause.
When I say "subquery fashion" I'm refering to one way to achieve the result got with PIVOT. Actually, I don't know how this works behind the scenes. This subquery fashion would be like this:
select <aggregation>
from <yourTable>
where 1=1
and <FORclauseColumns> = <INclauseValue>
and <subqueryTableColumns> = <PIVOTgroupedColumns>
Now you identified how you can create a query without the PIVOT clause:
select
name,
(select max(id_no) from yourTable where name = t.name and id_type = 'PAN') as pan,
(select max(id_no) from yourTable where name = t.name and id_type = 'DL') as dl,
(select max(id_no) from yourTable where name = t.name and id_type = 'Passport') as passport
from yourTable t
group by name
You can use CTE's to break the data down and then join them back together to get what you want:
WITH NAMES AS (SELECT DISTINCT NAME
FROM YOURTABLE),
PAN AS (SELECT NAME, ID_NO AS PAN
FROM YOURTABLE
WHERE ID_TYPE = 'PAN'),
DL AS (SELECT NAME, ID_NO AS DL
FROM YOURTABLE
WHERE ID_TYPE = 'DL'),
PASSPORT AS (SELECT NAME, ID_NO AS "Passport"
FROM YOURTABLE
WHERE ID_TYPE = 'Passport')
SELECT n.NAME, p.PAN, d.DL, t."Passport"
FROM NAMES n
LEFT OUTER JOIN PAN p
ON p.NAME = n.NAME
LEFT OUTER JOIN DL d
ON d.NAME = p.NAME
LEFT OUTER JOIN PASSPORT t
ON t.NAME = p.NAME'
Replace YOURTABLE with the actual name of your table of interest.
Best of luck.
Let's say I have an sql server table:
NumberTaken CompanyName
2 Fred 3 Fred 4 Fred 6 Fred 7 Fred 8 Fred 11 Fred
I need an efficient way to pass in a parameter [StartingNumber] and to count from [StartingNumber] sequentially until I find a number that is missing.
For example notice that 1, 5, 9 and 10 are missing from the table.
If I supplied the parameter [StartingNumber] = 1, it would check to see if 1 exists, if it does it would check to see if 2 exists and so on and so forth so 1 would be returned here.
If [StartNumber] = 6 the function would return 9.
In c# pseudo code it would basically be:
int ctr = [StartingNumber]
while([SELECT NumberTaken FROM tblNumbers Where NumberTaken = ctr] != null)
ctr++;
return ctr;
The problem with that code is that is seems really inefficient if there are thousands of numbers in the table. Also, I can write it in c# code or in a stored procedure whichever is more efficient.
Thanks for the help
A solution using JOIN:
select min(r1.NumberTaken) + 1
from MyTable r1
left outer join MyTable r2 on r2.NumberTaken = r1.NumberTaken + 1
where r1.NumberTaken >= 1 --your starting number
and r2.NumberTaken is null
I called my table Blank, and used the following:
declare #StartOffset int = 2
; With Missing as (
select #StartOffset as N where not exists(select * from Blank where ID = #StartOffset)
), Sequence as (
select #StartOffset as N from Blank where ID = #StartOffset
union all
select b.ID from Blank b inner join Sequence s on b.ID = s.N + 1
)
select COALESCE((select N from Missing),(select MAX(N)+1 from Sequence))
You basically have two cases - either your starting value is missing (so the Missing CTE will contain one row), or it's present, so you count forwards using a recursive CTE (Sequence), and take the max from that and add 1
Edit from comment. Yes, create another CTE at the top that has your filter criteria, then use that in the rest of the query:
declare #StartOffset int = 2
; With BlankFilters as (
select ID from Blank where hasEntered <> 1
), Missing as (
select #StartOffset as N where not exists(select * from BlankFilters where ID = #StartOffset)
), Sequence as (
select #StartOffset as N from BlankFilters where ID = #StartOffset
union all
select b.ID from BlankFilters b inner join Sequence s on b.ID = s.N + 1
)
select COALESCE((select N from Missing),(select MAX(N)+1 from Sequence))
this may now return a row that does exist in the table, but hasEntered=1
Tables:
create table Blank (
ID int not null,
Name varchar(20) not null
)
insert into Blank(ID,Name)
select 2 ,'Fred' union all
select 3 ,'Fred' union all
select 4 ,'Fred' union all
select 6 ,'Fred' union all
select 7 ,'Fred' union all
select 8 ,'Fred' union all
select 11 ,'Fred'
go
Try the set based approach - should be faster
select min(t1.NumberTaken)+1 as "min_missing" from t t1
where not exists (select 1 from t t2
where t1.NumberTaken = t2.NumberTaken+1)
and t1.NumberTaken > #StartingNumber
This is Sybase syntax, so massage for SQL server consumption if needed.
Create a temp table with all numbers from StartingValue to EndValue and LEFT OUTER JOIN to your data table.