I have developed Coded UI support for my Custom Control and i have compare assert property value like below,
Assert.AreEqual(this.AssertMethod2ExpectedValues.UIZoomResetCustomToolBarIconMargin,
uIZoomResetCustom.ToolBarIconMargin, "Toolbar margin failed");
But uIZoomResetCustom.ToolBarIconMargin returns always null. How to resolve this issue. Thanks
Did you try to debug the tests and/or highlight the toolbar before reaching the assertion?
It is quite clear that framework is unable to find the toolbar. Maybe you need to tweak the search properties.
Related
I am creating a suite of tests (using Geb/Spock) for a web site. In one of them, the element I want to access is on the top of the page, so, to make sure that is visible, I want to scroll to the top of the page.
The command I am using is:
browser.js.exec('window.scrollTo(0, 0);')
or variations of it like
js.exec('window.scrollTo(0, 0);')
or other alternative like:
js.exec('window.scrollBy(0, -250);')
None of them makes the page scroll up, and when executing I get the following error (it is the only error, no other feedback). The error message using the other options listed above is identical (other than the command itself):
Condition not satisfied:
browser.js.exec('window.scrollTo(0, 0);')
| | |
| | null
| geb.js.JavascriptInterface#4019094f
geb.Browser#3dcac33e
at UserCreatesCompany.Go to Home Page and click on the log to
GitHub button as user User1(UserCreatesCompany.groovy:170)
I can not interpret the message that 'exec' is null. What exactly it means?
To make things more interesting, at the end of this script I am running the following cleanup procedure
js.exec('window.scrollTo(0, document.body.scrollHeight);')
DeleteButton.click()
$("button",'data-automation-id':"button-modal-yes").click()
}
and that works well: the page scrolls down. So, does not seem a problem about some missing library.
Any suggestion of what I may be doing wrong?
The version of the different components I am using is:
groovyVersion = '2.5.4'
gebVersion = '2.3'
seleniumVersion = '3.141.59'
chromeDriverVersion = '2.45'
First of all, you should not need to ever manually scroll the page to make elements visible - Selenium WebDriver which is underpinning Geb will do that for you automatically as soon as you start interacting (clicking, setting value, etc) with content.
Secondly, the failure you are getting is a failed assertion coming from a statement in an automatically asserted (then: or expect:) Spock block. It feels to me that you don't understand a concept which is core to Spock and therefore you should read about it in the manual first. It should make the failure you're getting clearer.
Thanks for the answer. Clearly: I was not fully aware of the different constrains the different blocks impose on what is executable or not. The manual is pretty clear once you have stumbled!
I am intrigued by your first assertion pointing that Selenium WebDriver will move to the element as soon as I interact with it. That was my understanding but it was not working. I made sure the element in question had a unique identifier, but still, it was not able to found it if the element had to be found by scrolling up. On the other hand it worked smoothly when locating the element WebDriver scrolled the page down.
Thanks again for the explanation. I have learn something new today!
AppCode's autocomplete is showing some strange behaviour on my side that I cant seem to figure out. There are two issues I'm currently facing:
Auto complete results are missing or incorrect, in the case below I'm trying to create a CGRect, but only get shown one constructor:
No autocomplete what so ever. In the case below it will not auto complete any functions or properties on UIView.frame. Incidentally, if I create a CGRect and try and autocomplete on that variable, it will show results :
CoreGraphics is the first framework I'm working on where this seems to be a problem. This happens whether I add an import to the top of the file of not.
Any Ideas?
I have tried annotating a field with
org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.NonNull
org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull
javax.annotation.Nonnull
And in all cases, assigning a null to it generates no complaints from IntelliJ 2016.2.
public class GreetingController {
#NotNull Integer x = 3;
public void foo() { x = null; }
}
That all compiles fine according to IntelliJ.
This page from IntelliJ specifically states that "IntelliJ IDEA highlights the problems “on-the-fly”, so you can see the inspection results right in the editor." I have even copied the example code (public class TestNullable) into my editor and it produces no errors.
This other page from IntelliJ states you can change the annotations it responds to. So I chose javax.annotation.Nonnull and made sure that was the one I was using in my code, still no luck.
To be clear, what I'm hoping for, and what I understand should be provided, is that the editor window / compiler alerts me to the problem (I am not looking for a runtime check, NullPointerException already works fine at runtime.)
In case it didn't work in real time, I tried "Rebuild Project".
I'm sure this must work, what am I doing wrong?
I have uploaded an example of this not working here: ZIP download.
As I can see from your screenshots and the sample project, IntelliJ IDEA does show you the warnings. Note that these warnings are shown by the code inspections which are running on the fly and will be displayed in the editor or in the Analyze | Inspect Code results. These warnings will not be displayed by the compiler.
Note that you can configure the warnings highlighting if needed (for example add the underwave effect):
You can also change the severity of the inspection (like to Error):
You may also want to vote for this feature request:
IDEA-78625 Provide inspection severity level that will work like validation and abort compilation
As a bonus, pay attention to the javax.annotation.Nullable annotation, it may be not what you think it's for, see this comment and the documentation. For some years IntelliJ IDEA has incorrectly suggested to use this annotation, while the correct one for such cases would be javax.annotation.CheckForNull:
This annotation is useful mostly for overriding a Nonnull annotation.
Static analysis tools should generally treat the annotated items as
though they had no annotation, unless they are configured to minimize
false negatives. Use CheckForNull to indicate that the element value
should always be checked for a null value.
"Settings" > "Inspections" > "Probable Bugs" > "Constant conditions & exceptions"
Tick the first option: "Suggest #NotNull annotation for methods that possibly return null and report nullable values passed to non-annotated parameters.
Click "Configure Annotations". By default, Intellij will use their own annotations from org.jetbrains.annotation. I was using the more general (my own opinion) annotations from javax.annotation.
I set Nullable to: javax.annotation.Nullable
I set NotNUll to : javax.annotation.NotNull
In order to set these new options, you must click them, then click the tiny checkmark button to the right to set it. Selecting the javax.annotation annotations then hitting "OK" will NOT lock in the new settings, you must use the checkbox button.
After successfully specifying javax.annotation.Nullable and javax.annotation.NotNull, the code correctly highlighted null problems.
The best that this can do is offer up warnings. It will not stop compilation from happening, since the annotations do not prohibit or preclude code compilation from taking place.
Be sure that you have the appropriate inspections enabled in your IDE, and be sure that you remain aware of what parameters you're passing into your method. The IDE can at best warn you, but it can't really stop you.
Alternatively, introduce a unit test to fail if that method receives a null parameter, and rely on that to ensure that you're not breaking code or expectations.
The geb documentation shows that it has built in jQuery support. Im interested in one particular method called mouseover. However when I try to use the mouseover function I get a warning saying, "Cannot resolve symbol 'mouseover'". This happens even when I'm using the code in their example. What am I missing?
This might not directly answer your question. But if you are trying to mimic mouse over action in Geb, you could also use
interact {
moveToElement(element)
}
http://www.gebish.org/manual/current/#interact-closures
While executing my script in RFT, my script got failed due to the slight position change of a button. (This button's position slightly changes according to the option selected for previous combo box due to the label appearing near the button)
As there are 2 positions for this button in window, one of my script fails while other passes.
Please suggest how to identify this same object in 2 different places in RFT?
If you're alright with not using pre-mapped values and instead work with objects directly in code (which I've personally found to be extremely useful... it's allowed me to do great and wondrous things with RFT :), the following ought to work fine:
private void clickObject(String uniqueIdentifier) {
// Find object
RootTestObject root = RootTestObject.getRootTestObject();
TestObject[] matchingObjs = root.find(atProperty(".id", uniqueIdentifier));
if (matchingObjs.length > 0) {
// Click the object
((GuiTestObject) matchingObjs[0]).click();
}
// Clean-up
unregister(matchingObjs);
}
Feel free to replace ".id" with whatever property is best suited for the situation... since I work primarily with a web application, the ".id" property has worked splendidly for me.
Because the method finds the object anew each time, it'll grab the object's position wherever it's at at the time the method's called. The clean-up will also prevent any weird, horrible, and otherwise unfortunate UnregisteredObjectExceptions from cropping up.
Without looking at your pages I cannot be sure, but I think the buttons are actually two different buttons. Maybe they are generated by javascript, or they are just un-hidden after the option you select in the combobox.
If they are two different buttons (record them both and look at the recognition properties) you can either replace some properties with a regular expression or check wich button is visible/exists and then click it:
if (btn_button1.exists()) {
btn_button1.click();
} else if (btn_button2.exists()) {
btn_button1.click();
}
Here's a more complete tutorial on Object Recognition.
You can increase the tolerance of Rational Performance Tester AssureScript in the properties tab or you could set the description but hide the value. You can also make a custom code that updates the object map to prepare for this change in a java IF structure