At a client of mine, in-house applications are all located on a network share. Users create shortcuts to the required applications from the network share so we can easily make sure everyone uses the latest version.
This works fairly well, although we often have an issue when users are still using applications when we'd like to release a new version. For most applications, we'd forcibly remove all the file locks on the server and release the new version. Not a very elegant solution, especially since we need assistance from another department for this.
For newer applications, I've developed a cleaner solution, where the application intermittently checks if it's still the most recent release. If it isn't, it shows a message to the user, asking him to quit the application at first convenience, or within 3 minutes. After 3 minutes, the application quits itself and all is well. However, some users will immediately try to re-start the application. The application will then show a simple MessageBox telling the user this version is currently not supported. My problem is this: while this MessageBox is visible, my executable is still locked.
I'm looking for any of the following solutions:
Releasing all locks on the current assembly files from within code
Showing a message box that lingers after the current assembly has exited
This is exactly precisely the problem that .NET ClickOnce deployment is meant to solve. Users have a shortcut they can click, the latest version is downloaded on application start, and there are no server-side executables to be locked if a user leaves their process open.
ClickOnce Deployment Overview
HowTo:Publish a ClickOnce Application
Related
Apologies, this may not be a good question.
I have a VB based UI application running, supported by C++ modules through COM.
a month before it started to close randomly without any clue. I initially analyzed in perspective of a application crash and expected to see Dumps and Application/System event log entries. I have prior experience in application crash debugging. tried registry configurations (Like, CorporarteWerServer for application hang, LocalDumps and all that).
But no luck.
End user says they don't see any popup like "This application is not responding with options close/wait". The application just closes down without any prompts.
We have logging enabled where we intentionally close the application using exit(). So it is not closing formally.
User does not have testing environment where we can install debugging tools and monitor.
I have verified for insufficient memory and antivirus software and they are fine.
So, Is there any cases where an application can just simply close/crash without any prompts, logs, dumps ?
Please suggest if I am missing something. Also, is there any built-in windows tools to monitor ?
We have an application that can run as a Windows service (or as a user mode app). As part of it's processing, it launches a second executable that interacts with MAPI to read the contents of an MSG file. The executable is 32 bit. Office is 32 bit. So far, we've only tested using Outlook 2013.
This has worked fine for quite some time, but we've recently discovered a corner case where things do not work.
When we run as a Windows Service, and Outlook is not running in the user's session, then the application runs properly. However, if we launch Outlook, then MAPIInitialize fails with a return code of -7 (0xfffffffd).
I've tried calling with and without the MAPI_NT_SERVICE flag added (honestly, I can't figure out what that flag actually does), but it makes no difference.
So far in our testing, the Windows service account has been the same as the user logged into the Windows session that has Outlook installed - not sure if that might be important or not.
I can't for the life of me figure out how a process running under one session could interfere with a process running in another session.
I found this post a few minutes ago: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/7a9cc40a-ffd6-4f83-9973-5410615b4df4/mapi-working-when-accessed-from-normal-application-but-not-from-the-service?forum=outlookdev
I'll give that a shot, but it seems super unlikely that this could be the issue (it's not like we do anything different with COM initialization, and certainly that wouldn't have anything to do with whether Outlook was running or not).
Can anyone point me in direction(s) to pursue this?
=============
More interesting information:
This appears to only happen with Outlook 2013. It definitely does not happen with Outlook 2010.
I have created an application that exposes a OSX service for certain file by adding an NSService entry into my applications info.plist (as in http://www.macosxautomation.com/services/learn/), but I find that upon installing my application on a new machine the service doesn't show up quickly in the finder right click context menu.
I know that this is because pasteboard services hasn't re-indexed the /Applications folder and "discovered" the newly installed service.
I also know that I can force a re-index and discovery by manually running /System/Library/CoreServices/pbs.
The question here is what is the best way to ensure that my service shows up as quickly as possible for users who are installing my application for the first time.
I could execute a system call to "/System/Library/CoreServices/pbs" when my application starts up --If the user immediately starts my application--, but that only partly solves the problem (in addition I wonder if there is a better Cocoa API based way of doing this).
If my application is generally only accessed via the context menu, a user will never think to go out and start the application in the first place. They will only think it is broken when the context menu isn't there.
I am not distributing my application with an installer. I am simply providing a bundle that can be dragged and dropped into /Applications (as I believe Apple usually suggests).
Is there a way to expedite the process of service discovery when doing an installation in this fashion, so that there isn't any period of time where the user is without the newly installed service?
As a side note, it appears that the problem may not exist in 10.8 (or at least be as pronounced). Apple may have made this indexing happen more quickly in their most recent release.
I've actually ended up using
system("killall pbs;/System/Library/CoreServices/pbs -flush");
in one of my apps, just as you describe, though it's a long time ago, when 10.5 was in question as well.
You might want to try this function, however:
void NSUpdateDynamicServices(void)
which according to the documentation acts just like flushing pbs, but is a cleaner solution.
Also, if (according to your description), the app is nothing but a service, consider making it a really just a service - see (Installing the Service)
To build a standalone service, use the extension .service and store it in Library/Services.
I've deployed an application inside a corporate network and I want the update process to require less attention from users, similar to how Google Chrome install updates - in the background. I don't need to give the user a choice to update.
I've used the System.Deployment library to detect when new ClickOnce updates are available and install them automatically. I'm wondering if its necessary to restart the app after the update is complete. Currently I invoke Application.Restart() at the end of my update script.
But what if (to make the update process more transparent for the user) I performed a 'silent' async update and then displayed an icon prompting the user to restart the app to apply the changes? Would this make the app unstable in any way?
Furthermore, if I ran my custom InstallUpdate() process on a timer, say every 30 minutes, would ClickOnce be stable to continue to update for every new version that was released even thought the user has not restarted (nb: I'm expecting the updates to only apply once the user restarts the app)?
I would think it depends on what your application does at startup, and what it's doing when the update is installed and the application is restarted, and what the update contains. You could try running it and then attaching a debugger to it and see what it's doing and what impact it has.
For example, our application loads a lot of information into memory when it starts up. If the update included a change to one of the data structures, and the app didn't reload the data for some reason, it would cause a problem.
After a few years of doing it like this, we have found that it is possible to silently install updates this way. However there are a few issues to be aware of:
If the thread terminates prematurely during the Update() (eg: the user exits out of the app while the updating is in progress), the install will become corrupt and the next time the user loads the app, the ClickOnce normal deployment will fire off and re-install the app.
The user's desktop icons always redraw (flicker) after an update is installed.
Calling ApplicationDeployment.CurrentDeployment.CheckForUpdate() more than 65536 times causes a System.NullReferenceException Source.
An alternative is not to actually check for an update, I have found that this locks one of my dlls and prevented a form from loading, so use with care:
If ApplicationDeployment.CurrentDeployment.Update Then ' update app
console.writeline("update installed")
' code to inform user update was sucessfull and they need to restart
End If
If your ClickOnce project is 32bit, and you run it on an x64 platform, any file associations your app has will break after performing a manual ClickOnce update. See this MS support case for more details.
I've attempted just about everything to get our ClickOnce VB.NET app to run under Terminal Services as a RemoteApp. I have a batch file that runs the .application file for the app.
This works fine via RDP desktop session on the terminal server. As a TS RemoteApp, however, well... not so much.
I get a quick flash of command prompt (the batch file) on the client system and then... nothing...
Same goes for having it point to the .application file directly (without using a batch file) or even copying the publication locally and having it point to that.
I found a technet.microsoft.com discussion about a similar issue, but there's no resolution to it listed.
For anyone who has run into this before and got it working, what did you have to do?
We currently use RemoteApp's for everything else on that server, so I'm hoping to stick with that if possible.
The current workaround is to build and run an MSI-based installer for the app on our terminal server whenever we publish via OneClick out to the network, but this can be quite a pain at times and is easy to forget to do.
Since the app works fine via Terminal Services when run in full desktop mode but not during RemoteApp, I don't think it's anything specific to Terminal Server permissions so much as ClickOnce requiring something that isn't available when running as a RemoteApp.
The Key to getting it to work is to use Windows Explorer "C:\windows\explorer.exe". This process is the base process when you login to a full session.
If you setup the RemoteApp to use Windows Explorer and the command line argument of the path to the .application file for the ClickOnce application then it will work when launched as a remote application. Windows Explorer will flash for a second when it starts, but it will disappear then the ClickOnce application will launch.
Why does it have to be a ClickOnce application? I would consider just deploying the exe file and assemblies.
I know it only half a solution, but if the application does not change much, it might be a good solution.
I believe your problem is related to the fact that ClickOnce needs to store it's data in a special user folder called the ClickOnce application cache. Apparently because of how Terminal Services sets up user folders ClickOnce can't access this in TerminalServices mode.
See this link for more information.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/267k390a(VS.80).aspx
There may not be a way to do it :(
Can you launch the .exe directly? It's buried under your profile in \AppData\Local\Apps\2.0[obfuscated folders], but you should be able to find it.
That will skip the built-in update process, but if it can be launched that way you could then write code to do a manual update after the application starts.
Faced the same problem this morning and got it resolved by copying the clickonce app's directory from the user settings folder to somewhere like c:\MyApp\ - I know its nasty and not very ideal.. but good enough for me!
We recently ran across this issue and decided to post a bug report on this issue to the Visual Studio development team. Feel free to comment on the bug report. It has to be a bug in ClickOnce caused by some changes in Server 2008.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/653362/net-clickonce-deployment-not-working-as-remoteapp-or-citrix-xenapp-on-server-2008-server-2008-r2
We also have a discussion on the MSDN forums covering this issue:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winformssetup/thread/7f41667d-287a-4157-be71-d408751358d9/#92a7e5d9-22b6-44ba-9346-ef87a3b85edc
Try using RegMon and FileMon when starting the app - You may be able to track it down to a file and/or registry permission issue.
Also maybe check the event logs to see if anything's getting logged when the process fails.