I have 2 tables,
table 1 is transaction table
+----------+-----------+---------+------------+-----+
| IDOutlet | IDProduct | TrxType | TrxDate | Qty |
+----------+-----------+---------+------------+-----+
| 101 | ASD11 | 2 | 11/11/2015 | 15 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 3 | 11/14/2015 | -3 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 3 | 11/17/2015 | -6 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 2 | 11/22/2015 | 7 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 3 | 11/26/2015 | -2 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 2 | 12/3/2015 | 1 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 3 | 12/9/2015 | -3 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 3 | 12/11/2015 | -2 |
| 101 | ASD11 | 2 | 12/12/2015 | 5 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 2 | 11/11/2015 | 9 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 3 | 11/14/2015 | -3 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 2 | 11/16/2015 | 3 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 3 | 11/19/2015 | -4 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 3 | 11/23/2015 | -3 |
| 102 | FFD34 | 2 | 11/26/2015 | 2 |
| 102 | FFD34 | 2 | 11/28/2015 | 4 |
| 102 | FFD34 | 3 | 11/29/2015 | -5 |
| 102 | FFD34 | 3 | 12/1/2015 | -1 |
+----------+-----------+---------+------------+-----+
Table 2 is opnametable
+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
| IDOutlet | IDProduct | OpnameDate | QtyOpname |
+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
| 101 | ASD11 | 11/20/2015 | 5 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 11/30/2015 | 5 |
| 102 | FFD34 | 11/30/2015 | 1 |
+----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
And I want the result like this
+----------+-----------+------------+---------+
| IDOutlet | IDProduct | OpnameDate | Sum Qty |
+----------+-----------+------------+---------+
| 101 | ASD11 | 11/20/2015 | 6 |
| 101 | FFD34 | 11/20/2015 | 5 |
| 102 | FFD34 | 11/30/2015 | 1 |
+----------+-----------+------------+---------+
You can use a date comparison in your JOIN criteria:
SELECT T2.IDOutlet,T2.IDProduct,T2.OpnameDate,SUM(T1.Qty) AS Sum_Qty
FROM opnametable T2
LEFT JOIN transaction T1
ON T2.IDOUtlet = T1.IDOutlet
AND T2.IDProduct = T1.IDProduct
AND T1.TrxDate <= T2.OpnameDate
GROUP BY T2.IDOutlet,T2.IDProduct,T2.OpnameDate
I'm assuming the dates are stored in an appropriate date datatype, and that you want to include OpnameDate.
Try this
select o.IDOutlet,o.IDProduct,sum(t.Qty) as [Sum Qty]
from opnametable o left outer join transaction1 t on o.IDOutlet=t.IDOutlet
and o.IDProduct=t.IDProduct and t.trxdate<o.OpnameDate
group by o.IDOutlet,o.IDProduct
Related
I have the following sql to calculate a % total:
SELECT tblTourns_atp.ID_Ti,
Sum([FS_1]/(SELECT Sum(FSOF_1)
FROM stat_atp
WHERE stat_atp.ID_T = tblTourns_atp.ID_T)) AS S1_IP
FROM stat_atp
INNER JOIN tblTourns_atp ON stat_atp.ID_T = tblTourns_atp.ID_T
GROUP BY tblTourns_atp.ID_Ti
I'm getting the 'aggregate error' because it wants the ID_T fields either grouped or in an aggregate function. I've read loads of examples but none of them seem to apply when the offending field is the subject of 'WHERE'.
Tables and output as follows:
+----------+------+--------+--+---------------+-------+--+--------+--------+
| stat_atp | | | | tblTourns_atp | | | Output | |
+----------+------+--------+--+---------------+-------+--+--------+--------+
| ID_T | FS_1 | FSOF_1 | | ID_T | ID_Ti | | ID_Ti | S1_IP |
| 1 | 20 | 40 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 31.03% |
| 2 | 30 | 100 | | 2 | 1 | | 2 | 28.57% |
| 3 | 40 | 150 | | 3 | 1 | | 3 | 33.33% |
| 4 | 30 | 100 | | 4 | 2 | | | |
| 5 | 30 | 100 | | 5 | 2 | | | |
| 6 | 40 | 150 | | 6 | 2 | | | |
| 7 | 20 | 40 | | 7 | 3 | | | |
| 8 | 30 | 100 | | 8 | 3 | | | |
| 9 | 40 | 150 | | 9 | 3 | | | |
| 10 | 20 | 40 | | 10 | 3 | | | |
+----------+------+--------+--+---------------+-------+--+--------+--------+
Since you already have an inner join between the two tables, a separate subquery isn't required:
select t.id_ti, sum(s.fs_1)/sum(s.fsof_1) as pct
from tbltourns_atp t inner join stat_atp s on t.id_t = s.id_t
group by t.id_ti
I have the following table:
+--------+------------+----------------+
| saleId | saleDate | contractId |
+--------+------------+----------------+
| 1 | 01.07.2016 | 1001 |
| 2 | 02.07.2016 | 1001 |
| 3 | 03.07.2016 | 1002 |
| 4 | 04.07.2016 | 1002 |
| 5 | 05.07.2016 | 1001 |
| 6 | 06.07.2016 | 1001 |
+--------+------------+----------------+
I want to count number of previuos sales by contract for each sale (each row)
+--------+------------+------------+------------------------+
| saleId | saleDate | contractId | SalesCountPerContract |
+--------+------------+------------+------------------------+
| 1 | 01.07.2016 | 1001 | 0 |
| 2 | 02.07.2016 | 1001 | 1 |
| 3 | 03.07.2016 | 1002 | 0 |
| 4 | 04.07.2016 | 1002 | 1 |
| 5 | 05.07.2016 | 1001 | 2 |
| 6 | 06.07.2016 | 1001 | 3 |
+--------+------------+------------+------------------------+
select t.*
,row_number() over
(partition by contractId order by saleDate) - 1 as SalesCountPerContract
from mytable t
I have a table structure for SalesItems, and Sales.
SalesItems is setup something like this
| SaleItemID | SaleID | ProductID | ProductType |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 15 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
And Sales is setup something like this
| Sale | Cash |
| 1 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 10.00 |
| 3 | 28.50 |
I am trying to export a basic 'Daily History' that uses joins to spit out the information like this.
| Date | StoreID | Type1Sales | Type2Sales | ... | Cash Taken |
| 5/2 | 50 | 50 | 40 | ... | 39.50 |
| 5/3 | 50 | 10 | 32.50 | ... | 48.50 |
The issue I'm having is if I do an inner join From Sales to Sales Items, I'll end up with this.
| SaleItemID | SaleID | ProductID | ProductType | Sale | Cash |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 3 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10.00 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 28.50 |
| 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 28.50 |
So if I do a SUM(Cash), then I'll end up returning $70.00, instead of the correct $39.50. I'm not the best with joins, so I've been researching outer joins and such, but none of those seem to work as it's still matching up. Is there a way to only match on the FIRST instance, and return NULL for the rest? For example, something like this
| SaleItemID | SaleID | ProductID | ProductType | Sale | Cash |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | NULL |
| 3 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 1 | NULL |
| 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10.00 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 28.50 |
| 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | NULL |
Or do you have any other suggestions for returning back the correct amount of Cash for each particular day?
Use DISTINCT(SaleID) in your SELECT to return a single row for each Sale ID.
I have four tables as below:
tblAccount
Id i sprimary key
+----+-----------------+
| Id | AccName |
+----+-----------------+
| 1 | AccountA |
| 2 | AccountB |
+----+-----------------+
tblLocation
Id is primary key.
+----+---------------+
| Id | LocName |
+----+---------------+
| 1 | LocationA |
| 2 | LocationB |
| 3 | LocationC |
+----+---------------+
tblAccountwiseLocation
Id i sprimary key.LocId and AccId are foreign key.
+----+---------------+---------------+
| Id | LocId | AccId |
+----+---------------+---------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 |
| 6 | 3 | 2 |
+----+---------------+---------------+
tblRSCMaster
Id i sprimary key.LocId and AccId are foreign key.
+----+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------------+
| Id | LocId | AccId | RSCNo | DateOfAddition |
+----+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_1_14 | 15/01/2014 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_1_14 | 15/01/2014 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_1_14 | 15/01/2014 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | Acc2_Loc1_1_14 | 15/01/2014 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | Acc2_Loc2_1_14 | 15/01/2014 |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | Acc2_Loc3_1_14 | 15/01/2014 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_2_14 | 15/02/2014 |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_2_14 | 15/02/2014 |
| 9 | 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_2_14 | 15/02/2014 |
| 10 | 1 | 2 | Acc2_Loc1_2_14 | 15/02/2014 |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | Acc2_Loc2_2_14 | 15/02/2014 |
| 12 | 3 | 2 | Acc2_Loc3_2_14 | 15/02/2014 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 15 | 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 16 | 1 | 2 | Acc2_Loc1_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | Acc2_Loc2_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | Acc2_Loc3_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 20 | 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 21 | 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 22 | 1 | 2 | Acc2_Loc1_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | Acc2_Loc2_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 24 | 3 | 2 | Acc2_Loc3_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 26 | 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 28 | 1 | 2 | Acc2_Loc1_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 29 | 2 | 2 | Acc2_Loc2_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 30 | 3 | 2 | Acc2_Loc3_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
+----+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------------+
Acc1_Loc1_1_14 resembles RSC for LocationA of AccountA for Jan 2014.
I need to get a output as below from tblRSCMaster.
+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------------+
| LocId | AccId | RSCNo | DateOfAddition |
+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------------+
| 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 1 | 1 | Acc1_Loc1_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 2 | 1 | Acc1_Loc2_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
| 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_3_14 | 15/03/2014 |
| 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_4_14 | 15/04/2014 |
| 3 | 1 | Acc1_Loc3_5_14 | 15/05/2014 |
+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------------+
Each account has multiple locations and each location has multiple RSCs.
I need to get last three RSCs for each location for AccountA.
I have tried the below query:
SELECT tblAccountwiseLocation.LocId,tblAccountwiseLocation.AccId,tblRSCMaster.RSCNo,tblRSCMaster.DateOfAddition FROM tblAccountwiseLocation
INNER JOIN tblRSCMaster ON tblAccountwiseLocation.LocId= tblRSCMaster.LocId
where tblRSCMaster.AccId=1
But not getting the proper output.
Please help me out.
Thank you all in advance.
You can wrap the existing query inside a common table expression, and use ROW_NUMBER() to get only the last 3 (by tblRSCMaster.DateOfAddition) entries per tblAccountwiseLocation.LocId.
WITH cte AS (
SELECT tblAccountwiseLocation.LocId,
tblAccountwiseLocation.AccId,
tblRSCMaster.RSCNo,
tblRSCMaster.DateOfAddition,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY tblAccountwiseLocation.LocId
ORDER BY tblRSCMaster.DateOfAddition DESC) rn
FROM tblAccountwiseLocation
INNER JOIN tblRSCMaster
ON tblAccountwiseLocation.LocId = tblRSCMaster.LocId
AND tblAccountwiseLocation.AccId = tblRSCMaster.AccId
WHERE tblRSCMaster.AccId=1
)
SELECT LocId, AccId, RSCNo, DateOfAddition
FROM cte
WHERE rn <= 3
ORDER BY LocId, AccId, DateOfAddition
An SQLfiddle to test with.
Is this what you need?
select m.*
from (select m.*, row_number() over (partition by accID
order by DateOfAddition desc) as seqnum
from tblRSCMaster
where m.locid = 1
) m
where seqnum <= 3
order by AccId, DateOfAddition;
I think you need to filter on the locid rather than on the AccId to get what you want.
I have a table where I have a list of people, lets say i have 100 people listed in that table
I need to filter out the people using different criteria's and put them in groups, problem is when i start excluding on the 4th-5th level, performance issues come up and it becomes slow
with lst_tous_movements as (
select
t1.refid_eClinibase
t1.[dthrfinmouvement]
t1.[unite_service_id]
t1.[unite_service_suiv_id]
from sometable t1
)
,lst_patients_hospitalisés as (
select distinct
t1.refid_eClinibase
from lst_tous_movements t1
where
t1.[dthrfinmouvement] = '4000-01-01'
)
,lst_patients_admisUIB_transferes as (
select distinct
t1.refid_eClinibase
from lst_tous_movements t1
left join lst_patients_hospitalisés t2 on t1.refid_eClinibase = t2.refid_eClinibase
where
t1.[unite_service_id] = 4
and t1.[unite_service_suiv_id] <> 0
and t2.refid_eClinibase is null
)
,lst_patients_admisUIB_nonTransferes as (
select distinct
t1.refid_eClinibase
from lst_tous_movements t1
left join lst_patients_admisUIB_transferes t2 on t1.refid_eClinibase = t2.refid_eClinibase
left join lst_patients_hospitalisés t3 on t1.refid_eClinibase = t3.refid_eClinibase
where
t1.[unite_service_id] = 4
and t1.[unite_service_suiv_id] = 0
and t2.refid_eClinibase is null
and t3.refid_eClinibase is null
)
,lst_patients_autres as (
select distinct
t1.refid_eClinibase
from lst_patients t1
left join lst_patients_admisUIB_transferes t2 on t1.refid_eClinibase = t2.refid_eClinibase
left join lst_patients_hospitalisés t3 on t1.refid_eClinibase = t3.refid_eClinibase
left join lst_patients_admisUIB_nonTransferes t4 on t1.refid_eClinibase = t4.refid_eClinibase
where
t2.refid_eClinibase is null
and t3.refid_eClinibase is null
and t4.refid_eClinibase is null
)
as you can see i have a multi level filtering out going on here...
1st i get the people where t1.[dthrfinmouvement] = '4000-01-01'
2nd i get the people with another criteria EXCLUDING the 1st group
3rd i get the people with yet another criteria EXCLUDING the 1st and
the 2nd group
etc..
when i get to the 4th level, my query takes 6 - 10 seconds to complete
is there any way to speed this up ?
this is my dataset i'm working with:
+------------------+-------------------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------------------+
| refid_eClinibase | nodossierpermanent_eClinibase | dthrfinmouvement | unite_service_id | unite_service_suiv_id |
+------------------+-------------------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------------------+
| 25611 | P0017379 | 2013-04-27 | 58 | 0 |
| 25611 | P0017379 | 2013-05-02 | 4 | 2 |
| 25611 | P0017379 | 2013-05-18 | 2 | 0 |
| 85886 | P0077918 | 2013-04-10 | 58 | 0 |
| 85886 | P0077918 | 2013-05-06 | 6 | 12 |
| 85886 | P0077918 | 4000-01-01 | 12 | 0 |
| 91312 | P0083352 | 2013-07-24 | 3 | 14 |
| 91312 | P0083352 | 2013-07-24 | 14 | 3 |
| 91312 | P0083352 | 2013-07-30 | 3 | 8 |
| 91312 | P0083352 | 4000-01-01 | 8 | 0 |
| 93835 | P0085879 | 2013-04-30 | 58 | 0 |
| 93835 | P0085879 | 2013-05-07 | 4 | 2 |
| 93835 | P0085879 | 2013-05-16 | 2 | 0 |
| 93835 | P0085879 | 2013-05-22 | 58 | 0 |
| 93835 | P0085879 | 2013-05-24 | 4 | 0 |
| 93835 | P0085879 | 2013-05-31 | 58 | 0 |
| 93836 | P0085880 | 2013-05-20 | 58 | 0 |
| 93836 | P0085880 | 2013-05-22 | 4 | 2 |
| 93836 | P0085880 | 2013-05-31 | 2 | 0 |
| 97509 | P0089576 | 2013-04-09 | 58 | 0 |
| 97509 | P0089576 | 2013-04-11 | 4 | 0 |
| 102787 | P0094886 | 2013-04-08 | 58 | 0 |
| 102787 | P0094886 | 2013-04-11 | 4 | 2 |
| 102787 | P0094886 | 2013-05-21 | 2 | 0 |
| 103029 | P0095128 | 2013-04-04 | 58 | 0 |
| 103029 | P0095128 | 2013-04-10 | 4 | 1 |
| 103029 | P0095128 | 2013-05-03 | 1 | 0 |
| 103813 | P0095922 | 2013-07-02 | 58 | 0 |
| 103813 | P0095922 | 2013-07-03 | 4 | 6 |
| 103813 | P0095922 | 2013-08-14 | 6 | 0 |
| 105106 | P0097215 | 2013-08-09 | 58 | 0 |
| 105106 | P0097215 | 2013-08-13 | 4 | 0 |
| 105106 | P0097215 | 2013-08-14 | 58 | 0 |
| 105106 | P0097215 | 4000-01-01 | 4 | 0 |
| 106223 | P0098332 | 2013-06-11 | 1 | 0 |
| 106223 | P0098332 | 2013-08-01 | 58 | 0 |
| 106223 | P0098332 | 4000-01-01 | 1 | 0 |
| 106245 | P0098354 | 2013-04-02 | 58 | 0 |
| 106245 | P0098354 | 2013-05-24 | 58 | 0 |
| 106245 | P0098354 | 2013-05-29 | 4 | 1 |
| 106245 | P0098354 | 2013-07-12 | 1 | 0 |
| 106280 | P0098389 | 2013-04-07 | 58 | 0 |
| 106280 | P0098389 | 2013-04-09 | 4 | 0 |
| 106416 | P0098525 | 2013-04-19 | 58 | 0 |
| 106416 | P0098525 | 2013-04-23 | 4 | 0 |
| 106444 | P0098553 | 2013-04-22 | 58 | 0 |
| 106444 | P0098553 | 2013-04-25 | 4 | 0 |
| 106609 | P0098718 | 2013-05-08 | 58 | 0 |
| 106609 | P0098718 | 2013-05-10 | 4 | 11 |
| 106609 | P0098718 | 2013-07-24 | 11 | 12 |
| 106609 | P0098718 | 4000-01-01 | 12 | 0 |
| 106616 | P0098725 | 2013-05-09 | 58 | 0 |
| 106616 | P0098725 | 2013-05-09 | 4 | 1 |
| 106616 | P0098725 | 2013-07-27 | 1 | 0 |
| 106698 | P0098807 | 2013-05-16 | 58 | 0 |
| 106698 | P0098807 | 2013-05-22 | 4 | 6 |
| 106698 | P0098807 | 2013-06-14 | 6 | 1 |
| 106698 | P0098807 | 2013-06-28 | 1 | 0 |
| 106714 | P0098823 | 2013-05-20 | 58 | 0 |
| 106714 | P0098823 | 2013-05-21 | 58 | 0 |
| 106714 | P0098823 | 2013-05-24 | 58 | 0 |
| 106729 | P0098838 | 2013-05-21 | 58 | 0 |
| 106729 | P0098838 | 2013-05-23 | 4 | 1 |
| 106729 | P0098838 | 2013-06-03 | 1 | 0 |
| 107038 | P0099147 | 2013-06-25 | 58 | 0 |
| 107038 | P0099147 | 2013-06-28 | 4 | 1 |
| 107038 | P0099147 | 2013-07-04 | 1 | 0 |
| 107038 | P0099147 | 2013-08-13 | 58 | 0 |
| 107038 | P0099147 | 2013-08-15 | 4 | 6 |
| 107038 | P0099147 | 4000-01-01 | 6 | 0 |
| 107082 | P0099191 | 2013-06-29 | 58 | 0 |
| 107082 | P0099191 | 2013-07-04 | 4 | 6 |
| 107082 | P0099191 | 2013-07-19 | 6 | 0 |
| 107157 | P0099267 | 4000-01-01 | 13 | 0 |
| 107336 | P0099446 | 4000-01-01 | 6 | 0 |
+------------------+-------------------------------+------------------+------------------+-----------------------+
thanks.
It is hard to understand exactly what all your rules are from the question, but the general approach should be to add a "Grouping" column to a singl query that uses a CASE statement to categorize the people.
The conditions in a CASE are evaluated in order, so that if the first criteria is met, then the subsequent criteria are not even evaluated for that row.
Here is some code to get you started....
select t1.refid_eClinibase
,t1.[dthrfinmouvement]
,t1.[unite_service_id]
,t1.[unite_service_suiv_id]
CASE WHEN [dthrfinmouvement] = '4000-01-01' THEN 'Group1 Label'
WHEN condition2 = something THEN 'Group2 Label'
....
WHEN conditionN = something THEN 'GroupN Label'
ELSE 'Catch All Label'
END as person_category
from sometable t1