The concerned tables are as follows:
students(rollno, name, deptcode)
depts(deptcode, deptname)
course(crs_rollno, crs_name, marks)
The query is
Find the name and roll number of the students from each department who obtained
highest total marks in their own department.
Consider:
i) Courses of different department are different.
ii) All students of a particular department take same number and same courses.
Then only the query makes sense.
I wrote a successful query for displaying the maximum total marks by a student in each department.
select do.deptname, max(x.marks) from students so
inner join depts do
on do.deptcode=so.deptcode
inner join(
select s.name as name, d.deptname as deptname, sum(c.marks) as marks from students s
inner join crs_regd c
on s.rollno=c.crs_rollno
inner join depts d
on d.deptcode=s.deptcode
group by s.name,d.deptname) x
on x.name=so.name and x.deptname=do.deptname group by do.deptname;
But as mentioned I need to display the name as well. Accordingly if I include so.name in select list, I need to include it in group by clause and the output is as below:
Kendra Summers Computer Science 274
Stewart Robbins English 80
Cole Page Computer Science 250
Brian Steele English 83
expected output:
Kendra Summers Computer Science 274
Brian Steele English 83
Where is the problem?
I guess this can be easily achieved if you use window function -
select name, deptname, marks
from (select s.name as name, d.deptname as deptname, sum(c.marks) as marks,
row_number() over(partition by d.deptname order by sum(c.marks) desc) rn
from students s
inner join crs_regd c on s.rollno=c.crs_rollno
inner join depts d on d.deptcode=s.deptcode
group by s.name,d.deptname) x
where rn = 1;
To solve the problem with a readable query I had to define a couple of views:
total_marks: For each student the sum of their marks
create view total_marks as select s.deptcode, s.name, s.rollno, sum(c.marks) as total from course c, students s where s.rollno = c.crs_rollno group by s.rollno;
dept_max: For each department the highest total score by a single student of that department
create view dept_max as select deptcode, max(total) max_total from total_marks group by deptcode;
So I can get the desidered output with the query
select a.deptcode, a.rollno, a.name from total_marks a join dept_max b on a.deptcode = b.deptcode and a.total = b.max_total
If you don't want to use views you can replace their selects on the final query, which will result in this:
select a.deptcode, a.rollno, a.name
from
(select s.deptcode, s.name, s.rollno, sum(c.marks) as total from course c, students s where s.rollno = c.crs_rollno group by s.rollno) a
join (select deptcode, max(total) max_total from (select s.deptcode, s.name, s.rollno, sum(c.marks) as total from course c, students s where s.rollno = c.crs_rollno group by s.rollno) a_ group by deptcode) b
on a.deptcode = b.deptcode and a.total = b.max_total
Which I'm sure it is easily improvable in performance by someone more skilled then me...
If you (and anybody else) want to try it the way I did, here is the schema:
create table depts ( deptcode int primary key auto_increment, deptname varchar(20) );
create table students ( rollno int primary key auto_increment, name varchar(20) not null, deptcode int, foreign key (deptcode) references depts(deptcode) );
create table course ( crs_rollno int, crs_name varchar(20), marks int, foreign key (crs_rollno) references students(rollno) );
And here all the entries I inserted:
insert into depts (deptname) values ("Computer Science"),("Biology"),("Fine Arts");
insert into students (name,deptcode) values ("Turing",1),("Jobs",1),("Tanenbaum",1),("Darwin",2),("Mendel",2),("Bernard",2),("Picasso",3),("Monet",3),("Van Gogh",3);
insert into course (crs_rollno,crs_name,marks) values
(1,"Algorithms",25),(1,"Database",28),(1,"Programming",29),(1,"Calculus",30),
(2,"Algorithms",24),(2,"Database",22),(2,"Programming",28),(2,"Calculus",19),
(3,"Algorithms",21),(3,"Database",27),(3,"Programming",23),(3,"Calculus",26),
(4,"Zoology",22),(4,"Botanics",28),(4,"Chemistry",30),(4,"Anatomy",25),(4,"Pharmacology",27),
(5,"Zoology",29),(5,"Botanics",27),(5,"Chemistry",26),(5,"Anatomy",25),(5,"Pharmacology",24),
(6,"Zoology",18),(6,"Botanics",19),(6,"Chemistry",22),(6,"Anatomy",23),(6,"Pharmacology",24),
(7,"Sculpture",26),(7,"History",25),(7,"Painting",30),
(8,"Sculpture",29),(8,"History",24),(8,"Painting",30),
(9,"Sculpture",21),(9,"History",19),(9,"Painting",25) ;
Those inserts will load these data:
select * from depts;
+----------+------------------+
| deptcode | deptname |
+----------+------------------+
| 1 | Computer Science |
| 2 | Biology |
| 3 | Fine Arts |
+----------+------------------+
select * from students;
+--------+-----------+----------+
| rollno | name | deptcode |
+--------+-----------+----------+
| 1 | Turing | 1 |
| 2 | Jobs | 1 |
| 3 | Tanenbaum | 1 |
| 4 | Darwin | 2 |
| 5 | Mendel | 2 |
| 6 | Bernard | 2 |
| 7 | Picasso | 3 |
| 8 | Monet | 3 |
| 9 | Van Gogh | 3 |
+--------+-----------+----------+
select * from course;
+------------+--------------+-------+
| crs_rollno | crs_name | marks |
+------------+--------------+-------+
| 1 | Algorithms | 25 |
| 1 | Database | 28 |
| 1 | Programming | 29 |
| 1 | Calculus | 30 |
| 2 | Algorithms | 24 |
| 2 | Database | 22 |
| 2 | Programming | 28 |
| 2 | Calculus | 19 |
| 3 | Algorithms | 21 |
| 3 | Database | 27 |
| 3 | Programming | 23 |
| 3 | Calculus | 26 |
| 4 | Zoology | 22 |
| 4 | Botanics | 28 |
| 4 | Chemistry | 30 |
| 4 | Anatomy | 25 |
| 4 | Pharmacology | 27 |
| 5 | Zoology | 29 |
| 5 | Botanics | 27 |
| 5 | Chemistry | 26 |
| 5 | Anatomy | 25 |
| 5 | Pharmacology | 24 |
| 6 | Zoology | 18 |
| 6 | Botanics | 19 |
| 6 | Chemistry | 22 |
| 6 | Anatomy | 23 |
| 6 | Pharmacology | 24 |
| 7 | Sculpture | 26 |
| 7 | History | 25 |
| 7 | Painting | 30 |
| 8 | Sculpture | 29 |
| 8 | History | 24 |
| 8 | Painting | 30 |
| 9 | Sculpture | 21 |
| 9 | History | 19 |
| 9 | Painting | 25 |
+------------+--------------+-------+
I take chance to point out that this database is badly designed. This becomes evident with course table. For these reasons:
The name is singular
This table does not represent courses, but rather exams or scores
crs_name should be a foreign key referencing the primary key of another table (that would actually represent the courses)
There is no constrains to limit the marks to a range and to avoid a student to take twice the same exam
I find more logical to associate courses to departments, instead of student to departments (this way also would make these queries easier)
I tell you this because I understood you are learning from a book, so unless the book at one point says "this database is poorly designed", do not take this exercise as example to design your own!
Anyway, if you manually resolve the query with my data you will come to this results:
+----------+--------+---------+
| deptcode | rollno | name |
+----------+--------+---------+
| 1 | 1 | Turing |
| 2 | 6 | Bernard |
| 3 | 8 | Monet |
+----------+--------+---------+
As further reference, here the contents of the views I needed to define:
select * from total_marks;
+----------+-----------+--------+-------+
| deptcode | name | rollno | total |
+----------+-----------+--------+-------+
| 1 | Turing | 1 | 112 |
| 1 | Jobs | 2 | 93 |
| 1 | Tanenbaum | 3 | 97 |
| 2 | Darwin | 4 | 132 |
| 2 | Mendel | 5 | 131 |
| 2 | Bernard | 6 | 136 |
| 3 | Picasso | 7 | 81 |
| 3 | Monet | 8 | 83 |
| 3 | Van Gogh | 9 | 65 |
+----------+-----------+--------+-------+
select * from dept_max;
+----------+-----------+
| deptcode | max_total |
+----------+-----------+
| 1 | 112 |
| 2 | 136 |
| 3 | 83 |
+----------+-----------+
Hope I helped!
Try the following query
select a.name, b.deptname,c.marks
from students a
, crs_regd b
, depts c
where a.rollno = b.crs_rollno
and a.deptcode = c.deptcode
and(c.deptname,b.marks) in (select do.deptname, max(x.marks)
from students so
inner join depts do
on do.deptcode=so.deptcode
inner join (select s.name as name
, d.deptname as deptname
, sum(c.marks) as marks
from students s
inner join crs_regd c
on s.rollno=c.crs_rollno
inner join depts d
on d.deptcode=s.deptcode
group by s.name,d.deptname) x
on x.name=so.name
and x.deptname=do.deptname
group by do.deptname
)
Inner/Sub query will fetch the course name and max marks and the outer query gets the corresponding name of the student.
try and let know if you got the desired result
Dense_Rank() function would be helpful in this scenario:
SELECT subquery.*
FROM (SELECT Student_Total_Marks.rollno,
Student_Total_Marks.name,
Student_Total_Marks.deptcode, depts.deptname,
rank() over (partition by deptcode order by total_marks desc) Student_Rank
FROM (SELECT Stud.rollno,
Stud.name,
Stud.deptcode,
sum(course.marks) total_marks
FROM students stud inner join course course on stud.rollno = course.crs_rollno
GROUP BY stud.rollno,Stud.name,Stud.deptcode) Student_Total_Marks,
dept dept
WHERE Student_Total_Marks.deptcode = dept.deptname
GROUP BY Student_Total_Marks.deptcode) subquery
WHERE suquery.student_rank = 1
I have 2 tables.
Table #1: orders
order_id | crit_1 | crit_2 | crit_3 | other
01 | A00 | GER | 49er | x
02 | A00 | GER | 49er | x
03 | A00 | USA | 49er | x
04 | C80 | DEN | 66er | x
05 | B50 | GER | 99er | x
The table orders has 3 important criteria but doesn't have the criterion_4. There is another table with the order_positions which contains multiple criterion_4 entries for each order_id.
Table #2: classifications
crit_1 | crit_2 | crit_3 | crit_4 | class_1 | class_2
A00 | GER | 49er | 4711 | A | 11
A00 | GER | 49er | 4712 | A | 21
A00 | USA | 49er | 4711 | D | 12
A00 | USA | 49er | 4712 | D | 21
B50 | GER | 99er | 4801 | B | 12
B50 | GER | 99er | 4802 | B | 12
B50 | GER | 99er | 4803 | B | 14
C80 | DEN | 66er | 4904 | C | 22
C80 | DEN | 66er | 4905 | C | 21
The table classifications contains classifications for:
orders = class_1 = combination of crit_1, crit_2 & crit_3
order_positions = class_2 = combination of crit_1, crit_2, crit_3
& crit_4
I have a query where I join classifications.class_1 on the table orders to create a list of all orders and their respective classification.
select
orders.order_id,
orders.crit_1,
orders.crit_2,
orders.crit_3,
classifications.class_1
from
orders
left join
classifications
on
orders.crit_1=classifications.crit_1 and
orders.crit_2=classifications.crit_2 and
orders.crit_3=classifications.crit_3
where
orders.others = "..."
group by
orders.order_id,
orders.crit_1,
orders.crit_2,
orders.crit_3,
classifications.class_1
I need a GROUP BY at the end since the table classifications contains multiple entries with the combination of crit_1, crit_2 and crit_3. But this isn't a problem since the needed classification_1 is always the same for each combination of crit_1, crit_2 and crit_3.
Now I want to create another query where I count just the number of each classification_1 for the orders. Something like this:
class_1 | number
A | 12
B | 5
C | 18
. | .
But I don't know how without the whole selection of orders.order_id, orders.crit_1, orders.crit_2, orders.crit_3 and classifications.class_1
I just want to count the class_1 classifications for the query above.
Any suggestions?
edit
I tried it like suggested by Kaushik Nayak:
select
--orders.order_id,
--orders.crit_1,
--orders.crit_2,
--orders.crit_3,
classifications.class_1,
count(*)
from
orders
left join
classifications
on
orders.crit_1=classifications.crit_1 and
orders.crit_2=classifications.crit_2 and
orders.crit_3=classifications.crit_3
where
orders.others = "..."
group by
--orders.order_id,
--orders.crit_1,
--orders.crit_2,
--orders.crit_3,
classifications.class_1
But the results are not correct and I have no idea how to reproduce those numbers.
A few examples:
| class_1 | query w/ | query w/o | query |
| | group by | group by | count(*) |
---------------------------------------------
| A | 654 | 2179 | 1024 |
| B | 371 | 1940 | 667 |
| C | 94 | 238 | 247 |
When I use my query with group by then I get 654 entries for class_1 = A.
When I make my query without group bythen I get 2179 entries for class_1= A.
And when I try the query with Count(*) then I get 1024 entries for class_1 = A.
The last one is definitely not correct.
Just use GROUP BY class_1 for your classifications table and add an EXISTS condition to check if there is an order.
SELECT
c.class_1,
COUNT(c.class_1) "number"
FROM
classifications c
WHERE
EXISTS (
SELECT
1
FROM
orders o
WHERE
o.crit_1 = c.crit_1
AND o.crit_2 = c.crit_2
AND o.crit_3 = c.crit_3
)
GROUP BY
c.class_1
ORDER BY
1;
I'm struggle with a SQL join for parent client records and just posted a query, but I realised after posting it that my example was slightly wrong (but still a useful post) so i've created a new one, that's more accurate :)
If i have the following database structure:
Table Regions
|Region_no | Region_Level | owning_region_no |
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 3 | 2 |
| 5 | 3 | 2 |
| 6 | 3 | 3 |
Table Postcodes
| Postcode | Region_no |
| PO32 3AE | 4 |
| PO32 3AA | 5 |
| PO32 3AF | 6 |
Table UnitsMappings
| Unit_No | region_no |
| 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 3 |
| 3 | 3 |
| 4 | 6 |
| 4 | 5 |
Table Units
| Unit_no | Unit_Name |
| 1 | South |
| 2 | SouthEast |
| 3 | Central |
| 4 | SouthWest |
[Updated sample answer]
What I really want, is the following:
| Unit_name | Postcode |
| South | PO32 3AE |
| South | PO32 3AA |
| South | PO32 3AF |
| SouthEast | PO32 3AE |
| SouthEast | PO32 3AA |
| SouthEast | PO32 3AF |
Even though South has only regions 1 and 2 mapped to it, the level 3's are mapped to the level 2's and then 1's (and the postcodes are mapped to the level 3's)
Now the difficulty is, that i just want the postcodes (from the postcode tables) which are associated to the level 3 regions levels in regions. So there may be a region level 1 associated to a unit_no, but i need all of the postcodes at the bottom that are mapped to the level 3.
There is no valid unit name in you test data for the region in region level 3.
The region with region level 3 are 4, 5 and 6.
There is no unit associated with region 4, the unit associated with region 5 and 6 is the unit 4, but in the table unit_name there is no unit 4.
If you have the data then this query will get the data
SELECT pc.postcode, u.unit_name
FROM regions reg
INNER JOIN Postcodes pc ON reg.region_no = pc.region_no
INNER JOIN UnitsMappings um ON reg.region_no = um.region_no
INNER JOIN Units u ON um.unit_no = u.unit_no
WHERE reg.region_level = 3
changing the join on Units from INNER to LEFT will get you the postcodes with NULL as unit_name with the test data.
based on your details here's my mapping ,
unit => units_mapping
units_mapping => (Postcodes or regions) // assuming using all table we use postcodes
Postcodes => regions
regions (main)
select reg.region_no, Units.name , pc.postcodes
from regions reg,
Postcodes pc,
UnitsMappings UM,
Units units
where reg.region_no = pc.region_no and
pc.region_no = UM.region_no and
UM.Unit_No = Units.Unit_no
order by reg.region_no asc
if there is null in one table, the record won't appear ...
to handle use inner join
not yet tested ..... just assume :)
Try this,
Select u.Unit_name,pc.Postcode from Units as u
inner join UnitsMappings um on u.Unit_no = um.Unit_no
inner join Postcodes as pc on pc.Region_no = um.region_no