I am trying to implement secure LDAP using SSL and I want to validate the servers certificate against the local keystore for which I have imported the certificate.
I realize I can do this:
ldapConnection.SessionOptions.VerifyServerCertificate =
new VerifyServerCertificateCallback((con, cer) => true);
But that provides no authentication and will accept any cert. When I use SSL with WCF connections, it will automatically use my keystore by default without me having to supply a delegate at all, and that works perfect.
How can can direct the cert validation for an LDAP connection to my trust store? Can I implement the delegate, and then pass the X509Certificate arg to something else that will validate it against my store?
I have to use .NET 4.0
Related
I have CA certificates(.crt files) of the server, and I want to enable SSL verification on the client application's WebClient call.
Currently i am using InsecureTrustManagerFactory which i want to avoid
Not sure whether I need to add the certificates to the trust store or the keystore?
where do I locate the trust store and keystore ?
how do I add the trust store / keystore to spring WebClient ?
Currently I want to expose a gRPC Method as Public API and protected by Auth0 (JWT Token), with Istio(Envoy Proxy) will help validating the token on server side. Since the JWT Token is not encrypted by the standard (it is only used to end-user authentication and authorization layer), I want to encrypt the communication using TLS. Also, my public server already have valid certificate.
The problem is on the gRPC Client side. Every example I look, the gRPC Client have to initialize the TLS Connection with server cert pem file. Is it really necessary? Because it adds operational burden and complexity, where we have to distribute our server pem file everytime we renew the certificate AND/OR the client side has to restart the application.
Thanks,
Agung
If you are using a self signed certificate, then yes you must explicitly trust it in your client. If you use a publicly signed certificate on your Server, gRPC will use the Operating System's certificate authorities to verify the cert. (In the case of Java, it uses the JVMs cert authorities.)
If you are using a self-signed certificate you need to specify the server's root certificates in the pem_root_certs member of the SslCredentialsOptions struct passed in when creating a channel, as Carl says.
However if you are using a CA issued certificate, leaving the pem_root_certs member empty will cause gRPC to default to its own master list (reviewable online), not any OS-specific list.
Do not really know how x509 works.
If I have a Web Service that needs to authenticate and validate the client, and he uses a ClientCertificate, could he send me some information that I could then validate against?
I do not create the Web Site itself so I can't be sure they would do it right. I don't wan't to allow someone to say to the Web Service "It's okay, I ClientCertificated him and he's good".
You can implement your own custom client certificate validator but its usage will be different based on the way how do you use the client certificate. If you use pure message security your validator will be the only component used to validate the certificate. If you use HTTPS with client certificate (transport security) the certificate will be first validated by Windows (= your service hosting server must trust the certificate) and after that it will be passed to WCF and validated by your validator.
I have two WCF Services using WsHttpBinding with transport security mutual certificate authentication that are being hosted on the same windows server. Clients that can access one WCF service should not have access to the other WCF service. I need some help on configuring the client certificates on the windows host. The client certificates are signed by trusted CAs and the intermediate and root certificate chain is already installed on the the server. It seems like the service automatically relies on chain of trust and does not require the actual client certificates installed on the server at all before letting the client access the service - this is not the behavior I want. Can someone please tell me how I should be configuring these client certificates in order explicitly allow access to one service and not the other?
Thanks.
That has nothing to do with certificates themselves. When using mutual SSL authentication certificates are used only to authenticate client and the authentication is done outside of your application (this is difference to message security where you can create custom certificate validator). Once certificate is trusted client is automatically authenticated to anything on the server using certificates for authentication.
You are looking for authorization - the step where you define what can authenticated client do with your service. You can either hardcode your authorization logic into your service by using role based security or you can implement two custom ServiceAuthorizationManagers and assign each to single service.
We have a typical client-server WCF service and I would like the following:
Client passes a certificate to the Server through the ClientCredentials property
Server looks at the certificate and see's that it has been issued by our trusted certificate authority
The client is rejected if they use a certificate that is not issued by our CA.
The client has a clientAuthentication certificate installed, along with our trusted CA.
The server has our trusted CA certificate installed. I dont want to install any other certificates.
I am flexible on the binding, however it does need to work in a web scenerio.
I thought about using BasicHttpBinding with TransportCredentialOnly, however it doesnt support certificates :(.
Ive tried using wsHttpBinding in Message mode, however that requires a ServerCertificate to perform server authentication and message encryption... which I dont want!
Is there any built-in way to achieve this?
All build in bindings allow using client certificates only when server certificate is used - mutal certificate authentication and security. To support your scenario you will have to handle it completely yourselves. If you want to inject your authentication mechanism to WCF you will have to do custom token and custom credentials.