I am just starting to dabble in PL/SQL so this question may be very straightforward. Here is the scenario:
I have several checkboxes which carry a weighted numeric value. For example:
Checkbox I --> Value '5'
Checkbox II --> Value '10'
Checkbox III --> Value '15'
etc.
The form would have 15 checkboxes in total and the end-user can select anywhere from 0 to all 15. As they select the checkboxes, the total weight would get calculated and a final numeric value would be displayed. For example. checking off 3 Checkbox I & 2 Checkbox III would = 45 points.
Now the total value of 45 would equal to a separate value. Example:
At 0 points, value = 'Okay'
1-15 points, value = 'Error'
16-30 points, value = 'Warning'
31+ points, value = 'Critical'
The form itself is built within Oracle APEX and I can do it using Dynamic Actions but using PL/SQL may be a better solution.
In summary, I'd like the hidden field to first calculate the total from the checked checkboxes and then use that total to figure out the value of either Okay, Error, Warning, or Critical.
Any assistance is much appreciated!
In my experience, it is better if we're going to use javascript on your case since we have to manipulate DOM and events of the checkboxes. If you want to display/change item values and get values at runtime, then javascript is better in doing that than PLSQL unless you want to submit your page every time you check/uncheck a box in your page which is not advisable.
Here is my solution for your question.
First, create a Display Only item on your page. This is where the values "Okay", "Error", "Warning", or "Critical" will appear. And its very important to set it's default value to 0. Then inside your page's "Function and Global Declaration" part, put the following functions:
function getcheck(checkbox_id,displayOnly_id){
var chkboxName = document.getElementById(checkbox_id + "_0").getAttribute("name");
var chks = document.getElementsByName(chkboxName);
var howmanychecks = chks.length;
var currentSum=0;
var v_remarks = "";
for(x=0;x<howmanychecks;x++){
chks[x].setAttribute("onchange","checkIfchecked(this,\'" + displayOnly_id + "\')");
if(chks[x].checked){
currentSum = currentSum + Number(chks[x].value);
}
}
if(currentSum==0){
v_remarks = "Okay";
}
else if(currentSum>0 && currentSum<=15){
v_remarks = "Error";
}
else if(currentSum>15 && currentSum<=30){
v_remarks = "Warning";
}
else{
v_remarks = "Critical";
}
document.getElementById(displayOnly_id).value = currentSum;
document.getElementById(displayOnly_id + "_DISPLAY").innerHTML = currentSum + ": " + v_remarks;
}
function checkIfchecked(p_element, displayOnly_id){
var v_difference;
var v_sum = Number($v(displayOnly_id));
var displayOnly_display = displayOnly_id + "_DISPLAY";
var v_remarks = "";
if(p_element.checked){
v_sum = v_sum + Number(p_element.value);
$("#" + displayOnly_id).val(v_sum);
}
else{
v_difference=Number($("#" + displayOnly_id).val())-Number(p_element.value);
if(v_difference<0){
v_difference=0;
}
$("#" + displayOnly_id).val(v_difference);
}
if($("#" + displayOnly_id).val()==0){
v_remarks = "Okay";
}
else if($("#" + displayOnly_id).val()>0 && $("#" + displayOnly_id).val()<=15){
v_remarks = "Error";
}
else if($("#" + displayOnly_id).val()>15 && $("#" + displayOnly_id).val()<=30){
v_remarks = "Warning";
}
else{
v_remarks = "Critical";
}
document.getElementById(displayOnly_display).innerHTML=$("#" + displayOnly_id).val() + ": " + v_remarks;
}
The above functions will get the sum of the values of those boxes that are checked. A value of a box will be taken out of the current sum if it is unchecked as well. It will also display the remarks for the current checked points whether if it is "Okay", "Error", "Warning", or "Critical".
In your "Execute when Page Loads" part of your page, add the following line:
getcheck(nameofyourcheckboxitem,nameofyourdisplayonlyitem);
where nameofyourcheckboxitem is the name of your Check Box and nameofyourdisplayonlyitem is the name of the Display Only item you have just created.
Here's a sample line on how to use the function that I've given you:
getcheck("P1_MYCHECKBOX","P1_MYDISPLAYONLY");
Related
I have 5 contacts connected to a company, and i am trying to sort out the ones that does not have an email with the code below.
var mailArray = #All of Email with nulls
var temp = new Array()
for (var i = 0; i < mailArray.length; i++) {
if (mailArray[i].value == null) {
temp.push("null")
}
else {
temp.push("correct")
}
}
temp.join(" ")
Right now i am just pushing the strings to make sure that the flow is correct, it however returns
null null null null null
when it should return
null correct correct null null
since the second and third contact has emails. Can anyone help me or give me a hint, as how to use the return value of the #All of function.
I just want to make sure what you are referring to on the emails. Is it an email field in the contacts app, or is it a text field that is called 'email'? If you are using an email field, then the value at your [i] index is actually another object and not just a string yet. Although it doesn't matter if you are just checking for something existing, but personally I'd like to know which contacts do have emails in the output.
If it is just a text field, then you have a problem with the conditional statement. It should be === instead of ==, but I would personally just rewrite it as !mailArray[i].
I'd recommend changing your output to be a markdown table for legability. Here's the code I ended up with:
var mailArray = #All of Email text with nulls
var nameArray = #All of Name with nulls
var temp = new Array()
var table = "Email | Contact \n --- | --- "
for (var i = 0; i < mailArray.length; i++) {
if (!mailArray[i].value){// !== null) {
temp.push("correct")
temp.push(mailArray[i])
table +="\n"+ mailArray[i] + " | " + nameArray[i]
}
else {
temp.push("null")
table +="\n"+ mailArray[i] + " | " + nameArray[i] + "\n"
temp.push(mailArray[i])
}
}
temp.join(" ")
write = table
And this outputs the following table (made 3 contacts, 2 with emails and one without):
I am trying to port some existing VBA code to C#. One routine controls the indentation of bullet items, and is roughly:
indentStep = 13.5
For Each parag In shp.TextRange.Paragraphs()
parag.Parent.Ruler.Levels(parag.IndentLevel).FirstMargin = indentStep * (parag.IndentLevel - 1)
parag.Parent.Ruler.Levels(parag.IndentLevel).LeftMargin = indentStep * (parag.IndentLevel)
Next parag
The code works, but appears to be spooky black magic. In particular, each time a particular ruler's margins are set ALL NINE rulers margins are actually set.
But somehow the appropriate information is being set. Unfortunately, when you do the same thing in C#, the results change. The following code has no visible effect:
const float kIndentStep = 13.5f;
foreach (PowerPoint.TextRange pg in shp.TextFrame.TextRange.Paragraphs())
{
pg.Parent.Ruler.Levels[pg.IndentLevel].FirstMargin = kIndentStep * (pg.IndentLevel - 1);
pg.Parent.Ruler.LevelS[pg.IndentLevel].LeftMargin = kIndentStep * pg.IndentLevel;
}
This appears to be a limitation/bug when automating PowerPoint from C#. I confirm it works with VBA.
I do see an effect after the code runs: it changes the first level with each run so that, at the end, the first level has the settings that should have been assigned to the last level to be processed, but none of the other levels appear to be affected, visibly. I do see a change in the values returned during code execution, but that's all.
If the code changes only one, specific level for the text frame, it works. The problem occurs only when attempting to change multiple levels.
I tried various approaches, including late-binding (PInvoke) and putting the change in a separate procedure, but the result was always the same.
Here's my last iteration
Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.Application pptApp = (Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.Application) System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.GetActiveObject("Powerpoint.Application"); // new Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.Application();
//Change indent level of text
const float kIndentStep = 13.5f;
Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.Shape shp = pptApp.ActivePresentation.Slides[2].Shapes[2];
Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.TextFrame tf = shp.TextFrame;
object oTf = tf;
int indentLevelLast = 0;
foreach (Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.TextRange pg in tf.TextRange.Paragraphs(-1, -1))
{
int indentLevel = pg.IndentLevel;
if (indentLevel > indentLevelLast)
{
Microsoft.Office.Interop.PowerPoint.RulerLevel rl = tf.Ruler.Levels[indentLevel];
object oRl = rl;
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print(pg.Text + ": " + indentLevel + ", " + rl.FirstMargin.ToString() + ", " + rl.LeftMargin.ToString()) ;
object fm = oRl.GetType().InvokeMember("FirstMargin", BindingFlags.SetProperty, null, oRl, new object[] {kIndentStep * (indentLevel - 1)});
//rl.FirstMargin = kIndentStep * (indentLevel - 1);
object lm = oRl.GetType().InvokeMember("LeftMargin", BindingFlags.SetProperty, null, oRl, new object[] { kIndentStep * (indentLevel) });
//rl.LeftMargin = kIndentStep * indentLevel;
indentLevelLast = indentLevel;
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print(pg.Text + ": " + indentLevel + ", " + tf.Ruler.Levels[indentLevel].FirstMargin.ToString() + ", " + tf.Ruler.Levels[indentLevel].LeftMargin.ToString()) ;
rl = null;
}
}
FWIW neither code snippet provided in the question compiles. The VBA snippet is missing .TextFrame. The C# snippet doesn't like Parent.Ruler so I had to change it to TextFrame.Ruler.
I'm having trouble dynamically adding to a list of components.
I've defined the list in the data element "things" of the vue document. For each object in "things" there is a component loaded onto the page
data() {
return {
things: []
}
}
I use something like the code below to load each of the things on the page.
<div v-for="thing in things" :key="thing.objectId">
Then I load in more elements and add them to the list
let temp = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(results))
vm.things = vm.things.concat(temp)
And when I run it in dev I get the following
[Vue warn]: You may have an infinite update loop in a component render
function.
Other then the error message, the code works in dev mode but crashes the browser when run in production.
I've narrowed it down to this code, there is a bit in the loop which prints out a heading which is the month the data belongs to, so it might say January, then list all the data under january, then onto the next month and so on
showDate(data) {
this.currentDataMonth = helperfunctionsgetDate_format_month_year(data)
if (this.currentDataMonth != this.currentmonth) {
this.currentmonth = this.currentDataMonth
return "<h2>" + this.currentmonth + "</h2>"
} else {
return ""
}
Your issue is caused by the fact that you both modify the state, and use the state from the same method.
showDate(data) {
this.currentDataMonth = helperfunctionsgetDate_format_month_year(data) // set of the state
if (this.currentDataMonth != this.currentmonth) { // get of the state
this.currentmonth = this.currentDataMonth
return "<h2>" + this.currentmonth + "</h2>"
} else {
return ""
}
Since you directly use those variables inside your function, make them local to the function
showDate(data) {
const currentDataMonth = helperfunctionsgetDate_format_month_year(data)
if (currentDataMonth != undefined) {
const currentmonth = currentDataMonth
return "<h2>" + currentmonth + "</h2>"
} else {
return ""
}
Since the purpose of the code is to list every month under its own heading, you should do that using a computed function to return a list of data per month, and use 2 loops to loop over that
Currently, I encountered a small problem.
I have a goal: to test counter(functionality that calculates numbers) in order to check this counter returns a number that falls under set range of low and high (+-5% deviation)
Now, I have this piece of code:
var allLists = JSON.parse(responseBody);
var min = pm.variables.get("count"); // I separately extract min
var max = pm.variables.get("count1"); // and max, but want to extract one variable with min and max;
var low = parseInt(min)
var high = parseInt(max);
console.log("::MIN_VALIE: " + low + " | " + "::MAX_VALUE: " + high);
pm.test("test count", function () {
const value = allLists.data.count;
console.log(":::::::::=> COUNTER: " + value);
pm.expect(typeof value).to.eql('number');
pm.expect(value > low && value < high).to.eql(true);
});
It works ok, but I believe this code is bulky
In order to compare that value in the range of low and high I have to keep low and high number in collection variable, that out of desired 50 variables makes 100 variables and real mess.
Can I somehow keep one variable for low and high value in collection variables?
UPDATE:
Right after posting came up with it:
var allLists = JSON.parse(responseBody);
var num = pm.variables.get("count").split(',');
var min = parseInt(num[0]);
var max = parseInt(num[1]);
console.log("::MIN_VALIE: " + min + " | " + "::MAX_VALUE: " + max);
pm.test("test count", function () {
const value = allLists.data.count;
console.log(":::::::::=> COUNTER: " + value);
pm.expect(typeof value).to.eql('number');
pm.expect(15 > min && 15 < max).to.eql(true);
});
it's much better, but maybe exists better way
Resolved it with JSON.parse. In collection variable the range is written down as In Collection Varibles:
overall_count:[1,99] format, that I wanted to have.
var allLists = JSON.parse(responseBody);
// Here I parse this variable and make parse int to get integer and hurray, I have 1 variable instead of 2
const num = JSON.parse(pm.variables.get("overall_count")); //resolved it with JSON parsing
var min = parseInt(num[0]);
var max = parseInt(num[1]);
pm.test("test count", function () {
const value = allLists.data.count;
pm.expect(typeof value).to.eql('number');
pm.expect(15 > min && 15 < max).to.eql(true);
});
Scratching head here. I've got a pulldown and if I query it in SQL Server Manager Query Window I get 5 different values (these are sample points for a water system).
However, when the pulldown loads, there are 5 options of the first value. Can someone see something I can't?
I narrowed it down to the code below because I held my cursor over "results" which was the final step in my Controller's code, and it showed 5 items all of the same value:
else if ((sampletype == "P") || (sampletype == "T") || (sampletype == "C") || (sampletype == "A"))
{
var SamplePoints = (from c in _db.tblPWS_WSF_SPID_ISN_Lookup
where c.PWS == id && c.WSFStateCode.Substring(0, 1) == "S"
select c).ToList();
if (SamplePoints.Any())
{
var listItemsBig = SamplePoints.Select(p => new SelectListItem
{
Selected = false,
Text = p.WSFStateCode.ToString() + ":::" + p.SamplePointID.ToString(),
Value = p.WSFStateCode.ToString()
}).ToList();
results = new JsonResult { Data = listItemsBig };
}
}
return results ;
}
I have had a similar problem in nHibernate, it was caused by how I defined my primary keys/foreign keys in the ORM, leading to a bad join and duplicate values.