I want to move following Cloudflare Code From Header to Footer
<script type="text/javascript">//<![CDATA[
try{if (!window.CloudFlare) {var CloudFlare=
[{verbose:0,p:0,byc:0,owlid:"cf",bag2:1,mirage2:0,oracle:0,paths: cloudflare:"/cdn- cgi/nexp/dok3v=1613a3a185/"},atok:"802302a1741170af9cd1a6d4a353562a",petok:"65a55c 4936b5ba77732bd7e22d0cd0659f2a74da-1441275430- 1800",betok:"a306a4b060e1b1181a348e962189311608722454-1441275430- 120",zone:"caknowledge.in",rocket:"a",apps:{}}];document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="//ajax.cloudflare.com/cdn- cgi/nexp/dok3v=e9627cd26a/cloudflare.min.js"><'+'\/script>');}}catch(e){};
//]]>
</script>
How to transfer this code from header to Footer
You can't, unfortunately. That's where we have to place it for some optional features and apps to work.
Related
1) the below code i could write in my view to download any js or cs file at client side
<script type="text/javascript" src="~/Scripts/myScriptFile.js"></script>
OR
#Scripts.Render("~/Scripts/myScriptFile.js")
OR
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/myScriptFile.js")"></script>
then why we need to write my js code inside script section like below one?
#section Scripts{
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function () {
$("#submit1").click(function () {
alert("button");
});
});
</script>
}
2) what is the difference between the below two way to include js/css file in view ?
#Scripts.Render("~/Scripts/myScriptFile.js")
OR
<script type="text/javascript" src="#Url.Content("~/Scripts/myScriptFile.js")"></script>
Each approach will get you the same end result. In my experience, I find the approach to be more flexible and scalable as far as code maintenance goes. I'm not a fan of rendering HTML code through helpers for this reason. I hope this helps.
I'm trying to add a simple progress bar to my application in rails using jquery-ui. I'm following this example: http://jqueryui.com/progressbar/
I create the div
<div id="progressbar"></div>
and in my JS I have
$(document).ready( function() {
$("#progressbar").progressbar({
value: 37
});
});
But nothing happens to the div in the html - it remains empty and unstyled(ie no additional CSS is applied to it).
I have checked that I have jquery-ui included in my application - in particular, I have made certain the jquery-ui css file is included.
However, I am willing to bet the problem has something to do with jquery-ui not working properly in my app, because I was having another issue with it and the tooltip function, which I asked about over here: positioning jQuery tooltip
This is driving me nuts, does anyone have any ideas?
I had the same problem right now.
It seems like the referenced libaries in the example do not work.
The error i get from the "Firefox - Developer Tools - Browser Console" is:
ReferenceError: $ is not defined
(I tested on Firefox 32.0.3 and IE 11)
If you just copy the example html/jquery source from "http://jqueryui.com/progressbar/" to a local file (lets call it: "testJqueryProgressBar.html") and double click it, you will see no progress bar!
Source of "testJqueryProgressBar.html":
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>jQuery UI Progressbar - Default functionality</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/ui/1.11.1/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css">
<script src="//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script src="//code.jquery.com/ui/1.11.1/jquery-ui.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//jqueryui.com/resources/demos/style.css">
<script>
$(function()
{
$( "#progressbar" ).progressbar({ value: 37 });
});
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="progressbar"></div>
</body>
</html>
Therefore i checked the links in the header of the example and all reference something.
So the links are valid!
I even tried to reference the jquery libs from another provider, f.e. : https://developers.google.com/speed/libraries/devguide?hl=de#jquery-ui.
Same problem!
Then i went to http://jqueryui.com/download/
Selected Version : 1.11.1 (Stable, for jQuery1.6+)
Selected a different UI theme at the bottom
Downloaded the zip and referenced these unziped jquery sources in my local example testJqueryProgressBar.html and it worked.
I want to use a simple Sencha Touch keypad plugin.
The plugin code can be found over here.
The keypad can be created in an html file under tags as follows:
<script>
Ext.setup({
onReady: function () {
var basic = new Ext.ux.Keypad();
basic.render('keypad');
}
});
</script>
<div id="keypad"/>
Alternatively, it can be used in a Sencha container as follows too:
...
items:[
{
xtype: 'keypad'
}
]
However, I am not able to get it to work the latter way. I'm new to Sencha and I think I'm not placing the files at the right places or not including them properly. I have already included the following in my index.html:
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="js/sencha-touch-1.1.1/sencha-touch.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="js/sencha-touch-1.1.1/resources/css/sencha-touch.css">
<script src="js/Keypad.js" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>
Can someone let me know what modifications are necessary in which files so that I can use the keypad plugin directly in a container?
in your app.js file you need to set path for the plugin folder in the loader...
put the ux (plugin)folder where your app.js is located...
in app.js set the following
Ext.Loader.setPath('Ext.ux', 'ux');
On the view where you are using the numpad you need to specify a
requires: ['Ext.ux.NumPad' ...] //All plugin related files
Also ensure that the CSS files are in the proper location...
Hope it helps...
I have a website that is rendering a prototype based calender on 90% of the pages. I'm also looking at using the Uploadify module for handling multiple uploads with Paperclip. As you know, Paperclip and JQuery don't play nicely and a lot of the solutions I've tried such as NoConflict hasn't worked for me I still get the "not defined" errors in firebug all over the place. I'm wondering what the best way for me to approach adding this JQuery module that will be very localized in a largely Prototype-based application. I've considered switching my Prototype code with JQuery but I've yet to see a better JQuery solution for this particular calendar plugin that I'm using.
Use a proper structure for noConflict.
<script src="prototype.js"></script>
<script src="someprototypeplugin.js"></script>
<script src="jQuery.js"></script>
<script src="uploadify.jquery.js"></script>
<script>
$.noConflict();
jQuery(document).ready(function($){
$("#someelement").uploadify();
});
</script>
If this doesn't answer your question, please provide more(some) code.
Edit for comments:
Just run the $.noConflict() immediately following your jQuery plugins, and then use jQuery instead of the $ variable throughout your JS files.
<script src="prototype.js"></script>
<script src="someprototypeplugin.js"></script>
<script src="jQuery.js"></script>
<script src="uploadify.jquery.js"></script>
<script>
$.noConflict();
</script>
sample js file:
(function($){
// since we passed a reference to jQuery to this anonymous
// function and accepted it as a parameter named "$", we can
// safely use "$"
$("#target").uploadify();
})(jQuery);
If you need a document ready, you can do it this way:
jQuery(document).ready(function($) {
$("#target").uploadify();
});
I have a test jsp with:
<head>
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/dojo/1.5/dojo/dojo.xd.js" type="text/javascript">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
dojo.require("dojo.widget.Tree");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.TreeSelector");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.TreeNode");
dojo.require("dojo.widget.TreeContextMenu");
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div dojoType="TreeSelector" widgetId="treeSelector"></div>
<div dojoType="Tree" widgetId="treeWidget" selector="treeSelector"toggler="wipe">
<div dojoType="TreeNode" widgetId="1" title="First node" isFolder="false"></div>
<div dojoType="TreeNode" widgetId="2" title="Second node">
<div dojoType="TreeNode" widgetId="2.1" title="Second node First Child"></div>
<div dojoType="TreeNode" widgetId="2.2" title="Second node Second Child"></div>
</div>
<div dojoType="TreeNode" widgetId="3" title="Third node" isFolder="false"></div>
</div>
This will not work in any browser.
I thought this would be easy, it seems the dojo library is not being downloaded/found?
Do I need to do anything else?
Also, my IDE, JDeveloper, reports that the attribute "dojoType" is not defined on element div.
I have to say, this example looks like it is taken from a very old version of dojo, but you're trying to run it against Dojo 1.5. That most likely won't work. dojo.widget hasn't existed since...0.4, 0.9 maybe.
You may be right in your comment to the previous answer in that no parseOnLoad: true was necessary in the original example, but I'd also assure you that that example was not running any version of Dojo anywhere near what you're running it with.
Based on what you're looking at there, you may want to start somewhere like here: http://www.dojotoolkit.org/reference-guide/dijit/Tree.html
I'm not sure what the default behavior is when it's not present, but you probably need to define a djConfig with parseOnLoad set to true (or call the parser directly). See the following links for more information:
http://docs.dojocampus.org/djConfig
http://dojocampus.org/content/2008/03/08/the-dojo-parser/
Follow the:
Google AJAX Libraries API Dev Guide,
and the Google API Loader's Guide.
You need to:
register for an API key (or use a direct link as you did),
if not using a direct link but google.load, you need to defer the execution of your code using an onload callback.
Personally, I would just do something like:
within the <head> section of my.html:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/jsapi?key=MY_API_KEY_GOES_HERE"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="my.js"></script>
in my.js:
google.load("dojo", "1.5", {
uncompressed: true
});
function OnLoad() {
/* do stuff here */
}
google.setOnLoadCallback(OnLoad);