SQL - Delete selected row/s from database - sql

I'm quite new to SQL and I'm having issues with deleting a selected row/s from a table.
I've written a query that selects the desired rows from the table, but when I try to execute DELETE FROM table_name WHERE EXISTS it deletes all the rows in the database.
Here is my complete query:
DELETE FROM USR_PREF WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT *
FROM USR_PREF
WHERE USR_PREF.USR_ID = 1
AND ((USR_PREF.SRV NOT IN (SELECT SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW.ENTITYT_ID
FROM SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW
WHERE SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW.USR_ID = 1
AND SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW.ENTITYTYP_CODE = 2
AND USR_PREF.DEVICE IS NULL)
OR (USR_PREF.DEVICE NOT IN (SELECT SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW.ENTITYT_ID
FROM SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW
WHERE SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW.USR_ID = 1
AND SEC_ENTITY_FOR_USR_ACTION_VIEW.ENTITYTYP_CODE = 3)))))
The select query returns the desired rows, but the DELETE command just deletes that entire table.
Please assist.

Your where clause WHERE EXISTS (SOME QUERY) is the problem here. You are basically saying "Delete everything if this subquery returns even one result".
You need to be more explicit. Perhaps something like:
DELETE FROM USR_PREF
WHERE USR_FIELD IN (
SELECT USR_FIELD
FROM USR_PREF
WHERE USR_PREF_T.USER_ID=1
AND ((USR_PREF.SRV NOT IN ...
and so on... With this, only records that match records returned in your subquery will be deleted.

Related

IF Conditional to Run Schedule Query

I'm using BigQuery. I have a query-scheduler to generate a table (RESULT TABLE) that depends on another table (SOURCE TABLE). The case is, this source table doesn't always have data, there's a possibility that this source table is empty.
I want to Schedule the Query to make the RESULT TABLE only if there's data in SOURCE TABLE.
The example would be:
IF COUNT(1) FROM data.source_table > 0 THEN RUN:
SELECT *
FROM data.source_table
LEFT JOIN data.other_source_table
ELSE [Don't Run]
Thanks in Advance
The syntax is
IF condition THEN [sql_statement_list]
[ELSEIF condition THEN sql_statement_list]
[ELSEIF condition THEN sql_statement_list]...
[ELSE sql_statement_list]
END IF;
So for your case it's
IF COUNT(1) FROM data.source_table > 0
THEN
SELECT *
FROM data.source_table
LEFT JOIN data.other_source_table;
END IF;
For more details, you can read https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/scripting#if
At the moment you can't set a destination table when using BigQuery Scripting. It means that solutions based on IF statement will not work for your case.
Besides that, it seems that when you set a destination table, BigQuery creates the table before your query's execution, which means that independently of the results, the table will be created.
The query below is only SQL. In other words, it doesn't contains scripting. If you use it to create a scheduled query and set a destination table, you will see that even when the sub query is not run an empty table will be created.
SELECT
*
FROM
UNNEST(
(SELECT
(
CASE (SELECT COUNT(1) FROM data.source_table) > 0
WHEN TRUE
THEN (
SELECT ARRAY(
SELECT AS STRUCT *
FROM data.source_table
LEFT JOIN data.other_source_table)
)
END
)
)
)
As a workaround, you could keep your existing scheduled query and create another scheduled query just like below to run some minutes after the first one:
IF (SELECT count(1) FROM `dataset.destination_table`) = 0
THEN DROP TABLE `dataset.destination_table`;
END IF
To summarize, your solution would be:
Run a scheduled query that will create a destination table,
A few minutes later, run a scheduled query that will check if the created table is empty. If so, the table will be deleted.
I hope it helps

SQL Update only updates one row

This code is only updating one row, why? It has to do with one of the sub-queries but I am not sure. I'm thinking the WHERE..IN in the UPDATE statement but I am not sure.
UPDATE [sde].[sy1].[Valve_evw]
SET [sde].[sy1].[Valve_evw].[MA]
= (SELECT [sde].[sy1].[Valve_Join_evw].[MC]
FROM [sde].[sy1].[Valve_Join_evw])
WHERE [sde].[sy1].[Valve_evw].[PrimaryKey]
IN (SELECT [sde].[sy1].[Valve_Join_evw].[PrimaryKey]
FROM [sde].[sy1].[Valve_Join_evw]
WHERE [sde].[sy1].[Valve_Join_evw].[MA]
!= [sde].[sy1].[Valve_Join_evw].[MC])
Context:
What I am trying to do is update the MA column in Valve_evw using the MC column in Valve_Join_evw. The PrimaryKey in Valve_evw references equivalent rows as the PrimaryKey in Valve_Join_evw. As in, a single row in Valve_Join_evw will have the same PrimaryKey as a single row in Valve_evw, thus that equivalency can be used to update the records in Valve_evw. Also the MA column is equivalent in both tables. [Note: The Valve_Join_evw table is created with ESRI mapping software using the spatial relationship between the Valve_evw and a separate table, this is how the duplicate rows exist]
I am using database views (hence the '_evw') in SQL Server with a default INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger. This combination, views and trigger, prevents the use of table joins to do this update. I have also tried MERGE but that will not work either. Therefore I am stuck with the ANSI standard, hence the sub-queries. This script runs with no errors but it only updates a single row whereas there are about 9000 thousand rows in the tables.
The output message:
(1 row(s) affected)
(0 row(s) affected)
First of all let's reduce the eye hurting SQL to what it really is:
update sde.sy1.valve_evw
set ma = (select mc from sde.sy1.valve_join_evw)
where primarykey in (select primarykey from sde.sy1.valve_join_evw where ma <> mc)
WHERE clause
We look for all primarykey in valve_join_evw where a record's ma <> mc. We update all valve_evw records with such primarykey.
SET clause
For a record we want to update, we set ma to the value found with:
select mc from sde.sy1.valve_join_evw
But this query has no where clause, so what value does it select to fill the record's ma field? It selects all mc from valve_join_evw, so the DBMS probably picks one of these values arbitrarily. (It would be better, it raised an error.)
Conclusion
It is very easy to see which records the statement will update.
Which primarykey:
select primarykey from sde.sy1.valve_join_evw where ma <> mc
Which rows:
select *
from sde.sy1.valve_evw
where primarykey in (select primarykey from sde.sy1.valve_join_evw where ma <> mc)
As to the SET clause: Add a WHERE clause to your subquery that relates the record to select to the record to update (same ma? same primarykey?) E.g.:
set ma =
(
select mc
from sde.sy1.valve_join_evw vj
where vj.primarykey = valve_evw.primarykey
and vj.ma = valve_evw.ma
)
Hi there i recomend first to do the select statement and when you are ok with te records retrieved use the same where for the update statement
Here is what the final script looks like.
UPDATE [Valve_evw]
SET [Valve_evw].[MA] =
(
SELECT [Valve_Join_evw].[MC]
FROM [Valve_Join_evw]
WHERE[Valve_Join_evw].[PrimaryKey] = [Valve_evw].[PrimaryKey]
)
WHERE [Valve_evw].[PrimaryKey]
IN (
SELECT [Valve_Join_evw].[PrimaryKey]
FROM [Valve_Join_evw]
WHERE [Valve_Join_evw].[MA]
!= [Valve_Join_evw].[MC]
);

SQL SELECT statement within an IF statement

I have a trigger in SQL Server that needs to check on an update the number of rows with a value between a certain amount and do something accordingly. My current code is something like this:
IF EXISTS(SELECT COUNT(id) as NumberOfRows
FROM database
WHERE id = 3 AND value <= 20 and value > 2
GROUP BY id
HAVING COUNT(id) > 18)
-- if true, do something
From what I can tell, the select statement should find the number of rows with a value between 2 and 20 and if there are more than 18 rows, the EXISTS function should return 1 and the query will execute the code within the IF statement.
However, what is happening is that it is always executing the code within the IF statement regardless of the number of rows with a value between 2 and 20.
Any ideas on why this might be? I can post more complete code if it might help.
The reason is that the Exists function is checking the result of the sub-query for existing - are there any rows or not. And, as you return the COUNT, it'll never be not-existing - COUNT returns 0 if there are no rows presented in database.
Try to store the resulting count in a local variable, like in this question:
Using IF ELSE statement based on Count to execute different Insert statements
DECLARE #retVal int
SELECT #retVal = COUNT(*)
FROM TABLE
WHERE COLUMN = 'Some Value'
IF (#retVal > 0)
BEGIN
--INSERT SOMETHING
END
ELSE
BEGIN
--INSERT SOMETHING ELSE
END
I would do it like so (single line):
IF ((SELECT COUNT(id) FROM table WHERE ....)>18) BEGIN
...do something
You can even do between in a single line
IF ((SELECT COUNT(id) FROM table WHERE ....)between 2 and 20) BEGIN
...do something
END
Your subquery is looking for matches in the entire table. It does not limit the results only to those that are related to the rows affected by the update. Therefore, if the table already has rows matching your condition, the condition will be true on any update that affects other rows.
In order to count only the relevant rows, you should either join the database table to the inserted pseudo-table or use just the inserted table (there is not enough information in your question to be sure which is better).

sql server to delete a record and add sum of value on trigger

I have two tables in my database, bill_datail and bill_log. I want to delete one record from table bill_log and after that trigger an action to do something in table bill_detail. My code for delete is the following:
DELETE FROM [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log]
WHERE [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log].[CU_BILL_ID] in
(SELECT
FROM [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log],[mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Detail]
where [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log].bill_id=37
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log].bill_id=[mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Detail].cu_bill_id
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Detail].Pay_date>20130206
and [CL_Com_Rec_Description] like '%اoffpage%'
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log].amount<0
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log].[Com_Act_Date]='2013/02/07')
go
CREATE TRIGGER [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log]
ON [mydatabase].[dbo].[Bill_Log]]
AFTER Delete
AS
---
BEGIN
-- get 'amount' from deleted record and sum it to field 'amount' of bill detail
END
But in delete action I get the following error:
'Only one expression can be specified in the select list when the subquery is not introduced with EXISTS.
And I don't know how to fix the error and do the second part.
You only need to get a list of CU_BILL_ID to search. So remove all other fields from inner query and just select CU_BILL_ID.
DELETE FROM [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Log]
WHERE [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Log].[CU_BILL_ID] in
(SELECT cu_bill_id
FROM [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Detail]
where Pay_date>13930206)
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Log].cu_bill_id=37
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Log].cu_bill_id=
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Detail].
and [CL_Com_Rec_Description] like '%اoffpage%'
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Log].amount<0
and [mydatabase].[dbo].[CU_Bill_Log].[CL_Com_Act_Date]='2013/02/07'
go
Try this please.
if you want use of "in" keyword in your main query ,
the subquery must return just one column as result
Select ID,F_Name,L_Name
From Clients
Where ID in(
Select ClientID
From Orders
Where OrderNo > 120
)

Check whether a table contains rows or not sql server 2005

How to Check whether a table contains rows or not sql server 2005?
For what purpose?
Quickest for an IF would be IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM Table)...
For a result set, SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM Table returns either zero or one rows
For exactly one row with a count (0 or non-zero), SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table
Also, you can use exists
select case when exists (select 1 from table)
then 'contains rows'
else 'doesnt contain rows'
end
or to check if there are child rows for a particular record :
select * from Table t1
where exists(
select 1 from ChildTable t2
where t1.id = t2.parentid)
or in a procedure
if exists(select 1 from table)
begin
-- do stuff
end
Like Other said you can use something like that:
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Table)
BEGIN
--Do Something
END
ELSE
BEGIN
--Do Another Thing
END
FOR the best performance, use specific column name instead of * - for example:
SELECT TOP 1 <columnName>
FROM <tableName>
This is optimal because, instead of returning the whole list of columns, it is returning just one. That can save some time.
Also, returning just first row if there are any values, makes it even faster. Actually you got just one value as the result - if there are any rows, or no value if there is no rows.
If you use the table in distributed manner, which is most probably the case, than transporting just one value from the server to the client is much faster.
You also should choose wisely among all the columns to get data from a column which can take as less resource as possible.
Can't you just count the rows using select count(*) from table (or an indexed column instead of * if speed is important)?
If not then maybe this article can point you in the right direction.
Fast:
SELECT TOP (1) CASE
WHEN **NOT_NULL_COLUMN** IS NULL
THEN 'empty table'
ELSE 'not empty table'
END AS info
FROM **TABLE_NAME**