I have a apache server with 32 GB of RAM. When I start the server and execute top to see the resources It show me that the CPU is at 95 percent. It doesn't a normal behaviour and after a few minutes it raises:
apache cannot allocate memory fork unable to fork new process
I don't know how to solve the problem. Any tips?
I had same problem to fix it there is 2 options:
1- move from micro instances to small and this was the change that solved the problem (micro instances on amazon tend to have large cpu steal time)
2- tune the mysql database server configuration and my apache configuration to use a lot less memory.
tuning guide for a low memory situation such as this one: http://www.narga.net/optimizing-apachephpmysql-low-memory-server/ (But don't use the suggestion of MyISAM tables - horrible...)
this 2 options will make the problem much much less happening .. I am still looking for better solution to close the process that are done and kill the ones that hang in there .
Related
Need some help in diagnosing and tuning the performance of my Redis set up (2 redis-server instances on an Ubuntu 14.04 machine). Note that a write-heavy Django web application shares the VM with Redis. The machine has 8 cores and 25GB RAM.
I recently discovered that background saving was intermittently failing (with a fork() error) even when RAM wasn't exhausted. To remedy this, I applied the setting vm.overcommit_memory=1 (was previously default).
Moreover vm.swappiness=2, vm.overcommit_ratio=50. I have disabled transparent huge pages in my set up as well via echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled (although haven't done echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag).
Right after changing the overcommit_memory setting, I noticed that I/O utilization went from 13% to 36% (on average). I/O operations per second doubled, the redis-server CPU consumption has more than doubled, and the memory it's consuming has gone up 66%. Consequently, the server response time has substantially gone up . This is how abruptly things escalated after applying vm.overcommit_memory=1:
Note that redis-server is the only ingredient showing escalation - gunicorn, nginx ,celery etc. are performing like before. Moreover, redis has become very spikey.
Lastly, New Relic has started showing me 3 redis instances instead of 2 (bottom most graph). I think the forked child is counted as the 3rd:
My question is: how can I diagnose and salvage performance here? Being new to server administration, I'm unsure how to proceed. Help me find out what's going on here and how I can fix it.
free -m has the following output (in case needed):
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 28136 27912 224 576 68 6778
-/+ buffers/cache: 21064 7071
Swap: 0 0 0
As you don't have swap enabled in your system ( which might be worth reconsidering if you have SSDs), ( and your swappiness was set to a low value), you can't blame it on increased swapping due to memory contention.
Your caching about 6GB of data inside the VFS cache. In case of contention this cache would have depleted in favor of process working memory, so I believe it's safe to say memory is not an issue all together.
It's a shot in the dark, but my guess is that your redis-server is configured to "sync"/"save" too often ( search for in the redis config file "appendfsync"), and that by removing the memory allocation limitation, it now actually does it's job :)
If the data is not super crucial, set appendfsync to never and perhaps tweek the save settings to cause less frequent saving.
BTW, regarding the redis & forked child, I believe you are correct.
I have a Rails 3.2 application running on production server. The server has 8 GB of RAM and every other process works fine. But, there is a ruby process which keeps the memory utilization on the higher side. I have to manually login to the server console and type the TOP command and kill the process using the PID.
But, I am unable to figure out how to check which ruby process is taking so much of memory and also how to control it permanently.
Please suggest me a solution.
Thanks.
Could be so many things. Finding memory leaks is tough. What kind of application server are you using? If you're using Unicorn consider checking out Puma. It's actually really easy to switch over. We saw big gains in our app when we switched to Puma.
Also look through your app for n+1 queries. Optimizing some queries here and there would help tremendously.
Another thing you could consider trying is moving some longer running tasks to a background job with something like sidekiq.
Lots of performance monitoring services out there, like New Relic, that you could check out as well. Without more info it's a tough question to answer.
Virtual Machine:
4CPU
10GB RAM
10GB swap
Java 1.7
-Xms=-Xmx=6144m
Tomcat 7
We observed a very strange behaviour with the JVM. The JVm resident memory began to shrink and the swap usage shot up to over 50%.
Please see below stats from monitoring tools.
http://i44.tinypic.com/206n6sp.jpg
http://i44.tinypic.com/m99hl0.jpg
Any pointers to understand this is grateful.
Thanks!
Or maybe your Java program was idle and it didn't need that memory, and you have high swappiness? In such situation your OS would free RAM just in case and leave only used part.
In my opinion, that is actually good behaviour, why should you waste RAM for process that won't use it?
Unless you run only this one process on VM, then it would be quite good idea to set swappiness to 0 or other small number - this memory was given to this single process, so we may disable swapping it.
Thanks for the response. Yes this is more close to a system troubleshooting than Java but I thought this the right forum to initiate this topic incase anybody has seen such a phenomena with JVM.
Anyways, I had already checked the top and no there was no other process than Java which was hungry for memory. Actually the second top process was utilizing 72MB (RSS).
No the swappiness is not aggressive set on this system but at default 60. One additional information I missed to share is we have 4 app servers in cluster and all showed this behaviour exactly at the same time. AFAIK, JVM does not swap out but the OS would. But all of it is what confusing me.
All these app servers are production and busy serving request so not idle. The used Heap size was at Avg 5 GB used of the the 6GB.
The other interesting thing I found out were some failed messages in the Vmware logs at the same time which is what I'm investigating.
I have installed MongoDB 2.4.4 on Amazon EC2 with ubuntu 64 bit OS and 1.6 GB RAM.
On this server, only MongoDB running nothing else.
But sometime CPU usage reach to 99% and load average: 500.01, 400.73,
620.77
I have also installed MMS on server to monitor what's going on server.
Here is MMS detail
As per MMS details, indexing working perfectly for each queries.
Suspect details as below
1) HIGH non-mapped virtual memory
2) HIGH page faults
Can anyone help me to understand what exactly causing high CPU usage ?
EDIT:
After comments of #Dylan Tong, i have reduced active connetions but
still there is high non-mapped virtual memory
Here's a summary of a few things to look into:
1. Observed a large number of connections and cursors (13k):
- fix: make sure your connection pool is appropriate. For reporting, and your current request rate, you only need a few connections at most. Also, I'm guessing you have a m1small instance, which means you only have 1 core.
2. Review queries and indexes:
- run your queries with explain(), to observe how the queries are executed. The right model normally results in queries only pulling very few documents and utilization of an index.
3. Memory (compact and readahead setting):
- make the best use of memory. 1.6GB is low. Check how much free memory you have, and compare it to what is reported as resident. A couple of common causes of low resident memory is due to fragmentation. If there are alot of documents moving, changing size and such, you should run the compact command to defragment your data files. Also, a bad readahead can lead to poor use of memory as well. Check your readahead setting (http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/man2/readahead.2.html). Try a few values starting with low values (http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/administration/production-notes/). The production notes recommend 32 (for standard 512byte blocks). Sometimes higher values are optimal if your documents are larger. The hope is that resident memory should be close to your available memory and your page faults should start to lower.
If you're using resources to the fullest after this, and you're still capped out on CPU then it means you need to up your resources.
I have a Redis server running version 2.4.5 and with a dump.rdb of 11GB loaded into memory.
It is running on EC2 on a high memory 4x extra large instance (70GB total memory).
However, turns out Redis is already taking up 50GB of memory and is just growing more and more. My dataset is still gonna grow larger, probably to around 20GB, so clearly 70GB memory wont be enough. Do you guys have any ideas on how to overcome this limitation or how to make Redis eat less memory?
I've tried redis 32bit but it dies trying to load the data set into memory at startup.
Have also tried max-memory in the past but got weird results. Haven't tried virtual memory since I read it is/was gonna be deprecated.
Unlike the discussion in the comments, I think this problem can be solved with programming, not server configuration
Systems like redis work well sharded. Once you have your scheme set up, you can get it to scale pretty easily. It does take some work to get it set up though in the client code.
For example...
You could shard it across 4x instances using a modulo/hash scheme.
Basically, if md5sum(key) % 4 == 0, it goes to server 0; if md5sum(key) % 4 == 1, it goes to server 1, etc.
You'll have to add some logic into your client to make sure it accesses the right one. When you get a record, figure out which server it is suppose to be at, then query that one. If you have to set a record, figure out which server it is suppose to be at, then set it in that one.
The nice thing about this is that it doesn't affect your performance.