How do we use the 'variables' keyword in gitlab-ci.yml? - variables

I am trying to make use of the variables: keyword documented in the Gitlab CI Documentation here:
FROM: https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/ci/yaml/README.html
variables
This feature requires gitlab-runner with version equal or greater than
0.5.0.
GitLab CI allows you to add to .gitlab-ci.yml variables that are set
in build environment. The variables are stored in repository and are
meant to store non-sensitive project configuration, ie. RAILS_ENV or
DATABASE_URL.
variables:
DATABASE_URL: "postgres://postgres#postgres/my_database"
These variables can be later used in all executed commands and
scripts.
The YAML-defined variables are also set to all created service
containers, thus allowing to fine tune them.
When I attempt to use it, my builds do not run any stages and are marked successful anyway, a good sign of bad YAML. I pasted my gitlab-ci.yml contents into the LINT tool in the settings area and the output error is:
Status: syntax is incorrect
Error: variables job: unknown parameter PACKAGE_NAME
I'm using my YAML syntax the same as the docs, however it will not work. I'm unable to find any open bugs related to this. Below are my current versions and a sanitized version of my gitlab-ci.yml.
Gitlab Version: 7.13.2 Omnibus
Gitlab Runner Version: 0.5.2
gitlab-ci.yml (Sanitized)
types:
- test
- build
variables:
PACKAGE_NAME: "awesome-django-app"
PACKAGE_SUMMARY: "Awesome webapp backend."
MAJOR_RELEASE: "1"
MINOR_RELEASE: "0"
PATCH_LEVEL: "0dev"
DEV_DB_URL: "db"
DEV_SERVER: "pydev.example.com"
PROD_SERVER: "pyprod.example.com"
TEST_SERVER: "pytest.example.com"
envtest:
type: test
script:
- ". ./testbuild.sh"
tags:
- python2.7
- postgres
- linux
except:
- tags
buildrpm:
type: build
script:
- mkdir -p ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES
- mkdir -p ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
- mkdir -p ~/tarbuild/$PACKAGE_NAME-$MAJOR_RELEASE.$MINOR_RELEASE.$PATCH_LEVEL
- cp $PACKAGE_NAME.spec ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/.
- cp -r * ~/tarbuild/$PACKAGE_NAME-$MAJOR_RELEASE.$MINOR_RELEASE.$PATCH_LEVEL/.
- cd ~/tarbuild
- tar -zcf ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/$PACKAGE_NAME-$MAJOR_RELEASE.$MINOR_RELEASE.$PATCH_LEVEL.tar.gz *
- cd ~
- rm -Rf ~/tarbuild
- rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/$PACKAGE_NAME.spec
- echo $CI_BUILD_ID
- 'rpmbuild -ba ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/$PACKAGE_NAME.spec \
--define="_build_number $CI_BUILD_ID" \
--define="_python_version_min 2.7" \
--define="_version $MAJOR_RELEASE.$MINOR_RELEASE.$PATCH_LEVEL" \
--define="_package_name $PACKAGE_NAME" \
--define="_summary $SUMMARY"'
- scp rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/$PACKAGE_NAME-$MAJOR_RELEASE.$MINOR_RELEASE.$PATCH_LEVEL-$CI_BUILD_ID.noarch.rpm $DEV_SERVER:~/.
tags:
- python2.7
- postgres
- linux
- rpm
except:
- tags
Question:
How do I use this value properly?
Additional Info:
Removing this section from the YAML file causes everything to work so the rest of the file is in working order. (Of course undefined variables lead to script errors...)
Even just reducing the variables for testing down to just PACKAGE_NAME causes the same break.

The original answer is no longer correct.
The original documentation now stands, Now there are more ways as well. Variables can be created from the GUI, API, or by being defined in the .gitlab-ci.yml as well.
https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/ci/variables/README.html

While it is in the documentation, I do not believe that variables were included in the latest version of gitlab (7.13). The functionality to read variables out of the yaml files was brought in by a commit by ayufan 9 days ago.
Looking at the parser on the 7.13 stable branch, you can see that his contribution did not make it in. So assuming you're on 7.13 or earlier, I'm afraid we are out of luck. Since it is on master, I am fairly certain that we'll see it in the next release. Until then, we could either monkey patch, do a git pull if you're using the source directly, or just rely on the project variables until the next release.

Related

transferring strings across gitlab ci tasks stages using variables

I am wanting to store the output from a script in a variable for use in subsequent commands from within Gitlab CI.
Here is the script:
image: ...
build c-ares:
variables:
CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR: "-"
script:
- CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR=$(./build-c-ares.sh)
after_script:
- echo $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR
artifacts:
name: CARES_ARTIFACTS
paths:
- $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR
My intention is to:
first declare the variable CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR with global scope
Set the variable value using the output from the build-c-ares.sh script
Recover the output from the build-c-ares.sh script on a later command using the variable
My code does not behave as intended - on dereferencing the variable I find it contains the original value it was assigned at declaration:
$ CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR=$(./build-c-ares.sh)
Cloning into 'c-ares'...
Running after_script
00:01
Running after script...
$ echo $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR
-
Uploading artifacts for successful job
00:00
Uploading artifacts...
WARNING: -: no matching files. Ensure that the artifact path is relative to the working directory
ERROR: No files to upload
It is probably easier to just redirect the script output to a file and define that as an artifact.
Something similar to:
image: ...
build c-ares:
script:
- ./build-c-ares.sh > script_output
- cat script_output
artifacts:
paths:
- script_output
In regards to the specific issue, the variables used in the "artefacts" step will again use the variable initialisation defined for the job. Both the "artefacts" and the "script" steps for the job will start with the custom CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR variable set to the value "-":
build c-ares:
variables:
CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR: "-"
script:
# $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR=="-"
- CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR=$(./build-c-ares.sh)
# $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR=="hello from build-c-ares.sh"
- echo $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR # prints "hello from build-c-ares.sh"
after_script:
# $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR=="-"
- echo $CARES_ARTIFACTS_DIR # prints "-"
Fundamentally, Gitlab variables cannot feed information across job steps as intended in the original post. My subjective opinion is to keep steps independent where possible and restrict input to artefacts from upstream jobs or variables explicitly defined in the pipeline script or settings.

Append the package.json version number to my build artifact in aws-codebuild

I really dont know if this is a simple (must be), common or complex task.
I have a buildspec.yml file in my codebuild project, and i am trying to append the version written in package.json file to the output artifact.
I have already seen a lot of tutorials that teach how to append the date (not really useful to me), and others that tell me to execute a version.sh file with this
echo $(sed -nr 's/^\s*"version": "([0-9]{1,}.[0-9]{1,}.*)",$/\1/p' package.json)
and set it in a variable (it doesn't work).
i'm ending up with a build folder called: "my-project-$(version.sh)"
codebuild environment uses ubuntu and nodejs
Update (solved):
my version.sh file:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
echo $(sed -nr 's/^\s*\"version": "([0-9]{1,}\.[0-9]{1,}.*)",$/\1/p' package.json)
Then, i just found out 2 things:
Allow access to your version.sh file:
git update-index --add --chmod=+x version.sh
Declare a variable in any phase in buildspec, i dit in in build phase (just to make sure repository is already copied in environment)
TAGG=$($CODEBUILD_SRC_DIR/version.sh)
then reference it in artifact versioned name:
artifacts:
files:
- '**/*'
name: workover-frontend-$TAG
As result, my build artifact's name: myproject-1.0.0
In my case this script do not want to fetch data from package.json. On my local machine it working great but on AWS doesn't. I had to use chmod in different way, because i got message that i don't have right permissions. My buildspec:
version: 0.2
env:
variables:
latestTag: ""
phases:
pre_build:
commands:
- "echo sed version"
- sed --version
build:
commands:
- chmod +x version.sh
- latestTag=$($CODEBUILD_SRC_DIR/version.sh)
- "echo $latestTag"
artifacts:
files:
- '**/*'
discard-paths: yes
And results in console:
CodeBuild
I also have to mark that when i paste only for example echo 222 into version.sh file i got right answer in CodeBuild console.

cmake does not (always) order Fortran modules correctly

I have a code using Fortran modules. I can build it with no problems under normal circumstances. CMake takes care of the ordering of the module files.
However, using a gitlab runner, it SOMETIMES happens that cmake does NOT order the Fortran modules by dependencies, but alphabetically instead, which than leads to a build failure.
The problem seems to occur at random. I have a branch that built in the CI. After adding a commit, that modified a utility script not involved in any way in the build, I ran into this problem. There is no difference in the output of the cmake configure step.
I use the matrix configuration for the CI to test different configurations. I found, that I could trigger this by adding another mpi version (e.g. openmpi/4.1.6). Without that version, it built. With it added in the matrix, ALL configurations showed the problem.
stages:
- configure
- build
- test
.basic_config:
tags:
- hpc_runner
variables:
# load submodules
GIT_SUBMODULE_STRATEGY: recursive
.config_matrix:
extends: .basic_config
# define job matrix
parallel:
matrix:
- COMPILER: [gcc/9.4.0]
PARALLELIZATION: [serial, openmpi/3.1.6]
TYPE: [option1, option2]
BUILD_TYPE: [debug, release]
- COMPILER: [gcc/10.3.0, intel/19.0.5]
PARALLELIZATION: [serial]
TYPE: [option2]
BUILD_TYPE: [debug]
###############################################################################
# setup script
# These commands will run before each job.
before_script:
- set -e
- uname -a
- |
if [[ "$(uname)" = "Linux" ]]; then
export THREADS=$(nproc --all)
elif [[ "$(uname)" = "Darwin" ]]; then
export THREADS=$(sysctl -n hw.ncpu)
else
echo "Unknown platform. Setting THREADS to 1."
export THREADS=1
fi
# load environment
- source scripts/build/load_environment $COMPILER $BUILD_TYPE $TYPE $PARALLELIZATION
# set path for build folder
- build_path=build/$COMPILER/$PARALLELIZATION/$TYPE/$BUILD_TYPE
configure:
stage: configure
extends: .config_matrix
script:
- mkdir -p $build_path
- cd $build_path
- $CMAKE_COMMAND
artifacts:
paths:
- build
expire_in: 1 days
###############################################################################
# build script
build:
stage: build
extends: .config_matrix
script:
- cd $build_path
- make
artifacts:
paths:
- build
expire_in: 1 days
needs:
- configure
###############################################################################
# test
test:
stage: test
extends: .config_matrix
script:
- cd $build_path
- ctest --output-on-failure
needs:
- build
The runner runs on an HPC machine which a complex setup, and I am not to familiar with the exact configuration. I contacted the admin with this problem, but wanted to see if anybody else had run into this before and have solutions or hints on what is going on.
With the help from our admin I figured it out.
The problem comes from cmake using absolute paths. The runner has actually several runners for parallel jobs, with each using a different prefix path, e.g. /runner/001/ or /runner/012/. So when I run configure on a specific runner, cmake saves that prefix path to the configuration.
Now in the build stage, there is no guarantee to have the same configuration run on the same runner. However, since there are absolute paths in the make files, make tries to access the folders in the configure runner's prefix. Now, that can be anything from non-existing, over old files from previous pipelines to the correct files downloaded by another case.
The only fix I currently can see is to run everything on the same runner in one stage, to avoid the roulette of prefix paths. If anybody has a different idea, or if there is a way to fix a specific matrix case to a specific runner prefix, please comment.

Can't get simplest yml reference tag sample working

Following the gitlab reference for reference tags, this simplest example doesn't work.
.gitlab-ci.yml:
include:
- local: shared.yml
this-doesnt-work:
script:
- !reference [.test, script]
shared.yml:
.test:
script:
- echo from shared
But gitlab doesn't seem to replace the reference, it tries to execute the literal ".test":
Executing "step_script" stage of the job script
$ .test
/bin/bash: line 106: .test: command not found
Your code works perfectly fine. Which gitlab version are you using? The !reference feature was introduced with gitlab 13.9. Maybe you are running an older version?

Gitlab CI / CD with Terraform + Python

On my Gitlab CI / CD, I have a terraform code that requires Python installed to use an external module.
When running terraform plan via Gitlab pipelines, I get the following error:
module.notify_slack.module.lambda.data.aws_caller_identity.current[0]: Refreshing state...
Error: can't find external program "python3"
on .terraform/modules/notify_slack.lambda/terraform-aws-lambda-1.6.0/package.tf line 3, in data "external" "archive_prepare":
3: data "external" "archive_prepare" {
ERROR: Job failed: exit code 1
What image do I need to use that contains Terraform and Python? Will I need to create my own docker image?
I know this is a bit of an old post, but I'll share my solution in case anyone else stumbles upon this problem too.
Choose an existing python image and install terraform manually - this seems to me to be the easiest solution, if pragmatism is important to you.
This is the relevant section of my .gitlab-ci.yml file:
default:
image: python:latest
before_script:
- python -V # Display version for debugging purposes only
- apt-get update -y
- apt-get install unzip wget -y
- wget https://releases.hashicorp.com/terraform/${TERRAFORM_VERSION}/terraform_${TERRAFORM_VERSION}_linux_amd64.zip
- unzip terraform_${TERRAFORM_VERSION}_linux_amd64.zip
- mv terraform /usr/local/bin/
- terraform --version # Display version for debugging purposes only
The environment variable was set up in the GitLab CI/CD settings, otherwise just change it for the specific version of Terraform you want.
I was pleasantly surprised at the speed in which this installation takes place, as this clearly isn't an optimal way to do it - the best performing runner will probably use your own custom image with all of your required dependencies pre-installed - I'll leave you to decide whether its worth it for your own purposes. Nonetheless, this solution doesn't appear to be prohibitively slow.