I'm not a SQL expert, but if anybody can help me.
I use a recursive CTE to get the values as below.
Child1 --> Parent 1
Parent1 --> Parent 2
Parent2 --> NULL
If data population has gone wrong, then I'll have something like below, because of which CTE may go to infinite recursive loop and gives max recursive error. Since the data is huge, I cannot check this bad data manually. Please let me know if there is a way to find it out.
Child1 --> Parent 1
Parent1 --> Child1
or
Child1 --> Parent 1
Parent1 --> Parent2
Parent2 --> Child1
With Postgres it's quite easy to prevent this by collecting all visited nodes in an array.
Setup:
create table hierarchy (id integer, parent_id integer);
insert into hierarchy
values
(1, null), -- root element
(2, 1), -- first child
(3, 1), -- second child
(4, 3),
(5, 4),
(3, 5); -- endless loop
Recursive query:
with recursive tree as (
select id,
parent_id,
array[id] as all_parents
from hierarchy
where parent_id is null
union all
select c.id,
c.parent_id,
p.all_parents||c.id
from hierarchy c
join tree p
on c.parent_id = p.id
and c.id <> ALL (p.all_parents) -- this is the trick to exclude the endless loops
)
select *
from tree;
To do this for multiple trees at the same time, you need to carry over the ID of the root node to the children:
with recursive tree as (
select id,
parent_id,
array[id] as all_parents,
id as root_id
from hierarchy
where parent_id is null
union all
select c.id,
c.parent_id,
p.all_parents||c.id,
p.root_id
from hierarchy c
join tree p
on c.parent_id = p.id
and c.id <> ALL (p.all_parents) -- this is the trick to exclude the endless loops
and c.root_id = p.root_id
)
select *
from tree;
Update for Postgres 14
Postgres 14 introduced the (standard compliant) CYCLE option to detect cycles:
with recursive tree as (
select id,
parent_id
from hierarchy
where parent_id is null
union all
select c.id,
c.parent_id
from hierarchy c
join tree p
on c.parent_id = p.id
)
cycle id -- track cycles for this column
set is_cycle -- adds a boolean column is_cycle
using path -- adds a column that contains all parents for the id
select *
from tree
where not is_cycle
You haven't specified the dialect or your column names, so it is difficult to make the perfect example...
-- Some random data
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#MyTable') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #MyTable
CREATE TABLE #MyTable (ID INT PRIMARY KEY, ParentID INT NULL, Description VARCHAR(100))
INSERT INTO #MyTable (ID, ParentID, Description) VALUES
(1, NULL, 'Parent'), -- Try changing the second value (NULL) to 1 or 2 or 3
(2, 1, 'Child'), -- Try changing the second value (1) to 2
(3, 2, 'SubChild')
-- End random data
;WITH RecursiveCTE (StartingID, Level, Parents, Loop, ID, ParentID, Description) AS
(
SELECT ID, 1, '|' + CAST(ID AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|', 0, * FROM #MyTable
UNION ALL
SELECT R.StartingID, R.Level + 1,
R.Parents + CAST(MT.ID AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|',
CASE WHEN R.Parents LIKE '%|' + CAST(MT.ID AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|%' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END,
MT.*
FROM #MyTable MT
INNER JOIN RecursiveCTE R ON R.ParentID = MT.ID AND R.Loop = 0
)
SELECT StartingID, Level, Parents, MAX(Loop) OVER (PARTITION BY StartingID) Loop, ID, ParentID, Description
FROM RecursiveCTE
ORDER BY StartingID, Level
Something like this will show if/where there are loops in the recursive cte. Look at the column Loop. With the data as is, there is no loops. In the comments there are examples on how to change the values to cause a loop.
In the end the recursive cte creates a VARCHAR(MAX) of ids in the form |id1|id2|id3| (called Parents) and then checks if the current ID is already in that "list". If yes, it sets the Loop column to 1. This column is checked in the recursive join (the ABD R.Loop = 0).
The ending query uses a MAX() OVER (PARTITION BY ...) to set to 1 the Loop column for a whole "block" of chains.
A little more complex, that generates a "better" report:
-- Some random data
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#MyTable') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #MyTable
CREATE TABLE #MyTable (ID INT PRIMARY KEY, ParentID INT NULL, Description VARCHAR(100))
INSERT INTO #MyTable (ID, ParentID, Description) VALUES
(1, NULL, 'Parent'), -- Try changing the second value (NULL) to 1 or 2 or 3
(2, 1, 'Child'), -- Try changing the second value (1) to 2
(3, 3, 'SubChild')
-- End random data
-- The "terminal" childrens (that are elements that don't have childrens
-- connected to them)
;WITH WithoutChildren AS
(
SELECT MT1.* FROM #MyTable MT1
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM #MyTable MT2 WHERE MT1.ID != MT2.ID AND MT1.ID = MT2.ParentID)
)
, RecursiveCTE (StartingID, Level, Parents, Descriptions, Loop, ParentID) AS
(
SELECT ID, -- StartingID
1, -- Level
'|' + CAST(ID AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|',
'|' + CAST(Description AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|',
0, -- Loop
ParentID
FROM WithoutChildren
UNION ALL
SELECT R.StartingID, -- StartingID
R.Level + 1, -- Level
R.Parents + CAST(MT.ID AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|',
R.Descriptions + CAST(MT.Description AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|',
CASE WHEN R.Parents LIKE '%|' + CAST(MT.ID AS VARCHAR(MAX)) + '|%' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END,
MT.ParentID
FROM #MyTable MT
INNER JOIN RecursiveCTE R ON R.ParentID = MT.ID AND R.Loop = 0
)
SELECT * FROM RecursiveCTE
WHERE ParentID IS NULL OR Loop = 1
This query should return all the "last child" rows, with the full parent chain. The column Loop is 0 if there is no loop, 1 if there is a loop.
Here's an alternate method for detecting cycles in adjacency lists (parent/child relationships) where nodes can only have one parent which can be enforced with a unique constraint on the child column (id in the table below). This works by computing the closure table for the adjacency list via a recursive query. It starts by adding every node to the closure table as its own ancestor at level 0 then iteratively walks the adjacency list to expand the closure table. Cycles are detected when a new record's child and ancestor are the same at any level other than the original level zero (0):
-- For PostgreSQL and MySQL 8 use the Recursive key word in the CTE code:
-- with RECURSIVE cte(ancestor, child, lev, cycle) as (
with cte(ancestor, child, lev, cycle) as (
select id, id, 0, 0 from Table1
union all
select cte.ancestor
, Table1.id
, case when cte.ancestor = Table1.id then 0 else cte.lev + 1 end
, case when cte.ancestor = Table1.id then cte.lev + 1 else 0 end
from Table1
join cte
on cte.child = Table1.PARENT_ID
where cte.cycle = 0
) -- In oracle uncomment the next line
-- cycle child set isCycle to 'Y' default 'N'
select distinct
ancestor
, child
, lev
, max(cycle) over (partition by ancestor) cycle
from cte
Given the following adjacency list for Table1:
| parent_id | id |
|-----------|----|
| (null) | 1 |
| (null) | 2 |
| 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 4 |
| 1 | 5 |
| 2 | 6 |
| 6 | 7 |
| 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 |
| 10 | 11 |
| 11 | 9 |
The above query which works on SQL Sever (and Oracle, PostgreSQL and MySQL 8 when modified as directed) rightly detects that nodes 9, 10, and 11 participate in a cycle of length 3.
SQL(/DB) Fiddles demonstrating this in various DBs can be found below:
Oracle 11gR2
SQL Server 2017
PostgeSQL 9.5
MySQL 8
You can use the same approach described by Knuth for detecting a cycle in a linked list here. In one column, keep track of the children, the children's children, the children's children's children, etc. In another column, keep track of the grandchildren, the grandchildren's grandchildren, the grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren, etc.
For the initial selection, the distance between Child and Grandchild columns is 1. Every selection from union all increases the depth of Child by 1, and that of Grandchild by 2. The distance between them increases by 1.
If you have any loop, since the distance only increases by 1 each time, at some point after Child is in the loop, the distance will be a multiple of the cycle length. When that happens, the Child and the Grandchild columns are the same. Use that as an additional condition to stop the recursion, and detect it in the rest of your code as an error.
SQL Server sample:
declare #LinkTable table (Parent int, Child int);
insert into #LinkTable values (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 6), (3, 7), (7, 1);
with cte as (
select lt1.Parent, lt1.Child, lt2.Child as Grandchild
from #LinkTable lt1
inner join #LinkTable lt2 on lt2.Parent = lt1.Child
union all
select cte.Parent, lt1.Child, lt3.Child as Grandchild
from cte
inner join #LinkTable lt1 on lt1.Parent = cte.Child
inner join #LinkTable lt2 on lt2.Parent = cte.Grandchild
inner join #LinkTable lt3 on lt3.Parent = lt2.Child
where cte.Child <> cte.Grandchild
)
select Parent, Child
from cte
where Child = Grandchild;
Remove one of the LinkTable records that causes the cycle, and you will find that the select no longer returns any data.
Try to limit the recursive result
WITH EMP_CTE AS
(
SELECT
0 AS [LEVEL],
ManagerId, EmployeeId, Name
FROM Employees
WHERE ManagerId IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT
[LEVEL] + 1 AS [LEVEL],
ManagerId, EmployeeId, Name
FROM Employees e
INNER JOIN EMP_CTE c ON e.ManagerId = c.EmployeeId
AND s.LEVEL < 100 --RECURSION LIMIT
)
SELECT * FROM EMP_CTE WHERE [Level] = 100
Here is the solution for SQL Server:
Table Insert script:
CREATE TABLE MyTable
(
[ID] INT,
[ParentID] INT,
[Name] NVARCHAR(255)
);
INSERT INTO MyTable
(
[ID],
[ParentID],
[Name]
)
VALUES
(1, NULL, 'A root'),
(2, NULL, 'Another root'),
(3, 1, 'Child of 1'),
(4, 3, 'Grandchild of 1'),
(5, 4, 'Great grandchild of 1'),
(6, 1, 'Child of 1'),
(7, 8, 'Child of 8'),
(8, 7, 'Child of 7'), -- This will cause infinite recursion
(9, 1, 'Child of 1');
Script to find the exact records which are the culprit:
;WITH RecursiveCTE
AS (
-- Get all parents:
-- Any record in MyTable table could be an Parent
-- We don't know here yet which record can involve in an infinite recursion.
SELECT ParentID AS StartID,
ID,
CAST(Name AS NVARCHAR(255)) AS [ParentChildRelationPath]
FROM MyTable
UNION ALL
-- Recursively try finding all the childrens of above parents
-- Keep on finding it until this child become parent of above parent.
-- This will bring us back in the circle to parent record which is being
-- keep in the StartID column in recursion
SELECT RecursiveCTE.StartID,
t.ID,
CAST(RecursiveCTE.[ParentChildRelationPath] + ' -> ' + t.Name AS NVARCHAR(255)) AS [ParentChildRelationPath]
FROM RecursiveCTE
INNER JOIN MyTable AS t
ON t.ParentID = RecursiveCTE.ID
WHERE RecursiveCTE.StartID != RecursiveCTE.ID)
-- FInd the ones which causes the infinite recursion
SELECT StartID,
[ParentChildRelationPath],
RecursiveCTE.ID
FROM RecursiveCTE
WHERE StartID = ID
OPTION (MAXRECURSION 0);
Output of above query:
Related
Summary
In an Azure database (using SQL Server Management Studio 17, so T-SQL) I seek to concatenate multiple parent-child relationships of different lengths.
Base Table
My table is of this form:
ID parent
1 2
2 NULL
3 2
4 3
5 NULL
Feel free to use this code to generate and fill it:
DECLARE #t TABLE (
ID int,
parent int
)
INSERT #t VALUES
( 1, 2 ),
( 2, NULL ),
( 3, 2 ),
( 4, 3 ),
( 5, NULL )
Issue
How do I receive a table with the path concatenation as shown in the following table?
ID path parentcount
1 2->1 1
2 2 0
3 2->3 1
4 2->3->4 2
5 5 0
Detail
The real table has many more rows and the longest path should contain ~15 IDs. So it would be ideal to find a solution that is dynamic in the aspect of parent count definition.
Also: I do not necessarily need the column 'parentcount', so feel free to skip that in answers.
select ##version:
Microsoft SQL Azure (RTM) - 12.0.2000.8
You can use a recursive CTE for this:
with cte as (
select id, parent, convert(varchar(max), concat(id, '')) as path, 0 as parentcount
from #t t
union all
select cte.id, t.parent, convert(varchar(max), concat(t.id, '->', path)), parentcount + 1
from cte join
#t t
on cte.parent = t.id
)
select top (1) with ties *
from cte
order by row_number() over (partition by id order by parentcount desc);
Clearly Gordon nailed it with a recursive CTE, but here is another option using the HierarchyID data type.
Example
Declare #YourTable Table ([ID] int,[parent] int)
Insert Into #YourTable Values
(1,2)
,(2,NULL)
,(3,2)
,(4,3)
,(5,NULL)
;with cteP as (
Select ID
,Parent
,HierID = convert(hierarchyid,concat('/',ID,'/'))
From #YourTable
Where Parent is Null
Union All
Select ID = r.ID
,Parent = r.Parent
,HierID = convert(hierarchyid,concat(p.HierID.ToString(),r.ID,'/'))
From #YourTable r
Join cteP p on r.Parent = p.ID
)
Select ID
,Parent
,[Path] = HierID.GetDescendant ( null , null ).ToString()
,ParentCount = HierID.GetLevel() - 1
From cteP A
Order By A.HierID
Returns
I have a column name Parent and Child in table Example and Below is the Table Data
| Parent | Child |
|---------------------|------------------|
| 100 | 101 |
|---------------------|------------------|
| 101 | 102 |
|---------------------|------------------|
| 200 | 201 |
|---------------------|------------------|
| 103 | 102 |
|---------------------|------------------|
| 202 | 201 |
|---------------------|------------------|
If i give the input as 100 i should get the result as 100,101,102,103 Since 100->101->102->103 and also if i give the input as 102 then it should give the same above result. 102->101->100 and 102->103. I need to achieve this using stored Procedure only.
Below is the sample Code which i am trying
CREATE PROCEDURE GetAncestors(#thingID varchar(MAX))
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
WITH
CTE
AS
(
SELECT
Example.Parent, Example.Child
FROM Example
WHERE Parent = #thingID or Child = #thingID
UNION ALL
SELECT
Example.Parent, Example.Child
FROM
CTE
INNER JOIN Example ON Example.Parent = CTE.Child
)
SELECT
Parent AS Result
FROM CTE
UNION
SELECT
Child AS Result
FROM CTE
;
END
GO
The problem with your attempt is filtering at the start. If I'm right, your want to cluster your data (group them all together) by their relationships, either ascendant or descendant, or a mix of them. For example ID 100 has child 101, which has another child 102, but 102 has a parent 103 and you want the result to be these four (100, 101, 102, 103) for any input that is in that set. This is why you can't filter at the start, since you don't have any means of knowing which relationship will be chained throughout another relationship.
Solving this isn't as simple as it seems and you won't be able to solve it with just 1 recursion.
The following is a solution I made long time ago to group all these relationships together. Keep in mind that, for large datasets (over 100k), it might take a while to calculate, since it has to identify all groups first, and select the result at the end.
CREATE PROCEDURE GetAncestors(#thingID INT)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
-- Load your data
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TreeRelationship') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #TreeRelationship
CREATE TABLE #TreeRelationship (
RelationID INT IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED,
Parent INT,
Child INT,
GroupID INT)
INSERT INTO #TreeRelationship (
Parent,
Child)
SELECT
Parent = D.Parent,
Child = D.Child
FROM
Example AS D
UNION -- Data has to be loaded in both ways (direct and reverse) for algorithm to work correctly
SELECT
Parent = D.Child,
Child = D.Parent
FROM
Example AS D
-- Start algorithm
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#FirstWork') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #FirstWork
CREATE TABLE #FirstWork (
Parent INT,
Child INT,
ComponentID INT)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX CI_FirstWork ON #FirstWork (Parent, Child)
INSERT INTO #FirstWork (
Parent,
Child,
ComponentID)
SELECT DISTINCT
Parent = T.Parent,
Child = T.Child,
ComponentID = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY T.Parent, T.Child)
FROM
#TreeRelationship AS T
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#SecondWork') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE #SecondWork
CREATE TABLE #SecondWork (
Component1 INT,
Component2 INT)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX CI_SecondWork ON #SecondWork (Component1)
DECLARE #v_CurrentDepthLevel INT = 0
WHILE #v_CurrentDepthLevel < 100 -- Relationships depth level can be controlled with this value
BEGIN
SET #v_CurrentDepthLevel = #v_CurrentDepthLevel + 1
TRUNCATE TABLE #SecondWork
INSERT INTO #SecondWork (
Component1,
Component2)
SELECT DISTINCT
Component1 = t1.ComponentID,
Component2 = t2.ComponentID
FROM
#FirstWork t1
INNER JOIN #FirstWork t2 on
t1.child = t2.parent OR
t1.parent = t2.parent
WHERE
t1.ComponentID <> t2.ComponentID
IF (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #SecondWork) = 0
BREAK
UPDATE #FirstWork SET
ComponentID = CASE WHEN items.ComponentID < target THEN items.ComponentID ELSE target END
FROM
#FirstWork items
INNER JOIN (
SELECT
Source = Component1,
Target = MIN(Component2)
FROM
#SecondWork
GROUP BY
Component1
) new_components on new_components.source = ComponentID
UPDATE #FirstWork SET
ComponentID = target
FROM #FirstWork items
INNER JOIN(
SELECT
source = component1,
target = MIN(component2)
FROM
#SecondWork
GROUP BY
component1
) new_components ON new_components.source = ComponentID
END
;WITH Groupings AS
(
SELECT
parent,
child,
group_id = DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY ComponentID DESC)
FROM
#FirstWork
)
UPDATE FG SET
GroupID = IT.group_id
FROM
#TreeRelationship FG
INNER JOIN Groupings IT ON
IT.parent = FG.parent AND
IT.child = FG.child
-- Select the proper result
;WITH IdentifiedGroup AS
(
SELECT TOP 1
T.GroupID
FROM
#TreeRelationship AS T
WHERE
T.Parent = #thingID
)
SELECT DISTINCT
Result = T.Parent
FROM
#TreeRelationship AS T
INNER JOIN IdentifiedGroup AS I ON T.GroupID = I.GroupID
END
You will see that for #thingID of value 100, 101, 102 and 103 the result are these four, and for values 200, 201 and 202 the results are these three.
I'm pretty sure this isn't an optimal solution, but it gives the correct output and I never had the need to tune it up since it works fast for my requirements.
Here is a cut-down version of the query from a more generic question How to find all connected subgraphs of an undirected graph
The main idea is to treat (Parent,Child) pairs as edges in a graph and traverse all connected edges starting from a given node.
Since the graph is undirectional we build a list of pairs in both directions in CTE_Pairs at first.
CTE_Recursive follows the edges of a graph and stops when it detects a loop. It builds a path of visited nodes as a string in IDPath and stops the recursion if the new node is in the path (has been visited before).
Final CTE_CleanResult puts all found nodes in one simple list.
CREATE PROCEDURE GetAncestors(#thingID varchar(8000))
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
WITH
CTE_Pairs
AS
(
SELECT
CAST(Parent AS varchar(8000)) AS ID1
,CAST(Child AS varchar(8000)) AS ID2
FROM Example
WHERE Parent <> Child
UNION
SELECT
CAST(Child AS varchar(8000)) AS ID1
,CAST(Parent AS varchar(8000)) AS ID2
FROM Example
WHERE Parent <> Child
)
,CTE_Recursive
AS
(
SELECT
ID1 AS AnchorID
,ID1
,ID2
,CAST(',' + ID1 + ',' + ID2 + ',' AS varchar(8000)) AS IDPath
,1 AS Lvl
FROM
CTE_Pairs
WHERE ID1 = #thingID
UNION ALL
SELECT
CTE_Recursive.AnchorID
,CTE_Pairs.ID1
,CTE_Pairs.ID2
,CAST(CTE_Recursive.IDPath + CTE_Pairs.ID2 + ',' AS varchar(8000)) AS IDPath
,CTE_Recursive.Lvl + 1 AS Lvl
FROM
CTE_Pairs
INNER JOIN CTE_Recursive ON CTE_Recursive.ID2 = CTE_Pairs.ID1
WHERE
CTE_Recursive.IDPath NOT LIKE '%,' + CTE_Pairs.ID2 + ',%'
)
,CTE_RecursionResult
AS
(
SELECT AnchorID, ID1, ID2
FROM CTE_Recursive
)
,CTE_CleanResult
AS
(
SELECT AnchorID, ID1 AS ID
FROM CTE_RecursionResult
UNION
SELECT AnchorID, ID2 AS ID
FROM CTE_RecursionResult
)
SELECT ID
FROM CTE_CleanResult
ORDER BY ID
OPTION(MAXRECURSION 0);
END;
you can simply use graph processing introduced in SQL Server 2017.
here is an example
https://www.red-gate.com/simple-talk/sql/t-sql-programming/sql-graph-objects-sql-server-2017-good-bad/
I have a hierarchy described by an adjacency list. There is not necessarily a single root element, but I do have data to identify the leaf (terminal) items in the hiearchy. So, a hierachy that looked like this ...
1
- 2
- - 4
- - - 7
- 3
- - 5
- - 6
8
- 9
... would be described by a table, like this. NOTE: I don't have the ability to change this format.
id parentid isleaf
--- -------- ------
1 null 0
2 1 0
3 1 0
4 2 0
5 3 1
6 3 1
7 4 1
8 null 0
9 8 1
here is the sample table definition and data:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[HiearchyTest](
[id] [int] NOT NULL,
[parentid] [int] NULL,
[isleaf] [bit] NOT NULL
)
GO
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (1, NULL, 0)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (2, 1, 0)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (3, 1, 0)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (4, 2, 0)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (5, 3, 1)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (6, 3, 1)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (7, 4, 1)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (8, NULL, 0)
INSERT [dbo].[HiearchyTest] ([id], [parentid], [isleaf]) VALUES (9, 8, 1)
GO
From this, I need to provide any id and get a list of all ancestors including all descendents of each. So, if I provided the input of id = 6, I would expect the following:
id descendentid
-- ------------
1 1
1 3
1 6
3 3
3 6
6 6
id 6 just has itself
its parent, id 3 would have decendents of 3 and 6
its parent, id 1 would have decendents of 1, 3, and 6
I will be using this data to provide roll-up calculations at each level in the hierarchy. This works well, assuming I can get the dataset above.
I have accomplished this using two recusive ctes - one to get the "terminal" item for each node in the hiearchy. Then, a second one where I get the full ancestory of my selected node (so, 6 resolves to 6, 3, 1) to walk up and get the full set. I'm hoping that I'm missing something and that this can be accomplished in one round. Here is the example double-recursion code:
declare #test int = 6;
with cte as (
-- leaf nodes
select id, parentid, id as terminalid
from HiearchyTest
where isleaf = 1
union all
-- walk up - preserve "terminal" item for all levels
select h.id, h.parentid, c.terminalid
from HiearchyTest as h
inner join
cte as c on h.id = c.parentid
)
, cte2 as (
-- get all ancestors of our test value
select id, parentid, id as descendentid
from cte
where terminalid = #test
union all
-- and walkup from each to complete the set
select h.id, h.parentid, c.descendentid
from HiearchyTest h
inner join cte2 as c on h.id = c.parentid
)
-- final selection - order by is just for readability of this example
select id, descendentid
from cte2
order by id, descendentid
Additional detail: the "real" hierarchy will be much larger than the example. It can technically have infinite depth, but realistically it would rarely go more than 10 levels deep.
In summary, my question is if I can accomplish this with a single recursive cte instead of having to recurse over the hierarchy twice.
Because your data is a tree structure, we can use the hierarchyid data type to meet your needs (despite your saying that you can't in the comments). First, the easy part - generating the hierarchyid with a recursive cte
with cte as (
select id, parentid,
cast(concat('/', id, '/') as varchar(max)) as [path]
from [dbo].[HiearchyTest]
where ParentID is null
union all
select child.id, child.parentid,
cast(concat(parent.[path], child.id, '/') as varchar(max))
from [dbo].[HiearchyTest] as child
join cte as parent
on child.parentid = parent.id
)
select id, parentid, cast([path] as hierarchyid) as [path]
into h
from cte;
Next, a little table-valued function I wrote:
create function dbo.GetAllAncestors(#h hierarchyid, #ReturnSelf bit)
returns table
as return
select #h.GetAncestor(n.n) as h
from dbo.Numbers as n
where n.n <= #h.GetLevel()
or (#ReturnSelf = 1 and n.n = 0)
union all
select #h
where #ReturnSelf = 1;
Armed with that, getting your desired result set isn't too bad:
declare #h hierarchyid;
set #h = (
select path
from h
where id = 6
);
with cte as (
select *
from h
where [path].IsDescendantOf(#h) = 1
or #h.IsDescendantOf([path]) = 1
)
select h.id as parent, c.id as descendentid
from cte as c
cross apply dbo.GetAllAncestors([path], 1) as a
join h
on a.h = h.[path]
order by h.id, c.id;
Of course, you're missing out on a lot of the benefit of using a hierarchyid by not persisting it (you'll either have to keep it up to date in the side table or generate it every time). But there you go.
Okay this has been bothering me since I have read the question and I just came back to think of it again..... Anyway, why do you need to recurse back down to get all of the descendants? You have asked for ancestors not descendants and your result set is not trying to get other siblings, grand children, etc.. It is getting a parent and a grand parent in this case. Your First cte gives you everything you need to know except when an ancestor id is also the parentid. So with a union all, a little magic to setup the originating ancestor, and you have everything you need without a second recursion.
declare #test int = 6;
with cte as (
-- leaf nodes
select id, parentid, id as terminalid
from HiearchyTest
where isleaf = 1
union all
-- walk up - preserve "terminal" item for all levels
select h.id, h.parentid, c.terminalid
from HiearchyTest as h
inner join
cte as c on h.id = c.parentid
)
, cteAncestors AS (
SELECT DISTINCT
id = IIF(parentid IS NULL, #Test, id)
,parentid = IIF(parentid IS NULL,id,parentid)
FROM
cte
WHERE
terminalid = #test
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT
id
,parentid = id
FROM
cte
WHERE
terminalid = #test
)
SELECT
id = parentid
,DecendentId = id
FROM
cteAncestors
ORDER BY
id
,DecendentId
Your result set from your first cte gives you your 2 ancestors and self related to their ancestor except in the case of the originating ancestors who's parentid is null. That null is a special case I will deal with in a minute.
Remember at this point your query is producing Ancestors not descendants, but what it doesn't give you is self references meaning grandparent = grandparent, parent = parent, self = self. But all you have to do to get that is to add rows for every id and make the parentid equal to their id. hence the union. Now your result set is almost totally shaped up:
The special case of the null parentid. So the null parentid identifies the originating ancestor meaning that ancestor has no other ancestor in your dataset. And here is how you will use that to your advantage. Because you started your initial recursion at the leaf level there is no direct tie to the id that you started with to the originating ancestor, but there is at every other level, simply hijack that null parent id and flip the values around and you now have an ancestor for your leaf.
Then in the end if you want it to be a descendants table switch the columns and you are finished. One last note DISTINCTs are there in case the id is repeated with an additional parentid. E.g. 6 | 3 and another record for 6 | 4
I'm not sure if this performs better, or even produces the proper results in all cases, but you could capture a node list, then use xml functionality to parse it out and cross apply to the id list:
declare #test int = 6;
;WITH cte AS (SELECT id, parentid, CAST(id AS VARCHAR(MAX)) as IDlist
FROM HiearchyTest
WHERE isleaf = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT h.id, h.parentid , CAST(CONCAT(c.IDlist,',',h.id) AS VARCHAR(MAX))
FROM HiearchyTest as h
JOIN cte as c
ON h.id = c.parentid
)
,cte2 AS (SELECT *, CAST ('<M>' + REPLACE(IDlist, ',', '</M><M>') + '</M>' AS XML) AS Data
FROM cte
WHERE IDlist LIKE '%'+CAST(#test AS VARCHAR(50))+'%'
)
SELECT id,Split.a.value('.', 'VARCHAR(100)') AS descendentid
FROM cte2 a
CROSS APPLY Data.nodes ('/M') AS Split(a);
I expected the following to return all the tuples, resolving each parent in the hierarchy up to the top, but it only returns the lowest levels (whose ID is specified in the query). How do I return the whole tree for a given level_id?
create table level(
level_id int,
level_name text,
parent_level int);
insert into level values (197,'child',177), ( 177, 'parent', 3 ), ( 2, 'grandparent', null );
WITH RECURSIVE recursetree(level_id, levelparent) AS (
SELECT level_id, parent_level
FROM level
where level_id = 197
UNION ALL
SELECT t.level_id, t.parent_level
FROM level t, recursetree rt
WHERE rt.level_id = t.parent_level
)
SELECT * FROM recursetree;
First of all, your (2, 'grandparent', null) should be (3, 'grandparent', null) if it really is a grandparent. Secondly, your (implicit) join condition in the recursive half of your query is backwards, you want to get the parent out of rt.levelparent rather than t.parent_level:
WITH RECURSIVE recursetree(level_id, levelparent) AS (
SELECT level_id, parent_level
FROM level
WHERE level_id = 197
UNION ALL
SELECT t.level_id, t.parent_level
FROM level t JOIN recursetree rt ON rt.levelparent = t.level_id
-- join condition fixed and ANSI-ified above
)
SELECT * FROM recursetree;
I have two tables:
entreprises(id, name)
entreprises_struct(id,entreprise_id, entreprise_child_id)
let's say i have these data:
entreprises:
(1,canada)
(2,ontario)
(3,quebec)
(4,ottawa)
(5,toronto)
(6,montreal)
(7,laval)
entreprises_struct
(1,1,1)
(1,1,2)
(1,1,3)
(1,2,4)
(1,2,5)
(1,3,6)
(1,3,7)
I want a query that will sort the data in this way :
montreal (child level 3)
laval (child level 3)
quebec (child level 2 and parent of those childs from level 3)
ottawa (child level 3)
toronto (child level 3)
ontario (child level 2 and parent of those childs from level 3)
canada (chil level 1 and parent of thoses childs from level 2)
If I had that from level 7 , the select must start listing thoses values till level one.
I cannot use CTE because the numbers on recursions is too much limited.
You can use option(maxrecursion 0) to get around the CTE recursion limit. As for the sorting part of the query, see the below
Sample data
create table entreprises(id int, name varchar(max));
create table entreprises_struct(id int, entreprise_id int, entreprise_child_id int);
insert entreprises values
(1,'canada'),
(2,'ontario'),
(3,'quebec'),
(4,'ottawa'),
(5,'toronto'),
(6,'montreal'),
(7,'laval');
insert entreprises_struct values
(1,1,1),
(1,1,2),
(1,1,3),
(1,2,4),
(1,2,5),
(1,3,6),
(1,3,7);
The query
;with cte as (
select entreprise_id, level=0,
path=convert(varchar(max),entreprise_id) + '/'
from entreprises_struct
where entreprise_id =entreprise_child_id -- root
union all
select s.entreprise_child_id, cte.level+1,
path=cte.path + convert(varchar(max),s.entreprise_child_id) + '/'
from entreprises_struct s
inner join cte on s.entreprise_id = cte.entreprise_id
where s.entreprise_child_id != cte.entreprise_id
)
select e.name
from cte
inner join entreprises e on e.id = cte.entreprise_id
order by path desc
option (maxrecursion 0)