I am working on enhancing the DSR implementation of NS2. I have added some extra fields to the DSR header (in class hdr_sr in hdr_sr.h). I need to fill these additional fields at the time of dsr header construction. I am unable to figure out exactly which function I need to modify. My understanding is that this happens in 'sendOutPacketWithRoute' in dsragent.cc.
Related
Within the dimension properties for an attribute within SSAS, there is an option called TokenizationBehavior which is defaulted to TokenizationNone. The alternative is TokenizationText.
I tried it out and it gives an error message as per below. There is little content on the internet about anybody trying this out or what it is actually for. Any ideas? I'm not sure if this Tokenization is for parsing text or a security mechanism? And why it doesn't work or how it's supposed to work in SSAS?
The ddl500:TokenizationBehavior element (namespacehttp://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2013/engine/500) cannot appear under Envelope/Body/Execute/Command/Batch/Alter/ObjectDefinition/Database/Dimensions/Dimension/Attributes/Attribute
I looked at the XML code which adds the below line if you put TokenizationText in the dimension attribute properties:
<ddl500:TokenizationBehavior valuens="ddl500_500">TokenizationText</ddl500:TokenizationBehavior>
I have some records in a CMS that include HTML fragments with custom tags for a widget tool. The maker of the CMS has apparently updated their CMS without providing proper data conversion. Their widgets use keys for layout based on screen width such as block_lg, block_md, block_sm. The problem kicks in with the fact they used to have a block_xs and they have now shifted them all -- dropping the block_xs and instead placing a block_xl on the other end.
We don't really use these things, but their widget configurations do. What this means for us is the values for each key are identical. The problem occurs when the updated CMS code is looking for the 'block_xl' in any widget definition tags, it can't find it and errors out.
What I'm thinking then is that the new code will appear to 'ignore' the block_xs due to how it reads the tags. (and similarly, the old code will ignore block_xl) Since the values for each are identical, I need to basically read any widget definition and add a block_xl value to it matching the value of [any one of] the other width parameters.
Since the best place order-wise would be 'before' the block_lg value, it's probably easiest to do it as follows:
Replace any thing matching posix style regex matching /block_lg(="\d+,\d+")/ with: block_xl="$1" block_lg="$1"
Or whatever the equivalent of that would be.
Example of an existing CMS block with multiple widget definitions:
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="The Album" classes="highlight-bottom modish greenfont font52 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="127" lazyload="0"
block_lg="127,12," block_md="127,12," block_sm="127,12," block_xs="127,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
<!-- Image Block -->
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="What’s Your Favorite Cover Style?"
classes="zoo-widget-style2 modish grey font26 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="126" lazyload="0"
block_lg="126,12," block_md="126,12," block_sm="126,12," block_xs="126,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
What I would prefer to end up with from the above (adding block_xl):
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="The Album" classes="highlight-bottom modish greenfont font52 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="127" lazyload="0"
block_xl="127,12," block_lg="127,12," block_md="127,12," block_sm="127,12," block_xs="127,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
<!-- Image Block -->
<div>{{widget type="CleverSoft\CleverBlock\Block\Widget"
widget_title="What’s Your Favorite Cover Style?"
classes="zoo-widget-style2 modish grey font26 fontlight"
enable_fullwidth="0" block_ids="126" lazyload="0"
block_xl="126,12," block_lg="126,12," block_md="126,12," block_sm="126,12," block_xs="126,12,"
template="widget/block.phtml" scroll="0" background_overlay_o="0"}}</div>
I know how to do it in php and if necessary, I will just replace it on my local DB and write an sql script to update the modified records, but the html blocks can be kind of big in some cases. It would be preferable, if it is possible, to make the substitutions right in the SQL but I'm not sure how to do it or if it's even possible to do.
And yes, there can be more than one instance of a widget in any given cms page or block. (i.e. there may be a need for more than one such substitutions with different local 'values' assigned to the block_lg)
If anyone can help me do it in SQL, it would be greatly appreciated.
for reference, the tables effected are called cms_page and cms_block, the name of the row in both cases is content
SW
I am trying to separate files in an Elm project, as keeping everything in global Model, Messages, etc. would be just a mess.
Here is how I tried it so far:
So, there are some global files, and then Header has its own files. However I keep getting error, when importing Header.View into my global View:
The 1st and 2nd entries in this list are different types of values.
Which kind of makes sense:
The 1st entry has this type:
Html Header.Messages.Msg
But the 2nd is:
Html Msg
So, my question is whether all the messages (from all my modules, like Header) needs to be combined somehow in global Messages.elm? Or there is a better way of doing this?
My advice would be to keep messages and update in 1 file until that feels uncomfortable (for you to decide how many lines of code that means - see Evan's Elm Europe talk for more on the modules flow). When you want to break something out, define a new message in Main
type Msg
= HeaderMsg Header.Msg
| ....
Then use Cmd.map HeaderMsg in your update function and Html.map HeaderMsg in your view function to connect up your sub-components
I have a little problem. I want to map every detail line to one OrderInfo. The destination schema can not have any duplicate OrderInfo. All the detail lines should be in the destination orderInfo, but the SuppliersOrderNo and BuyersOrderNo should not be twice.
Any ideas how to do this, is it possible to use XSL or inline script?
<inv:OrderInfo>
<inv:SuppliersOrderNo>123456</inv:SuppliersOrderNo>
<inv:BuyersOrderNo>6789</inv:BuyersOrderNo>
<inv:DetailLines>
<inv:DetailLine>
<inv:InvoiceDetailLineNo>1</inv:InvoiceDetailLineNo>
<inv:Item>
<inv:SuppliersArticleNo>article2</inv:SuppliersArticleNo>
<inv:SuppliersDescription>BestArticle</inv:SuppliersDescription>
</inv:Item>
</inv:DetailLine>
<inv:DetailLine>
<inv:InvoiceDetailLineNo>2</inv:InvoiceDetailLineNo>
<inv:Item>
<inv:SuppliersArticleNo>article3</inv:SuppliersArticleNo>
<inv:SuppliersDescription>AlmostBestArticle</inv:SuppliersDescription>
</inv:Item>
</inv:DetailLine>
</inv:DetailLines>
</inv:OrderInfo>
<inv:OrderInfo>
<inv:SuppliersOrderNo>123456</inv:SuppliersOrderNo>
<inv:BuyersOrderNo>6789</inv:BuyersOrderNo>
<inv:DetailLines>
<inv:DetailLine>
<inv:InvoiceDetailLineNo>1</inv:InvoiceDetailLineNo>
<inv:Item>
<inv:SuppliersArticleNo>article1337</inv:SuppliersArticleNo>
<inv:SuppliersDescription>WOW</inv:SuppliersDescription>
</inv:Item>
</inv:DetailLine>
</inv:DetailLines>
</inv:OrderInfo>
If you want to do this purely in XSLT, you'll have to use Muenchian gruoping. I wrote a blog that links to some other blogs on how to do this in BizTalk a little while back: https://blog.tallan.com/2014/12/09/muenchian-grouping-in-biztalk-while-keeping-mapper-functionality/
To summarize the blog: if you pursue this, you'll need a map that's completely custom XSLT somewhere, but you could put it into a custom pipeline component if you still want to be able to use "regular" maps functionality without any other caveats (in my blog I describe a method of doing that in a pipeline component so that a "regular" BizTalk map can still be used on the preprocessed output). There are lots of resources on Muenchian grouping out there (including on StackOverflow), so I'm not rehashing all of that in this answer.
You could also try to serialize the message in a C# component and use some LINQ methods to group/sort/order/etc, or if you're inserting the content into SQL at some point you could do it in SQL (which would be able to handle this kind of task more naturally).
I want to create issues with the youtrack rest api,
Currently I'm using:
PUT /rest/issue?{project}&{summary}&{description}&{attachments}&{permittedGroup}
but I want to set other fields (priority, type, subsystem...)
How do I get a list of available fields from the api? and the fields metadata(is mandatory, field type...)?
And after that, How do I set the value of these fields?
I found this in the docs:
https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/YTD6/Apply+Command+to+an+Issue
but it looks too complex for setting a field.
Issue can be created with following method and fields set only https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/YTD6/Create+New+Issue . So as you mentioned, it's
PUT /rest/issue?{project}&{summary}&{description}&{attachments}&{permittedGroup}
It's assumed, other fields can be updated within next call. ApplyCommand (https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/YTD6/Apply+Command+to+an+Issue)method is pretty good example of such a method.
If you need to know all available fields in the projects, here is the method https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/YTD6/GET+Project+Custom+Fields.
Meta can be called with the following https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/YTD6/GET+Project+Custom+Field. As you can see, details are available on per field basis.