I am facing a read access violation error on SAS when running proc sql.
the error is
The SAS task name is [SQL]
ERROR: Read Access Violation SQL
Exception occurred at (2868651F)
Task Traceback
What could be the problem.
The libname used is a usual libname and just accessing the data from a normal library.
libname xxx "location";
If you are using SAS in a working environment and you are not the administrator, then you may have a meta engine that you are not aware of. Among other things, it can be used to set the access rights for various user groups. You may be in conflict with administrator defined user group permissions. See http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/lrmeta/60739/HTML/default/viewer.htm#a003162997.htm
Related
I've been running into an issue in R Studio with a SQL connection.
We've had an on-prem SQL Server that's been upgraded over the years, and a colleague that set it up no longer is with the organization.
We also have an Azure Server that's loaded with a SQL Server as well that was much more recently set up before they departed.
We have a GUI program we're currently developing, and one of the early steps is a SQL Login connection for the user where the variable is declared (db_user) and changes with their login and passes the password correctly within system variables defined in .Renviron as posted on RStudio's site for references.
Our initial connection string looks like this, and this is the line of code that starts the connection and where I believe the issue may lie first:
db_conn_onprem <- DBI::dbConnect(odbc::odbc(),
Driver = "SQL Server",
Server = Sys.getenv("server"),
Database = Sys.getenv("database"),
UID = Sys.getenv("db_user"),
PWD = Sys.getenv("PWD")
Whenever the Azure connection succeeds, it connects as dbo#Azure\Azure vs On-Prem's guest#Server\Server.
(I can't post in-line screenshots yet)
On-Prem Connection Screenshot: https://i.ibb.co/PmbGt5y/RStudio-SQL.png
Azure Connection Screenshot: https://i.ibb.co/WFY3FqZ/azure1.png
I feel this is something dbo-related since that's where the connection drops.
(variable names anonymized)
Now for the issue:
Whenever we attempt to run a series of queries, our on-prem errors out with this:
Error: nanodbc/nanodbc.cpp:1655: 42000: [Microsoft][SQL Server][SQL Server]Cannot execute as the server principal because the principal "db_user" does not exist, this type of principal cannot be impersonated, or you do not have permission.
<SQL> 'EXECUTE AS LOGIN = 'db_user' SELECT name FROM master.sys.sysdatabases WHERE dbid > 4 AND HAS_DBACCESS(name) = 1 ORDER BY name ASC'
However, run the exact same procedure on the SQL Server in Azure with relatively no major configuration, and it succeeds.
Here's the SQL Code we run:
EXECUTE AS LOGIN = 'db_user' SELECT name
FROM master.sys.sysdatabases
WHERE dbid > 4
AND HAS_DBACCESS(name) = 1
ORDER BY name ASC
I feel like I've exhausted my resources for this, first I thought it was the initial R code or possibly SQL Drivers, however I don't believe that to be the issue since the SQL driver pulls a list of names in R Studio in the Connections context menu, but bounces back the error when attempting to complete the query.
Whenever I'm searching errors for references for this error, I see
Cannot execute as the server principal because the principal "dbo" does not exist, this type of principal cannot be impersonated, or you do not have permission.
Listed as the most commonly related error for the one I'm experiencing, however I've tried a number of those (From blank DB ownerships to unrelated solutions), but I've mostly hit a wall here.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
I feel this is something dbo-related since that's where the connection drops, but I have no clue where to continue going on this issue.
Yep.
This
EXECUTE AS LOGIN = 'db_user'
requires impersonate permission for the login. Which the error message is clearly telling you. It's unclear why you want to impersonate that login instead of simply connecting as the login to begin with.
I'm using the SQL Connector in Azure Logic Apps to connect to our Azure SQL Database to perform queries, update tables, and execute stored procedures. After several months of developing logic apps, I'm seeing the below error message when using the SQL Connector "Execute Stored Procedure (V2)". I'm only encountering this error with this specific connector. All the other connectors work just fine. Has anyone encountered this error before and had success troubleshooting?
Error:
Could not retrieve values. Error code: 'BadRequest', Message: 'The value's length for key 'application name' exceeds it's limit of '128'.
clientRequestId: 'XXXXX'. More diagnostic information: x-ms-client-request-id is 'XXXXX'.
Just had a call with Microsoft Support and got confirmation: this is the global issue in the SQL connector of LogicApp. They are working on this to fix, no ETA for now.
Update: should be fixed from around 29.03.2022 03:00 CET
Hi I delete all publications and subscriptions on sql server 2008 . Then try to disabling publishing and distribution for reconfigure replication but have an error :
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
Invalid object name 'dbo.sysmergesubscriptions'.
Changed database context to 'master'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 208) Ho solve it ?
One thing you can do is: create that object by yourself. Most likely there would be more than one table/view missing. Just script those missing objects from another database (for example, develop environment) and create them in your production box.
I am trying to rename the schema for a dozen tables in an old database on SQL Server 2005. I'm using SQL Server Management Studio Express version 9.0. Based on detailed advice found here, as well as several forums on other sites, I've been trying this straightforward command:
ALTER SCHEMA newschemaname TRANSFER oldschemaname.table1
I consistently get this error:
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'SCHEMA'
It's the same whether I run it directly in the "New Query" window or build it into a stored procedure.
The database's owner is "SA," dating back to when my web host (the physical server's owner) first set up this database years ago. This makes me think there might be a permissions issue, or some obscure mismatch between the owner name and the login I'm using. But if that was true, I'd expect the error to tell me I don't have rights to execute that command.
Is there some obvious syntax error I'm missing, or do I need to delve deeper into the ownership and permissions to get the rights to fix this?
New Schema name needs to be in brackets otherwise it will fail
Example statement:
ALTER SCHEMA [NewSchemaName] TRANSFER dbo.Tracking
We have a database running on SQL 2005. One of the store procedure looks up a user's email address from Active Directory using a linked server. The call to the linked server occurs in a database function.
I'm able to call is successfully from my Asp.Net application the first time, but periodically after that, it fails with the following error:
{"The requested operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider \"ADsDSOObject\" for linked server \"ADSI\" does not support the required transaction interface."}
It appears that the amount of time between calling the function affects whether the linked server query will work correctly. I am not using any transactions. When I try calling the function in a quick make-shift SQL script, it runs fine everytime (even when tested in quick succession).
Is there some sort of transaction being left open that naturally dies if I don't try calling the procedure again? I'm at a loss here.
Here is the simple call in the store procedure:
DECLARE #email varchar(50)
SELECT #email = LEFT(mail, 50)
FROM OPENQUERY (
ADSI,
'SELECT mail, sAMAccountName FROM ''LDAP://DC=Katz,DC=COM'' WHERE objectCategory = ''Person'' AND objectClass = ''User'''
)
WHERE sAMAccountName = CAST(#LoginName AS varchar(35))
RETURN #email
I've worked with SQL Server linkservers often, though rarely LDAP queries... but I got curious and read the Microsoft support page linked to in Ric Tokyo's previous post. Towards the bottom it reads:
It is typical for a directory server
to enforce a server limitation on the
number of objects that will be
returned for a given query. This is to
prevent denial-of-service attacks and
network overloading. To properly query
the directory server, large queries
should be broken up into many smaller
ones. One way to do this is through a
process called paging. While paging is
available through ADSI's OLEDB
provider, there is currently no way
available to perform it from a SQL
distributed query. This means that the
total number of objects that can be
returned for a query is the server
limit. In the Windows 2000 Active
Directory, the default server limit is
1,000 objects.
I'm thinking that the reason it fails on you (or not) depending on whether call it from the app or from a "quick make-shift sql script" (as you put it) might be related to the security context under which the operation is executing. Depending on how the link server connection was set up, the operation could be being executed under a variety of possible credentials depending on how you initiate the query.
I don't know, but that's my best guess. I'd look at the linkserver configuration, in particular the linkserver settings for what set of credentials are used as the security context under which operations executed across the linkserver run.
Rather then query Active Directory through a linked server, you might be better off caching your AD data into a SQL database and then querying that instead. You could use Integration Services by creating a OLE DB connection using "OLE DB PRovider for Microsoft Directory Services" and having a DataReader source with a query like:
SELECT physicalDeliveryOfficeName, department, company, title, displayName, SN,
givenName, sAMAccountName, manager, mail, telephoneNumber, mobile
FROM 'LDAP://DC=SOMECO,DC=COM'
WHERE objectClass='User' and objectCategory = 'Person'
order by mail
Using this method you will still run into the 1000 row limit for results from an AD query (note it is NOT advisable to try and increase this limit in AD, it is there to prevent the domain controller from becoming overloaded). Sometimes its possible to use a combination of queries to return the full data set, e.g. names A - L and M - Z
Alternatively you could use the CSVDE command line utility in Windows Server to export your directory information to a CSV file and then import it into a SQL database (see http://computerperformance.co.uk/Logon/Logon_CSVDE_Export.htm for more info on exporting AD data with CSVDE).
please read the support page from Microsoft
I suspect that it might be the cached query plan due to your statement that "When I try calling the function in a quick make-shift SQL script, it runs fine everytime (even when tested in quick succession)."
Could you try executing your stored procedure like so:
EXEC usp_MyProcedure WITH RECOMPILE
This question appears in the top of the first google page when search for the error string but has not valid answer.
This error happens intermitently when isolation level is not specified on .NET code nor in Store Procedure.
This error also happens in SQL Server 2008.
The fix is force SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ (UN)COMMITTED because a isolation level any higher is not supported by Active Directory and SQL Server is trying to use SERIALIZABLE.
Now, as this error is intermitent. Why is ADO.NET or SQLServer switching its default isolation to SERIALIZABLE sometimes and sometimes not? What triggers this switching?