This is my router:
expressJwt = require('express-jwt')
router.post '/signin' , controller.signUp
router.get '/signout/:id' , expressJwt(secret:secretToken, isRevoked: isRevokedCallback), controller.signOut
This is my signOut endpoint:
exports.signOut = (req, res) ->
console.log res.user
What do I need to put into my endpoint to revoke the token.
I tried putting this function into my router:
isRevokedCallback = (req, payload, done) ->
for key, value of payload
console.log(key + ' ' + value)
# The below part does not work. Also I don't know what data should refer to
issuer = payload.iss
tokenId = payload.jti
data.getRevokedToken issuer, tokenId, (err, token) ->
if err
return done(err)
done null, ! !token
return
The list comprehension indeed logs out:
iat 1436437563
exp 1436653563
And there is also also a user object in my endpoint logged out:
user [object Object]
Now how to put the pieces together and revoke the JWT Token, so that the user who's token it is is not able to login anymore with that Token (or alternatively expire it immeadiately)?
Here is some sample console log of my user object:
{ user:
{ __v: 0,
_id: '559e6aad50cdf686db31ea55',
local:
{ password: '$2a$08$YBvzOWADlw9tZCDh3aG/j.gV.Tbaesk3pLbbiHL/lkGaC08bSbGmy',
email: 'dieter#mustermann.de' } },
iat: 1436445357,
exp: 1436661357 }
GET /user/signout/559e6aad50cdf686db31ea55 401 2.530 ms - 12
ERROR:Error: expected 200 "OK", got 401 "Unauthorized"
1) should sign out via passport.js
I managed this by returning a token: false key, value pair. Another idea would be to send back a token with expirationInSeconds: 1. The old token will still be valid, and this can't be called very secure at all. So set the default token expiration very low or move to another option like blacklists.
Related
I'm currently using google.accounts.oauth2.initTokenClient and then tokenClient.requestAccessToken() to prompt the user to select an account. Then, I'm using the access_token from the TokenResponse of https://developers.google.com/identity/oauth2/web/reference/js-reference#TokenResponse and sending that param to my server to login.
The issue I have is for google.accounts.oauth2.revoke(), since that now requires a valid access token as a parameter.
However, since the access token expires after an hour, is there any way to get a new access token without making the user go through the UX flow again with requestAccessToken()?
_googleClient = google.accounts.oauth2.initTokenClient({
client_id: _clientid,
scope: 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email',
callback: function (tokenResponse) {
_accessToken = tokenResponse.access_token; additionalOptions);
},
error_callback: function (err) {
console.log('err:', err)
}
});
_googleClient.requestAccessToken();
I have implemented the new Google Identity Services to get an access_token to call the Youtube API.
I try to use this on an Angular app.
this.tokenClient = google.accounts.oauth2.initTokenClient({
client_id: googleApiClientId,
scope: 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/youtube.readonly',
callback: (tokenResponse) => {
this.accessToken = tokenResponse.access_token;
},
});
When I call this.tokenClient.requestAccessToken(), I can get an access token and use the Youtube API, that works.
But after one hour, this token expires. I have this error : "Request had invalid authentication credentials."
How can I get the newly refreshed access_token transparently for the user ?
There are two authorization flows for the Google Identity Services (GIS) library:
The implicit flow, which is client-side only and uses .requestAccessToken()
The authorization code flow, which requires a backend (server-side) as well and uses .requestCode()
With the implicit flow (which is what you are using), there are no refresh tokens. It is up to the client to detect tokens aging out and to re-run the token request flow. Here is some sample code from google's examples for how to handle this:
// initialize the client
tokenClient = google.accounts.oauth2.initTokenClient({
client_id: 'YOUR_CLIENT_ID',
scope: 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/calendar.readonly',
prompt: 'consent',
callback: '', // defined at request time in await/promise scope.
});
// handler for when token expires
async function getToken(err) {
if (err.result.error.code == 401 || (err.result.error.code == 403) &&
(err.result.error.status == "PERMISSION_DENIED")) {
// The access token is missing, invalid, or expired, prompt for user consent to obtain one.
await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
try {
// Settle this promise in the response callback for requestAccessToken()
tokenClient.callback = (resp) => {
if (resp.error !== undefined) {
reject(resp);
}
// GIS has automatically updated gapi.client with the newly issued access token.
console.log('gapi.client access token: ' + JSON.stringify(gapi.client.getToken()));
resolve(resp);
};
tokenClient.requestAccessToken();
} catch (err) {
console.log(err)
}
});
} else {
// Errors unrelated to authorization: server errors, exceeding quota, bad requests, and so on.
throw new Error(err);
}
}
// make the request
function showEvents() {
// Try to fetch a list of Calendar events. If a valid access token is needed,
// prompt to obtain one and then retry the original request.
gapi.client.calendar.events.list({ 'calendarId': 'primary' })
.then(calendarAPIResponse => console.log(JSON.stringify(calendarAPIResponse)))
.catch(err => getToken(err)) // for authorization errors obtain an access token
.then(retry => gapi.client.calendar.events.list({ 'calendarId': 'primary' }))
.then(calendarAPIResponse => console.log(JSON.stringify(calendarAPIResponse)))
.catch(err => console.log(err)); // cancelled by user, timeout, etc.
}
Unfortunately GIS doesn't handle any of the token refreshing for you the way that GAPI did, so you will probably want to wrap your access in some common retry logic.
The important bits are that the status code will be a 401 or 403 and the status will be PERMISSION_DENIED.
You can see the details of this example here, toggle to the async/await tab to see the full code.
To refresh the access token in a transparent way for the end-user you have to use the Refresh Token, This token will also come in the response to your call.
With this token, you can do a POST call to the URL: https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v4/token with the following request body
client_id: <YOUR_CLIENT_ID>
client_secret: <YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET>
refresh_token: <REFRESH_TOKEN_FOR_THE_USER>
grant_type: refresh_token
refresh token never expires so you can use it any number of times. The response will be a JSON like this:
{
"access_token": "your refreshed access token",
"expires_in": 3599,
"scope": "Set of scope which you have given",
"token_type": "Bearer"
}
#victor-navarro's answer is correct, but I think the URL is wrong.
I made a POST call to https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token with a body like this and it worked for me:
client_id: <YOUR_CLIENT_ID>
client_secret: <YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET>
refresh_token: <REFRESH_TOKEN_FOR_THE_USER>
grant_type: refresh_token
I'm trying to setup discord oauth2 pkce using passportjs and the passport-oauth2
const discordStrategy = new OAuth2Strategy({
authorizationURL: 'https://discord.com/api/oauth2/authorize',
tokenURL: 'https://discord.com/api/oauth2/token',
clientID: DISCORD_CLIENT_ID,
clientSecret: DISCORD_CLIENT_SECRET,
callbackURL: DISCORD_CALLBACK_URL,
state: true,
pkce: true,
scope: ['identity', 'scope'],
passReqToCallback: true,
},
(req: Request, accessToken: string, refreshToken: string, profile: DiscordUserProfile, cb: any) => {
prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { email: profile.email ?? '' }}).then(foundUser => {
if (foundUser === null) {
// Create a new user with oauth identity.
} else {
cb(null, foundUser)
}
}).catch(error => {
cb(error, null);
})
});
I've been following the google example as well as some others, these examples indicate that, I should be able to use:
passport.use('discord', discordStrategy);
and
authRouter.get('/discord', passport.authenticate('discord'));
and this should redirect to the OAuth2 providers login page, but instead, I get a 400 Bad Request "The request cannot be fulfilled due to bad syntax." The response body contains an object:
{"scope": ["0"]}
Why is this happening instead of the expected redirect?
My intention is that, once the user logs in, I should get a code, then I can post that code and the code verifier to get an access token, then once the access token is obtained, the actual authenticate call can be made
Edit: I put breakpoints in the passport.authenticate function and I stepped through it. It does actually get through everything and it calls the redirect. The parsed URL it generates, even if I copy it and manually navigate to the URL, it gives me the same, just gives:
{"scope": ["0"]}
and no login page, why?
If you add a version number to the base api url, e.g. /v9 it gives a full error message.
It turned out I had typo'd the scopes, I had 'identity' instead of 'identify' - now this part of the process is working as expected.
I've got a function that runs 'beforeEnter' in the Vue router to verify that the user has been authenticated, otherwise triggers a message.
It checks to see if a (jwt) token is saved in the localStorage - this works if the user signs out manually, as it removes the token from the localStorage. However when the token expires it still remains in the localStorage so the function thinks ((localStorage.token)) the user is logged in.
The server still blocks any requests made as the token is invalid - so is safe.
How do I check the token's validity on the server side, in the 'beforeEnter' middleware, before the page loads?
Do I need to make an endpoint that checks a tokens validity and returns the result? (I'm using fetch(), however I've seen people use axios interceptors...)
Worth nothing that I'm not using VUEX, and there seems to be more details on that?
function protectedPage(to, from, next) {
if (localStorage.token) {
next();
} else {
Vue.toasted.show("The session has ended. Please login.", {
theme: "toasted-primary",
position: "top-center",
duration: null,
action: {
text: "Login",
onClick: (e, toastObject) => {
next("/");
toastObject.goAway(0);
}
}
});
next("/");
}
}
Since exp is part of the payload, and JWT is just a base64 string, you can just decode it and check the exp time on your Vue app.
This is a function to decode JWT token and get the payload (taken from here)
function parseJwt (token) {
var base64Url = token.split('.')[1];
var base64 = base64Url.replace(/-/g, '+').replace(/_/g, '/');
var jsonPayload = decodeURIComponent(Buffer.from(base64, "base64").toString("ascii").split("").map(function(c) {
return '%' + ('00' + c.charCodeAt(0).toString(16)).slice(-2);
}).join(''));
return JSON.parse(jsonPayload);
};
and check it on your beforeRouteEnter function:
beforeRouteEnter (to, from, next) {
if (localStorage.token) {
const jwtPayload = parseJwt(localStorage.token);
if (jwtPayload.exp < Date.now()/1000) {
// token expired
deleteTokenFromLocalStorage();
next("/");
}
next();
} else {
next("/");
}
},
You don't really need to check it on your backend server, since there's no security concern by decoding the JWT token payload and checking it in on the client side. Plus it saves you one HTTP request every time a user access a route.
You need a backend middleware which bound to each API call and validates user session if still exists and has same tokens.
If the session has been expired or token has been changed and doesn't match with the current user session, you can redirect user to the login page from backend and force him to create a fresh session.
I think you don't need to fetch the authentication for each route entrance, just block the backend api calls and return a message or redirect to the login page. User can still browse the pages with the expired session info but won't be able to perform any fetch or form actions.
This has probably been asked before, so a preemptive apology from me.
I built a site and I built an API. The API will also be used by a mobile app in the future. I own both so I'm pretty sure two and three legged OAuth aren't for me. The API has parts that are accessible to the world and other parts that are protected and require a user account. To keep things simple I've just gone with a https + Basic Auth solution (for now). It's all fine and good when testing requests manually to the API (I didn't write tests because I'm a bad person), things work as expected and Basic Auth is fine.
I'm trying to solve the flow of a user logging in with plaintext user and password, send that to the API to authenticate, the API just needs to say yes or no, yet all requests from the site (on behalf of a user) to the API should be signed in some way with their credentials for when they want to POST/GET/PUT/DEL one of the protected resources.
Out of all of the auth resources I've read I'm still confused as to what scheme to use. Storing the plaintext password on the site side so that I can base 64 encode it and send it over the wire seems bad, but it looks like that's what I'd have to do. I've read of digest auth but I'm not sure I get it. Any and all advice is welcome.
This is how I would handle this case;
POST the username and password as a plain text to your api using HTTPS of course.
Then validate it to your database, the best algorithm used nowadays to salt password is bcrypt.
If the user is not valid return 401, or whatever.
If the user is valid, return a JWT token with his profile signed with a Public Key algorithm.
Your fron-end knows the public key so it can decode the JWT but it can't generate a new one.
For every request that needs authentication, you attach an Authentication header, with Bearer [JWT]
A middleware in the backend reads this header and validate it with the private key.
Don't be affraid of JWT there are plenty of implementations for every language and framework and is easier than you might think. A lot of applications are already using JWT already even Google.
Auth0 is an authentication broker that can validate against any identity provider or custom database, and returns JWTs. It provides a clientID that can be used to decode the profile in the front end and a secret to validate the tokens in the backend as well as client side library to do this.
Disclaimer: I work for auth0.
Update: Since you mention node.js and express in comments I will give an example in this technology.
var http = require('http');
var express = require('express');
var jwt = require('jsonwebtoken'); //https://npmjs.org/package/node-jsonwebtoken
var expressJwt = require('express-jwt'); //https://npmjs.org/package/express-jwt
var secret = "this is the secret secret secret 12356";
var app = express();
app.configure(function () {
this.use(express.urlencoded());
this.use(express.json());
this.use('/api', expressJwt({secret: secret}));
});
//authentication endpoint
app.post('/authenticate', function (req, res) {
//validate req.body.username and req.body.password
//if is invalid, return 401
var profile = {
first_name: 'John',
last_name: 'Foo',
email: 'foo#bar.com',
id: 123
};
var token = jwt.sign(profile, secret, {
expiresInMinutes: 60*5
});
res.json({
token: token
});
});
//protected api
app.get('/api/something', function (req, res) {
console.log('user ' + req.user.email + ' is calling /something');
res.json({
name: 'foo'
});
});
//sample page
app.get('/', function (req, res) {
res.sendfile(__dirname + '/index.html');
});
http.createServer(app).listen(8080, function () {
console.log('listening on http://localhost:8080');
});
This is an express application with one endpoint that validates username and password. If the credentials are valid it returns a JWT token with the full profile, with expiration 5 hours.
Then we have an example endpoint in /api/something but since I've a express-jwt middleware for everything on /api it requires a Authorization: Bearer header with a valid token. The middleware not only validates the token but also parses the profile and put it on req.user.
How to use this client-side? This is an example with jquery:
//this is used to parse the profile
function url_base64_decode(str) {
var output = str.replace("-", "+").replace("_", "/");
switch (output.length % 4) {
case 0:
break;
case 2:
output += "==";
break;
case 3:
output += "=";
break;
default:
throw "Illegal base64url string!";
}
return window.atob(output); //polifyll https://github.com/davidchambers/Base64.js
}
var token;
//authenticate at some point in your page
$(function () {
$.ajax({
url: '/authenticate',
type: 'POST',
data: {
username: 'john',
password: 'foo'
}
}).done(function (authResult) {
token = authResult.token;
var encoded = token.split('.')[1];
var profile = JSON.parse(url_base64_decode(encoded));
alert('Hello ' + profile.first_name + ' ' + profile.last_name);
});
});
//send the authorization header with token on every call to the api
$.ajaxSetup({
beforeSend: function(xhr) {
if (!token) return;
xhr.setRequestHeader('Authorization', 'Bearer ' + token);
}
});
//api call
setTimeout(function () {
$.ajax({
url: '/api/something',
}).done(function (res) {
console.log(rest);
});
}, 5000);
First, I've an authenticate call with the username and password, I can decode the profile in the JWT to get the user profile and I also save the token to use in every request later on.
The ajaxSetup/beforeSend trick adds the header for every call. So, then I can make a request to /api/something.
As you can imagine this approach doesn't use cookies and sessions so it works out of the box in CORS scenarios.
I'm a big fan of passport.js and I've contributed a lot of adapters and fixes for some other adapter but for this particular case I wouldn't use it.
I've been thinking about a similar scenario lately; here's what I did:
SSL + Basic Auth
In the DB (on the API side), generate a random salt (per user), and save the salt and the hashed (password + salt). When a request arrives, throw on the salt and hash it, then compare to what you've saved
Send the password in plaintext - you are using SSL so I think this is okay (this is the part I am most uncertain of)
I don't have a great reason for recommending this but in case you have a reason to use it:
.4. Attach a timestamp to every request and have them expire after a couple of minutes.
The reason you should save salted-and-hashed passwords in your DB is in case someone steals your DB.
Basically I'm putting a lot of faith into SSL, and what I've read tells me that's okay.