How can I generate a web page that checks the status of a process or service? - apache

I have a dedicated server that runs a few lightweight game servers. The server is already running Apache. However I am cheap and the server hardware is not exactly robust and not all the servers we use run concurrently. I want to be able to generate a web page say /stats that has some info like:
Game 1: Online <uptime>
Game 2: Offline
...etc
I'm certain that I could run a script using a cronjob that just uses ps + grep logged into a file, and then parse that file for information on the server but I'm looking for a more dynamic option that checks as the page is generated.

You have at least a few options (other people may have additional suggestions beyond what is listed here):
Cron a shell script to generate a stats.html or stats.txt
PHP's shell_exec (could run ps |grep... for example) or exec
PHP's variety of posix functions may help (http://php.net/manual/en/ref.posix.php)
If you have PERL available there may be a few options there as well
My suggestion is to evaluate shell_exec or exec before any of the others.
If you need additional assistance please post what you have tried and the results.

Related

Logging every perl script executed by Apache

Is there a way to configure apache to log every perl script execution?
Or on the other hand to configure perl to log it's own executions.
About the second option I've read about perl wrappers, but also have read that it is tricky, since I only want to log the ones from apache maybe it is easier to configure apache to do it.
Made StackOverflow and Google searches and couldn't find this specific information.
Cheers.

tcl shell through apache

I have a tool which supports interactive queries though tcl shell. I want to create a web application through which users can send different queries to the tool. I have done some basic programming using Apache web server and cgi scripts, but i am unable to think of a way to keep the shell alive and send queries to that.
Some more information:
Let me describe it more. Tool builds a graph data structure, after building users can query for information using tcl shell, something like get all child nodes of a particular node. I cannot build the data structure with every query because building takes lot of time. I want to build the data structure and somehow keep the shell alive. Apache server should send all the queries to that shell and return the responses back to the user
You might want to create a daemon process, perhaps using expect, that spawns your interactive program. The daemon program could listen to queries over TCP using Tcl's socket command. Your CGI program would create a client socket to talk to the daemopn.
I'd embed the graph-managing program into an interpreter that's also running a small webserver (e.g., tclhttpd, though that's not the only option) and have the rest of the world interact with the graph through RESTful web accesses. This could then be integrated behind Apache in any way you like — a CGI thunk would work, or you could do request forwarding, or you could write some server-side code to do it (there's many options there!) — or you could even just let clients connect directly. Many options would work.
The question appears to be incomplete as you did not specify what exactly does "interactive" mean with regard to your tool.
How does it support interactive queries? Does it call gets in a kind of endless loop and processed each line as it's read? If so, the solution to your problem is simple: the Tcl shell is not really concerned about whether its standard input is connected to an interactive terminal or not. So just spawn your tool in your CGI request handling code, write the user's query to that process's stdin stream, flush it and then read all the text written by that process to its stdout and stderr streams. Then send them back to the browser. How exactly to spawn the process and communicate with it via its standard streams heavily depends on your CGI code.
If you don't get the idea, try writing your query to a file and then do comething like
$ tclsh /path/to/your/tool/script.tcl </path/to/the/query.file
and you should have the tool to respond in a usual way.
If the interaction is carried using some other way in your tool, then you probably have to split it to a "core" and "front-end" parts so that the core just reads queries and outputs results, and the front-end part carries out interaction. Then hook up that core to your CGI processing code in a way outlined above.

Allowing a PHP script to ssh, using sudo

I need to allow a PHP script on my local web server, to SSH to another machine to perform a specified task on some files. My httpd runs as _www with low permissions, so setting up direct passwordless SSH is difficult, not to say ill-advised.
The way I do it now is to have a minimal PHP script that sudo-exec's (as me) a shell script which is outside of the document root. The shell script in turn calls (as me) the PHP code that does the actual SSH work, and prints its output. Here's the code.
read_remote_files.php (The script I call from my browser):
exec('sudo -u me -n /home/me/run_php.sh /path/to/my_prog.php', $results);
print $results;
/home/me/run_php.sh (Runs as me, calls whatever it's given):
php $1 2>&1
sudoers:
_www ALL = (me) NOPASSWD: /home/me/run_php.sh
This all works, as my_prog.php is called as me and can SSH as me. It seems it's not too insecure since run_php.sh can't be called directly from a browser (outside document root). The issue I'm having is that my_prog.php isn't called as an HTTP program so doesn't have access to the HTTP environment variables (DOCUMENT_ROOT etc).
Two questions:
Am I making this too complicated?
Is there an easy way for my final script to get the HTTP variables?
Thanks!
Andy
Many systems do stuff like this using a (privileged) cron job that frequently checks for the existence of a file, a database record or some other resource, and then performs actions if there are any.
The huge advantage of this is that there is no direct interaction between the PHP script and the privileged script at all. The PHP script leaves the instructions in a resource, the privileged script fetches it. As long as the instructions can't lead to the system getting compromised or damaged, it's definitely more secure than sudoing.
The disadvantage is that you can't push changes whenever you like; you have to wait until the cron job runs again. But maybe it's an option anyway?
"I need to allow a PHP script on my local web server, to SSH to another machine to perform a specified task on some files."
I think that you are phrasing this in terms of a solution that you have difficulty in getting to work rather than a requirement. Surely what you should be saying is "I want to invoke a task on machine B from a PHP script running under Apache on Machine A." And then research solutions to this -- to which there are many from a simple 'roll-your-own' RPC tunnelled over HTTP(S) to using an XMLRPC or SOA framework.
Two caveats:
Do a phpinfo(); on both machines to check what extensions are available and
Also check your php.ini setting to make sure that your service provider hasn't disabled any functions that you expect to use (or do a Q&D script to echo 'disable_functions = ' . ini_get('disable_functions') . "\n"; ...)
If you browse here and the wider internet you'll find many examples. Here is one that I use for a similar purpose.

Executing scripts as apache user (www-data) insecure? How does a contemporary setup look like?

My scripts (php, python, etc.) and the scripts of other users on my Linux system are executed by the apache user aka "www-data". Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this might lead to several awkward situations:
I'm able to read the source code of other users' scripts by using a script. I might find hardcoded database passwords.
Files written by scripts and uploads are owned by www-data and might be unreadable or undeleteable by the script owner.
Users will want their upload-folders to be writeable by www-data. Using a script I can now write into other users upload directories.
Users frustrated with these permission problems will start to set file and directory permissions to 777 (just take a look at the Wordpress Support Forum…).
One single exploitable script is enough to endanger all the other users. OS file permission security won't help much to contain the damage.
So how do people nowadays deal with this? What's a reasonable (architecturally correct?) approach to support several web-frameworks on a shared system without weakening traditional file permission based security? Is using fastCGI still the way to go? How do contemporary interfaces (wsgi) and performance strategies fit in?
Thanks for any hints!
as far as i understand this, please correct me if i am wrong!
ad 1. - 4. with wsgi you have the possibility to change and therefor restrict the user/group on per process-basis.
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationDirectives#WSGIDaemonProcess
ad 5. with wsgi you can isolate processes.
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationDirectives#WSGIProcessGroup
quote from mod_wsgi-page:
"An alternate mode of operation available with Apache 2.X on UNIX is 'daemon' mode. This mode operates in similar ways to FASTCGI/SCGI solutions, whereby distinct processes can be dedicated to run a WSGI application. Unlike FASTCGI/SCGI solutions however, neither a separate process supervisor or WSGI adapter is needed when implementing the WSGI application and everything is handled automatically by mod_wsgi.
Because the WSGI applications in daemon mode are being run in their own processes, the impact on the normal Apache child processes used to serve up static files and host applications using Apache modules for PHP, Perl or some other language is much reduced. Daemon processes may if required also be run as a distinct user ensuring that WSGI applications cannot interfere with each other or access information they shouldn't be able to."
All your point are valid.
Points 1, 3 and 5 are solved by setting the open_basedir directive in your Apache config.
2 and 4 are truly annoying, but files uploaded by an web-application is also (hopefully) removable with the same application.

What is Common Gateway Interface (CGI)?

CGI is a Common Gateway Interface. As the name says, it is a "common" gateway interface for everything. It is so trivial and naive from the name. I feel that I understood this and I felt this every time I encountered this word. But frankly, I didn't. I'm still confused.
I am a PHP programmer with web development experience.
user (client) request for page ---> webserver(->embedded PHP
interpreter) ----> Server side(PHP) Script ---> MySQL Server.
Now say my PHP Script can fetch results from MySQL server & MATLAB server & some other server.
So, now PHP Script is the CGI? Because its interface for the between webserver & All other servers? I don't know. Sometimes they call CGI, a technology & other times they call CGI a program or some other server.
What exactly is CGI?
Whats the big deal with /cgi-bin/*.cgi? What's up with this? I don't know what is this cgi-bin directory on the server for. I don't know why they have *.cgi extensions.
Why does Perl always comes in the way. CGI & Perl (language). I also don't know what's up with these two. Almost all the time I keep hearing these two in combination "CGI & Perl". This book is another great example CGI Programming with Perl. Why not "CGI Programming with PHP/JSP/ASP"? I never saw such things.
CGI Programming in C, confuses me a lot. "in C"?? Seriously?? I don't know what to say. I'm just confused. "in C"?? This changes everything. Program needs to be compiled and executed. This entirely changes my view of web programming. When do I compile? How does the program gets executed (because it will be a machine code, so it must execute as a independent process). How does it communicate with the web server? IPC? and interfacing with all the servers (in my example MATLAB & MySQL) using socket programming? I'm lost!!
People say that CGI is deprecated and isn't in use anymore. Is that so? What is the latest update?
Once, I ran into a situation where I
had to give HTTP PUT request access to
web server (Apache HTTPD). Its a long
back. So, as far as I remember this is
what I did:
Edited the configuration file of Apache HTTPD to tell webserver to pass
all HTTP PUT requests to some
put.php ( I had to write this PHP
script)
Implement put.php to handle the request (save the file to the location
mentioned)
People said that I wrote a CGI Script.
Seriously, I didn't have a clue what
they were talking about.
Did I really write CGI Script?
I hope you understood what my confusion is. (Because I myself don't know where I'm confused). I request you guys to keep your answer as simple as possible. I really can't understand any fancy technical terminology. At least not in this case.
EDIT:
I found this amazing tutorial "CGI Programming Is Simple!" - CGI Tutorial, which explains the concepts in simplest possible way. After reading this article you may want to read Getting Started with CGI Programming in C to supplement your understanding with actual code samples. I've also added these links to this tutorial to Wikipedia's article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Gateway_Interface
CGI is an interface which tells the webserver how to pass data to and from an application. More specifically, it describes how request information is passed in environment variables (such as request type, remote IP address), how the request body is passed in via standard input, and how the response is passed out via standard output. You can refer to the CGI specification for details.
To use your image:
user (client) request for page ---> webserver ---[CGI]----> Server side Program ---> MySQL Server.
Most if not all, webservers can be configured to execute a program as a 'CGI'. This means that the webserver, upon receiving a request, will forward the data to a specific program, setting some environment variables and marshalling the parameters via standard input and standard output so the program can know where and what to look for.
The main benefit is that you can run ANY executable code from the web, given that both the webserver and the program know how CGI works. That's why you could write web programs in C or Bash with a regular CGI-enabled webserver. That, and that most programming environments can easily use standard input, standard output and environment variables.
In your case you most likely used another, specific for PHP, means of communication between your scripts and the webserver, this, as you well mention in your question, is an embedded interpreter called mod_php.
So, answering your questions:
What exactly is CGI?
See above.
Whats the big deal with /cgi-bin/*.cgi? Whats up with this? I don't know what is this cgi-bin directory on the server for. I don't know why they have *.cgi extensions.
That's the traditional place for cgi programs, many webservers come with this directory pre configured to execute all binaries there as CGI programs. The .cgi extension denotes an executable that is expected to work through the CGI.
Why does Perl always comes in the way. CGI & Perl (language). I also don't know whats up with these two. Almost all the time I keep hearing these two in combination "CGI & Perl". This book is another great example CGI Programming with Perl Why not "CGI Programming with PHP/JSP/ASP". I never saw such things.
Because Perl is ancient (older than PHP, JSP and ASP which all came to being when CGI was already old, Perl existed when CGI was new) and became fairly famous for being a very good language to serve dynamic webpages via the CGI. Nowadays there are other alternatives to run Perl in a webserver, mainly mod_perl.
CGI Programming in C this confuses me a lot. in C?? Seriously?? I don't know what to say. I"m just confused. "in C"?? This changes everything. Program needs to be compiled and executed. This entirely changes my view of web programming. When do I compile? How does the program gets executed (because it will be a machine code, so it must execute as a independent process). How does it communicate with the web server? IPC? and interfacing with all the servers (in my example MATLAB & MySQL) using socket programming? I'm lost!!
You compile the executable once, the webserver executes the program and passes the data in the request to the program and outputs the received response. CGI specifies that one program instance will be launched per each request. This is why CGI is inefficient and kind of obsolete nowadays.
They say that CGI is deprecated. Its no more in use. Is it so? What is its latest update?
CGI is still used when performance is not paramount and a simple means of executing code is required. It is inefficient for the previously stated reasons and there are more modern means of executing any program in a web enviroment. Currently the most famous is FastCGI.
What exactly is CGI?
A means for a web server to get its data from a program (instead of, for instance, a file).
Whats the big deal with /cgi-bin/*.cgi?
No big deal. It is just a convention.
I don't know what is this cgi-bin directory on the server for.
I don't know why they have *.cgi extensions.
The server has to know what to do with the file (i.e. treat it as a program to execute instead of something to simply serve up). Having a .html extension tells it to use a text/html content type. Having a .cgi extension tells it to run it as a program.
Keeping executables in a separate directory gives some added protection against executing incorrect files and/or serving up CGI programs as raw data in case the server gets misconfigured.
Why does Perl always comes in the way.
It doesn't. Perl was just big and popular at the same time as CGI.
I haven't used Perl CGI for years. I was using mod_perl for a long time, and tend towards PSGI/Plack with FastCGI these days.
This book is another great example CGI Programming with Perl
Why not "CGI Programming with PHP/JSP/ASP".
CGI isn't very efficient. Better methods for talking to programs from webservers came along at around the same time as PHP. JSP and ASP are different methods for talking to programs.
CGI Programming in C this confuses me a lot. in C?? Seriously??
It is a programming language, why not?
When do I compile?
Write code
Compile
Access URL
Webserver runs program
How does the program gets executed (because it will be a machine code, so it must execute as a independent process).
It doesn't have to execute as an independent process (you can write Apache modules in C), but the whole concept of CGI is that it launches an external process.
How does it communicate with the web server? IPC?
STDIN/STDOUT and environment variables — as defined in the CGI specification.
and interfacing with all the servers (in my example MATLAB & MySQL) using socket
programming?
Using whatever methods you like and are supported.
They say that CGI is depreciated. Its no more in use. Is it so?
CGI is inefficient, slow and simple. It is rarely used, when it is used, it is because it is simple. If performance isn't a big deal, then simplicity is worth a lot.
What is its latest update?
1.1
CGI is an interface specification between a web server (HTTP server) and an executable program of some type that is to handle a particular request.
It describes how certain properties of that request should be communicated to the environment of that program and how the program should communicate the response back to the server and how the server should 'complete' the response to form a valid reply to the original HTTP request.
For a while CGI was an IETF Internet Draft and as such had an expiry date. It expired with no update so there was no CGI 'standard'. It is now an informational RFC, but as such documents common practice and isn't a standard itself. rfc3875.txt, rfc3875.html
Programs implementing a CGI interface can be written in any language runnable on the target machine. They must be able to access environment variables and usually standard input and they generate their output on standard output.
Compiled languages such as C were commonly used as were scripting languages such as perl, often using libraries to make accessing the CGI environment easier.
One of the big disadvantages of CGI is that a new program is spawned for each request so maintaining state between requests could be a major performance issue. The state might be handled in cookies or encoded in a URL, but if it gets to large it must be stored elsewhere and keyed from encoded url information or a cookie. Each CGI invocation would then have to reload the stored state from a store somewhere.
For this reason, and for a greatly simple interface to requests and sessions, better integrated environments between web servers and applications are much more popular. Environments like a modern php implementation with apache integrate the target language much better with web server and provide access to request and sessions objects that are needed to efficiently serve http requests. They offer a much easier and richer way to write 'programs' to handle HTTP requests.
Whether you wrote a CGI script rather depends on interpretation. It certainly did the job of one but it is much more usual to run php as a module where the interface between the script and the server isn't strictly a CGI interface.
The CGI is specified in RFC 3875, though that is a later "official" codification of the original NCSA document. Basically, CGI defines a protocol to pass data about a HTTP request from a webserver to a program to process - any program, in any language. At the time the spec was written (1993), most web servers contained only static pages, "web apps" were a rare and new thing, so it seemed natural to keep them apart from the "normal" static content, such as in a cgi-bin directory apart from the static content, and having them end in .cgi.
At this time, here also were no dedicated "web programming languages" like PHP, and C was the dominating portable programming language - so many people wrote their CGI scripts in C. But Perl quickly turned out to be a better fit for this kind of thing, and CGI became almost synonymous with Perl for a while. Then there came Java Servlets, PHP and a bunch of others and took over large parts of Perl's market share.
Have a look at CGI in Wikipedia. CGI is a protocol between the web server and a external program or a script that handles the input and generates output that is sent to the browser.
CGI is a simply a way for web server and a program to communicate, nothing more, nothing less. Here the server manages the network connection and HTTP protocol and the program handles input and generates output that is sent to the browser. CGI script can be basically any program that can be executed by the webserver and follows the CGI protocol. Thus a CGI program can be implemented, for example, in C. However that is extremely rare, since C is not very well suited for the task.
/cgi-bin/*.cgi is a simply a path where people commonly put their CGI script. Web server are commonly configured by default to fetch CGI scripts from that path.
a CGI script can be implemented also in PHP, but all PHP programs are not CGI scripts. If webserver has embedded PHP interpreter (e.g. mod_php in Apache), then the CGI phase is skipped by more efficient direct protocol between the web server and the interpreter.
Whether you have implemented a CGI script or not depends on how your script is being executed by the web server.
CGI essentially passes the request off to any interpreter that is configured with the web server - This could be Perl, Python, PHP, Ruby, C pretty much anything. Perl was the most common back in the day thats why you often see it in reference to CGI.
CGI is not dead. In fact most large hosting companies run PHP as CGI as opposed to mod_php because it offers user level config and some other things while it is slower than mod_php. Ruby and Python are also typically run as CGI. they key difference here is that a server module runs as part of the actual server software - where as with CGI its totally outside the server The server just uses the CGI module to determine how to pass and recieve data to the outside interpreter.
CGI is a mechanism whereby an external program is called by the web server in order to handle a request, with environment variables and standard input being used to feed the request data to the program. The exact language the external program is written in does not matter, although it is easier to write CGI programs in some languages versus others.
Since CGI scripts need execute permissions, httpd by default only allows CGI programs in the cgi-bin directory to be run for (possibly now misguided) security purposes.
Most PHP scripts run in the web server process via mod_php. This is not CGI.
CGI is slow since the program (and related interpreter) must be started up per request. Modern alternatives are embedded execution, used by mod_php, and long-running processes, used by FastCGI. A given language may have its own way of implementing those mechanisms, so be sure to ask around before resorting to CGI.
A real-life example: a complicated database that needs to be shown on a website. Since the database was designed somewhere around 1986 (!), lots of data was packed in different ways to save on disk space.
As the development went on, the developers could no longer solve complicated data requests in SQL alone, for example because the sorting algorythms were unusual.
There are three sensible solutions:
quick and dirty: send the unsored data to PHP, sort it there. Obviously a very expensive solution, because this would be repeated every time the page is called
write a plugin to the database engine -- but the admin wasn't ready to allow foreign code to run on their server, or
you can process the data in a program (C, Perl, etc.), and output HTML. The program itself goes into /cgi-bin, and is called by the web server (e.g. Apache) directly, not through PHP.
CGI runs your script in Solution #3 and outputs the effect to the browser. You have the speed of the compiled program, the flexibility of a language broader than SQL, and no need to write plugins to the SQL server. (Again, this is an example specific to SQL and C)
A CGI script is a console/shell program. In Windows, when you use a "Command Prompt" window, you execute console programs. When a web server executes a CGI script it provides input to the console/shell program using environment variables or "standard input". Standard input is like typing data into a console/shell program; in the case of a CGI script, the web server does the typing. The CGI script writes data out to "standard output" and that output is sent to the client (the web browser) as a HTML page. Standard output is like the output you see in a console/shell program except the web server reads it and sends it out.
A CGI script can be executed from a browser. The URI typically includes a query string that is provided to the CGI script. If the method is "get" then the query string is provided to the CGI Script in an environment variable called QUERY_STRING. If the method is "post" then the query string is provided to the CGI Script using standard input (the CGI Script reads the query string from standard input).
An early use of CGI scripts was to process forms. In the beginning of HTML, HTML forms typically had an "action" attribute and a button designated as the "submit" button. When the submit button is pushed the URI specified in the "action" attribute would be sent to the server with the data from the form sent as a query string. If the "action" specifies a CGI script then the CGI script would be executed and it then produces a HTML page.
RFC 3875 "The Common Gateway Interface (CGI)" partially defines CGI using C, as in saying that environment variables "are accessed by the C library routine getenv() or variable environ".
If you are developing a CGI script using C/C++ and use Microsoft Visual Studio to do that then you would develop a console program.
You maybe want to know what is not CGI, and the answer is a MODULE for your web server (if I suppose you are runnig Apache). AND THAT'S THE BIG DIFERENCE, because CGI needs and external program, thread, whatever to instantiate a PERL, PHP, C app server where when you run as a MODULE that program is the web server (apache) per-se.
Because of all this there is a lot of performance, security, portability issues that come into play. But it's good to know what is not CGI first, to understand what it is.
A CGI is a program (or a Web API) you write, and save it on the Web Server site. CGI is a file.
This file sits and waits on the Web Server. When the client browser sends a request to the Web Server to execute your CGI file, the Web Server runs your CGI file on the server site. The inputs for this CGI program, if any, are from the client browser. The outputs of this CGI program are sent to the browser.
What language you use to write a CGI program? Other posts already mention c,java, php, perl, etc.
The idea behind CGI is that a program/script (whether Perl or even C) receives input via STDIN (the request data) and outputs data via STDOUT (echo, printf statements).
The reason most PHP scripts don't qualify is that they are run under the PHP Apache module.