How to merge parent and child style properties using LESS - less

I have this less code, this is working just fine. I just want to save some spaces when the less cli compiles it.
.secondary-content {
background: #ffcc80;
color: white !important;
label, i {
background: #ffcc80;
color: white !important;
}
}
When I run less from the command prompt, the output looks like this.
.secondary-content {
background: #ffcc80;
color: white !important;
}
.secondary-content label,
.secondary-content i {
background: #ffcc80;
color: white !important;
}
as you can see they are separated on each block. I would like to have them on the same block. How could I easily merge the parent and child style properties? Like this.
.secondary-content,
.secondary-content label,
.secondary-content i {
background: #ffcc80;
color: white !important;
}
I'm still learning less, so any help would be much greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance

You can make use of the parent selector (&) like in the below snippet. Usage of parent selector would mean that the same rules apply for .ghost .secondary-content selector as well as its child label and i tags.
.ghost .secondary-content {
&, label, i {
background: #ffcc80;
color: white !important;
}
}

Of course the solution provide by #Harry works. When you are learning Less you should keep in mind that Less helps you to write your CSS code DRY and more efficient. Less does not help you to solve issues, that you can not solve in common CSS, Less compiles into CSS and does not add any feature to the compiled CSS.
To reduce the size of your CSS for selectors which share some properties you should consider the extend feature of Less: http://lesscss.org/features/#extend-feature-reducing-css-size:
.selector1 {
color: red;
}
.selector2:extend(.selector1) {}
outputs:
.selector1,
.selector2 {
color: red;
}
To solve your issue you should reconsider the desired CSS code instead of the Less code. You can not use extend due to the nesting of the label, i, but why should you nest them to set the color and background-color?
The default value for the background-color is transparent so when you set the background-color for the parent you do not have set the background-color for the child elements (when using the same value).
Possible you override the default transparent with an other style rule with a higher specificity, see also http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/04/07/css-specificity-and-inheritance/
An example which gives your nested label the wrong background-color:
label {
background-color:green;
}
.secondary-content {
background-color:red;
color: white;
}
The same for the color property which always inherit from its parent, unless applied in an anchor.
You are also using !important, see: https://css-tricks.com/when-using-important-is-the-right-choice/

Related

Changes in Shopware5 less-file has no effect

I've installed Shopware
inherited from the responsive theme and
adjusting the colors (less-files).
This worked well with the header and a few other components like container.less but not offcanvas-menu.less.
In Detail:
finding the color to change:
For this I first made all colors of the entire shop unique. So I can easily tap the color value over the current shop via a pipette tool.
Then I find the color value in the source code and copy the corresponding less source code components into my new theme. Only then do I change the color.
copied inside themes/Frontend :
a) /Responsive/frontend/_public/src/less/_components/offcanvas-menu.less too
b) /MyNewTheme/frontend/_public/src/less/_components/offcanvas-menu.less
the following part :
.sidebar--navigation {
.border-radius();
background: #0492d6;
.navigation--entry {
&:last-child {
border-bottom: 0 none;
}
}
.navigation--link {
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
}
}
and changed background: #0492d6; to background: #003E7e; inside b)
Complete result: gist MyNewTheme offcanvas-menu.less
But if i reload and grap the color i got again #0492D6.
As doppelcheck i changed the color in a) to background: black; and its black.
As another doppelcheck i changed the color in themes/Frontend/MyNewTheme/frontend/_public/src/less/_components/container.less to background: red; And red is visible.
Please check if you also imported it.
Please enter in your themes\Frontend\MyNewTheme\frontend_public\src\less\all.less
#import "_components/offcanvas-menu";

Chartist.js grid color

I would like to change grid color on Chartist.js from default grey. I tried to override ct-grid-color setting, but probably did something incorrectly. Can anyone please suggest how to do it?
Just insert in your CSS.
.ct-grid{ stroke: red;}
grid lines:
.ct-grids line {
color: steelblue;
}
.. and don't forget the labels! ..
grid labels:
.ct-labels span {
color: steelblue;
}
The reason why targeting only ".ct-grid" won't work is due to css specificity. Basically the more specific the css, the more important it becomes so ..
.ct-grids line { } > .ct-grids { }
If it's a little confusing, a nifty little tool is Keegan Street's css specificity calculator.

Inline-block line-wrap extra space

I've got an inline-block element that contains a very long word. When I resize the viewport until I reach the breakpoint of the text wrapping to the next line, I get a substantial amount of space. However, I would like the inline-block element to wrap immediately to the width of its contents.
I found it hard to explain exactly what's going on, so below an animated gif to illustrate my issue:
Upon resizing the viewport:
To be clear, the image above is me continuously resizing the viewport.
Does anybody know a way to achieve what I'd like? Even with CSS hyphenation the white-space still remains (which I don't want).
JSFiddle. Resize the frames to see what I mean.
div {
display: inline-block;
background-color: black;
color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
The inline-block indeed extends on resizing as your animation shows, so that it keeps place for the long word to go into that space again.
One simple solution would be to add text-align: justify, but I'm afraid it may not exactly be what you want (see demo).
Another one would be the use of media queries, as #Parody suggested, but you would have to know the dimentions of the containing div, and that would not be very scalable as you mentionned.
The word-break: break-all suggested by #yugi also works but causes the words to to collapse letter by letter, regardless of their length.
The only way to achieve the exact behavior is (as far as I know) to use javascript. For example, you would have to wrap your text into a span element inside the div, and then add something like this :
var paddingLeft = parseInt($('#foo').css('padding-left')),
paddingRight = parseInt($('#foo').css('padding-left')),
paddingTop = parseInt($('#foo').css('padding-top')),
paddingBottom = parseInt($('#foo').css('padding-Bottom')),
cloned = $('#foo span').clone(),
cloned_wrap = document.createElement('div');
$(cloned_wrap).css({
paddingLeft : paddingLeft,
paddingRight : paddingRight,
display : 'inline-block',
visibility: 'hidden',
float: 'left',
});
$(cloned_wrap).insertAfter('#foo');
cloned.appendTo(cloned_wrap);
$(window).on('resize', function(){
$('#foo').css('width', cloned.width() + 1);
$(cloned_wrap).css('margin-top',- $('#foo').height() - paddingTop - paddingBottom);
}).resize();
Please see the jsfiddle working demo. (← edited many times)
That's quite a lot of code, but it works ; )
(PS : I assumed jquery was available, if not, quite the same is achievable in pure JS)
I don't think this is possible only with CSS for the one element. The reason for your behavior is that the width of the element is still 100% of its container. The only way I could think to accomplish this is by doing something a little bit "creative"...try setting the style to inline so you get the shrink-wrap behavior, but to get around the background color issue, also put it in a container that shares the same background. That should work.
If im understanding you correctly you could use the #media type to decide what css to use depending on the width of the screen
here is an example of what i mean
#media(min-width:0px) and (max-width:200px){
div {
display: block;
background-color: black;
color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
}
#media (min-width:200px){
div {
display: inline-block;
background-color: black;
color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
}
I am still very appreciative of #lapin's answer (which I accepted and awarded bounty to), I found out after the fact that it didn't quite work on multiple elements next to each other (that has nothing to do with #lapin, I just didn't mention it in my original question as I thought it would be irrelevant information).
Anyway, I've come up with the following that works for me (assuming the elements it should be applied to are .title and .subtitle):
$('.title, .subtitle').each(function(i, el) {
var el = $(el),
inner = $(document.createElement('span')),
bar = $(document.createElement('span'));
inner.addClass('inner');
bar.addClass('bar');
el.wrapInner(inner)
.append(bar)
.css({
backgroundColor: 'transparent'
});
});
function shrinkWrap() {
$('.title, .subtitle').each(function(i, el) {
var el = $(el),
inner = $('.inner', el),
bar = $('.bar', el),
innerWidth = inner.width();
bar.css({
bottom: 0,
width: innerWidth + parseFloat(el.css('paddingLeft')) + parseFloat(el.css('paddingRight'))
});
});
}
shrinkWrap();
$(window).on('resize', function() {
shrinkWrap();
});
Basically what I do is:
put the text in an inner wrap element
create an additional absolutely-positioned background element
get the width of the inline inner wrap element
apply said width to the background element (plus padding and whatnot)
The CSS:
.title, .subtitle {
position: relative;
z-index: 500;
display: table;
padding-left: 10px;
margin-right: 10px;
background-color: red;
}
.title .bar, .subtitle .bar {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
z-index: -10;
background-color: red;
}

Dojo - Tree in accordion is broken (while outside is ok) , Why?

I've made simple application with dojo.
I took the exact same combo tree (cbtree) and put it once inside accordion and once first on page.
I don't understand why inside the accordion I get different cbTree (it looks really bad)
Here is online example of the problem :
http://77.235.53.170/cbTree/cbTree.htm
The problem is at your main.css, you have
#leftCol img {
width: 100%;
}
Which overwrites
.dijitFolderOpened, .dijitIconFolderOpen, .dijitIconError {
background-image: url("../../icons/images/commonIconsObjActEnabled.png");
width: 16px;
height: 16px;
}
You need resolve this in main.css by either removing your style, or changing it to a more specific rule; i.e. instead of #leftCol img, use #leftCol .yourClass.

Include a less file and pass parameters

I have a common.less file, that implements the basic CSS for different skins:
#textColor: black;
#iconSize: 16px;
.container: {
color: #textColor;
background-color: white;
}
.icon: {
width: #iconSize;
height: #iconSize;
}
// note that #iconSize is also used in this file inside mixins
The plan is to use it like so skin_1.less:
#iconSize: 32px; // override the icon size
// but leave #textColor as default
#import "common.less";
.container: {
color: red;
}
// I would now have big icons and red text
So I would like to have a common style, that I can reuse and selectively override variables.
This does not ssem to work however. I think it's because imports are always moved to the top, so variables cannot be pre-defined.
(I also read that variables are rather constants, so that may be another problem.)
Anyway: is there a better pattern to solve my use case?
You don't need to split the files up, just override the variable after the import. Variables are always resolved as the last definition, even if it is after where it is used.