fusion 2 tables with inner join - sql

in my database i have 2 tables.
table1
i have ID and NAMES
table2
i have ID, IDASSOCIATION, QUANTITY
so
i have 2 names in table1:
john and tom
and in table2 i have 3 lignes
john, 1
tom, 1
john, 1
nombre one is the quantity
in my result i want get
john = 2
and tom = 1
so i do this:
sql = "SELECT t1.*, t2.IDASSOCIATION, (SELECT SUM(t2.id_qte) FROM associationdepotarticle t2 WHERE t1.fusiontable = t2.fusiontable GROUP BY t2.IDASSOCIATION) as id_qte FROM articletable t1, associationdepotarticle t2";
but i not get this:
john = 2
tom = 1
why ? what i will do, i need correction please

You can just join the tables together and use sum:
select t1.name, sum(t2.quantity)
from table1 t1
join table2 t2 on t1.id = t2.idassociation
group by t1.name
It's not completely clear from your sample data what to join on, but I assume it's the idassociation field. If you want to return those names in table1 which aren't in table2, then use an outer join.

Related

Comma Separated Values in SQL with three tables

I have three tables and a complicated SQL query to extract data from these tables. To put it in context here is some sample data:
Table 1 aka Training (T1)
id
Name
1
Training 1
2
Training 2
Table 2 aka Roles (T2)
id
Name
1
Role 1
2
Role 2
3
Role 3
Table 3 aka TrainingRoles(T3)
id
idTraining
IdRoles
1
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
3
4
2
2
5
2
3
So far there are 2 tables and a "detail table (t3)"
so what I need to do is get this result:
Result Table
id
Training Name
Roles
1
Training 1
Role1, Role 2, Role 3,
2
Training 2
Role 2, Role 3,
I tried to do something like this but it gives me separated date even when I use Group By
select t1.Name,
(select string_agg(t2.Name, ',')
from T2 Td2
where Td2.Id = t3.IdCargo) AS Role
from
t1 t1
left join T3 t3 on t1.Id = t3.IdTraining
left join T2 t2 on t3.IdRoles = t2.id
group by t1.Name, t3.IdRole
I'm using left join so I can get Trainings that don't have a role linked
Ok so I tried this thx to #Larnu and got it solved:
select t1.Name,
string_agg(t2.Name, ',') as Role
from
t1 t1
left join T3 t3 on t1.Id = t3.IdTraining
left join T2 t2 on t3.IdRoles = t2.id
group by t1.Name

Selecting values from 2 columns that both are IDs of another tables rows

Let's say i have:
Table1:
ID Name
1 Ann
2 Mike
3 Stan
4 Kyle
Table2:
Pair ID Person1ID Person2ID
1 1 2
2 3 4
I want to select pairs, but with names instead of IDs, so this would be the output:
1 Ann Mike
2 Stan Kyle
I imagine a simple:
inner join Table1 on Table1.ID=Table2.Person1ID
won't work, because I want both of them, not only one.
I'm pretty new to SQL so i'm sorry if there is a simple answer.
You have to join twice and use alias to diference the tables
SELECT t2.PairID, A.Name, B.Name
FROM Table2 t2
JOIN Table1 A
ON t2.Person1ID = A.ID
JOIN Table1 B
ON t2.Person2ID = B.ID
You can join sub query like below:
Select p.PairID, p.Name, q.Name
from
(Select t2.PairID, t1.Name
from Table1 t1 inner join Table2 t2
on t1.ID = t2.Person1ID) p
inner join
(Select t2.PairID, t1.Name
from Table1 t1 inner join Table2 t2
on t1.ID = t2.Person2ID) q
on p.PairID = q.PairID
See the result here in the demo.

Joining tables without nulls

I'm not sure how to explain what I need but here's the data first:
Table 1
District
-1
3
2
1
3
Table 2
ID ID_Name
1 Main 1
2 Main 2
3 Main 3
How do I join the tables so that it looks like this?
District
-1
Main 3
Main 2
Main 1
Main 3
I'm assuming the second column is named Name for this, but you can do it with a COALESCE and a LEFT JOIN:
Select Coalesce(T2.Name, Str(T1.District)) As District
From Table1 T1
Left Join Table2 T2 On T1.District = T2.Id
assuming table 2 have
Table 2
ID col2
1 Main 1
2 Main 2
3 Main 3
you could use a left join
select table1.Distric, table2.col2
from table1
left join table2 on table1.dictrict = t2.ID
order by table2 col2
You can use left join:
Select coalesce(t2.col, t1.District) from table1 t1
left join table2 t2 on t1.District = t2.Id

MSSQL select single row with all references counted

I am attempting to do something using MSSQL that I believe is possible (easily) but I do not know how to vocalize the correct search string. I have the situation below.
Table A
UID | Value....
1 | a
2 | b
3 | c
Table B
PartTypes_uid_fk | Value....
1 | a
1 | b
1 | c
1 | d
1 | e
3 | 67
3 | 1354
I am attempting to get the following result, query Table A for all results {TableA.*} and on the same row result show the number of table b references {count TableB.tableA_fk}
What I have so far is the following.
SELECT DISTINCT t1.uid, CONVERT(varchar(MAX), t1.Name) AS Name, CONVERT(varchar(MAX), t1.Description) AS Description,
Count(t2.Items_uid_fk) OVER (Partition By t2.PartTypes_uid_fk) as Count
FROM [Table1] as t1 left outer join Table2 as t2 on t2.PartTypes_uid_fk=t1.uid;
This works for all of Table A records with an associated record in Table B but if there are 0 entries in Table B it won't work. The conversion of the varchars was required due to the fact they are ntext format and it was distinct.
Thank you for all your help in advance.
Stephen
Instead of running into problems with the GROUP BY on N/TEXT columns, and to run faster, you would want to pre-aggregate the B table and LEFT JOIN that against A.
select t1.*, ISNULL(t2.c, 0) AS CountOfB
from table1 t1
left join
(
select parttypes_uid_fk, count(*) c
from table2
group by parttypes_uid_fk
) t2 on t2.PartTypes_uid_fk=t1.uid
It's easier than that:
SELECT t1.uid, t1.Name, COUNT(*)
FROM [Table1] t1
LEFT JOIN [Table2] t2 ON t2.PartTypes_uid_fk = t1.uid
GROUP BY t1.uid, t1.Name
Your query should be
SELECT t1.uid,
CONVERT(varchar(MAX), t1.Name) AS Name,
CONVERT(varchar(MAX), t1.Description) AS Description,
Count(t2.Items_uid_fk) CountItems
FROM [Table1] as t1 left outer join Table2 as t2 on t1.uid = t2.PartTypes_uid_fk
GROUP BY uid, t1.name, t1.Description;

postgreSQL Duplicate rows counting on join

I have one complicated question. I'll try to explain it with example:
have one table that have primary key, and I want to join other table there the first's table primary key is foreign key, and I want If in the second table there is duplicate foreign key to select the number of repeatability. For example:
1-st table:
id name
--- -----
1 Greg
2 Alan
3 George
4 John
5 Peter
2-nd table
id aid data
--- ----- -------
1 2 CCCV
2 2 VVVV
3 3 DDDDD
4 3 SSSS
5 4 PPPPP
I want the result of the join to be:
id(1st table) aid name Data Number
----------- ---- ----- ----- -----
1 null Greg null 1
2 1 Alan CCCV 1
2 2 Alan VVVV 2
3 3 George DDDDD 1
3 4 George SSSS 2
4 5 John PPPPP 1
5 null Peter null 1
I searched a lot, I couldn't find anything. Maybe I do not know how search, or there is no such thing as what I want to do.
SELECT Table1.id, Table2.id as aid, Table1.name, Table2.data,
GREATEST(1, (SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM Table2 t2
WHERE t2.aid = Table1.id
AND t2.id <= Table2.id))
AS number
FROM Table1
LEFT JOIN Table2
ON Table2.aid = Table1.id
ORDER BY id, aid;
works in both MySQL and PostgreSQL.
As per my comment, you've tagged this both MySQL and PostgreSQL.
This answer is for PostgreSQL.
SELECT
table1.id,
table2.aid,
table1.name,
table2.data,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY table1.id ORDER BY table2.aid) AS number
FROM
table1
LEFT JOIN
table2
ON table1.id = table2.aid
Queries for PostgreSQL 8.3 which has no window functions.
With bigger tables it is regularly much faster to use a JOIN instead of a correlated sub-query.
The first query aggregates values for Table2 before joining to Table1, which should befaster, too:
SELECT t1.id, t2.aid, t1.name, t2.data, COALESCE(t2.ct, 1) AS number
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT x.aid, x.data, count(y.aid) + 1 AS ct
FROM Table2 x
LEFT JOIN Table2 y ON x.aid = y.aid AND x.id > y.id
GROUP BY x.aid, x.data
) t2 ON t2.aid = t1.id
ORDER BY t1.id, t2.ct;
And ORDER BY should be fixed.
Alternative without sub-query. Might be faster, yet:
SELECT t1.id, t2.aid, t1.name, t2.data, count(*) + count(t3.id) AS number
FROM Table1 t1
LEFT JOIN Table2 t2 ON t2.aid = t1.id
LEFT JOIN Table2 t3 ON t3.aid = t2.aid AND t3.id < t2.id
GROUP BY t1.id, t2.aid, t1.name, t2.data
ORDER BY t1.id, count(t3.id);
Not sure, didn't test with a bigger set. Test performance with EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Could you report back your results?