I have the next structure:
public class mysample
public property status as integer
end class
Dim mylist=new List(Of mysample)
Dim item as new mysample
item.status=1
mylist.add(item)
Dim item1 as new mysample
item2.status=1
mylist.add(item1)
...
I have next function which it is calculating something:
Function test(Of T)(newstatus as integer, mylist as List(of T)) as integer
Dim res as integer = myList.Where(Function(x) x.status=newstatus).First.status
Return res
End function
The call is where I am interested to execute: test(Of mysample)(2, mylist)
I have mysample in different projects and they can not be in the same for this reason I decided to use generic list to do my Linq calcultion.
THE PROBLEM IS IN FUNCTION WHICH TELL ME STATUS IS NOT MEMBER OF T OBJECT.
How can I solve this issue? all clases has status but I have different classes and I pass the name as generic type.
Do the classes share a common base class or interface? If so you should place a filter on the generic type like this:
Function test(Of T as CommonBaseClassOrInterface)(newstatus as integer, mylist as List(of T)) as integer
That will allow you to access any members on CommonBaseClassOrInterface. If they currently don't share a base class or interface you should consider adding one, making sure that Status is a member.
If you can't give them a base class or interface for some reason, you can still do this using reflection, but I DO NOT recommend going that direction.
STATUS IS NOT MEMBER OF T OBJECT.
Yes, because you have not constraint T in any way. It would be perfectly legal to call
test(Of Integer)(2, new list(of Integer))
which would fail because Integer does not have a status property. You either need to constrain T to be of some type that has a status property (either a base class or a common interface), or don't make it generic:
Function test(newstatus as integer, mylist as List(of mystatus)) as integer
Dim res as integer = myList.Where(Function(x) x.status=newstatus).First.status
Return res
End function
I have mysample in different projects
You mean you have several classes names mystatus in several projects? Then they are not the same class.
all classes has status but I have different classes and I pass the name as generic type
The create at least an interface that has a Status property and use that to constrain the generic parameter in Test.
Related
I am wrapping a COM API.
In general, I have had good luck designing some generic classes and shoving the tested parts down into those classes.
Here is one that is giving me a problem.
There are classes that represent result sets. They do not inherit, they do implement a common interface, but it is a very simple interface. It does not expose the ResultSet functionality, specifically .COUNT or .GetAt(i)
My workaround is to make this a MustInherit and use CodeSmith to do the work for me. Not the end of the world. 13 more lines of generated code per entity.
I have played around with a class that might bridge this, and an interface that might bridge this, but I keep coming back to the fact that there is no common 'thing' in the API that represents a result set.
I may be missing something, I certainly am not seeing the solution.
The code for one instance of the work around is listed below
I would like to move this function to the Generic. It currently sits in each instance of class that uses the generic.
ICustomerRetList inherits from IBase. IBase has neither .Count or .GetAt() as mentioned above.
To be clear- My question is this : Can you suggest a vb construct that will allow me to move this function from my concrete class, down to my generic class
Public Overrides Function RetListToList(RetList As ICustomerRetList) As List(Of Customer)
Dim oItem As ICustomerRet
Dim oItem As Customer
Dim l As New List(Of Customer)
For idx = 0 To RetList.**Count** - 1 '.Count is not a member of IBase
oqbItem = RetList.**GetAt**(idx) '.GetAt() is not a member of IBase
oItem = New Customer()
'add the Item to the list
Call l.Add(oItem)
Next
Return l
End Function
If all implementations of IBase have these methods, and they all have the same names, you could combine extension methods and reflection to effectively lower the functions.
Public Class CustomerRetListExtensions
<Extension()>
Public Function GetAt(ByVal list As IBase, ByVal idx As Integer) As IBase
Return DirectCast(list.GetType().GetMethod("GetAt").Invoke(list, New Object() { idx }), IBase)
End Function
' If Count is a property, otherwise use the same approach as for GetAt
<Extension()>
Public Function Count(ByVal list As IBase) As Integer
Return DirectCast(list.GetType().GetProperty("Count").GetValue(list), Integer)
End Function
End Class
I have an interface which I defined like this:
Public Interface ISomething(Of T)
' methods
End Interface
I now did an implementation:
Public Class ConcreteThing
Implements ISomething(of SomeClass)
' Implementation
End Class
I have multiple such concrete implementations, and want to have a function which returns any of them based on its parameters. In Java, I would do something like this:
public ISomething<?> getSomething(ParamType p) {
if(p.hasFoo()) return new ConcreteThing();
if(p.hasBar()) return new OtherConcreteThing();
throw new IllegalStateException("p neither has Foo nor Bar");
}
I already searched about this issue and found out that VB.net does not have wildcard types, so I tried:
Public Function GetSomething(p as ParamType) as ISomething(Of Object)
If p.HasFoo Then Return New ConcreteThing()
If p.HasBar Then Return New OtherConcreteThing()
Throw New InvalidOperationException("p neither has Foo nor Bar")
End Function
This compiles, but I get the warning: Runtime errors might occurr when converting 'Foo.ConcreteThing' to 'Foo.ISomething(Of Object)'.
When I try the following, as suggested in a similar question:
Public Function GetSomething(Of T)(p as ParamType) as ISomething(Of T)
If p.HasFoo Then Return New ConcreteThing()
If p.HasBar Then Return New OtherConcreteThing()
Throw New InvalidOperationException("p neither has Foo nor Bar")
End Function
the warning only changes to Runtime errors might occurr when converting 'Foo.ConcreteThing' to 'Foo.ISomething(Of T)'.
So, how do I get this right? Or, if this indeed IS right, how do I have Visual Studio ignore this warning?
I investigated on this issue a little more, discussed it with my colleagues, and I think I found the solution / reason for the warnings.
The warning message is a bit hard to understand and unconcise. What they are trying to say is that, as silly as it sounds, covariance does not work as expected for primitive types, even when using the Out keyword!
Consider an excerpt from this example on MSDN:
' Covariance.
Dim strings As IEnumerable(Of String) = New List(Of String)()
' An object that is instantiated with a more derived type argument
' is assigned to an object instantiated with a less derived type argument.
' Assignment compatibility is preserved.
Dim objects As IEnumerable(Of Object) = strings
This works. Now, change the first IEnumerable to IList:
Dim strings As IList(Of String) = New List(Of String)()
Dim objects As IEnumerable(Of Object) = strings
Works, too. OK, we are lucky, let's change the second:
Dim strings As IList(Of String) = New List(Of String)()
Dim objects As IList(Of Object) = strings
Boom, InvalidCastException. Looking at the signature, this is because the generic parameter in IEnumerable is defined as Of Out T, and IList is only defined As T.
Now, let's define our own.
Interface ISomething(Of Out T)
ReadOnly Property Value As T
End Interface
Class IntThing
Implements ISomething(Of Integer)
Public ReadOnly Property Value As Integer Implements ISomething(Of Integer).Value
Get
Return 42
End Get
End Property
End Class
Now, do this:
Dim s1 As ISomething(Of Integer) = new IntThing()
Works. Now add this:
Dim s2 As ISomething(Of Object) = s1
Boom, InvalidCastException. Now, the funniest part. Add a second implementation of ISomething:
Class StringThing
Implements ISomething(Of String)
Public ReadOnly Property Value As String Implements ISomething(Of String).Value
Get
Return "foo"
End Get
End Property
End Class
And do:
Dim s1 As ISomething(Of String) = New StringThing()
Dim s2 As ISomething(Of Object) = s1
This, on the other hand, works! So, let's go back to the List example.
Dim ints As IEnumerable(Of Integer) = New List(Of Integer)()
Dim objects As IEnumerable(Of Object) = ints
This will get you an InvalidCastException, too.
So, my conclusion is that covariance not only needs the Out keyword, it additionally only works with non-primitive types. .net seems to handle wrapper classes differently to the JVM.
So, never ignore this warning when it pops up. When it does, things will go wonky in an absolutely illogical way! That means, for what I want to achieve, going with simple Objects instead trying to find an equivalent for ISomething<?> is the way to go.
I only use this internally to read a binary file into a more convenient structure to extract the data I pass out via the API in the end, so using Object does not make things very much worse here.
It's weird, I don't get the warning like you do. But I do get an InvalidCastException if I try to run the code.
To get rid of the error (and hopefully your warning as well), you can make the generic type T on ISomething covariant.
Public Interface ISomething(Of Out T) ' Add the "Out" keyword here to make it covariant
' methods
End Interface
Then you should be able to use your GetSomething function as you had attempted:
Public Function GetSomething(p as ParamType) as ISomething(Of Object)
If p.HasFoo Then Return New ConcreteThing()
If p.HasBar Then Return New OtherConcreteThing()
Throw New InvalidOperationException("p neither has Foo nor Bar")
End Function
Relevant documentation: Covariance and Contravariance in Generics
Covariance
Enables you to use a more specific type than originally specified.
You can assign an instance of IEnumerable<Derived> (IEnumerable(Of Derived) in Visual Basic) to a variable of type IEnumerable<Base>.
And lower in the Defining Variant Generic Interfaces and Delegates section:
A covariant type parameter is marked with the out keyword (Out keyword in Visual Basic, + for the MSIL Assembler).
To avoid getting into the weeds on my particular program, let me just create a simplified case.
I have a generic class that should work on a variety of objects. Each of those objects must implement a certain interface.
What I WANT to say is something like:
Public Interface GenThing
Shared Function thing_name() As String ' This doesn't work! Can't be shared!
Sub FillOne(row As DataRow)
End Interface
public class Thing1
implements GenThing
public shared function thing_name() as string implements GenThing.thing_name
return "thing number one"
end function
public sub FillOne(row as DataRow) implements GenThing.MakeOne
... bunch of work ...
end sub
end class
public class ThingUtil(of T as {GenThing,New})
public function GetList(id as integer) as List(of T)
dim name=T.thing_name() ' This doesn't work!
dim ds as DataSet=GetData(name,id) ' bunch of work here that's the whole point of the class but not relevant to the question
dim my_list = new List(of T)
for each row as DataRow in ds.tables(0).rows
dim my_t = new T()
my_t.FillOne(row)
my_list.add(my_t)
next
return my_list
end function
end class
Do you get my problem? I need every class that implements the interface to have a function that returns a "name" that is used to get the data that is needed to create an instance of the object. But I need to know this name BEFORE I create the instance, because I need it to be able to create the instance. But VB doesn't allow an interface to have a shared function, so what I want to write doesn't work.
So what I've done is this:
I make thing_name not shared.
Then instead of simply "dim name=T.thing_name()", I write
dim dummy = new T()
dim name = dummy.thing_name()
Okay, it works, but it seems really ugly. I create an instance of the object, with all the overhead that that involves, just to get a piece of constant text.
Is there a better way? Or am I making a big deal out of nothing?
Update
I see that two people voted to close this question on the grounds that it is the same as "Why can't we have shared functions in an interface?"
I am not asking why I can't have a shared. I am saying, GIVEN that I can't, how do I solve this particular problem?
There's no really simple way of fixing this, no.
Depending on what thing_name does, however, you might approach things in a different way. If each implementation just returns a constant value, then it's effectively metadata about the class - and could be described in an attribute instead, which can be fetched at execution time. (See Type.GetCustomAttributes.) Unfortunately you can't then enforce all types implementing the interface to be decorated with the attribute - but you could write a unit test to check this pretty easily.
If thing_name needs to really do work at execution time, that's tougher. You could potentially look for a well-known shared method name instead and execute that via reflection (and again have unit tests to check that it's implemented properly).
I realize this is from a few years ago, but running into a similar problem, I wanted to offer a different solution. Pass a delegate as parameter to the ThingUtil constructor. You avoid having to put a shared method in an interface, and the constructor will force you to include the parameter at compile time.
You can add more delegates if needed, or to make it even simpler in this case, just pass name as a string instead of get_name as a delegate.
Define the delegate in the interface:
Public Interface GenThing
Delegate Function ThingNameDelegate() As String
Sub FillOne(row As DataRow)
End Interface
Public Class Thing1
Implements GenThing
Public Shared Function thing_name() As String 'name this whatever you want
Return "thing number one"
End Function
Public Sub FillOne(row As DataRow) Implements GenThing.FillOne
'do stuff
End Sub
End Class
In ThingUtil, add a member to store the delegate, a constructor parameter to to accept, and call it with .Invoke():
Public Class ThingUtil(Of T As {GenThing, New})
Private m_thing_name As GenThing.ThingNameDelegate
Public Sub New(thing_name As GenThing.ThingNameDelegate)
m_thing_name = thing_name
End Sub
Public Function GetList(id As Integer) As List(Of T)
Dim name = m_thing_name.Invoke()
Dim ds As DataSet = GetData(name, id) ' bunch of work here that's the whole point of the class but not relevant to the question
Dim my_list = New List(Of T)
For Each row As DataRow In ds.Tables(0).Rows
Dim my_t = New T()
my_t.FillOne(row)
my_list.Add(my_t)
Next
Return my_list
End Function
End Class
Finally, use it like this:
Dim tu as new ThingUtil(Of Thing1)(AddressOf Thing1.get_name)
tu.GetList(1)
I've developed some serialization code for my types. They all share a common interface to facilitate the serialization logic. Would it be possible to also add that interface to some basic types like Integer or String so I could pass one of those basic type values into my serialization logic and have it work? I'm imagining something along the lines of extension methods, but adding an interface rather than a method? I'm sure I could come up with some way to do it using late-binding, but I'd like to avoid that, if possible.
No. It is not possible to extend an existing type to make it implement an interface (short of adding Implements IMyInterface to the top of the code for that type, that is). The closest thing to that would be to create a derived class which adds the interface to the base class. If you override the CType operator you could even make it so values could be seamlessly converted from one type to the other without explicitly casting them. However, since you mentioned String and Integer as the types that you want to extend, that is not even possible. You can't create a new type that inherits from String because String is defined as NotInheritable. Similarly, you can't create a new type that inherits from Integer because Integer is a Structure, not a Class. Structures do not support inheritance.
Therefore, the best option that you have would be to create a new class which wraps the core value, extends it by implementing the interface, and then overrides the CType operator to make it simple to convert between the core type and the wrapper type. For instance, let's say you had an interface like this:
Public Interface IWritable
Sub Write()
End Interface
And you had a method that took an argument of that type, like this:
Private Sub TestWrite(writableObject As IWritable)
writableObject.Write()
End Sub
If you needed to pass an Integer into that method, you could make a wrapper class like this:
Public Class WritableInteger
Implements IWritable
Public Sub New(value As Integer)
Me.Value = value
End Sub
Public Property Value As Integer
Public Sub Write() Implements IWritable.Write
Console.Write(Value)
End Sub
Overloads Shared Widening Operator CType(value As Integer) As WritableInteger
Return New WritableInteger(value)
End Operator
Overloads Shared Widening Operator CType(value As WritableInteger) As Integer
Return value.Value
End Operator
End Class
Since the CType operator is overloaded as Widening, that means that you can convert the value between the two types without casting (even with Option Strict On). For instance, this works:
Dim w As WritableInteger = New WritableInteger(5)
Dim i As Integer = w
w = i
Unfortunately, since TestWrite is asking for an IWritable rather than a WritableInteger, you can't just call TestWrite with an Integer, like this:
Dim i As Integer = 5
TestWrite(5) 'This won't work!
The compiler knows that it needs to convert the Integer to an IWritable object, but since any number of types may implement that interface, it doesn't automatically try to figure out if any of them provide a CType operator for that. Since there may be multiple types that allow widening conversions from Integer to IWritable, it just throws up its hands and cries fowl. Therefore, even though the widening conversion is declared, you still have to explicitly cast the type in a case like that. For instance:
Dim i As Integer = 5
TestWrite(CType(i, WritableInteger))
Or, perhaps more simply:
Dim i As Integer = 5
TestWrite(New WritableInteger(5))
You could make it more convenient by creating overloads for all the common types that will need to be wrapped. For instance, if you created an overload to the TestWrite method, like this:
Public Sub TestWrite(value As Integer)
TestWrite(New WritableInteger(value))
End Sub
Then you could easily call it like this:
TestWrite(5)
Converting back from an IWritable variable to an Integer, though, is even more difficult. For instance:
Dim w As IWritable = New WritableInteger(5)
Dim i As Integer = w ' This won't work!
Dim i2 As Integer = CType(w, Integer) ' Whis won't work either!
If you need to do that, you'd actually have to first cast it to a WritableInteger (and know that it is that type of object in the first place), for instance:
Dim w As IWritable = New WritableInteger(5)
If TypeOf w Is WritableInteger Then
Dim i As Integer = CType(w, WritableInteger)
End If
Unfortunately, there's really no way to make that any easier while still maintaining the safety of the compile-time type checking.
Finally it's also worth mentioning that, if you decide to make a wrapper like that, and the implementation of the interface is the same regardless of the wrapped type, then you could implement it as a generic type, like this:
Public Class Writable(Of T)
Implements IWritable
Public Sub New(value As T)
Me.Value = value
End Sub
Public Property Value As T
Public Sub Write() Implements IWritable.Write
Console.Write(Value)
End Sub
Overloads Shared Widening Operator CType(value As T) As Writable(Of T)
Return New Writable(Of T)(value)
End Operator
Overloads Shared Widening Operator CType(value As Writable(Of T)) As T
Return value.Value
End Operator
End Class
Then you could call the TestWrite method like this:
TestWrite(New Writable(Of Integer)(5))
TestWrite(New Writable(Of String)("Hello World"))
I have an ArrayList of strings of the form "Q19_1_1", "Q19_10_1", "Q19_5_1".
With the normal sort method the list will be sorted as
"Q19_1_1"
"Q19_10_1"
"Q19_5_1"
But I would like to sort it numerically based off the second integer in name and then the third. So I would like:
"Q19_1_1"
"Q19_5_1"
"Q19_10_1"
My Sub:
Dim varSet As New ArrayList
varSet.Add("Q19_1_1")
varSet.Add("Q19_10_1")
varSet.Add("Q19_5_1")
varSet.Sort(New VariableComparer())
I have a IComparer:
Public Class VariableComparer
Implements IComparer(Of String)
Public Function Compare(ByVal x As String, ByVal y As String) As Integer Implements System.Collections.Generic.IComparer(Of String).Compare
Dim varPartsX As Array
Dim varPartsY As Array
varPartsX = x.Split("_")
varPartsY = y.Split("_")
Return String.Compare(varPartsX(1), varPartsY(1))
End Function
End Class
But when I attempt to sort I get the error:
Unable to cast object of type 'VBX.VariableComparer' to type 'System.Collections.IComparer'.
VariableComparer implements IComparer but I'm guessing it can't be of type IComparer(Of String)?
How can I resolve this issue? What am I missing?
Using a List(Of String) also gives you access to the LINQ extensions. Specifically the OrderBy and the ThenBy extensions. You could do it something like this:
Dim test3 As New List(Of String)({"Q19_1_1", "Q19_10_1", "Q19_5_1", "Q19_5_2"})
test3 = test3.OrderBy(Of Integer)(Function(s) Integer.Parse(s.ToString.Split("_"c)(1))) _
.ThenBy(Of Integer)(Function(s2) Integer.Parse(s2.ToString.Split("_"c)(2))).ToList
Casting to Integer gives you the proper sorting without using a new IComparer interface
You are correct - the issue is that you implemented IComparer(Of String), but not IComparer, which is a completely different interface.
If you switch to use a List(Of String) instead of ArrayList, it will work correctly.
This will also give you type safety within your collection.
In general, ArrayList (and the other System.Collections types) should be avoided in new development.