I'm playing a bit with the new Microsoft.AspNet.Identity but the 3.0.0-beta2 looks very different from the current state of affairs in git. I'd like to build against he git version.
I seem to remember hearing that it possible to reference a git repository directly from the dependencies in project.json. How does one do that? What's the syntax?
There are two options:
Instead of using the NuGet feed, switch to the Nightly feed on MyGet. We produce builds on every checkin from the code in Git. The latest versions on the MyGet feed are beta4-*
Clone the repo and use global.json to point to the sources, as described in this article
Adding a reference directly to a Git repo without cloning it beforehand is not supported.
Related
We have a React App which uses some components written by us and published to our internal npm repository. Our code is maintained in Bitbucket Data Center, the build is done with Bamboo and the npm repository is hosted in JFrog Artifactory. We work with feature branches and pull requests for developing new features.
It happens often that a new feature in the app, requires a change in the component. In this case, each repository (the App and the component) will have its own feature branch and pull request. Many times the component interface changes, so that the App needs the pull request version of the component and not the mainline one to build and to be tested.
The build is done exclusively by the build server, so that the bundled javascript files are not committed to git.
Let's say the component has version 1.0.0. A new feature in the App needs a change in the component. In this case, the component version will incremented to 1.0.1. We don't want to publish it to Artifactory, until version 1.0.1 is tested, but at the same time, the build of the new App version needs the changes from version 1.0.1.
Our current solution is to change the package version of the component during the build of feature branches to something like 0.<Ticket #>.<Build #>. This 0.x.x version will be published to Artifactory so that the App feature branch can use it to compile.
We use 0.x.x so that the version is never bigger than the current released version. Once the component is merged to the main branch, it will compile with the right version (1.0.1) and will be published to Artifactory again.
I find this solution cumbersome, it requires some funny build scripts, making sure that the branch name always follows some convention and teaching developers about it.
I wonder if there is a better way for managing pull requests and feature branches using npm, without having to manipulate the package.json during build time, depending if it is a feature branch or the main branch.
Sounds like you are using artifactory like a secondary version / staging for the npm package, just use npm?
I am not in devops, but have worked on a few packages, testing a package that has not been released does not sound like testing the package - what about using a beta tag npm publish --tag beta, pulling that into your app npm i package#beta then testing your application in a staging environment?
As i expect you know if you apply a tag then the tag would need to be specified to be pulled into a repo so you can use it to deter users from using that version of the package - an i believe you can delete versions later if you are dead set on not having it public.
Here is a medium article which may be helpful?
I'm using git submodule to build and shared components between projects. The project is not in production yet, so, at this point submodule is serving well.
But I'm concerned about maintenance and deploy, would be a good idea transform it into a npm package ?
An npm package will allow fragmentation across different package versions. On the other hand, git submodules have a bit of a learning curve, and the tooling is really not that good. With git submodules, you have all the source in one folder.
If it's at all possible, I'd recommend using a plain monorepo for all projects. You may need to create build time variables (via babel plugin/s), you may need some sort of "live config" get served from the backend. I worked with git submodules for a year and I've recently worked with a project that uses npm to share code.
I would recommend using only one git submodule, for all shared code, instead of several submodules. I would strongly consider using lerna, and use your one git submodule to track lerna's packages directory. And if the team decides they don't like git submodules, you can easily make this repo a sibling git repo, instead of a submodule. However, above all this, I'd recommend using a plain monorepo.
Here's a great talk on monorepo's from Netflix: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNqmHJtItCs (strong focus on discouraging npm-style packages)
Here's google's infamous monorepo talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W71BTkUbdqE
This is a great site to read to help you think about good development flows: https://trunkbaseddevelopment.com/ (it primarily advocates for the monorepo approach)
If you are developing software for different clients(different people/companies paying you for similar projects), and have some agreement that they should be at least ~80% the same, you may really enjoy using build flags to help get started on splitting functionality, but I'm sure you should very proactively keep the code around the build flags clean, and refactor into re-usable components/packages. Give each client some sort of build-flags.json. Build flags should be named for features only, which in theory can all be individually toggled. Some code may be totally custom for each project, in this case, you may want to consider using dynamic imports, but generally this is a pain point I have yet to fully cross, although I have plenty of unrefined ideas around this.
If a monorepo is just not happening, I would actually recommend using npm packages+separate repos over git submodules, assuming you can do good semantic versioning of the package. (And, yalc seems to be a good tool for linking together packages, as opposed to the standard npm/yarn link)
My findings after trying both lerna, npm workspaces and git submodules. I find it is not a case of the one vs the other.
The reason why I say this is because one can have submodules that are part of the monorepo. Doing exactly this made my development experience better as I could clone an existing project and actively develop it within the bigger project (monorepo). I could then contribute back to the cloned project once satisfied with the changes. This is something that you cannot do with npm workspaces alone. Hence my argument that it is not a case of one vs the other. They solve different problems and can therefore complement each other.
Before using npm workspaces I would use npm link all the time. npm workspaces makes this use-case of developing with multiple packages more convenient. Even when the team you work with does not use a monorepo; you could use one to develop multiple packages and test them in conjunction. Once satisfied, you can push the individual repos. This is something you cannot do with git alone.
Maybe you can think of more novel ways of combining the features of npm and git.
I need a few changes to the ra-core package of the react-admin monorepo on my productive environment.
Can I tell a lerna published module to use my own published module as a submodule instead of it's own?
It's about this package:
https://github.com/marmelab/react-admin
https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-admin
I'm about to create a PR to maybe have these changes merged into the project itself, but I can't know when it will be merged and / or whether it will be even accepted.
But unfortunately I need these changes immediately and it's okay for me to use a fork of mine until it's clear what happens to the PR.
I tried to fork a new ra-core package and use this in my package.json, but this doesn't work. Locally linking is no problem, as I can link it directly in the react-admin module, but I need it in my production build process.
So I'm wondering if there is some way to tell the module in my package.json (react-admin) which comes with it's own subpackages to use one package that I provide in the package.json instead of it's subpackage.
When developing iOS applications, I frequently use third-party code from GitHub and reusable classes I created myself. What I have been doing is cloning the source code into a specific folder somewhere in ~/Documents, where I kept all the library code. Then I would drag the source files into the Xcode project and code away, with a local Git repository keeping track of the changes in my own source code. So far so good, but I recently found a severe problem: I wanted to switch back to a older version of my Xcode project and found that it did not compile anymore because it used an older version of the third-party code, and nowhere had I stored which version it used!
How is this problem usually solved? I have looked briefly into Git submodules, but I'm not sure if it's the right thing. I also briefly read about CocoaPods, but could I also use that for libraries I created myself?
It is actually solved with git submodule: the idea is to reference an exact commit for each submodule you need, allowing you to go back in the history, and find the coherent set of commits you need for your project to compile then.
(More in this answer)
However, that does require a slight change in your working tree structure, since each submodule would become sub-directories of the parent repo which represents your project.
Note also that it (git submodule) is useful for source dependencies.
CocoaPods would be more for building the binaries you depend on (binary dependency).
I'd like to use ConnectionKit in a project, but haven't yet been able to compile the framework.
I haven't been able to find a definitive list of external projects that ConnectionKit depends on. I've attempted to include projects that fit my best guess, but nothing has worked so far.
Does anyone know exactly what projects / libraries ConnectionKit requires?
To take my comment and turn it into an answer: it appears that ConnectionKit already includes many of its dependencies by default. However, there are two Git submodules that you're going to have to install for this framework to compile: "libssh2_sftp-Cocoa-wrapper" and "DAVKit".
The easiest way to install them is to cd to the framework directory once you've cloned it, and to run git submodule update --init libssh2_sftp-Cocoa-wrapper DAVKit.