I have a Brother mutlifunction networked printer/scanner/fax (model MFC-9140CDN). I am trying to use the following code with WIA, to retrieve items scanned in with the document feeder:
const int FEEDER = 1;
var manager=new DeviceManager();
var deviceInfo=manager.DeviceInfos.Cast<DeviceInfo>().First();
var device=deviceInfo.Connect();
device.Properties["Pages"].set_Value(1);
device.Properties["Document Handling Select"].set_Value(1);
var morePages=true;
var counter=0;
while (morePages) {
counter++;
var item=device.Items[1];
item.Properties["Bits Per Pixel"].set_Value(1);
item.Properties["Horizontal Resolution"].set_Value(300);
item.Properties["Vertical Resolution"].set_Value(300);
var img=(WIA.ImageFile)item.Transfer();
var path=String.Format(#"C:\Users\user1\Documents\test_{0}.tiff",counter);
img.SaveFile(path);
var status=(int)device.Properties["Document Handling Status"].get_Value();
morePages = (status & FEEDER) > 0;
}
When the Transfer method is reached for the first time, all the pages go through the document feeder. The first page gets saved with img.SaveFile to the passed-in path, but all the subsequent pages are not available - device.Items.Count is 1, and trying device.Items[2] raises an exception.
In the next iteration, calling Transfer raises an exception -- understandably, because there are now no pages in the feeder.
How can I get the subsequent images that have been scanned into the feeder?
(N.B. Iterating through all the device properties, there is an additional unnamed property with the id of 38922. I haven't been able to find any reference to this property.)
Update
I couldn't find a property on the device corresponding to WIA_IPS_SCAN_AHEAD or WIA_DPS_SCAN_AHEAD_PAGES, but that makes sense because this property is optional according to the documentation.
I tried using TWAIN (via the NTwain library, which I highly recommend) with the same problem.
I have recently experienced a similar error with a HP MFC.
It seems that a property was being changed by the driver. The previous developer of the software I'm working on just kept reinitalisating the driver each time in the for loop.
In my case the property was 'Media Type' being set to FLATBED (0x02) even though I was doing a multi-page scan and needed it to be NEXT_PAGE (0x80).
The way I found this was by storing every property before I scanner (both device and item properties) and again after scanning the first page. I then had my application print out any properties that had changed and was able to identify my problem.
This is a networked scanner, and I was using the WSD driver.
Once I installed the manufacturer's driver, the behavior is as expected -- one page goes through the ADF, after which control is returned to the program.
(Even now, when I use WIA's CommonDialog.ShowSelectDevice method, the scanner is available twice, once using the Windows driver and once using the Brother driver; when I choose the WSD driver, I still see the issue.)
This bug did cost me hours...
So thanks a lot Zev.
I also had two scanners shown in the dialog for physically one machine. One driver scans only the first page and then empties the feeder without any chance to intercept. The other one works as expected.
BTW: It is not needed to initialize the scanner for each page. I call my routines for initialization prior to the Transfer() loop. Works just fine.
Another hickup I ran into was to first initialize page sizes, then the feeder. So if you do not get it to work, try switching the sequence how you change the properties for your WIA driver. As mentioned in the MSDN, some properties also influence others, potentially resetting your changes.
So praise to ZEV SPITZ for the answer on Aug. 09, 2015.
You should instantiate and setup device inside the 'while' loop. See:
const int FEEDER = 1;
var morePages=true;
var counter=0;
while (morePages) {
counter++;
var manager=new DeviceManager();
var deviceInfo=manager.DeviceInfos.Cast<DeviceInfo>().First();
var device=deviceInfo.Connect();
//device.Properties["Pages"].set_Value(1);
device.Properties["Document Handling Select"].set_Value(1);
var item=device.Items[1];
item.Properties["Bits Per Pixel"].set_Value(1);
item.Properties["Horizontal Resolution"].set_Value(300);
item.Properties["Vertical Resolution"].set_Value(300);
var img=(WIA.ImageFile)item.Transfer();
var path=String.Format(#"C:\Users\user1\Documents\test_{0}.tiff",counter);
img.SaveFile(path);
var status=(int)device.Properties["Document Handling Status"].get_Value();
morePages = (status & FEEDER) > 0;
}
I got this looking into this free project, which I believe is able to help you too: adfwia.codeplex.com
Related
I need to check if the user's device can input from a camera on my site. To do this I am attempting to use modernizr. I have followed the steps/example code provided on their site but when I test the capture attribute, I always get undefined, regardless of if I am on a device that supports capture.
Steps I followed:
I browsed for the input[capture] attribute and added it to the build
I copied the demo code to check this feature and added it to my project
I downloaded the build, added the js file to my project, and included the appropriate reference in my page
However after all of this, when inspecting Modernizr.capture in the chrome inspector, it always shows up as undefined.
My basic check function is as follows:
$scope.hasCamera = function() {
if (Modernizr.capture) {
// supported
return true;
} else {
// not-supported
return false;
}
}
This is my first time using Modernizr. Am I missing a step or doing something incorrectly? I also installed modernizr using npm install and tried adding the reference to a json config file from the command line.
Alternatively, how might I check if my device has a camera?
Thank you very much for your time. Please let me know if I am being unclear or if you need any additional information from me.
A few things
while photos are helpful, actual code hosted in a public website (either your own project, or on something like jsbin.com) is 10x as useful. As a result, I am not sure why it is coming back as undefined.
The actual capture detect is quite simple. It all comes down to this
var capture = 'capture' in document.createElement('input')`
Your code is a lot more complicated than it needs to be. Lets break it down. You trying to set $scope.hasCamera to equal the result of Modernizr.capture, and you are using a function to check the value of Modernizr.capture, and if it is true, return true. If it is false, return false. There is a fair bit of duplicated logic, so we can break it down from the inside out.
Firstly, your testing for a true/false value, and then returning the same value. That means you could simplify the code by just returning the value of Modernizr.capture
$scope.hasCamera = function() {
return Modernizr.capture
}
While Modernizr will always be giving you a boolean value (when it is functioning - without seeing your actual code I can't say why it is coming back as undefined), if you are unsure of the value you can add !! before it to coerce it into a boolean. In your case, it would make undefined into false
$scope.hasCamera = function() {
return !!Modernizr.capture
}
At this point, you can see that we are setting up a function just to return a static value. That means we can just set assign that static value directly to the variable rather than setting up a function to do that
$scope.hasCamera = !!Modernizr.capture
Now, the final thing you may be able to do something better is if you are only using Modernizr for this one feature. Since it is such a simple feature detection, it is overkill to be using all of Modernizr.
$scope.hasCamera = 'capture' in document.createElement('input')`
I have a completely empty RavenHQ database that's linked to my Appharbor application. The amount of space the database is currently using is 1.1mb out of an available 25mb for my bronze account. The database previously had records in it, but I have deleted them using "delete collection" in the management studio.
The very first time I call session.Store(myobject), and BEFORE I call .SaveChanges(), I get the following error.
System.InvalidOperationException: Url: "/docs/Raven/Hilo/AccItems"
Raven.Database.Exceptions.OperationVetoedException: PUT vetoed by Raven.Bundles.Quotas.Triggers.DatabaseSizeQoutaForDocumetsPutTrigger because: Database size is 45,347 KB, which is over the allowed quota of 25,600 KB. No more documents are allowed in.
Now, the document is definitely not that big, so I don't know what this error can mean, especially as I don't think I've even hit the database at that point since I haven't closed the session by calling SaveChanges(). Any ideas? Here's the code itself.
XDocument doc = XDocument.Parse(rawXml);
var accItems = ExtractItemsFromFeed(doc);
using (IDocumentSession session = _store.OpenSession())
{
var dbItems = session.Query<AccItem>().ToList();
foreach (var item in accItems)
{
var existingRecord = dbItems.SingleOrDefault(x => x.Source == x.SourceId == cottage.SourceId);
if (existingRecord == null)
{
session.Store(item);
_logger.Info("Saved new item {0}.", item.ShortName);
}
else
{
existingRecord.ShortName = item.ShortName;
_logger.Info("Updated item {0}.", item.ShortName);
}
session.SaveChanges();
}
}
Any other comments about the style of this code would be most welcome, as I was unsure of the best way to approach the "update existing item or create if it isn't there" scenario.
The answer here was as follows.
RavenHQ support found that the database was indeed oversized, but it seemed that the size reported in the Appharbor-branded RavenHQ control panel was incorrect. I had filled up the database way over the limit with a previous faulty version of the code posted above, so the error message I received was actually correct.
Fixing this problem without paying to upgrade the database wasn't straightforward, as it's not possible to shrink the database. As I also wasn't able to delete my single Appharbor/RavenHQ database or create another one that left me with the choice of creating an entirely new Appharbor application, or registering directly with RavenHQ for a new account. I chose the latter. The RavenHQ-branded control panel is slightly different to the Appharbor one, in that it has the ability to create and delete databases.
So to summarize: there doesn't seem to be any benefit to using RavenHQ as an add-on to Appharbor - you might as well go and get a proper free RavenHQ account.
Ive got an problem currently on an mobile site that i'm running directly in my pc's firefox browser. Everytime a button is clicked, the page reloads, thus resetting my variables. I've got this script:
// ==UserScript==
// #name trada.net autoclick 55_1min_mobile
// #namespace airtimeauction auto click
// #include http://www.trada.net/Mobile/
// #version 0.1
// #description Automatically click // ==/UserScript==
var interval = 57000;
var bidClickTimer = setInterval (function() {BidClick (); }, interval);
var numBidClicks = 0;
function BidClick ()
{var bidBtn1=document.getElementById("ctl00_mainContentPlaceholder_AirtimeAuctionItem7_btn_bidNow");
numBidClicks++;
if (numBidClicks > 500)
{
clearInterval (bidClickTimer);
bidClickTimer = "";
}
else
{
bidBtn1.click (1);
}
};
BidClick();
It should click the button every 57 seconds, but the moment it clicks the button, the page reloads, thus resetting the variables. How can i get greasemonkey to "remember" or carry over the variables to the next page/script when it reloads? Will it have something to do with GM_setValue? It will only be this few variables, but the second problem or question wil be, will it subtract the few seconds it takes the page to reload from the "57" seconds? How do i compensate for that?
In addition to GM_setValue...
you also can use the new Javascript "localStorage" object, or a SQL Javascript API.
The advantage of the SQL approach is it is very meager in its resource consumption in a script (think about it; rather than concatenating a humongous string of results, you can tuck away each result and recall it if needed with a precise query. The downside is you have to set up a SQL server, but using something like SQLite that's not a big deal these days. Even postgres or mysql can be quickly spun on a laptop...
Yes, I think you have to use GM_setValue/GM_getValue.
And if you have to do something exactly every 57 seconds, then calculate the time when the next action should take place after the reload, and store it using GM_setValue.
When your script starts, read first if the next action is stored, if it is, use that time to schedule the next action, and calculate the time for the action after that, and so on...
GM.setValue will set a value indefinitely and is scoped to the script, but will work if your script runs across multiple domains.
window.localStorage will set a value indefinitely and is scoped to the domain of the page, so will not work across domains, but will work if you need several GreaseMonkey scripts to access the same value.
window.sessionStorage will set a value only while the window or tab is open and is scoped to only that window or tab for that domain.
document.cookie can set a value indefinitely or only while the browser is open, and can be scoped across subdomains, or a single domain, or a path, or a single page.
Those are the main client-side mechanisms for storing values across page loads that are intended for this purpose. However, there is another method which is sometimes possible (if the page itself is not using it), and can also be quite useful; window.name.
window.name is scoped to the window or tab, but will work across domains too. If you need to store several values, then they can be put into an object and you can store the object's JSON string. E.g. window.name = JSON.stringify(obj)
I wrote a script that downloads file from web using file URL. I have an ActiveXObject of following type.
var objHTTP = new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.XMLHTTP");
objHTTP.open("GET", strFileURL, false);
It works perfect for small size file says, file size less than 100MB. But when I try to download file with size greater than 100MB my script hanged. Then I tried,
objHTTP.open("GET", strFileURL, true);
but in this case we have to implement a callback function. I don't know how to implement callback and then use it. Can somebody help me. I am using TestComplete 7. Script that I wrote;
var objHTTP = new ActiveXObject("MSXML2.XMLHTTP");
objHTTP.open("GET", strFileURL, true);
objHTTP.onreadystatechange = Callback;
objHTTP.send();
while((objHTTP.readyState != 4) && (objHTTP.readyState != 'complete'))
{
Delay(100);
}
if(200 != objHTTP.Status)
{
Log.Error("The " + strFileURL + " file was not found." + " The returned status is " + objHTTP.Status);
return;
}
I don't know how to implement Callback function. Can somebody provide me implementation?
Thanks
Probably, the hanging is the result of the while loop waiting for a specific value of the readyState property. If the property never gets one of the expected values, the script will work forever.
I think the MSXML2.XMLHTTP object fails to load the large file, and never sets the readyState to one of the values your script expects. To understand what exactly is happening, I would check what value the property has after very long time, which is enough either for the file to load, or for the attempt to fail (say, 2 hours). If you know what value the readyState property has when the downloading fails, you can handle it in the script to avoid hanging.
That's it about the hanging itself. Now about the cause of the file downloading problem. I have found a page that tells about the problem and suggests setting higher timeouts - take a look:
http://edgylogic.com/blog/downloading-large-files-vbscript/
The example is in VBScript, but it should be easy to implement the same approach with JScript. Please note that the example uses a different COM object - ServerXMLHTTP. You can read about it (including differences from XMLHTTP) here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms762278(v=VS.85).aspx
I hope this helps.
So our app is set up like the standard left frame with the tree, right frame has the main content (loaded from clicking the tree).
Our web app inconsistently displays a blank page in the main frame in Firefox. By inconsistent I mean everyday for a few, rarely for others, never for most. Once we get this, going to any other page through our tree results in a blank page. We found that deleting the "aTreeSaveStateCookie" restores normal operation. "aTree" is the name of our Div. I found "SaveStateCookie" strings in dijit/Tree.js.
This also happens in IE, except I would get a browser error page which I can't recall right now. I would then delete the only cookie I could find for our app (not sure how to do the Firefox steps in IE)
Any ideas on why this would happen?
Thanks
Dojo 1.3 through http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/dojo/1.3/dojo/dojo.xd.js
Firefox 3.1x
IE 8
Windows XP
In my case, I don't recall ever changing browser settings around Private Data.
Please check to see if the response code is 413 (413 = request entity too large), usually this happens when the cookie(s) used to store the tree(s) expansion state (aTreeSaveStateCookie) exceed(s) the maximum request size for your server
You could try increasing the maximum request size (follow instructions for your specific web app server) or at least display a meaningful error message like "please clear your browser cache" when the 413 error code is encountered
If the persist property is set to a truthy value, dijit.Tree is persisting its state to remember which nodes were expanded, and expand them after a page reload. If you need to persist the tree state in presence of a very large data structure, I recommend overriding Tree to use localStorage instead of dojo.cookie.
This is Dojo v. 1.9, but similar changes can be done to the non-AMD version 1.3
_saveExpandedNodes: function(){
if(this.persist && this.cookieName){
var ary = [];
for(var id in this._openedNodes){
ary.push(id);
}
// Was:
// cookie(this.cookieName, ary.join(","), {expires: 365});
localStorage.setItem(this.cookieName, ary.join(","));
}
},
And:
_initState: function(){
// summary:
// Load in which nodes should be opened automatically
this._openedNodes = {};
if(this.persist && this.cookieName){
// Was:
// var oreo = cookie(this.cookieName);
var oreo = localStorage.getItem(this.cookieName);
if(oreo){
array.forEach(oreo.split(','), function(item){
this._openedNodes[item] = true;
}, this);
}
}
},