env: IDEA-14.0.2, kubuntu14.10 x64
Yesterday I use IDEA to learn source from Spark. When discussing with my partner, I write serval lines directly to the source, then I closed the IDEA without ctrl+S
Today when I open the project I found that those little changes still exist and make the source very dirty (and bit hard to remove them since they are everywhere). I assume that there's a autosave feature the avoid close without saving by incident.
how to close that on certain project? or do it globally?
Currently it can't be disabled. There are a few open issues in the IntelliJ's YouTrack, for instance IDEABKL-6460. There is a long discussion in this issue, but from comments like this:
Auto-saving is built in very deeply and many IDE features just won't
work without it (e.g. compilation, running, etc). For reverting
unwanted changes there's VCS, Local History and Undo.
Currently we don't plan to add a possibility to disable auto-save.
it seems that implementing this feature isn't planned and even if it was it would be probably difficult. But you can leave a comment and vote for the issue because the more people request this feature the more probable it is that it will get actually implemented sometime in the future.
Related
So, there is this cool package I've found but it leaves a lot to be desired. Since it made more sense to modify it, rather than build a new one myself, I changed the code in the corresponding source directory (C:\Users[my username].julia\v0.4[package name]\src). I made sure to modify not just the base.jl file, but also the [name of package].jl one so that there are no issues with dependencies or the new functions I added. I tried running the package several times to ensure that Julia doesn't spit out any errors or exceptions (the original package had some deprecated stuff, which I also remedied). Still, I fail to use the additional functionality of the package that I augmented. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm using Julia ver 0.4.2, on a Windows 7 machine. As an IDE I use Notepad++. Thanks
I'm not exactly sure what you tried, but here's a guess as to what's going on: if you've already loaded the package in your julia session, edits to the source files won't take effect unless you explicitly reload the package. There are some good workflow tips here, and more explanation of the module system here.
However, for a newbie the easiest thing might be to quit julia and restart.
As far as making changes to a package, as Gnumic commented, your best approach is to make a branch and commit your changes there. Once you become convinced your changes represent an improvement, consider sharing your changes with the rest of the world.
I know that I can mark unsaved files with asterisk if I check the corresponding check box in settings. But when I close the tab IDEA is not asking me "Do you want to save changes?". Tab is just closed and nothing in the project structure is not indicating that I have unsaved file. When I run the application it just saves the file and run the app.
Can I make IntelliJ IDEA to ask me that there is unsaved files in my project that I should now about before launching ?
You can't, at least not until this request is addressed.
Use Local History feature, see also this answer.
I've researched this and it appears that the designers of IntelliJ intentionally block this feature for the most bizarre of reasons, and have been doing so since at least 2012 on this ticket: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEABKL-6460 . They refuse to even let you configure the editor to warn on closing unsaved files and give you the choice of saving it or discarding your edits.
Wow. I'm dumbfounded.
Sorry for the bad news...I had the same question and am thoroughly disappointed with their answer.
Where do you store your old classes and files, which you don't longer use in a current project?
I have quite a few classes and files, which are no longer required, but which I would like to keep somewhere in case I need to reuse some of the code later.
Currently, I am just copying and pasting the code in a tool called Code Collector Pro.
However, since this seems not to be the most elegant way of storing old code, I would like to ask you: How do you save your old code?
If you are talking about handy snippets of code that you might use often I store them in Xcode's Code Snippet Library (just drag selected code in to create a snippet.)
Generally though, I delete unused code. If I need it again it will be in my version control system.
I would definitely use a version control system (I'm most familiar with Subversion, but am getting into Git now). If this is code that's worth keeping around then it's code you'll likely use and modify in multiple projects over time. You'll want to be able to review the history of your changes, compare how you used it differently in project A vs. project B, and maintain notes to help refresh your memory and to help in keyword searching when you're trying to find that bit of code you remember using two years ago.
You can set up repositories however makes sense for your work - by project, by code type, etc.
I'm not familiar with Code Collector Pro - if it works as a GUI for a version control system, it may be fine for what you're doing.
On both Xcode 4.4 and 4.4.1 I'm experiencing the same issue in that with the specific project I'm working on, I don't seem to be able to rename any classes or variables from the Refactor menu option.
Each time I try and do a rename, I type in the new name for the class/variable and click Preview at which point the bottom left begins a spinner with Finding files.... However, I then get a message saying:
The selection is not a type that can be renamed.
Make a different selection and try again.
I'm pretty sure that this is not an issue with my specific install of Xcode, because I can refactor other projects fine, it's just that I can't seem to be able to refactor this specific project.
Anyone with any ideas? I don't have any particularly exotic configuration for this project, it just seems to be a random affliction. I've deleted all of my derived data and re-indexed, but that doesn't seem to help.
Since it works OK in other projects, I'm thinking one thing I could try to do is re-generate the actual project file(s) itself. I don't know if there is a way to do this automatically?
If they're in dropbox get them out of there. It mangles project files. I've had it happen numerous times and at times it makes refactoring > renaming not work.
I have managed to solve this issue after trying many different things (tweaking project settings, pch, etc.) and it turns out there was a very simple (and totally counter-intuitive) method of fixing this issue.
All I have done is:-
Copy my entire project folder (so from Project to Project Copy).
Move Project (the original folder) to trash.
Rename Project Copy to Project.
Mysteriously, everything now works fine.
I really cannot figure out why this works. As mentioned previously, I had already deleted all derived data, etc. so I don't know why this should make things spontaneously work, but it does.
Would appreciate anyone who is able to shed some light on this as it does expose just how fiddly Xcode can be, and any understanding of what goes on under the hood is always beneficial.
Sounds like a buggered index.
I usually use the nuke from space option to delete everything in the derived data directory.
Unless you have changed it (I change mine to /tmp/bbum-derived), it'll be at:
~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData
Thus, I'll quit Xcode and do:
rm -rf ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData
Yes, it is a bit brute force, but it works. You can likely force Xcode to rebuild the index from the UI, but I never bother. Of course, I'm also installing quite a few "odd" builds of this and that as a part of my day job...
(that is an rm -rf. It means "nuke everything and don't ask" in unix parlance. It is dangerous. Do not mistype that command.)
It seems you have an active selection somewhere in the gui, perhaps some of your files or classes are selected ? Try unselect in every sub window and retry refactoring.
I'm a bit late to this thread, but I ran into the same problem today and I was able to get it to finally refactor correctly, thought I share it.
So in large part I did what bbum said, I closed xCode, nuked the Derived data for the project the class files were in and re opened the project. Doing just that, it didn't work; the key, I found (at least for me), is that I had to do a clean (command shift k) after xCode restarts. After that I was able to rename the class files again :)
Also as a side note, my project is divided into the main project, and a static library. When I had to rename classes in the static library, I had to quit the main project and do what I described in the static library itself. Somehow I got the same error described in the question when I tried to do the refactor/rename from the main project.
Good luck!
This thread was very helpful for me in determining the problem.
It turned out that I had to Repair Disk with Disk Utility. I had visited a site earlier that had hijacked Safari and was telling me to call a number for emergency repairs, an obvious scam.
I followed the Disk Utility instructions to repair disk (including restarting with CMD-R pressed). Another clue was that I tried to commit to git and Xcode said No Way, Jose.
Afterwards I was able to refactor and commit changes as if nothing ever happened. I hope this helps someone else as a possible cause to investigate.
I know there are other applications also, but considering yum/apt-get/aptitude/pacman are you core package managers for linux distributions.
Today I saw on my fedora 13 box:
(7/7): yum-3.2.28-4.fc13_3.2.28-5.fc13.noarch.drpm | 42 kB 00:00
And I started to wonder how does such a package update itself? What design is needed to ensure a program can update itself?
Perhaps this question is too general but I felt SO was more appropriate than programmers.SE for such a question being that it is more technical in nature. If there is a more appropriate place for this question feel free to let me know and I can close or a moderator can move.
Thanks.
I've no idea how those particular systems work, but...
Modern unix systems will generally tolerate overwriting a running executable without a hiccup, so in theory you could just do it.
You could do it in a chroot jail and then move or something similar to reduce the time during which the system is vulnerable. Add a journalling filesystem and this is a little safer still.
It occurs to me that the package-manager needs to hold the package access database in memory as well to insure against a race condition there. Again, the chroot jail and copy option is available as a lower risk alternative.
And I started to wonder how does such a package update itself? What
design is needed to ensure a program can update itself?
It's like a lot of things, you don't need to "design" specifically to solve this problem ... but you do need to be aware of certain "gotchas".
For instance Unix helps by reference counting inodes so "you" can delete a file you are still using, and it's fine. However this implies a few things you have to do, for instance if you have plugins then you need to load them all before you run start a transaction ... even if the plugin would only run at the end of the transaction (because you might have a different version at the end).
There are also some things that you need to do to make sure that anything you are updating works, like: Put new files down before removing old files. And don't truncate old files, just unlink. But those also help you :).
Using external problems, which you communicate with, can be tricky (because you can't exec a new copy of the old version after it's been updated). But this isn't often done, and when it is it's for things like downloading ... which can somewhat easily be made to happen before any updates.
There are also things which aren't a concern in the cmd line clients like yum/apt, for instance if you have a program which is going to run 2+ "updates" then you can have problems if the first update was to the package manager. downgrades make this even more fun :).
Also daemon like processes should basically never "load" the package manager, but as with other gotchas ... you tend to want to follow this anyway, for other reasons.